Tuesday, February 27, 2024

Marin Håskjold | I kveld er det lov å være mann (Lady of the Night) / 2017

lady in red

by Douglas Messerli

 

Marin Håskjold (screenwriter and director) I kveld er det lov å være mann (Lady of the Night) / 2017 [13.45 minutes]

 

In this quite profound Norwegian short, directed by Marin Håskjold, something strange happens to the men, close friends, who evidently regularly celebrate a men’s night, this one evidently for Christmas.

     Quite daringly and certainly with a bravery most of us have never imagined, Martin (Jonas Strand Gravli) determines to join his colleagues as a woman, dressed in a red short knit dress, a wig in place, soon replaced by how own short cut blond hair, a "do" which any smart young woman might feel comfortable wearing.


     We don’t quite know what Martin is telling the others. Is it simply an audacious joke? He is admitting that he is actually coming out as a transgender woman? Might he be suggesting that he is actually gay? The mystery is part of the evening, and indeed his appearance as a woman makes this “men’s night out” a memorable occasion.

     The men become entirely different beings, the discussion turning to topics they might never before have engaged it. Would you rather be on an island of lesbians or gay men, being one of the questions that surely never before entered their minds. The man who throws out the question, argues that he’d rather be on an island of gay men. Afterall a butthole is just butthole and women are so difficult, his answer representing both his incomprehension of what a gay man is and at the same time a misogynistic put-down of women.

     Others laugh and are charmed by Martin’s appearance, who quite credible come across as a woman, despite his rejection of their flirtations, some of which are obviously simply a tease, but others of which become far more serious. One friend, in particular, Sigurd (Sverre Kvamme) can literally not keep is his hands off of his former male friend, now the lady in red. Throughout the party, as everyone become drunker, he stands behind Martin massaging his neck, nestling his mouth on his friend’s shoulder, and demanding a lapdance.


     Martin grows more and more angry as his colleague gets increasingly intimate with him. And, given that face, we wonder what were his reasons, accordingly, for appearing as a woman at this event. Is it a test case? A mockery of their typically heteronormative behavior? Or might it be truly an expression of a desire about which both men, Martin and Sigurd, have long kept their silence.

     In the meanwhile, Martin grows violent, challenges his friends to a hand-wrestling match (which he loses), and generally does everything in his power to demonstrate that he is most definitely not a lady.


     But eventually, Martin does provide Sigurd with a lapdance, attempting to actually kiss him, which Sigurd is finally unable to accep—that is until, after Martin dances quite happily with the female bartender, he does somewhat accept a short kiss, although pushing Martin away when he tells him he is “fond of him.” There are limits to this game.

 

     This complex work shows us just how thin the veneer is between the genders. Put on a dress and a pair of heels and suddenly everything in the stereotypical male society breaks down. Former friends become immediately confused, question their own sexuality, and query their own sexual preferences. Director Marin Håskjold, despite giving us no previous history of his characters, quite convincingly portrays their reactions to the sudden deep shift in their sexual consciousness, in part by presenting it in fragments, each small section ending with brief blackout, almost as these men themselves must be confronting their increasingly drunken confrontation with a friend they obviously didn’t know as well as they previously thought they had. Perhaps, on this particular, they also realized that they didn’t know themselves as well as they had imagined. Certainly Martin’s relationship with his friends will never again be the same. And Sigurd’s relationship with Martin has radically changes—perhaps even his relationship with all the others.

 

Los Angeles, February 27, 2024

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (February 2024).

Leandro Wenceslau | Enquanto Ainda é Tempo (While There Is Still Time) / 2014

say goodbye

by Douglas Messerli

 

Leandro Wenceslau (screenwriter and director) Enquanto Ainda é Tempo (While There Is Still Time) / 2014 [14 minutes]

 

In Brazilian director Leandro Wenceslau’s short film While There Is Still Time, long time friends discover that they are also in love with one another when Caio (Thiago Aguiar) announces to his friend Lucas (Filipe Morais) that his father has received a scholarship in Germany, and that he and his family will soon be moving there.


      Lucas first senses it as a kind of betrayal. Why hasn’t his friend told him immediately, he wants to know. He backs away for a short while from their intense relationship, the kind of friendship where, at any moment, you expect the two to come together in a kiss.

