Thursday, June 26, 2025

Nathan Kim | Crème Brulée / 2025 [music video]

driving them crazy

by Douglas Messerli

 

David Archuleta, Robyn Dell’Unto, Ryan Nealon, and Michael Bloom (composers), Nathan Kim (director) Crème Brulée / 2025 [3 minutes]

 

Another smooth, pop-singing gay crooner, David Archuleta was only 18 when he released his first single, “Crush,” which landed his album at the number 2 position of the Billboard 200 chart. And since then, he has continued to produce singles and albums, some of them exploring old time hits such as The Beatles’ “The Long and Winding Road,” while several others have been original songs that deal with queer life.

     A former member of the Latter-Day Saints, Archuleta came out as queer (gay and “demisexual”) in 2021 and he made in clear in a 2023 interview that he and his mother were no longer involved with the LDS church.

     “Crème Brulée,” a single for his upcoming album Earthly Delights, is a rather self-congratulatory song about his sexual prowess, or at least his sexual draw, as it celebrates, sometimes in Spanish, the fact that one “bite” of the singer, other men will inevitably want more.

The Spanish phrase, “I drive you crazy, crazy,” is repeated several times throughout.


 

Oh no

Another man down

Another heart left on the dance floor

Took a bite, now he wants more

Words flow

Right out of his mouth

Yeah like he's never had sugar before

Don't care bout a main course

 

One night and they're singing my praises

Two shots then the honeymoon phase, it's

Three word phrases, skipping stages

It's all over your face like


 

Oh no

There goes all of your clothes

Speaking words you don't know

Yo te vuelvo loco, loco

Oh no, you want me in slo-mo

Snap me like a photo

Yo te vuelvo loco, loco

I can't help that you don't wanna wait

Ok

Now you've had a taste of crème brûlée


    Like the major analogy of the poem, the sweetness one must break into of crème brûlée, so does the song sweetly brush away the possibility of a long relationship with the narrative voice of the singer.

    Perhaps the most notable aspect of this 2025 video, however, is the group dancing choreographed by Jordon Johnson and Aidan Carberry, featuring Archuleta, Amy Cheng, Nico Lonetree, and Jongo Zeizel.

 

Los Angeles, June 26, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (June 2025).

Ewald André Dupont | Moulin Rouge / 1928

mother love

by Douglas Messerli

 

Ewald André Dupont (screenwriter and director) Moulin Rouge / 1928

 

It’s strange that given its brilliantly-filmed first 30 minutes that German director E. A. Dupont, here directing his first British film, is not given more critical attention regarding his 1928 film Moulin Rouge. Working with his brilliant cinematographer Werner Brandes, more is packed into the first quarter of this 2-hour film about pre-Depression Paris than almost any other film provides. Dupont and Brandes are immersed in the boulevard and café nightlife of the Pigalle in Montmartre more than any film does until John-Pierre Melville’s Bob le Flambeur (1956) and Julien Duvivier’s Boulevard (1960).


     And after diving in an out of the Pigalle bars and nightclubs the film centers around acts that give us what seems to be a fairly accurate picture of the Moulin Rouge entertainment (even though the interior theater scenes were filmed not in the Moulin Rouge but in the Lido and in London), including a wonderful series of vignette’s that capture the various aspects of the theater’s audiences—a gentleman distracted by a nearby female beauty, upbraided by his wife; a young girl terrified by a woman on stage with a large python wrapped around her neck; gawking tourists, including a Harold Lloyd look-alike; and a young man standing next to a sailor, who through the old trick of swallowing a burning cigarette, gets the man to put his arms around him just to check out his health. 


     On stage we get a glimpse of the vast acts that Americans know best through Ziegfeld’s US Broadway imitations, including vast lineups of chorus girls decked out in beaded and jeweled costumes; Arabian scenes in which a sitting sultan dressed is in a thawb so ornate that when he stands, with the camera looking up at his presence, it appears he is costumed in a female gown; racist skits such as an imitation bonsai version of a Japanese Kabuki play performed by little people and a black-face number in which the featured dancer Parysia (Olga Tschechowa)* attempts, unsuccessfully, to outdo the contortions of Josephine Baker; and, of significant LGBTQ interest, a slightly longer sequence involving two obviously gay chorus boys, naked except for glitteringly sequined “dancing diapers” who create a series of “fairy friezes” of the likes of which were seen in US cinema only in John W. Harkrider and Millard Webb’s Glorifying the American Girl, of a year later, which featured similar scenes from an actual Ziegfeld Follies production—pictures of which, when I attempted to post them on Facebook (a quite hilarious incident in hindsight, since it appears that the 2022 Facebook censors felt the 1929 stage performer’s costumes insufficiently covered up their nakedness) got me thrown into Facebook prison for a month!



