Friday, February 2, 2024

Daniel Nolasco | Sr. Raposo (Mr. Fox) / 2018

performing death

by Douglas Messerli

 

Daniel Nolasco (screenwriter and director) Sr. Raposo (Mr. Fox) / 2018 [23 minutes]

 

Brazilian director Daniel Nolasco recounts the life of his partner Acácio (Geovaldo Souza) from day he discovers that he was HIV positive in 1995 in this work which he describes as a “staged documentary.”

  

   One shouldn’t, however, imagine a coherent narrative for the man the neighbors called “Mr. Fox” for a childhood appearance in the play The Little Prince and the Fox. Rather, Nolasco creates what Rich Cline describes as “a freeform collage with a dramatic core,” the interplays scenes of a active sexual life of S&M and leather sex, along with dreams, and the social fears of what AIDS represents, as well as hinting at the spiritual highs and lows of Acácio and his sexually-involved friends.

      At one moment, fearing that he nearing death, Acácio invites all of his friends to a party. Yet with the pills available and a daily regimen, he survives, despite hospitalizations, yet toying with the reality of his own death—at one point inserting a gun again and again in his mouth, using it like a dangerous cock as he masturbates.

 

      There are several moments of him having hot leather sex with actors Stefano Aguiar, Norval Berbari, Cássio Borges, Jonnatas David, Jerry Gilli, Diodi Lucas, Delcides Neto, Kassio Pires, Thauan Portillo, Leandro Rabello, and Marcos Vinícius.

      Dreams and fables also play a significant role, as Acácio describes going to the beach with friends, having to take a circular staircase to reach the shore before suddenly realizing that his friends have abandoned him, the staircase having disappeared and there is no way to return. At another point two men with an ax seem to threaten him in a forest, but actually when they come across his dead body, one sucks up the blood and shares it with the other in a long sensual kiss.


     Both of these dream-fables, obviously, emanate from the fear and realities of AIDS, the feeling of abandonment, loneliness, and the recognition that even in death the blood of body contaminates all who have intimately shared it; having symbolically drunk of the dead man’s blood becomes a kind of death wish in itself.

      What this film ultimately says about gay sex and AIDS is unclear. It reads more like a purgation of the love, fears, memories, and pleasures by a gay man who survived the bleak pronouncement of the disease longer that even he might have imagined back in 1995.  

 

Los Angeles, February 2, 2024

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (February 2024).

Laurent Perreau | Devine / 2011

a revelation

by Douglas Messerli

 

Laurent Perreau (screenwriter and director) Devine / 2011 [8 minutes]

 

A group of 4 teenage friends, Yann (Louis-Emmanuel Blanc), Axel (Raphael Goldman), Camille (Charlotte-Victoire Legrain), and Joseph (Romain Merle) are playing a game of mime, this one based only on film titles.



     The first of the game we observe, where one of the group attempts to mime the 2008 film Wall-e, ends in a loss for the performers team. Another figures it out only after Camille announces their time has run out, a sub-theme throughout this gathering, perhaps player’s last time together as a group.

      Joseph admits he hasn’t seen the film, and Axel jokes that his friend hasn’t seen anything, putting Jo for a few moments into a sulk. When Joseph hands Axel the film he is to mime, Axel claims it cannot read it, as Joseph whispers the title into his ear, Axel insisting that he can’t mime that work since it’s not a film. Yet Camille quickly perceives it to be Gossip Girl, the US television series from 2007-2012. Obviously there is some tension between these two young men.

     Joseph is now up, and attempts to give clues such as a Dutch windmill, a woman, and finally growing frustrated moves over to kiss Axel directly on the lips, holding the kiss just a little to long and clearly irritating the recipient. Joseph has been attempting to reveal a gay film with a windmill and a woman, whom Christine soon after declares was Mulholland Drive.

     But something has happened with that kiss, Joseph moving further into his funk, particularly given Axel’s immediate rejection. Christine attempts one further mime, but no one guesses the title, and we are never told what it was. The game is suddenly over.

     On the balcony, Joseph alone seems to be crying as he is joined by Christine. When she asks if he’s been crying, it says it’s only the cold, Christine gently giving him a kiss. Axel has observed the scene but ducks back into the room. As they look out over the city, Christine observes, “Just think, in 10 years, we’ll be thirty.”

