Thursday, September 5, 2024

Wilhelm Prager | Wege zu Kraft und Schönheit—Ein Film über moderne Körperkultur (Ways to Strength and Beauty) / 1925

body beautiful

by Douglas Messerli

 

Wilhelm Prager, Nicholas Kaufmann, and Ernst Krieger (screenplay), Wilhelm Prager (director) Wege zu Kraft und Schönheit—Ein Film über moderne Körperkultur (Ways to Strength and Beauty) / 1925

 

Based on writing by physician Nicholas Kaufmann and incorporating the current physical culture writings popular in the day, this German film presents numerous examples of methods to develop the body in relationship the natural world through exercise, dance, sports, bathing, and other individual and group activities. Looking often to the Greco-Roman past, Prager’s film often moves close to the territory of Adolf Brand and his Wandervogel Movement, a German youth movement encouraging both young boys and girls to join in groups tutored by strong individual adults engaged in scouting-like hiking, camping, and other activities.

      Near the end of this film, in fact, we witness several scenes of young boys involved in just such groups which the narrator once more equates with the ancient Roman scenes portrayed early on this film of young, nearly-naked males engaged in athletic activities. In Brand’s case, in particular, these groups often bordered on or actually spilled over into male and female pederasty, headed as they were by strong male and female leaders. Brand would later openly argue for man-boy relationships based on those of Greek and Roman history such as those of Achilles and Hannibal.


 


   Prager doesn’t go that far, and in fact this film has no outwardly LGBTQ connection except that it clearly has bought into the Weimar attitudes towards nudity and the growing sexualization of youth. In one early sequence, for example, a man exercises the bodies of nude newborns as if they were mere plastic dolls.

 


     The film begins almost as a domestic drama as an overweight Berlin father attempts to dress himself, hardly able to fit into this own suit, to visit a lecture on physical culture. At the meeting he is joined by several other overweight, bodily challenged, and underdeveloped Berlin citizens, representative of a city that has forgotten its ties with nature. The film shows men working in factories, women dressing in tight corsets, and various other images of individuals who obviously need to take participate in the activities that this film promotes.

        The film is divided into six parts titled “The Ancient Greeks and the New Era,” “physical training for the sake of health: hygienic gymnastics,” “rhythmic gymnastics,” “the dance,” “sport,” and “fresh air, sun, and water.”

 


       Throughout the film presents clips of famous athletes, artists, dancers, and native performers and other notables including Dussia Bereska (of the Rudolf von Laban Dance School, Hamburg), Rudolf Bode, Kitty Cauer, Jack Dempsey, David Lloyd George, Jenny Hasselquist, Gerhart Hauptmann, Niddy Impekoven, Baku Ishii (石井漠, Bac Ishii), Konami Ishii, Tamara Karsavina, Rudolf von Laban and his dance group, Eva Liebenberg, Hans Luber, Bess Mensendieck, Loren Murchison, Benito Mussolini, Leni Riefenstahl, Babe Ruth, Carolina de la Riva, Hertha von Walther, Johnny Weissmuller, Mary Wigman and her dance group to name but a few.

       The sports and dance sections, in particular, are often fascinating just for their footage of famous dancers and sports players, female and male. But, overall, in its idolatry of the human body this work must be seen as an ideological forerunner of the National Socialist body cult, particularly in its later pitches for mass group sports activities, marches, and gatherings that point to Riefenstahl’s later representation of the Berlin Olympics and, of course, her documentaries of Nazi gatherings.

       Particularly in the early segments of Roman sports activities and in its later recreation of a Roman bath profusely representing female nudity, but also in several of the dance performances Ways to Strength and Beauty so fetishizes the body that it becomes highly homoerotic for both gay men and lesbians. And if nothing else, the attitude this cinematic work has toward the body’s expression of sexuality is far ahead of its time.

 

Los Angeles, May 27, 2022

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (May 2022). 

John G. Blystone | Dick Turpin / 1925

showing up for the showdown

by Douglas Messerli

 

Charles Darnton and Donald W. Lee (scenario and screenplay, based on a story by Charles Kenyon), John G. Blystone (director) Dick Turpin / 1925

 

In John G. Blystone’s well-wrought and even charming adventure story from 1925, legendary British highway robber Dick Turpin is played by the American Western hero Tom Mix as a Robin Hood-like figure who gallantly protects traveling notables and lovely maidens such as Lady Alice Brookfield (Kathleen Myers) while stealing from the wealthy effete such as Lord Churlton (Philo McCullough), rewarding the poor much of what is stolen.

