by Douglas Messerli
Arnold Schulman (screenplay, based on And the Band Played On: Politics, People, and the AIDS Epidemic by Randy Shilts), Roger Spottiswoode (director) And the Band Played On / 1993
The spectacular
extravaganza that Roger Spottiswoode’s And the Band Played On appears
to represent with its all-star cast of Matthew Modine, Ian McKellan, Alan Alda,
Lily Tomlin, B. D. Wong, Phil Collins, Steve Martin, Richard Gere, Anjelica
Huston, Richard Masur, Jeffrey Nordling, and numerous others belies the fact
that they play a group of individuals who, with the exception of Alda’s rather
despicable character Dr. Robert Gallo—who still today is recognized somewhat
unfairly as one the major discoverers of HIV as the infectious agent
responsible for AIDS—were unknown and unheard by US government agencies and the
media, along with other spokespeople of the LGBTQ community in the early years
of the AIDS infection when they should have been the ones most listened to and
followed. It is almost an irony that director Spottiswoode found so many
celebrities to perform the true unsung heroes who fought during the Ronald
Reagan years to whom few listened.
Accordingly,
we can immediately admit that And the Band Played On is a work
with a strong message to convey, and is consequently not as objective as some
might have wished—although given the absurdity of the US leaders’ ignorance, I
might have wished the film was even more outspoken in its views.
As
it was, even in making this movie screenplay writer Arnold Schulman, the
director, his film associates, and his cast encountered almost as much red tape
and denial as the original figures described in Randy Shilts documentary
book And the Band Played On: Politics, People, and the AIDS Epidemic upon
which the film was based.
The
film begins with epidemiologist Dr. Don Francis (Modine) and an associate
arriving in an African medical outpost only to discover that nearly all the
villagers are already dead of Ebola hemorrhagic fever. Only
one woman is still alive, who after grabbing Francis’ arm in desperation, falls
dead. They have nothing to do in this place but to burn the bodies, unable to
even explain to a surviving young boy what has happened to his friends and
family. It is a horrific vision which haunts the character and the movie
throughout, a foretelling of events that will suddenly occur in San Francisco,
New York, Los Angeles, in eventually in nearly all major American cities,
particularly and inexplicably among young sexually active gay men.
I
lived through the time, afraid like every other gay man that any of my years of
sexual activities might suddenly render me as simply another statistic; and
since then, I have watched nearly every LGBTQ-oriented film and television
broadcast devoted to AIDS. So I must admit I came to this film with a weak
stomach and several gallons of tears ready to be released at every momentary
frustration these AID researchers and committed social organizers might face.
And there were most certainly enough that by film’s end I felt drained. You
must excuse me, accordingly, if I don’t bother to recount them all in detail
once again. The discomfort that one feels while watching this film is
intentional, a reward for having the conscience and empathy to relive history
and to feel enraged by past events.
The small group of scientists at the Center for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) were already understaffed and working on a miniscule budget which as
doctors Mary Guinan (Glenne Headly), James Curran (Saul Rubinek), and Francis
along with CDC investigators Harold Jaffe (Charles Martin Smith) realized did
not even allow them an updated electron microscope let alone the sophisticated
medical devices they needed to begin to properly research, identify, and
explain the new disease. And even worse, under the new Reagan presidency, the
CDC was highly under-budgeted facing disease that had stricken a homosexual
community that the Regan administration at best did not want to talk about let
alone support and encourage. For many religious leaders of the day the disease
was the curse of God, a deservéd punishment for their behavior. And the more
the CDC administrators might push for funding, the less they were likely to be
able to obtain.
It doesn’t help that Francis is apparently not gay, and has no links
with that community other than his new-made friends Kraus and Dritz (not even knowing Kraus in reality). And that becomes a problem for the film as well. Can a gay
viewer feel the full frustrations and sympathies for a cause so near to the
core of one’s being shared by someone who is basically an outsider? Since the
straight world of government and media do not seem to care, how are we to
imagine a lone scientist as being the beacon of gay men who are dying from
AIDS? Unfortunately, in a world of “them” and “us,” Francis is presented and at
times represents himself as one of “them,” and the movie doesn’t have time to
explore that important aspect of human folly in depth. When the gays vote down
the resolution to close the gay baths, Francis turns to his friend, the
presumably lesbian Dritz with utter confusion, she rather lamely explaining,
“They’re only human, and they’re scared.” It doesn’t fully answer for his or
our frustrations, particularly for those of us, as gay men, who weren’t
dependent on the baths and open sex in bookstores or meetups in gay bars for
our sexual and social lives. But, in all honesty, in those days I still snuck out occasionally for a gay backroom bookstore hookup, and in so doing endangered my life and
that of my companion. I was lucky.
Kraus has a young lover, Kico Govantes
(B. D. Wong) who is devoted to Kraus, but also hurt and lonely that the man has
turned his full life over to his activist causes, leaving little time for their
own private lives. He leaves Kraus in the midst of the crisis, and sometime
after the man who felt no fear of the bath house and bar sexual encounters
notices a spot at the base of his leg which might be Kaposi’s sarcoma, and soon
after is diagnosed with AIDS, is eventually hospitalized, and dies. Although
Kico returns to him at the first sign of his illness, the film hints that it is
perhaps the lover who has explored sex with others to salve his sexual
loneliness and brought home the disease. But once more, the movie itself is so
busy with other concerns that it has no time to truly explore this possibility
and its ramifications. Which is also perhaps for the better. The worst thing
such a film might do is begin to blame individuals for a national catastrophe.