     But except for these scenes and the sailor and his boyfriend, Dupont’s Moulin Rouge is a strictly heterosexual affair—although certainly one of the most perverted of heterosexual stories put to screen since Charles Bryant’s Salomé (1923).

     Near the end of the acts I have described above, two individuals enter box seats at the Moulin Rouge, Margaret (Eve Gray) and Andre (Jean Bradin) to watch the rest of the performances by the show’s feature performer, Parysia. Andre is a wealthy young man and his girlfriend, Margaret, just happens to me Parysia’s daughter who has returned from years of education in select boarding school somewhere else in Europe, almost unable to recognize the beautiful woman on the stage as her mother.


      She is, however, not the only one taken by Parysia’s beauty, as Andre almost immediately gets an erection for the older woman that is so overwhelming that he must excuse himself for a moment as he runs out to the theater café in order to buy a program with numerous photos of the star. Later that evening, we see him in bed, unable to sleep, as he picks up the magazine which we clearly recognize in today’s parlance he intends to use as “whacking off” material, while the director alternates these scenes with images of the real woman rubbing on face cream as she bemoans her age.

     In fact, Tschechowa was only 3 years older than the woman who portrayed her daughter when the film was made, but the actress convinces us—while still wowing Andre—that she is far older.


     Andre’s infatuation might simply be humorous, but in fact he is secretly engaged to marry Margaret, and falling in love with one’s future mother-in-law was verboten even in the Paris of 1928.

     That doesn’t stop him from attempting to declare his affections to Parysia, who is quite rightfully both somewhat appreciative of his revelations and utterly shocked! And the fact that he is engaged to her daughter, doesn’t stop her from immediately getting in her car and driving off to the family estate to convince André’s father (Georges Tréville) that despite her being an actor it has not contaminated her daughter, and that he should give his permission immediately for the marriage. Just to convince him that she’s serious about the matter, she casually leaves behind her handkerchief, a subtle threat that if he doesn’t go along with her plans that she can make his life quite miserable in the gossip columns. He immediately writes of his approval.


      That is the nearly full substance of this film’s plot. The rest of the story is filled out with melodramatic details as the young boy suffers deeply for his oedipal complex, guiltily sulking around the innocent, and rather empty-headed Margaret, who is so blind to his lack of interest in her that she joins her mother in a lovely outing to a haute couture fashion house for her trousseau and gets so drunk from champagne at a private dinner with André that she doesn’t have to notice his odd grimaces as he compares her handsome face and childish demeanor with the grace and beauty of her mother. Fortunately, cinematographer Brandes captures all the angst in such beautiful tableaux vivants that the film maintains our interest.

      André attempts to write a confession to his father before finally determining to commit suicide. He visits Parysia’s dressing room to leave her flowers and a suicide note, but even backs out of that, arriving instead to the house, where he has scheduled a drive with Margaret to his father with the hope of returning with him to Paris for the wedding.


      André, however, has cut the brakes, and insists that given the bad roads and numerous hills on route that it’s too dangerous for Margaret to accompany him. For the first time, Margaret truly sees her lover as he really is: a frightened and highly confused young man. What is he talking about? Bad roads and hills? Surely that’s not a sufficient excuse to go alone. But when she queries him about his logic, he falls into a faint. And, after she and her mother, get him to couch, she determines to make the drive alone to bring back his father.

       When he is awakened by a telephone call for Parysia, and discovers that she has driven off in his stead, he interrupts the telephone call to tell his mother-in-law that the message will reveal that her that her daughter is dead, explaining what he has done.

        The telephone call is simply from her dresser, reporting a new costume has arrived. But the now furious tigress Parysia demands he take her car, catch up with Margaret and save her, after which he should kill himself.

        The last quarter of this film is filled with action as the two cars speed to and from André’s family home, linking up finally with him attempting to save his fiancée by pulling her from his out-of-control sports car into his sedan en route. It ends with a terrible crash, André badly wounded and Margaret near death.


        Despite the news, Parysia must still go on stage which she attempts in various states of dizzying shock, collapsing backstage at the very moment that Margaret pulls through in surgery, the doctors announcing that she will live.

       Evidently in the process of nearly losing Margaret, André has rediscovered his love for her and been cured of his oedipal infatuation. This time, as Parysia later puts it, he’s been given an opportunity to rectify his behavior. The two rush off on their honeymoon as Parysia sends flowers, unable to see them off, since she is once more onstage delighting her audience with her youthful beauty.

      If Dupont’s story is negligible, the way he and Brandes tell it through their photographic images is so brilliant that I’d suggest that critics take another look at this work to reevaluate its place in film history. And if it doesn’t offer much in the way of specific LGBTQ history, what it reveals about outsider love is utterly fascinating.

 

Los Angeles, February 18, 2023

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (February 2023).