 

     Accompanied by his amazing steed Black Bess, a beautiful horse who is required from time to time to travel on the back routes alone, as Turpin holds up the coaches and rides with his victims in order to rob them and accompany their female companions back to safety, quickly removing the mask when he meets up with Churlton’s beautiful finacée, Brookfield, who admits to him that she loathes the man her uncle has chosen for her marry.

      In between his various robberies and rescues and his attempts to elude the Highway Patrol (led by Sid Jordan), Dick meets up his old friend, Tom King (Alan Hale), another cohort and competing highway robber; it is clear the two have a deep bond that goes back for many years, and once they have reunited that bond appears to represent a permanent relationship, as Tom grabs the opportunity to invite Dick to a boxing match between the champion Bristol Bully (Jack Herrick) and Bully Boy (Bull Montana), the latter of whom Tom is promoting.


       Accordingly, the very moment Alice has conventionally set Dick’s heart aflutter, the subtly coded text has Tom meet up with his Dick suggesting if not an outright homosexual pairing, certainly a queer one given that they both hide their identities while they enact their outsider activities—this film almost comically displaying the awkward necessity of tipping their hats into the air in order to pull on their masks—the two of them representing one face to each another and yet another to their victims and the society at large. Dick Turpin is itself a kind of hidden Western, a genre that almost always involves the love of two men who struggle against their own desires for each other before they face their hetero-normal showdowns.

       Screenwriters Charles Darnton and Donald W. Lee take the coded text just a bit further, however, in having Dick require his new conquest Lady Alice to dress up like a boy before he can “help” her escape the marriage of convenience her uncle requires.

        As is standard in such coded affairs of the heart, if Dick has his Tom so does Alice need her female companion in order to break free of convention, in this case in the form of her maid Sally (Lucille Hutton) who bravely takes her place in Alice’s wedding dress so that her lady can escape as a male hidden in a haycart. Symbolically speaking, by donning that dress Sally has replaced her mistress, symbolically marrying her in the sense of that word’s definition: “to unite in close and usually permanent relation.”

        Like all great adventure stories, the excitement of this tale lies in its the recounting of how Dick and Tom fall into danger only to miraculously escape, playing out a series of rehearsals for how these two outsiders, in the end, might be able to escape the film’s final demands of conventionality, the traditional act of marriage.

        There is another twist in the Dick Turpin tale, just as there is in most of the Robin Hood stories, in that in this world conventionally heterosexual males are represented as being effete, mincing men dressed in pleats, ruffles, and furbelow enough to match any silent movie pansy. And it is precisely that attire, a telltale lacy handkerchief of the bandit’s caught at the last moment in Churlton’s carriage that gives away Dick’s underground identity to the so-called normative society.

         The real man in him, just as the real man in Tom is a surly commoner, dressed in simple, straight-forward breeches, shirt, and hat, not in the pleated shirts in which Turpin is made to wear in the society into which he was born, costumes ironically in which he appears when he is finally imprisoned in Newgate.

         Before that, however, Dick blusters his way through the film, boxing the ears of the British champion Bristol Bully (the rules of fair fighting get dreadfully close to gay camp long before it even existed: “No seizing by ham, breeches, or anything below the waist.”), sliding down bannisters, and leaping onto the back of his magnificent Bessie, at one point even hiding out behind and under the skirts of Alice and Sally as he dares conventional forces to curb his boyish behavior. As in all such fables, women love such queer churlishness while the straight-laced—in this case quite literally—men despise it. And they are quite emphatically out to stop him from remaining the queer the riff-raff and commoners truly love.


        When ultimately Dick is trapped, about to be hung for his crimes of his perversion of what men are “supposed” to be, he is saved by his beloved Tom who, pretending to be the hangman releases the noose around Dick’s head yet one more time, allowing his friend to defy hetero-normative demands again; Dick is instead “married” through a kind of sexual death to his savior, once more allowed his queer freedom.

        In removing that “conventional” noose, Tom has clearly pulled Dick back into his own orbit, the two returning to their Arcadia of Epping Forest, where, in fact, the real poacher-highwayman-and former butcher Dick Turpin got his infamous start by killing the Royal deer. But even back then, long before the Hays code, Hollywood knew the rules. Dick and Tom are not permitted to stay in their Neverland for long. And in order to force Dick into the necessary romantic conventions, Tom has to be done away with. He is shot and killed, gently imploring his loved one to return to the straight-and-narrow patterns of the plot before he dies.


       On the back of his faithful horse Turpin rushes to save his damsel from her distress. He nearly reaches his destiny but is pulled back by yet one last queer transgression when Bessie is shot and killed by the gatekeeper. His mourning for the horses’ death is strangely greater than even for his mate Tom. Now without those he loved most, his friend and horse, Dick has no choice but save and marry Lady Alice or in the terms of heterosexual misogyny to “put on the noose” and throw away his old life by reciting the marital vows.