      The film hints of insignificance of the moment while also making clear just how important it has been, that clue into Joseph’s deep feeling for his fellow friend, its rejection or perhaps maybe the beginning of something these four friends had never before imagined. French director Laurent Perreau, as if he himself were creating a mime performance, doesn’t provide any answers. He’s only given us a clue of a relationship between two of the boys not previously revealed—perhaps even to themselves.

 

Los Angeles, February 2, 2024

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (February 2024).

Paul Schrader | The Comfort of Strangers / 1990

fait accompli

by Douglas Messerli

 

Harold Pinter (screenplay, based on Ian McEwan’s The Comfort of Strangers), Paul Schrader (director) The Comfort of Strangers / 1990

 

As audiences and commentators of LGBTQ films have long complained, there are far too many instances in the movies where queer figures are tortured, maimed, and killed—to say nothing of the real-life psychological abuses many of us have suffered. Yet it is quite another thing to portray such figures as cold-blooded murderers and savage fiends—a phenomenon which began recurring regularly, it’s strange to say, in the 1970s and 1980s during the increasing liberation of that coalition.  Of course, in the US we might also add that women have long been portrayed similarly, and that, in general, movies in the always-violent 50 states have all focused intensely upon murder and mayhem.

      But it is one thing for male macho heterosexual cowboys—living in the West of the past or presently in urban communities—to “shoot it out” with one another for the possession of land, money, sexual dominance (usually over a woman) or simply privilege, but it is quite another thing to portray individuals who have long suffered societal ostracization by gender, religion, race, or sexual identity as dangerous psychopaths lurking at the edges of society ready at any moment to pounce upon those who already possess the perceived rewards of what is described a normative life. The fear such images call up help to set-back any of the achievements and recognition of normalcy the LGBTQ community has struggled to make apparent to the general society.

      I have already reviewed several of these accusatory films along the way, but I want to make it clear, even if I have not centered my commentaries on the fact, that I am appalled by their existence, even if sometimes fascinated by the tales they tell.

      Like any segment of society, those who identify as LGBTQ beings are not all saints, however one wants to define that word. And some few of us are extremely dangerous beings. To ignore this fact, moreover, would be tantamount to a wholesale erasure of queer life. Yet, I am somewhat relieved that, in general, that writers and directors attribute such behaviors as emanating from their character’s inabilities to accept their own sexualities. Certainly, that is true of Paul Schrader’s The Comfort of Strangers (1990).

 

     Harold Pinter who has written many a play along with the scripts of films in which gays or bisexual men play out nefarious and almost, at times, explicable relationships, but nothing in his previous work efforts have prepared us for this adaptation of the novel by Ian McEwan, in which two seemingly innocent lovers, Colin (Rupert Everett) and Mary (Natasha Richardson), currently having some difficulties with their lack of completely committing to one another, return to Venice, where they had once shared a stronger sense of their love.

      Both are good-looking and, quite obviously, well off, staying in a pleasant small hotel and wandering the labyrinthine streets connected by small walking bridges. But if Mary is quite pretty, as The New York Times Critic Vincent Canby put it, “With his chiseled male-model good looks, [Colin] is more than handsome. He is beautiful. When he and Mary go sightseeing, he is the one whom strangers pinch.”

      If it first appears that Colin is the reluctant one in deciding to move in together with Mary, perhaps because she has children from a previous marriage, as the film progresses it becomes apparent that Mary has grown more cautious, in part, perhaps because of her lover’s masculine appeal to nearly everyone they meet.

      Certainly, Colin seems to be of interest to a local, the well-dressed Robert (Christopher Walken), who decked-out in an immaculate white suit is observed snapping pictures of him. When the couple, after waking in their hotel one evening, decide to seek out a late-night snack, finding most the restaurants now closed, they encounter Robert—not so very accidentally we later perceive—who knows of a spot where they might dine, happily accompanying them to the bar-restaurant.



       Robert appears to be well known in this place, and when told the kitchen has closed, quickly orders up several bottles of his favorite wine, which they drink while crunching on a dinner of breadsticks.              Their host, meanwhile, when asked about his past, tells a rather long and somewhat meaningless tale about his apparently sadistic and highly controlling Italian diplomat father, a tale which he repeats at least two other times in the movie: "My father was a very big man. And he wore a black mustache. When he grew older and it grew gray, he colored it with a pencil. The kind women use on their eyebrows. What do you call it? Mascara."

