Sunday, August 24, 2025

J. E. Dufton | Every Waking Moment / 2023

a shell of being

by Douglas Messerli

 

J. E. Dufton (screenwriter and director) Every Waking Moment / 2023 [20 minutes]

 

This rather arch short British movie is based on the love and life of composer Benjamin Britten and tenor Peter Pears, who lived together as a gay couple at a time when simply being gay might, at any moment, result in the police arriving at your doorstep, arresting you, and engaging in a kind of conversion therapy through electric shock therapy and chemical alteration of your body.


     The film itself begins, in black-and-white, with a performance of Henry Purcell’s “Man Is for the Woman Made,” a truly heterosexual declaration by the Baroque composer, whose work Britten arranged and who had an important influence on the 20th century composer.

      The characters in this work, however, are named Edward Talbot as the composer (William Bennett) and Alistair Percy (Harry Coolan) as the singer. The director shifts to full color for a day in their life, as Talbot out for a breath of air in a public park notices a beautiful man (Michael Ainger) pass by.


    Soon after, we see a British policeman pull the beautiful man and a young boy out of a cottage (the British word for a public men’s room).


       The incident troubles Talbot, who the very next day is scheduled to give a performance of his new song, “Every Waking Moment,” which is a coded love song to Percy. Tortured by the reality that British gay men of the time daily had to face, Talbot can’t sleep, getting up, pouring himself some whiskey, and playing the music of several composers such as Tchaikovsky and Schubert. Percy, awakened, puts on the tea, ready once again, apparently, to face a long bout with his lover who is not only nervous about the next day’s performance but even more troubled by the possibility that one or both of them will one day be arrested and subjected to the tortures of sterilization or chemical neutering that leaves the body an empty shell unable to feel any emotion, or imprisoned as was Wilde.


      These men clearly knew the procedures applied to many of their kind, including the famed scientist Alan Turing, who committed suicide through arsenic poisoning as a result.

     Most of us can no longer imagine the fear of such men, who everyday had to face the fears that their truest beings and sources of love might be stolen away from them by the conventional values of the society at large.

       As images of the “conversion” are displayed, and a later meeting between Talbot and the now shell of the beautiful man who he attempts unsuccessfully to kiss back to life, as if he were simply the sleeping Snow White, Percy calms him by reminding him that no one, no procedures, and no imprisonment can ever stop him from loving his partner in life, Talbot.


      The song—not one of Britten’s but composed with lyrics by Dufton himself—is sung in the small church in which they perform it, received with heavy applause:

 

And every waking moment

I long to see the morning sun

cast its beams across your face.

 

And every waking moment

I yearn to see the stars align

and etch you’re your name across the sky.


      This short film is another reminder—along with the many histories of Oscar Wilde, and more modern tellings such as Sam Ashby’s The Colour of His Hair (2019) and Thomas Hescott’s The Act (2020), to say nothing of earlier film’s such as James Ivory’s Maurice (1987)—of the horror of the British attitudes toward homosexuality for most of the 20th century.


Los Angeles, August 24, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (August 2025).

  

Brian Knappenberger | The Trials of Gabriel Fernandez / 2020

a shock to the system

by Douglas Messerli

 

Brian Knappenberger (director) The Trials of Gabriel Fernandez / 2020

 

For the last couple of days, sidelined by the almost lockdown of the Covid-19, I watched the 6-part series of what is described as a documentary work on the death the 8-year-old Palmdale, California child, Gabriel Fernandez. It is a grizzly and painful work, and just perhaps as Los Angeles Times television critic Robert Lloyd described it, “another slice of tragedy as entertainment”—although I did not perceive it that way.

      If this series was a bit overlong, and somewhat “messy” in its structure—not entirely revealing actually that the true monsters, Gabriel’s mother Pearl and her boyfriend Isauro Aguirre, who quite literally locked up, hung up, and tortured this evidently loving child, eventually beating him to death.


      I read the 2013 Los Angeles Times pieces, recounted daily primarily by the reporter Garrett Therolf, for weeks after the death of Gabriel and tried to wipe away the tears. I couldn’t, and Howard would not even let me share them with him. He refused to even hear of such events.

      As the accounting nurse at the time of Gabriel’s entry into a local hospital, after he had been beaten to death by the two, describes—in complete disbelief at what she and the doctors saw: his entire body was covered with welts of torture, his inner body revealing bi-bi shots into it, cigarettes were put out on the surface of his skin, a wasting of his body since he’d been locked up in a closet and fed, for long periods of time, only cat litter. And then what was worse than even the movie reveals, evidently that had been hung-up by his legs, “was forced to eat cat feces and his own vomit; made to sleep in a locked cabinet without access to the bathroom; and subjected to regular beatings.”