       The two escape to France, the country where, as every Brit knows, readily welcomes disgraced faggots; just ask Oscar Wilde.

        Dear reader, I promise you I have no intention of reading through every coded adventure tale, Robin Hood fable, pirate yarn, Zorro episode, and western legend to prove just how these supposedly heterosexual modes of storytelling are woven with the warp and woof of queer myth. Dick Turpin and the few others I attend to in these pages are just too obvious for me to ignore.

 

Los Angeles, May 1, 2021

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog and World Cinema Review (May 2021).

 

Manfred Noa | Helena: Der raub der Helena (Helena: The Rape of Helen) / 1924 || Helena: Der Untergang Trojas (The Fall of Troy) / 1925

passion / betrayal / treachery

by Douglas Messerli

Hans Kyser (screenplay, based on The Iliad), Manfred Noa (director) Helena: Der raub der Helena (Helena: The Rape of Helen) / 1924

———Helena: Der Untergang Trojas (The Fall of Troy) / 1925

 

This 3 hour and 20-minute film released in two parts by its producer Bavaria Film, was long thought to be lost until an almost complete copy was discovered in Lausanne, Switzerland which, along with forgotten copies in film archives in Rome, Madrid, and Moscow, allowed the Film Museum München to issue fully restored DVD copies which included the tints used in the original.

     The sheer magnitude of sets, costumes, and casts might have challenged even D. W. Griffith’s epic films Birth of a Nation and Intolerance, and Noa is far more cinematically experimental than Griffith, with the kind of cinema tricks that would be further explored later in the decade by William A. Wellman, Fritz Lang, Jean Epstein, James Sibley Watson, and Melville Webber. Yet the retelling of the complex narrative of The Iliad is surprisingly linear and straight forward in Noa’s script, with only a few major changes of events from the original, namely that, after the bird of Adonis visits Helen (Edy Darclea), declaring that she has been chosen to be the female representative of the Spartan Spring celebrations, her husband Menelaos (Friedrich Ulmer) is only too happy to show her off before the entire city as the celebrant that award the crown of victory to the winner of chariot race, presumably himself. So vain is Menelaos that he cannot even heed Helen’s own fears that appearing so openly in public may bring problems to a marriage in which to claims complete happiness.


      Her visions of what the future may lead to reveal Paris’ image, a face so beautiful that she almost willingly goes forward with her plans which will lead ultimately to the betrayal of her marriage vow.

      Meanwhile, on the outskirts of the Trojan capitol, Paris (Vladimir Gajdarov) dreams, revealing his own visions of Helen and events that he could otherwise have not imagined. What the shepherd boy cannot know is that he is the child of the Trojan King Priam and Queen Hecuba whose birth foretold the downfall of Troy in dreams to both Hecuba and the seer Aesacus.

      In a world of dreams, signs and prognostications, Paris (similar to Oedipus) is handed over to the chief herdsman Agelaus to remove the child and kill him, an act that like Priam and Hecuba before him, he could not follow through, raising the beautiful boy as his own son.

      The story is not revealed in full in Noa’s version, but we know enough that we realize Paris is part of the Gods’ plans, particularly when in his dream he is asked to choose between the three goddesses, Hera, Athena, and Aphrodite—the goddess of love bribing him with the love of the most beautiful woman in the world, Helena. Who might resist? The very next day, in Noa’s retelling, Paris is on his way with a sacrifice of his and Agelaus’ best calf to the Spartan island wherein lies Adonis’ shrine at which Helen must spend the night.

      The images of Paris’ dream and voyage are some of the most memorable of Noa’s film, each of them more fascinating the one just previous.

    


 So far, as anyone with knowledge of Homer’s work or the ancient Greek mythology might have expected, Helena is a heterosexual fantasy. Yet back in Sparta, as the men prepare for the chariot race which Helen, the director focuses for a rather long while on the relationship between Achilles (Carlo Aldini) and Patroclus (Carl Lamac). Presuming the relationship between them was a result of the customary Greek paiderasteia relationship between an older and younger man, Ancient and modern historians have endlessly argued which was the older erastes (lover, protector) and the younger eromenos (the beloved), Aeschylus, for example placing Patroclus in the role of the eromenos, while Plato saw Achilles as the younger loved one.