 

Todd Flaherty | Chrissy Judy / 2022

decline and fall

by Douglas Messerli

 

Todd Flaherty (screenwriter and director) Chrissy Judy / 2022

 

I’ll confess, never having been personally interested in or particularly fascinated by drag queens, I find that world somewhat entertaining, and obviously writing this book I have entered that world in terms of cinema numerous times. But I still have felt apart and removed from it, finding it difficult to imagine what a female impersonator does throughout his or her regular day. Is it a world totally devoted to that role-playing or is there another self, another being who alternates or even dominates the periods off-stage?


     I’m not sure of the total credulity of Todd Flaherty’s 2022 gorgeous black-and-white film Chrissy Judy, but it certainly has given me a better sense of that world and of the individuals involved in it through the film’s characters, the energized and almost magnetically appealing Judy (played by Flaherty) and Chrissy (Wyatt Fenner), and if there was ever a film that might help one enter that world and empathize with the gay and straight men who are involved in drag it is surely this movie.


     Let us begin with the language or the patois used by these individuals. The effeminate chatter we witness on stage and in the movies when the character is in drag is similar in this film, reminding me of a gay patter that used to be employed, when I was first coming out, by many gay men gathering with others of an evening: an exaggerated, queer female-oriented banter—most participants were awarded like the characters in this film female names—and the language was  purposely camp, an over-the-top rendition of reality that included numerous words, expressions, and metaphors known only to gay communities, sometimes even limited to the local chapter. It is also a language of wit, demanding that each participant throw off statements and comebacks that seemingly “put down” or “dismiss” the other participants, offered in part as evidence of one’s knowledge of their weaknesses and well as their strengths, and positing the idea that your love for them is based on knowing both their failures and gifts only too well. And finally, it depends on the moment, who enters the room at what moment, what has just happened the world about gleaned through news or gossip, and whatever history (individual or political) that is appropriate to the moment, bringing that into the world of cut off, separated, and dissociated world into which the speakers belong. It short, even speaking is an utterly exhausting experience.

     For the outsider, moreover, it is nearly impossible to assimilate or even translate since it is precisely meant to keep others out. It represents a private world fought for tooth and nail by individuals who are not permitted into more normalized living rooms and parlors. Beyond language, accordingly, behavior can also be unusual, outré, or even purposely offensive, particularly if one is told that something is off limits or one is visiting a different clique or outsider gathering. People can be hurt, accordingly, abused because of their relationship to the others.

      It is a world most other young gay men coming of age in the early 1970s and I quickly abandoned, at a time, long before Stonewall, when many of us realized that we were no longer on the outside mocking ourselves for our position in the world, but actually were beginning to be  accepted into the heterosexual communities from which we had so long been banned. Talking in patois of our creation, accordingly, no longer made sense. Even behaving badly to prove we were after all the bad boys that society had defined us as, was no longer useful.


      In many respects the drag world, a least as presented in this movie, has retained a sense of otherness that most of the LGBTQ world has long abandoned, particularly those of us who have been comfortably accepted in the heteronormative worlds of arts, education, entertainment, and other fields of endeavor who, at least outwardly, have seemingly assimilated the quirks of LGBTQ individuals.

      And in large part, that attitudinal difference is what the film Chrissy Judy is all about.  Beautiful as a male specimen and able to attract sexual partners, Judy is still of the “old school,” a gay man surrounded by his own kind and also, in that respect, trapped at going-on-30 in a world that is gradually disappearing. He (the pronoun I’ve chosen since most of the time “Judy,” real name Jack, performs as a sis male bottom) lives with his long-time friend Chrissy in a world that is made up of close gay friends. At one point, indeed, another friend of theirs, Samoa (James Tison) declares that she no longer even has time for heterosexual beings.


      The drag team of Chrissy and Judy begin the film with a familiar trip to Fire Island, a weekend celebration where Judy hopes to get to kiss another man and both hope for a deep tan and perhaps even a little rest in their schedule which is a busy one without much financial renumeration.

       Mostly what these early scenes simply reveal is the intensity of their friendship, as they drunkenly dance together declaring that there is no one in their lives that they love better and insisting that if by 40 they have still found no one to whom they can devote their love they will marry one another.

       But here also, Judy begins to perceive that Chrissy is not his usual self, and soon after discovering him at a dive bar where they are performing, he realizes that his life-long friend is about to abandon him, to go out into the real “gay” world that has grown up around in order to try out a relationship in Philadelphia with his long-distance boyfriend Shawn (Kiyon Spencer). Judy cannot believe that his friend would truly leave him, and when it happens his world begins to fall apart.

       First of all, his drag act is stale. No one is interested, he is told, in the old drag act of singing campy versions of vintage songs as he does. Today drag queens dance!