      The abrasions to his body were so severe that the reporting nurse could hardly write up her summary, and director Brian Knappenberger commiserates upon the horrors that this lovely boy had to suffer.

      Even worse, as the series moves forward, we realize that the entire social system, which was meant to protect people like him, failed. The movie makes it clear that there were so many signs, teachers and relatives reporting what they felt was abuse, which the four-charged, ultimately released social workers simply refused to accept or believe, allowing the tortuous life the young child had to survive to continue. It’s as if they turned away from their focus to accept the concept that somehow it was better for a child to live with his quite disturbed mother (abused as a child herself and as an adult mentally incompetent). There’s even a suggestion that she and her lover Aguirre received sexual pleasures in the abuse of the innocent.

      As the film’s narrator confirms:

 

               Everything you can think about Gabriel had gone through

               of feeling, it’s your fault. Being scared every day. At that

               age you can’t do anything.


     Although the film concentrates on his unbearably painful last year, Gabriel did, in fact, have move through loving relationships with his gay uncle and his companion and, later, his grandparents, who fought with the mysterious Los Angeles Office of Childhood Protection, a organization not even quite controllable by the powerful LA County Supervisors nor the errant Los Angeles Sherriff at the time, the now-imprisoned Lee Baca.

     The white-knight hero of this film is the prosecutor, the handsome (almost Hollywood-like figure) Jonathan Hatami, who takes on this cause with a serious sense of disgust for all it represents, pushing, successfully for the death sentence—which in Newsom’s current governance means little (fortunately, I might add)—of Aguirre. Nevertheless, he is locked up for life! Unlike O. J. Simpson’s trial, the dedicated Hatami made it work.


     The real punch-in-the-gut, however, was that Aguirre and Pearl Hernandez mostly punished this young boy because they thought him to be gay. He once proclaimed he identified himself as such and liked to play with dolls. They forced him to wear dresses and tortured him for that very fact. He was only 8 years old. He had evidently received the love of his gay uncle and attempted to reclaim his life in that respect.

      Knappenberger’s documentary does not truly deal with this, nor with the final logistical decisions Hatami accomplished, without allowing us to truly seek a resolution for such absolute punishment of a kid who was seeking to find a source of security and love in a world of absolute horror. This is a film-series I cannot ever watch again, but I’m glad I saw it once. The Los Angeles systems of power must simply bow their head in sorrow to their ineffective embrace of protecting our most innocent and vulnerable citizens.

 

Los Angeles, March 15, 2020

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (March 2020).

Brock Cravy | Innocent Boy / 2020

waiting to die

by Douglas Messerli

 

Brock Cravy (screenwriter and director) Innocent Boy / 2020 [14 minutes]

 

This short movie is the kind you wish you hadn’t seen but once you have you can’t get its images out of your head. As a Letterboxd commentator “Sarah” summarized the movie: “Innocent Boy is a sharp mixture of filth and neon with compelling performances that let the themes rise to the surface without a pointed plot. The messy narrative will confuse most viewers but those interested in queer, Southern, grindhouse horror aesthetics won't be disappointed.”


     There is no real story. A mad Texas Cowboy (Kamy D. Bruder), having evidently just finished off (as in murdering) another human being, is hurrying on his way to the off-the-road Texas bordello unlike any others.

      Controlled by Momma (Michael Vicent Berry), this little horror house, garbage lining the path to its door, doesn’t even invite its guests in. As Cooter (Ian Michaels) explains, there are no longer any women left. They don’t even take cash anymore. Maybe some “mints,” (jewelry) or diesel? The cowboy orders him in the back to the pickup truck and proceeds to brutally fuck him.


      Meanwhile, the young “innocent boy” of the title, Penny (Unique Jenkins), a young black trans boy in the midst of drug withdrawal wants to pleasure the cowboy badly, Cooter beating him, in both senses of that word, to the cowboy’s cock.

      The bearded drag queen mamma, simultaneously, is offering up some of her special milk to her completely drugged-out favorite boy, Gabriel (Saul Vasquez).

      Penny sneaks into the kitchen where Gabe lies half-way upon a counter top and the stove, trying to help him escape the attentions of Momma; but he quickly realizes that the milk she has provided him was no cum but a potent mix of drugs, and the beautiful Gabriel has passed out, pissing his jockey shorts.