      But gradually the two high school boys do return to some sense of normalcy. And just as we might have imagined, at a point when Lucas asks Caio to help him put on a necklace, the two boys suddenly find themselves in the middle of a deep kissing session, realizing, perhaps too late, that they have truly loved one another all along.

      Unfortunately, the film has not established any of their previous relationship, and at no point do we see either of these boys engage with their families, who seem well-attuned to their son’s friendship and not particularly homophobic—although Caio does comment that his father is committed to the entire family staying together, even though they have long ago gone their separate ways.

      Accordingly, we are simply told that these two boys are in love without providing us with any previous evidence, even if we can see it in the eyes and gestures from the first moment that they communicate with one another in the film.

      Before either the boys and their audience realizes it, Lucas is rushing to the airport to say goodbye, perhaps forever, to the boy he now realizes he loves. He presents him with a new necklace, a cross, as a sign of his love.


       So the film might have ended had not Wenceslau created a strange melodramatic ending right out of a telenovela, a form so popular in South America. As Lucas begins to leave the airport longue, he appears to be hit by a car, people gathering around him to photograph the event. Almost at the same moment, Caio suddenly appears, presumably having miraculously convinced his family that he must stay on in Brazil. Lucas comes round, and the two embrace, suggesting a very happy ending. Or is it, we must wonder, simply the last image that Lucas imagines before dying? There’s no way of knowing, and we feel cheated, either way, by the implausible ending.

 

Los Angeles, February 27, 2024

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (February 2024).

Rainer Werner Fassbinder | Die Sehnsucht der Veronika Voss (Veronika Voss) / 1982

finishing what you start

by Douglas Messerli

 

Rainer Werner Fassbinder, Pea Frölich, and Peter Märthesheimer (screenplay), Rainer Werner Fassbinder (director) Die Sehnsucht der Veronika Voss (Veronika Voss) / 1982

 

The penultimate film of Rainer Werner Fassbinder, Veronika Voss, is also, in my estimation, one of his very best. Shot in lush black and white reminiscent of 1940 Hollywood productions, nearly every frame is stunningly beautiful in this heady mix of suspense thriller, romance, tough film noir, and gangster movie that engages its viewers at all levels. Part II of the loosely connected BRD Trilogy (coming between The Marriage of Maria Braun and Lola) this film is also highly political, revealing a postwar, 1955, Munich as a city of figures caught in the past, attempting to blot out not only the present but all consciousness. The former World War II movie star, Veronika (Rosel Zeach)—unable after the war to regain her movie star status, and gradually losing her beauty and, through the morphine to which she is addicted, her mind—represents, clearly, Germany’s Nazi past, Veronika having been a protégé of Goebbels. But that is only one side of the coin in a film that is filled with doubles and mirror images. On the other side of war-time sufferers is an old Jewish man who has survived the death camp Treblinka who uses the same doctor as Veronika, Marianne Katz (Annemarie Duringer), to obtain morphine to obliterate his memories.

      Into this city of the dead steps Robert Krohn (Hilmar Thate), a vital newspaper sportswriter, who accidentally encounters Veronika after she has escaped from a showing of one of her long-ago films (the double image occurs in this first scene, as the film’s director, Fassbinder, is seen sitting beside the suffering actress being shown a scene similar to that which will be played out later in the film). Unable to bear the image of her younger self, she bolts, discovered in tears by Robert in a nearby forest. A man of the “real” world, Robert does not even recognize the aging beauty, but gallantly offers to accompany her home, offering her his umbrella and arm for protection. A bit like Blanche DuBois in A Streetcar Named Desire, Veronika perceives him as a kind of “gentleman stranger” offering her “a safe haven in a storm.”

 

     Later, like Blanche in that earlier film, Veronika will time and again ask for the lights to be dimmed so that the wrinkles and aging spots of her face might go unnoticed, allowing her, as she admits, to seduce defenseless men like Robert. Similarly, like Blanche, Veronika is a figure out of the past, offering up her former mansion as well as her jewelry to her doctor in payment for her “treatments.”  Robert, we soon discover, is truly defenseless, agreeing to meet with Veronika in a posh restaurant the very next day, where she exhorts from him 500 marks so that she might buy a broach she has spotted in the hotel lobby.