       Judy attempts a dance class with a younger group of individuals, but is out of sync—as well as out of rhythm—and gets winded when the others are just ready to continue.



       A visit to an older friend Samoa who has become a successful businessman (or woman, since we cannot quite discern whether Samoa now identifies as fully transgender or as a cis male who dresses daily in drag and as Judy retains his female name at all times), drops him into different world of patois, filled with faux-psychological, spiritual, new wave, and other babble that is as radically inexplicable to Judy as his “sissy talk” is to some others. Feeling as isolated in this world as others feel in his, he behaves badly, letting himself be fucked by Samoa’s “hands off” boyfriend, Marcus (Joey Taranto) who happens to also to have been a member of the audience in his last drag performance who dismissed and totally ignored his act.

       In some respects, Judy’s behavior is a reaction to both Samoa’s and Marcus’ disdain and disrespect. But at heart it is obviously a performance in anger for Chrissy having gone off and left him alone. A phone call from Sissy in the closet where he has just had sex, with as he informs him “cum dripping from my ass,” livens him up, especially when Chrissy invites him to come and share a Thanksgiving barbecue with Shawn and others in the city of brotherly love.

       But that visit proves even more disastrous as Judy is forced to look on at the apparently kissy-lovey life of Chrissy and Shawn, surrounded by gay men who are so conservative and uninteresting—who talk in yet another language about their bird-watching habits, sports, and jobs—that they might as well be married heterosexuals. Getting drunk, Judy performs in this “polite” society an act that Bette Davis might envy as he mocks the city and its values, their empty conversations, and performs an almost drunken Medea-like dance of disdain. Even Chrissy cannot bring him to his senses, and Judy is shipped off in the very next greyhound bus.


        Gradually, Judy’s world as he knew it is collapsing, a sort of decline and fall of his drag-centered empire. Without the ability to find new drag venues, he is forced to take part-time jobs such as handing out samples in stores. For his bad behavior, most of his friends seem to have abandoned him or left for the “other” worlds they have realized that it is time to embrace. Trying out a sexual tryst with Marcus once again, Judy realizes that he is a “fuck ‘em and leave ‘em kind of guy,”—no sleepovers for him—finishing up his sex and telling Judy that paper towels are on a nearby table while he goes upstairs to shower. He is startled when he comes out of the bathroom that Judy as strayed on the balcony and curtly sends him off.

     Out of despair, Judy dresses up in drag, seeing “herself’ in the mirror finally as a washed-up figure from a time that no longer even exists. Trimming away his beautifully peroxided hair, he finally takes a job he once mocked as a latrine-scouring, bedmaking houseboy in a Provincetown bed and breakfast.

      Now a shortly shaven jet-black haired young man he behaves as seriously as he can earning a living in P-town while enjoying the company of his fellow houseboy-servant Pedro (João Pedro Santos). Pedro would certainly like to break the rules of the B&B owner, but for the first time ever Judy follows orders, allowing himself fun with the cute boy with whom he works, while staying out of his bed.


       Besides, he’s now busy, working nights at Ryan Landry’s famed gay performance space preparing a new drag act as Sweet Lorraine (a new persona suggested by Marcus) who now sings seriously—and I might add quite beautifully through Flaherty’s performance—old torch songs.

       On the very day he is to finally premiere the act, Chrissy turns up in town. The two spot one another but don’t dare acknowledge each other’s existence. Yet Chrissy does show up the performance and is clearly moved by Judy’s new show; after all her act wins Landry’s “Miss Congeniality” contest, and Judy is mobbed by admirers after.

       It’s the last night in P-Town for Judy, and Pedro convinces him to celebrate in a bar, but Judy leaves early, wandering the beach where he unintentionally on purpose confronts the waiting Chrissy, who admits he’s gone on vacation alone since Shawn had no more free days left. But we  also recognize that he has gone off alone to think things out.

       Now recognizing that his friend has, after all this time, found himself, he wonders if he has discovered his own purpose in the relationship to which he has seemed to be so devoted. But as Judy admits, he too has no idea what the next day will bring. For both of them, it has become another world than the one they formerly inhabited, a world which doesn’t have the safe corners of clique in which one feels fully at home. The family members have fled one another, leaving each on his own to discover who they might possibly be or who they might become.


     Chrissy and Judy, once so close you mightn’t ever imagine them apart, share the ferry back to Boston. Chrissy, clearly not the happy “married” man he once seemed to be, lays his head upon his friend Judy’s shoulder. But it is not an invitation to renew the past, but simply a recognition that they have each gone their separate ways to places they no longer recognize.

 

Los Angeles, October 19, 2022

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (October 2022).

 

My Queer Cinema Index [with former World Cinema Review titles]

https://myqueercinema.blogspot.com/2023/12/former-index-to-world-cinema-review.html Films discussed (listed alphabetically by director) [For...