     Noa basically presents them as being of the same age, and thus suggests that their relationship is a romantic one, or at the very least that Patroclus is only slightly younger than the more-experienced and better muscled Achilles. No matter, Achilles spends a great deal of time showing off his musculature to his friend, while just before the race begins, wherein they appear together in the cart, hardly keep their hands off of one another.

 


     Should one happen to miss their physical expression of the sexual desires, Noa relates Menelaos’ own fears that the buff hero Achilles will surely outrun him in the race, and asks Tersites (Rudolf Meinhard-Jünger) what he might do about the possibility of his wife having to offer the crown of victory to another man. The elder Tersities assures him that it will be no problem, and as Achilles and Patroclus ready themselves in the final moments before race begins, taunts the hero, “Since when does Achilles fight for a woman’s wreath?” suggesting that it is only for the male gender that Achilles poses and fights. Offended by the suggestion, he throws a small discus, hitting the old man without truly harming him. But he does unloose the horses, and bows, temporarily out of the chariot race.

      Only when the others have gone round once, and Achilles again witnesses the beauty of Helen, does he determine to retie the chariot to the horses and participate in the race.

      Of course, Western commentators from the Elizabethans to the present have gone out of their way to point out that Achilles was also attracted to women and that both he and Patroclus’ married women, debunking for some the idea of their homosexual love. But obviously even the ancients comprehended bisexuality, and as we shall see in most of the movies from 1887 until the mid-1960s, homosexuals generally kept a lower profile if they were perceived to follow conventional heterosexual marital patterns. But for the ancient Greeks, more importantly, to be married and have homosexual affairs was not at all a contradiction but a common pattern of behavior. Sexuality was not perceived as a structure of closure but of openness. There is absolutely no contradiction in Achilles’ love for Patroclus and finding Helen so sexually attractive that he might wish to flirt with the possibility of bedding her. And Noa does not blink in this possibility when as Achilles finally wins the race, Menelaos grows angry that the young hero will have the honor of escorting is wife by boat to Adonis’ shrine where she will spend the night alone in order to bring the god’s blessings upon the Spring season.


      But, of course, she does not spend the night alone since Paris arrives, the two fall deeply in love with each other’s beauty, imagined long before by each of them, and sleep together, breaking every vow and code of the ancient world imaginable. When morning arrives, and the boat returns to take Helen home, the soldiers discover that Helen has been raped, the older meaning of that word suggesting that Paris has abducted her and carried her away to Troy.

      By the oaths Menelaos himself and others have taken, nearly all the men of Sparta must now fight the Trojans in order to get her back.

      Troy, having offended the gods in many ways by this time, is suffering a plague against its infant children, a cyclone destroys one of goddesses’ image, and a lightning bolt destroys another’s. The seer predicts a fate that even he dare not speak aloud. Priam, seeking out a new god to protect his city, finds it in Aphrodite when a mast from Paris’ presumably destroyed ship is brought back, the image of the goddess featured upon it since it was stolen from the holy shrine. But even then the gods do not seem avenged. Lions are eating the Trojan cattle and sheep. And Priam, realizing that Paris has died on the voyage home, finally confesses to fact that he has saved and raised the royal son.

      A lion hunt is ordered up, while simultaneously we discover that Paris and Helen have survived having struggled ashore only a few miles from Troy itself. Paris takes her back to his shepherd’s hut wishing and praying for a kingdom he might award to her. In the midst of this island upheaval, Agelaos discovers Paris is alive and is introduced to Helen. When the lions are ready to attack both Paris and his shepherd father, Helen stands as a sacrifice, strangely calming the beasts, after which all return in celebration to Priam and Hecuba, even the King and his wife now delighted to see that their son, brother to the young Prince Hector (Carl de Voght), is alive.

     


     This time when Aesacus warns once more of Troy’s fall, Priam has him shackled and imprisoned as Troy begins to celebrate. But it is already too late. The Spartans fleet has arrived, and the battle begins, with Hector soon near death. Paris of Iliad with his bows and arrows instead of his sword and armor, is hardly a warrior, but in Noa’s version he rises up for the challenge, leading those still within the walls of Troy to join him in battle, the crude Trojan navy somehow managing to rout the Spartan ships and saving his brother.

 

    At the end of Part I of Noa’s film, the Trojans finally have a great deal to celebrate.

 

Los Angeles, July 15, 2022

*

 

 

     If Part I of Noa’s epic film is highly entertaining and simply fascinating with regard to how he has adapted Homer to the screen, Part II, The Fall of Troy, has to be one of the greatest of psychological dramas of all of silent film history.

      Even at the beginning of the film, the Greeks are described as being highly demoralized after years of battle with no major success, and a plague has begun to take life of some of their soldiers. The desire to return home, the central subject of The Odyssey, begins here on the shores of the Trojan empire.