      When they finish lunch, she returns to the store to ask the clerk if she might return the jewelry for money; fortunately, for her, the shop-owner (Lilo Pempeit, Fassbinder’s mother, who appears in most of his films) recognizes the actress—and who, like Veronika, calls up, with some fondness, the German war years—is only too ready to comply. Accordingly, Veronika has tricked the innocent reporter out of cash she very much needs for her addiction. In retribution, however, Dr. Katz later returns the money to Robert.

     Utterly out of his element in this world of dreamers, Robert discovers himself being strangely drawn to the mysterious woman, and is swept up into her horrific world. Obviously, this world also parallels, as most critics have noted, the one into which American actor William Holden, equally by accident, steps into in Billy Wilder’s Sunset Boulevard, where the equally delusional Norma Desmond madly rules; like Norma, Veronica spends much of Fassbinder’s movie trying to get back into filmmaking, finally convincing a director to cast her in a couple of scenes of a new movie, which end, like Norma, in her mental collapse.

      These allusions to other films, in fact, serve as further mirroring images, doublings that Fassbinder uses at every level. I am sure Tony Rayns is correct when he suggests that Fassbinder used a common “woman’s problem” genre, popular in the German cinema of the 1930s. But the director also calls up—in the blindingly bright all-white sanatorium, a kind of lit-up hell run by Dr. Katz, wherein Veronika often finds herself entrapped—the Lewis Allen mystery/romance film of 1944 The Uninvited, wherein the characters all must also face past ghosts (in this case quite literally) which threaten to tear apart their current lives and kill one of them. In that film, as well, a psychiatrist, a lesbian lover of the young heroine’s mother, imprisons the young girl with the intent to kill her. Fassbinder makes clear in Veronika Voss that his heroine’s involvement with her doctor is not merely her drug addiction, but derives from her need to be loved; and that relationship is revealed—particularly given scenes with the doctor’s assistant, Josefa—as a lesbian one. Despite Robert’s later attempts to free her from the clinic in order to help Veronika come to terms with the “real” world, the actress lies, revealing her masochistic attachment to the self-destructive situation

 


     After observing Veronika’s breakdown and incidentally encountering her former husband, screenwriter Max Rehbein (Armin Mueller-Stahl), Robert and he share a few beers, resulting in what appears as far more than a male-bonding relationship, Rehbein, in particular, almost caressing and holding the drunken Robert, begging him not leave.    

      There are similar connections with numerous other films, even including George Stevens’ 1942 Hepburn-Tracy “comedy,” Woman of the Year, wherein an equally clueless sportswriter attempts to woo a brilliantly strong-willed beauty and bring her into his reality, but ultimately fails.

       Many critics, moreover, have observed the strange use of music by Peer Raben throughout, mostly American songs which might have been heard on German radio during those postwar days. These have generally been described as creating a kind of irritating and disorienting feeling (much like the visual use of Fassbinder’s lover Günther Kaufmann, an African-American GI, who speaks only in English, who appears as a kind of minion to Dr. Katz’s evil empire—but, in fact, is busy wrapping up extra drugs from the clinic for sale in the illegal market outside). Certainly, the zither-like tunes, the intrusion of country-western ballads, the heavy beating of a kettle drum—are irritating. But they are also thematically important, creating yet more “mirror-like” allusions, which enrich this already thickened film. The zither music, as Roger Ebert, perceived, reminds one surely of The Third Man, another movie about postwar Europe that involves evil intentions regarding drugs, and centers upon the arrival in Austria of a kind of cowboy like character—a writer of westerns, Holly Martin—who is equally unable to make sense of the world around him.

       At one moment I thought I heard remnants of the song that accompanied the trail by Robert Mitchum in the 1955 film The Night of the Hunter, as he attempts to track down the innocent children whom he intends to murder. Later, I listened through the score again, but couldn’t precisely find that passage. But I most certainly did hear bits from the Tennessee Ernie Ford classic country-western song, “Sixteen Tons,” an appropriate choice for a story about a woman indentured by her doctor:

 

                                 You load sixteen tones, what do you get

                                 Another day older and deeper in debt

                                 Saint Peter don’t you call me ‘cause I can’t go

                                 I owe my soul to the company store

 

     In short, just as Fassbinder uses the references to 1940s films, so too does he use music, reiterating and mirroring the conceits of the picture.* These tunes are not simply “irritating” background noise.            