It does get close to that, however, when the CDC team finally get hold of the victim they describe as Patient Zero, Gaëtan Dugas (Nordling), a Canadian flight attendant sought out by Dr. William Darrow (Richard Masur) because of his thousands of sexual encounters and ability to recall a large number of their names. By linking his sexual encounters he’s named to other AIDS patients, and their further sexual meetings with people who became sick or died, Darrow was able to prove that AIDS was in fact passed on through sexual contact.
But even with that evidence, the gay community was, once more
understandably, afraid of being denied their right to give blood or of being
identified automatically as carriers. Until very recently as a gay man I was
unable to give blood, something I did quite often as a community service when I
was younger. Moreover, the blood industry wasn’t about to put their money into
testing all blood samples, even if had they found a reliable method of testing.
In this case it took the discovery of AIDS occurring in a wealthy San Francisco
couple whose wife had acquired the disease from a blood transfusion,
information her doctors had kept from her, to begin to change
A wealthy choreographer (played by Gere, obviously representing the
hundreds of famed actors and dancers who contracted HIV and died of AIDS, in
particular Michael Bennett), after discovering he has AIDS, offers a large
check to be spent for the cause.
With all these positives, however, there
was still one endlessly large problem. The disease cell itself had yet to be
identified; and when a French virologists from the Pasteur Institute in Paris
Luc Montagnier, Jean-Claude Chermann and Françoise Barré-Sinoussi were finally
able to separate out and find the infectious agent, an American biomedical
researcher, argued that he believed the agent to be related to the HTLV cell he
had discovered in his research on Leukemia, and when the French announced their
discovery threatened to sue for the patent which would have further slowed-down
the process of identifying the disease for at least another six years.
Although the film shows him personally
making a pact with the Pasteur scientists, the agreement that he would share
equal credit was arranged through Reagan and French Prime Minister Jacques
Chirac; but even then Gallo lied, claiming he had discovered the cell which
closely matched those the French had sent him as samples. The Nobel Prize
eventually went to the Pasteur team. And the ignominy of seeking personal gain
went once more to the American establishment.*
The movie closes with a great number of unattached strings hanging from its narrative seams, attempting to wrap them up in the final strains Elton Johns’ “The Last Song” in a montage to those who died of AIDS or those whose lives were lost through the failures of HIV or AIDS education and research, including Rock Hudson, Anthony Perkins, Rudolf Nureyev, Arthur Ashe, Michael Bennett, Liberace, Freddie Mercury, Elizabeth Glaser, Larry Kramer, Magic Johnson, Halston, Willi Smith, Perry Ellis, Peter Allen, Brad Davis, Keith Haring, Stewart McKinney, Denholm Elliott, Amanda Blake, Robert Reed, Michel Foucault, Tom Waddell, all of which seems to make this film even more diffuse than it previously was. What do these many dozens of victims have to do with the film’s actual narrative, about the thousands of those who died of AIDS? Well, everything of course, but these represent only a sampling of celebrities.
You need only read Betsy Sharkey’s 1993 essay in The New York Times
to realize that, after three directors, we were lucky to actually have been
able to see this movie in any form without strings attached. As she summarizes
early on, later her essay going into the painful details:
Like Randy Shilts's book of the same title and on which it is based, the
movie And the Band Played On attempts to expose the deadly role that
inaction and infighting among Government officials, blood banks, the scientific
community and segments of the gay community played in the early spread of
acquired immune deficiency syndrome. The director, Roger Spottiswoode, believed
that the film would be as much a social statement as a dramatic work. It was he
who wanted the controversial images to remain.** Mr. Shilts thought they should
go, and at least one gay-rights advocate threatened to mobilize protests if the
scenes weren't pulled.
The screenwriter Arnold Schulman, who
wrote 20 drafts of the script, is brutal in his assessment of the production's
troubles. ‘I lived through every issue we dealt with in the movie, egos, greed,
politics,’ he says. ‘It was a nightmare.’"
But of even greater significance is the
fact that in their search for a larger truth, Schulman and Spottiswoode often falsified what really
happened. For example, in reality, Dr. Francis never met Bill Kraus, let alone
talked with him while Kraus spoke gibberish at his death bed. The real Francis
observes: "There were many things that happen in the script that indeed
did not happen, so I am talking to people I never really talked to. What Arnold
[Schulman] did was to accordion this stuff so the truth is there, but it is not
in fact what happened."
No one, of course, could possibly put
the millions of pieces of the truth of such horrible failures and laudable
attempts together in a two and a half-hour work for general audiences of
television. The disaster of AIDS came like a plague upon us, and so many turned
away from what was happening or refused to accept the truth if its existence
that millions worldwide were made to suffer before those who cared could began
to have effect and change the picture. This film, if it does nothing else
profoundly reminds us, however, that such a national failure to act in
meaningful ways was not inevitable, but a willed decision of those in
power.
*Gallo was only typical of many larger than
human egos at the time. I remember an evening when we were invited to dinner at
the home of actor Harry Hamlin and his wife at the time Laura Johnson in 1988
or 1989. They had also invited Jonas Salk, the man who created, of course, the
Polio Vaccine of which my generation were the first to benefit (I received the
shot at age 8). He told us that he was also working on the discovery of a cure
for HIV, and believed that only he could accomplish this impossible task.
Obviously he made no such discovery before his death in 1995.
**These included cuts from the real
gay Halloween parade of drag queens, a deletion of much of a scene that took
place in a gay bath house, and a bookstore owner’s explanation of what amyl
nitrite or poppers are.
Los Angeles, April 28, 2022
Reprinted from World Cinema
Review (April 2022).
No comments:
Post a Comment