      Penny knocks out Momma with a metal iron, slurps some of the precious “milk” from the floor, and attempts to get Gabe to wake up, but quickly realizes he’s gone, perhaps even dead.



     Finished fucking Cooter, the Cowboy slits his slut’s throat, only to come face to face with the escaped Penny. The cowboy stabs Penny in the leg and is about to take back his knife when Momma, having recovered, suddenly reappears, with a pitchfork she places into the torso of the Cowboy, declaring “Momma loves all her babies!”



      Having removed the knife from his leg, Penny shoves it into Momma’s heart, slurping up the blood that comes pouring out of it.

     If that sounds like a plot, I’d argue that its purpose is not narrative, but is focused instead upon presenting a series of remarkable and unforgettable images. The order of any of these events could easily be rearranged, and the significance of the events are purposeless, used only for their representation of gore and mayhem.      

     The film’s primarily LGBTQ characters, appearing in a work that would have been unthinkable a few decades before, nonetheless take us back to the darkest days of queer cinema, in which all gay, bisexual, transsexual, and transgender figures were inherently evil and of necessity were killed off before the end of the movie. One might possibly describe this work as a kind of camp version of that terrible past reality, except that none of the characters, except perhaps for Momma, are given enough dialogue to help transform the horrific images into camp, maintaining instead a kind of Southern gothic horror that reminds one of Sade, the long tradition of the Grand Guignol theater, and the later Dario Argento-like “splatter films.”

 

Los Angeles, October 14, 2023

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (October 2023).

 




Nicolas Maury | Garçon chiffon (My Best Part) / 2020

rag doll

by Douglas Messerli

 

Maud Ameline, Sophie Fillières, and Nicolas Maury (screenplay), Nicolas Maury (director) Garçon chiffon (My Best Part) / 2020

 

French actor and director Nicolas Maury’s Garçon chiffon (2020) might be translated into English as “rag boy,” closer to the nickname that his mother in this movie calls him, “napkin.” Yet the English language title, My Best Part, mundanely insists upon the role he plays on stage (and off) as the central character Moritz Stiefel in Frank Wedekind’s Spring Awakening, transferring the film away from the parental roots of his psychological sufferings to focus instead on the role he learns to play in life that allows him a new strategy of survival—not necessarily a mistaken interpretation, but still a fairly clumsy one, as if he will now look back upon the incidents the film reveals as something like the character Benjy Stone does in Richard Benjamin’s My Favorite Year, with nostalgic regret.


       Yet we have the pangs of the extreme jealousy that Maury’s remarkable character feels, based on his deep feelings of unworthiness and a recognition of the fragile oddities of his behavior in a world in which everyone else seems to be adapting far better than he, that will not simply disappear with the closing of the camera’s shutter after his gentle last musical number about the possibilities  of love. For both Maury and his character Jérémie Meyer are memorable outsiders, figures who once you’ve witnessed you can’t quite erase from your memory. Maury has a strange gracefulness in the manner of Dan Levy’s character David Rose in the Canadian TV series Schitt’s Creek, a highly effeminate masculinity that superficially looks to be so over the top that you might miss the bedrock reality upon which the figure has structured his life.

      Jérémie has the horrible blessing of having a seemingly loving relationship with a hunk of male virility, Albert (Arnaud Valois), who works as a veterinarian. Their relationship, even to the viewer of this film, appears so immediately out of balance, that even we have to wonder how the two have ever come together—perhaps one imagines, in part, because of the wonderful blow jobs Jérémie later admits he loves to enact.

       Unfortunately, Jérémie himself cannot believe his good luck, appearing to do everything he can to undercut the relationship through his constant suspicions that every moment that Albert is apart from him are being spent with someone else who will replace his own love. Obviously such a tenuous sense of commitment can only destroy what true bonds with which relationship might have bound the two; and, unfortunately, in this case, Jérémie is not totally mistaken in his suspicions as he learns late in the film that indeed Albert was developing a more than collegial connection to his doctorial assistant Gianfranco (Andrea Romano).

       Spinning out of control through his byzantine suspicions of his lover, however, we observe Jérémie attempting to regain control of his mania by attending a “Jealousy Anonymous support group” that functions somewhat like Alcoholics Anonymous—except that in the members’ long descriptions of their behavior they create an environment of crazy doubt that might make even the most trusting of individuals run out and buy a spy cam, which is precisely what Jérémie does, finally cutting the last chord with Albert.

       At the very same moment, moreover, a film role for which Jérémie had been assured only he could play, is cruelly pulled away from him by his seemingly “best friend,” the director who suggests that his decision to put someone else in the role surely hurts him more than Jérémie, which the actor immediately disproves by jabbing a piece of glass into his hand.