    Finally, like the ridiculously innocent Holly Martins of The Third Man, Robert is a kind of American cowboy, not only defenseless, as Veronika puts it, but, as he describes himself, a man who is determined to “finish what he starts.” What he discovers in his amateur sleuthing, however, is something that puts him completely out of these villains’ league: government and the evil Dr. Katz are in collusion, the two of them torturing not only people on both sides of the horror of the German war, but killing Robert’s girlfriend when she attempts to frame the doctor. Unknowingly, the police support their acts. And even Robert, at film’s end, finally refuses any further involvement. He has been defeated, and, perhaps for the first time in his life, cannot complete what he has begun.

     When the elderly Jewish couple commit suicide earlier, leaving their house and antiques to Dr. Katz, it is inevitable, we perceive, that Veronika must follow them in “closing the book.” Allowing her one last foray into an imaginary past—this one calling up Josef von Sternberg’s The Blue Angel, Dr. Katz locks her away in a small room, without morphine, but with a large stash of sedatives. Veronika, awakening on Good Friday is desperate to relieve her pain. Staring into a mirror, she carefully makes up her lips before swallowing a bottle of the pills.

      No longer an innocent—Robert now knows the complete involvement of the head of public health and the drug-dealing doctor—our would-be hero rejects any attempt to “finish” his reporting duties, declaring, quite cynically, that “journalistically speaking” it is not much of a story. 

      In Veronika’s death scene, in retrospect, the film suddenly jumps out of its several mirror-like frames into real life. For a few months later, Fassbinder would replay the scene, overdosing—either accidently or intentionally—on drugs, and, in that act, finally carrying his cross into Robert’s “real world.” **

 

*Fassbinder carries this doubling to extremes in the scene with Robert and his drunken girlfriend as they comment on the two “Walters,” she, evidently, uncomprehending the two famous soccer-playing brothers, Fritz and Ottmar, were being both referred to by their last names.

 

**Fassbinder’s last film, Quarelle, unedited at the time of his death, most definitely can be described as not of “a real world,” representing as it does a kind of highly decoratively colorized hallucination of a gay paradise of sado-masochistic masculine beauty. Certainly, it seems to me, it is something not of this world, which, the characters in Veronika Voss, as much as they which to escape it, are forced to face.

 

 

Los Angeles, August 15, 2013

Reprinted from Nth Position (September 2013).

 


Rainer Werner Fassbinder | Lola / 1981

rules of the game

by Douglas Messerli

 

Peter Marthesheimer, Pea Frohlich, and Rainer Werner Fassbinder (screenplay), Rainer Werner Fassbinder (director) Lola / 1981

 

Although nearly all of Rainer Werner Fassbinder’s films are filled with comic moments and even comical subplots, one might suggest that one of his last masterworks, Lola, is the closest to being a true comedy. Certainly the work, at moments, veers to sarcasm and disgust for the petty scheming, fraud, backroom fixes, and other dirty works of the small German town’s haute bourgeoisie: the mayor, head of police, and other city leaders as well as the greedy contractor, Schuckert (Mario Adorf), who also owns the local whorehouse into which these “good” men escape most evenings. But, more often, Fassbinder’s movie chortles along with the naughty goings on—after all, it is just these activities that result in the building boom described as Germany’s economic miracle; and, as the local reporter later argues, even if the rich have stolen from the poor, it ultimately filters down to make the poor richer.


     The whorehouse, where a great deal of the film’s events take place, has the feel almost of prewar Berlin, with sex (heterosexual and homosexual, as well as mixed groupings) taking place in the main room as well in bedrooms throughout the house. Perhaps taking a cue from theatrical productions such as Cabaret, Fassbinder’s director of photography, Xaver Schwarzenberger, has cast much of the film in garish candy-like colors: reds, yellows, lavenders, greens, and blues.

     Although the club features a great many talents (particularly for such a small town), including a full orchestra with a drum-playing assistant to the Housing Inspector, its special feature is Lola (the amazing Barbara Sukowa): a mix of Dietrich in The Blue Angel, to which Fassbinder’s work tips it hat; Rita Hayworth in Gilda, whom Sukowa marvelously imitates after being outed by her secret lover as a whore; and Bette Midler. In short, Sukowa has it all: the transsexual allure of Dietrich, the breathy hedonism of Hayworth, and the gutsy, quick-thinking wit of Midler. She’s the kind of girl with whom anyone might wish to crawl into bed.