     As the camera slowly pans the bar’s other patrons, the observant viewer will witness a room of mostly men, with only one woman other than Mary. I made note of this, suspecting what it might mean.

     Yet, nothing happens as the two lovers, now somewhat tipsy, leave the establishment and attempt to return to their hotel. It is almost as if they have now entered a Venice they have never before encountered. Wherever they turn they end up somewhere other than the opening to the small squares they had expected, again and again encountering walls where they recalled other paths and bridges, or small walkways that might move them away from the direction they are seeking. Finally, they become so tired from the wine and exhausted from their walk, that they simply sit down and fall asleep, waking up in the early dawn.

     Ultimately making their way out of circuitous maze, they find their way back to St. Mark’s Basilica and, still exhausted and hungry, stop at a small outdoor café for breakfast.

     There, they once more run into Robert, who apologizing for not having guided them back to their hotel the previous evening, now insists that they rest at his home and dine there. They discover that he and his wife Caroline (Helen Mirren) reside in a multi-story Moorish-like mansion, and gladly fall into the beds to which she and Robert guide them.



     When, hours later, they awaken, they discover their clothes are missing; Mary slipping into a bathrobe she finds in the room and Colin donning a huge towel, they seek out their hosts.

      Caroline appears, reporting that her husband has gone out for a while, but that she, on his orders, has hidden their clothing until they agree to stay for dinner. She also, somewhat disconcertingly describes that she has watched them asleep simply to observe their beauty.

       Apparently, they have no choice but to remain.


    Robert soon returns, taking Colin aside to show him his father’s immense library, while Mary remains talking to Caroline, the latter of whom explains that she seldom goes out because she suffers significant back pain.

        Once again Robert demonstrates that he is obsessed by his father, speaking of his preference for the past. Out of the blue, so to speak, he asks a rather off-handed question about what Colin thinks of homosexuals, and when the young man responds that he has nothing against them, the host inexplicably slugs him hard in the stomach, forcing Colin to stagger back, gasping for breath. Suddenly, we perceive that Robert is an extreme homophobe, and that his comments about his father using mascara were somehow related to his vision of heterosexual men being representative of another preferable period in history.

      The lovers, Mary and Colin, spend an uncomfortable evening at the dinner table, despite the fact that Robert and Caroline are sociable and polite. But as they turn to go, Mary picks up a few photographs lying nearby on a side table, hiding her distress that in one of the pictures she has spotted Colin.

       Their hosts calmly see them out, insisting that they must return soon.

      That event, we soon perceive, has completely altered, inwardly, their own relationship. And from this point on, Colin, who has not yet told her of Robert’s violent aggression, becomes increasingly determined to set up house with his lover and her children, while Mary grows seemingly leerier of their making a sudden decision.

       Nonetheless, the two finally take in some of the standard tourist sites, some of which they perhaps experienced on their first visit to the water-bound city. There does appear to be a closer bond between them, both of them revealing their meaningless “secrets.”

       I’d suggest that Colin’s new-found eagerness to actualize their love has something to do with both his attraction to and his fear of Robert, while Mary’s sudden diffidence may be related to the fact that Colin, having been captured on camera by Robert, could be hiding something from her.*

      Soon after, the two determine to visit the beach, and while trekking back toward their hotel suddenly find themselves directly across a waterway from Robert and Caroline’s mansion, impulsively deciding to simply drop in to say goodbye.

      They take a small boat to the house, and are greeted with open arms by both of the strangers, who seemed to have expected them since they had called the couple’s hotel earlier that morning to invite them, also to say goodbye, since they are moving to Canada in order to allow them a one-level residence to help Caroline move about more freely. Robert is busy packing up his father’s library, but stops what he is doing to announce that he must make a short errand before dinner, requesting that Colin join him.

     What we discern from that short trip is that the bar/restaurant to which Robert first took them is owned by Robert himself, and moreover, that, as we might have suspected, it is a gay establishment. In the alley, where they meet some of Robert’s employees, he tells them in Italian—later reporting the incident to Colin—that the beautiful man accompanying him is his lover. If Colin isn’t utterly confounded by this time, then the audience certainly is.