       The satire against the film and theater world continues—perhaps a little bit too long—through a scene in which the writer of the film, Sylvie (Laure Calamy) determines to become the actor of her work as well, insisting on hiring Jérémie as her personal acting coach. This time, Jérémie’s stunned crash to the floor is absolutely unintentional but even more devastating to his body.


       Is it any wonder that this apparently fragile being flees to the countryside where he grew up, Limosin, where his mother, recovering from the suicide her own philandering husband and Jérémie’s father, runs a country-based bed-breakfast-and-dinner inn out of her house. Our hero’s mother Bernadette (the marvelous Nathalie Baye) is such a force of energy fed by her need for love from her “rag boy” son—who as a child, evidently was found sleeping at odd places around the house and grounds like he were some rag left behind—and anyone else that happens to cross her path, such as her wonderful new-found handyman Kévin (Théo Christine), that you almost immediately sense why husband and son might have suicidal thoughts.

       Like Jérémie’s Albert, her absolute devotion seems to be too wonderful to be believed—and is! She devours her son in hugs and kisses while evaluating his numerous behavioral tics with the well-meaning tongue slashings of a verbal whip. Her son’s youthful trances into a world anywhere other than the fraught tensions between his mother and father, the bullying of his own youthful girlishness by the taunting boys of the neighborhood, and his inabilities as the son of a mother who can do nearly anything she puts or mind to or find someone nearby to help her accomplish her desires, represents, as she describes it, his “autistic-like behavior.” Jérémie is forced to keep reminding her that momentarily tuning out the pain in childhood fantasies does not necessarily represent autism. And he is forced to keep reminding himself that he is still loved despite his failures to undertake any of the tasks that the young strangers like Kévin, who come in and out of his mother’s life with serial frequency, gracefully accomplish. 

       One cannot imagine another home in which the grown son might feel perfectly comfortable to walk around the house in his jockey underpants or, at times, even naked, particularly given that the fact that it is also filled with other married couples, who are treated by the saintly Bernadette more like family than paying guests.


      Such a looney-like environment, along with stone-cold memorial service in the middle of the woods for his dead father fitfully attended by Jérémie’s mother, the dead man’s second wife, and  a mad mother who keeps mistaking her grandson for own physically effusive son, along with Jérémie’s discovery of Kévin’s late-night practice of swimming nude in the pool followed by chugging down a six-pack of beer makes for a black-comic atmosphere that French cinema has always been more than able to pull off.

     Final episodes in which Jérémie retreats to his father’s woodside hut, attempts suicide, and is rescued by a group of nearby nuns who mysteriously offer him advice and potions to help cure his jealousy, along with a late-night drunken confession by Bernadette of how she discovered the existence of his father’s numerous sexual peccadilloes and affairs through letters hidden away in the books of her personal library all seem too bizarre and border-line surreal to be believed. But then, we have to remind ourselves, My Best Part is a comic psychological study in mania, not a realist story of a quirky family and their friends. And despite all the oddities that this film heaps upon us in its voyage into the wilds before returning us to the presumed “order,” his mother awards Jérémie the thing he perhaps has always needed, someone for him to look after and love, a beautiful pet dog.


       In any case, these events send Jérémie back to Paris where—after experiencing the near-death of his beloved pet which forces him momentarily back into the world of Albert the veterinarian/lover with whom he finally gets the opportunity to properly say goodbye—he performs the role of Wedekind’s teenage suicide brilliantly, and is surprised by the sudden appearance of Kévin who has shown up just for Jérémie’s performance and—despite his previous insistence of not being interested in guys—is ready just maybe for the blowjobs that the actor claims he loves to perform.

      At least that is what Jérémie must believe as he breaks into song about the love and commitment he will show the beautiful handyman stud who has appeared, out of the night, on his doorstep. And maybe, if we can simply put away our own doubts, Jérémie (and the wonderful man behind his creation, Maury) does, after all, deserve such happiness.

      Perhaps we should perceive Garçon chiffon less as a whole cloth of narrative experience than as a series of rag-like episodes that if carefully picked up and skillfully stitched together create a spread under which one can catch an hour and 48 minutes of comfy pleasure.

 

Los Angeles, October 24, 2021

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (October 2021).

My Queer Cinema Index [with former World Cinema Review titles]

https://myqueercinema.blogspot.com/2023/12/former-index-to-world-cinema-review.html Films discussed (listed alphabetically by director) [For...