 

     It’s no wonder she’s outraged by the possessive jealousy of both her lovers, Schuckert—whom, as Vincent Canby quipped in his original review, “she calls a pig and frequently means it”—and the drum-playing government employee Esslin (Matthias Fuchs). Upon hearing about the new man in town, Housing Inspector Von Bohm (Armin Mueller-Stahl)—a principled fool alike Gogol’s Government Inspector, who descends upon the small community as a man torn between high ideals and his humanist good intentions—Lola becomes intrigued. His job, after all, is to help bring the new German economic miracle to such outlying communities filled with just such crafty foxes, and she senses, surely, that this is the time get in on the rewards.

     Mueller-Stahl is an excellent actor, but the way Fassbinder sets up Von Bohm’s entry, the actor might have acted the part while being asleep. Lola first hears of this man of noble heritage and handsome demeanor from her own mother, who has just been hired to be his housekeeper; Schuckert has heard some of the same things, repeating them to Lola, and arguing that the new Housing Inspector is the kind of man who kisses the hands of the women he meets, while assuring her that she would never merit such a gallant response; Esslin simply tells Lola that  Von Bohm is not the man for her. Is it any wonder that the quick-thinking and somewhat soulless (qualities expressed by Lola herself in the first few moments of the film) temptress changes course? She bets Schuckert several cases of champagne that Von Bohm will, in fact, kiss her hand as gently as that of any others, and quickly proves it by arriving at a war memorial ceremony officiated by Von Bohm in a bright red car, which she exits, and in an elegant dress and white gloves walks up to him to present herself—holding out her hand, of course, so that he has no choice but to do what comes naturally.


     The audience also cannot help but to root for this brazen enchantress, and is soon rewarded by the hussy’s attempt to lure the slightly prissy town official by pretending to study up in the town library on Ming vases, one of which Von Bohm features in his house.

      Within the space of a few frames, the city officials get their first face-to-face meeting with the new man, while Lola meets him for a country stroll, far away from the spying eyes of others. So taken is Von Bohm with the beauty that he orders up a ridiculous English hiking suit which even Lola dares to describe as unnatural given his usual conservative attire.

      Lola successfully seduces Von Bohm, in part, by singing a gentle round with him in a country chapel, dressed in a handsome white dress with small black dots—a gown that in the year before these events are said to have happened, 1955, might have been worn by the fashion savvy Lisa of Hitchcock’s Rear Window.

     Just as Von Bohm falls for Lola, going so far to even buy her an engagement ring, the activist Esslin, disappointed with Von Bohm’s mild reaction to the city leaders and Schuckert’s evil actions, decides to show his boss the darker “side” of the community, taking him into the whorehouse at the very moment that Lola is about to sing. It is his discovery and outrage that sends her over the edge, performing the Rita Hayworth standard as something closer to a striptease.


     In revenge, Von Bohm searches all city records in which Schuckert and the mayor have been involved, uncovering, as we might expect, a long history of kickbacks, illegal transfers, and other evil doings. When he announces that he intends to postpone all new building, city leaders secretly meet to determine their tactics. Helped by the idealist Esslin, Von Bohm builds a case against them which he attempts to leak—without success—to a local reporter. Even Esslin realizes that, in the morass of such corruption, Von Bohm cannot win, playing as he is without any rules.

     As ever, Schuckert, who, more than anyone knows “the rules of the game,” immediately senses how to solve the dilemma, offering up the services of Lola to Von Bohm, and, accordingly, abandoning his claims to her.

     As usual, he gets his way: Von Bohm marries Lola, who suddenly links the well-meaning official with the town’s ruling class (Lola has borne a child with Schuckert), while offering Lola the opportunity to join their ranks. The film ends with Lola being welcomed into the arms of Schuckert’s and the mayor’s nasty wives, after which she rushes off for one last fling with the town’s biggest economic wunderkind, a man who knows how to control both his compatriot’s pocketbooks and hearts.

 

Los Angeles, September 15, 2015

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (September 2015).

My Queer Cinema Index [with former World Cinema Review titles]

Films discussed (listed alphabetically by director) [Former Index to World Cinema Review with new titles incorporated] (You may request any ...