three fathers
by Douglas Messerli
Joaquim
Leitão (screenwriter and director) Adão e Eva (Adam and Eve) /
1995
Despite the radical changes now touted after
the 1970s events surrounding Stonewall, even as late as the 1990s—with some
notable exceptions—US films were still rather coy and polite in their basic
avoidance of the subject homosexuality. The highly serious but still relatively
discrete AIDS drama Philadelphia was hyped in 1993 for its daring
honesty and deeply felt presentation of gay sexuality despite the existence of
the far superior and truly radical independent films on the subject such as
Arthur J. Bressan, Jr.’s Buddies and Bill Sherwood’s Parting Glances
released as early as 1985 and 1986, both directors themselves dying of AIDS.
Similarly, the other “radical” commercial US film Arthur Hiller’s Making
Love (1982) carefully tiptoed through a happily married man’s
gradual discovery that he was gay and supposedly ruined actor Harry Hamlin’s
career for playing the confused traitor to heterosexuality. And Norman René’s
moving but terribly late-to-the-subject of AIDS movie, Longtime Companion (1989),
viewed homosexuality and the disease which was then killing so many young
gay men primarily through the lens of a wealthy TV producer and other fairly
well-off acquaintances instead of facing down the pandemic as it suddenly hit
those living ordinary lives such as Bressan and Sherwood had attempted
basically shirked its reality.
By 1995, the date of the Portuguese / Spanish
movie I am about to discuss, the US had only just begun to hint at what Ruby
Rich described as a “New Queer Cinema” in the US which would begin to take on
the quirky issues that even the staid, homosexually adverse British had long
before brought up in Roger Tonge’s TV drama of two young gay boys who took to
the road of 1987 in Two of Us or as in another general British TV
release, Nigel Finch’s The Lost Language of Cranes (1991) a world in
which both father and son reveal their homosexuality at the same moment. No one
in US commercial US filmmaking offered up such a radical vision of gay life
such as British director Stephen Frears had in his film about a British punk and
“Paki’s” unlikely gay relationship in My Beautiful Launderette
(1985)—although I argue that underneath its shiny gay sheen it is truly a
conservative affair that might have even appealed to Margaret Thatcher—to say
nothing of the far more radical forays into LGBTQ life by the Germans such as
Rainer Werner Fassbinder, Werner Schroeter, Rosa von Praunheim, and others
beginning a full decade earlier, and to totally ignore the Australian
celebration of transgender and transsexual life in Stephen Elliot’s The
Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert and the varied political and
social issues brought up by popular Canadian gay directors’ works of the 1980s
and 90s such as John Greyson and Wrik Mead.* The Spanish filmmaker Pedro
Almodóvar had already transformed Spanish film in the mid-1980s and the early
1990s with some of his most popular of his films.
And
suddenly even the seemingly docile and quiet Portugal wanted in on the new gay
cinema with the production of Joaquim Leitão’s Almodóvar-influenced
Adão e Eva. I began this essay with the incomplete history of gay
film from the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s, in part, because despite the relative
success in the US of Priscilla, presented as a minor commercial film
here, one simply could not imagine that a film like Adam and Eve,
produced, in part, by a private TV channel (the Portuguese SIC), might have a
success in the US as it did in its home country where it become one of the
biggest box-office hits in the history of Portuguese cinema.
The
doe-eyed seeming innocent, but hard-hitting TV journalist Catarina Meneses
(Maria de Medeiros) hardly seems like the kind of woman who might cause a major
scandal, but like one of Almodóvar’s hard-headed feminists, she suddenly
decides that despite the fact she is involved in a fairly happy lesbian
relationship with Te (Ana Bustorff), she wants a baby, a subject to which Te
evidently hasn’t been very open.
In
Spain, she calls up a noted Spanish humanitarian doctor Rafael Tristan (Karra
Elejalde), offering up an important document that she has obtained from her
journalistic channels that could help him in his political cause. She delivers
it to him on a bus bench as if it were a top-secret document of national
interest, looking about her as she lays it beside him as if spies might
immediately be about to pounce.
Rafael cannot at all imagine her secretive behavior and jokingly calls
her Mata Hari, but doesn’t realize just how close he has come to the truth. For
by pretending to be hurt by what she does for him, she lures him into a dinner
date which winds up in his bed as the two have wonderful sex. She disappears by
the time he awakens the next morning and searching the hotel and the name she
has given finds not only that there has been no one registered under that name
but that there has been no Iberian Conference she claimed to have been
attending.
Shocked and outraged at her sudden secret, Te grows violent, leaving
only after issuing an ultimatum that she will get her revenge for her lover’s
underhanded behavior.
Meanwhile through his medical connections, Rafael tracks down Catarina’s
address and discovers her pregnancy, matching the child’s blood-type with his
own and realizing that he has been tricked into fathering her baby.
As if that weren’t enough, Catharina has a vengeful enemy in another
studio worker, Helena Amado (Cristina Carvalhal), who is equally determined to
find a way to defeat the woman who has increasingly been receiving all the
major television awards for her reporting, while she has been ignored.
At that very moment, reporters from a magazine show up to interview her.
She quickly sends them away and calls up a friendly fellow worker, Francisco
(Joaquim de Almeida), who just happens to be Te’s former husband, pleading for
his assistance.
Three people now claim to be the father of her unborn baby, one
biologically, the other through a growing love, and the third through love
lost. And the rest of the film is a battleground seemingly littered by their
own and other’s bodies, at the very moment her envious fellow journalist
Helena, has figured out all of Catarina’s betrayals and threatens to expose her
in a TV game show which she hosts.
Miraculously, as Catharina attempts to both maintain their support and
push away those who most love her, in her attempt to focus of the real subject
at hand, her unborn daughter, they come together to save the day.
Having been brushed off, Francisco quietly stays near her just for her
protection.
Rafael has written her a letter explaining that he is now determined to return to Spain and leave her in peace, but hopes that he might remain in touch just for his own child’s sake.
As
Catarina wanders home eating an ice cream cone that she has long craved, she
suddenly spots Francisco nearby and smiles as if possibly allowing him back
into her life. But at the same she spots Te, obviously having come to meet
Francisco to share what has happened to Helena. Taken aback by their being
together again, Catharina steps back into the traffic. At that very moment
Rafael, having left his package in Catarina’s mailbox, exits her apartment
building, and being closest to Catarina, he leaps to save her from being hit by
a taxi, himself falling to the ground with her.
Francisco reaches the spot a few seconds later and calls for an
ambulance—once more. But this time Rafael is not hurt and thankfully not dead,
but opens his eyes and returns to the crazy world his almost sacrificed for her
sake.
Order has been restored to Catarina’s terribly messy life through the
love she had engendered from everyone who has met and known her—except, of
course, for Helena, who undergoes her punishment through having to appear as
the substitute guest on her own TV show, and who, when she refuses to answer a
leading question about her feelings about her producer, is doused with a bucket
of cold water.
If Adam and Eve is not a great film, it is certainly a lot of
fun, and takes its audiences to a much better place for understanding of the
complexity of heterosexual, bisexual, and homosexual relationships than almost
any US film of the early 1990s had succeeded in doing. US studios were being
gradually dismantled or reestablished simply for the purposes of pop youth
entertainment, leaving independents and small filmmakers with the possibilities
of offering audiences more complex film experiences. Whether or not they succeeded
is still open to question, but by the end of the decade LGBTQ concerns were no
longer considered something that the movies could ignore.
*And I’m ignoring the many innovative French,
Italian, and Scandinavian innovative gay films of the same period.
Los Angeles, December 26, 2022
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (December
2022).