      Meanwhile, back at their Maison, Caroline, while boiling up the water to serve tea, explains that her back is the product of the S&M games in which she and Robert have engaged, which over the years have increasingly escalated into more painful events.

     The tea is served. Mary asks why Colin appeared in one of their photos. As Mary begins to drink the tea, which she quickly perceives has been spiked with a drug, Caroline suggests she visit their bedroom, helping her guest, at this point, to remain steady on her feet as she pulls her into a small cell-like space whose walls are covered with blown-up pictures of Colin, all shot, apparently, by her husband and brought home to her as a gift in which she has found great delight.

      By this time Mary, startled by the course of events, but unable to even speak, begs to be released or, at least, a doctor called. But by this point we realize that whatever trap the monsters have set up is already in place.

  

    As Robert returns with Colin, Mary attempts to call out to him about her newfound terrors, while the urbane gentleman in the white suit smilingly takes out a knife and slits Colin’s neck, sliding his beautiful prey slowly to the floor, which only now we recognize as a sexual fait accompli.

      The comfort—or even what Tennessee William’s Blanche DuBois describes as the kindness—of strangers should never be something upon which one might need to depend.

 

* It is interesting to note that just a year before he was chosen to play this role, Everett came out publicly as a gay man, having played several gay roles in films previously.

 

Los Angeles, September 17, 2020

Reprinted from World Cinema Review and My Queer Cinema blog (September 2020).

 

Anna Thew | Eros Erosion / 1990

it could have been as simple as that

by Douglas Messerli

 

Anna Thew (director) Eros Erosion / 1990

 

In this 45 minute “image poem,” Anna Thew explores the pandemic of AIDS through the 1990 lens and voices of individuals suffering from the disease, several of whom later died, as well as brief segments from Boccaccio’s Decameron, a poem By Wei Wen Ti, as well as other invocative fragments. As Thew herself wrote about the impetus for this film:

     "Eros Erosion began as two words jotted over a drawing of a river. It grew from there. Words, jottings over drawings, another friend had AIDS, conversations, struggle, the futile pursuit of miracle treatments… the only thing I could do was film people fighting and arguing, film landscape, film the sea, and try and make some sense of that helplessness you feel."

          Although her film is definitely not narrative—paralleling the disease with images of World War II bombings of the British landscape, decaying city streets and buildings, empty shipyards and vessels, and various views of sea, birds, and trees in order to invoke the sense of time and decay—the director also does create small narrative segments such as the murder by the two brothers of the Decameron’s Lisabetta’s lover and images of couples arguing, battling, and making love which the viewer can certainly imagine as scenes such individuals played out before and after coming to terms with the realization of the disease.



    Repeated phrases, moreover, such “It is no use to put one’s head in the sand,” “over the safety net,” “a kind of love/death thing,” and “it could have been as simple as that,” among others, call out for imaginative incidents in which these words might have been appropriately spoken.

      And ultimately, this work is permeated more by a sense of regret and acceptance rather than anger or terror—although obviously those emotions are implied in some of the film’s scenes.

      As in so many gay and lesbian narratives, mirror images and Narcissus are called upon to hint at the queer search for the other, as well as the myths and literary tales of Orfeo, Ulysses, and Dante.

 


     Buses, trains, ships, and the sea itself come to represent transport both to places to which those suffering from AIDS still express their hopes to travel, to describe from where they have come, and, of course, to signify the voyage into death itself.

     The images from the film I’ve included above are organized almost randomly, much the way they often appear in the film, although obviously the pattern I created is missing the rhythm and the important use of sound in Thew’s film.

     Voicing and performing this short work are Ali Zaidi, Carlyle Reedy, David Medalla, Julian Woropay, Christian Anstice, Gina Czarnecki, Anna Malni, Anna Thew, Junior Corsini, Simon Periton, Toni Dominici, Philippe Barbut, Jean Pascal Auberge, and Franco Bosisio.

     Thew also has expressed her feelings about the end of this evocative film: “For me, the film remains unfinished. It ends in hiatus with a shot of the Alps from the plane to Rome. Atilio died before it was printed, followed by Kosmo, Alf, Stuart and Derek.”

 

Los Angeles, February 19, 2022

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (February 2022).

Index [listed alphabetically by director]

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.