      The Trojans, however, are no better off, exhausted and frustrated by the continual battles of war, some of the court demanding that Helen simply be handed over to the Greeks to end the war. Obviously Paris loudly protests, pleading to his father Priam to continue to protect his lover. But Priam has already begun to show signs of a Lear-like madness, handing over the decision to a court of his close advisors. In the midst of their deliberations Helen herself appears, her beauty immediately altering any negative feelings, as they vote unanimously to continue to protect her.


      I should interject the fact that, while we know that anyone performing the role of the most beautiful woman in the world cannot live up role, and given that beauty is always a slippery designation, Noa and his associates might have chosen a more conventionally beautiful woman to play Helen. Edy Darclea is willowy and lithe and has a rather “classical,” look whatever that means. But to be honest Vladimir Gajdarov’s Paris is far more beautiful than his consort.

      The decision to stand by her, however, represents one of several later such incidents to blame Paris and Helen for the death and desolation facing both sides, not all of them ending so felicitously. Meanwhile, as the Trojans gear up for yet another attack, Helen is able to convince Paris not to participate in the battle, particularly given his inexperience as a warrior and her own Greek ethnicity. Andromache (Hanna Ralph), Hector’s wife, is less successful, given the fact that Priam’s only other surviving son is the hero of the Trojan forces. His mother Hecuba, desperate throughout the entire work to protect her sons, asks Helen to intercede, hoping that she may be able to convince him to remain at home.


      Helen makes her case and almost succeeds, Hector at first refusing but finally breaking down in a long embrace indicating that he too has fallen in love with her, which forces him to realize even more fully how much he must resist his feelings and return to the battlefield. In one of the most subtly significant moments of silent film, when he leaves Helen, the door remains slightly open as Andromache stands outside watching Hector leaving in a rush, one might almost say of embarrassment, with Helen heaving in shock and sorrow in the back.     

     Andromache, at first, simply attempts yet again to convince her husband to stay, holding up their child as evidence of what she sees his true responsibility, to be the boy’s father. And the child himself refuses to be held by the hero until finally Hector removes his helmet to hold him.

 

    But in the end he becomes more determined and leaves Andromache and his son’s side. Andromache now turns to Helen to ask if her husband loves her, the Greek beauty, and Helen’s silence reveals everything to the wife, who must now settle with the fact that her husband has betrayed their mutual marital vow.

      Betrayal becomes a major theme, indeed, in The Fall of Troy, as back in the Spartan camp we see Agamemnon (Karl Wüstenhagen) and Menelaos arguing over whether or not to kill Helen for her betrayal of his love. Menelaos is still torn, unsure whether or not she is truly responsible—as well as being inwardly guilty for having dared to show her off like the “trophy” wife she represented to him. But when Achilles, still seeking his infamous wreath from Helen’s hand, demands the right to fight Hector to the death, Menelaos insists that it is his right only, Agamemnon, his brother, agreeing, which basically eliminates the Greek’s best hero from serving any role other than a soldierly footman. And in his pride, Achilles suddenly refuses to even participate in the upcoming struggles, ultimately betraying his own country and his fellow soldiers.


    His “friend” Patroclus, in Noa’s rendition, attempts to calm Achilles down and convince him that as the best of the soldiers he must suit up for war. The director represents this in a series of loving strokes of Achilles’ body that comes just shy of showing the two making love. Certainly, cinema had never quite shown previously two males in physical contact while nearly naked.*

     Obviously, neither Vito Russo, in 1981 or even second edition of his The Celluloid Closet in 1987, nor Richard Barrios as late as 2003, had encountered this work or surely they would have cited it for its important homosexual revelations. In this instance, not only does Patroclus “feel up” his friend, but when Archilles calls for women and wine in order distract him from the sounds of warfare, and a woman dances enticingly over Achilles’ body, Patroclus turns away in an obvious huff of disgust, while Achilles, observing his behavior, sends the women away.


      What Noa makes far clearer than Homer, and which shall soon have great significance, is that this is a tale not only of a great heterosexual passion, that of Paris and Helen, but of a crucial homosexual love of Patroclus and Achilles.

       So Hector goes to war, while Achilles stays behind, the Greeks being pushed back to their ships and even some of their boats being burned by the Trojans. Time and again agents from the battlefront beseech Achilles to rethink his decision and to join in the battle to rout the Greeks as only he would be able. But Achilles stubbornly refuses to participate.


     Finally, realizing the severity of the situation, Patroclus begs his friend to allow him to go dressed in his armor, perhaps enough to frighten off the enemy, Achilles reluctantly agreeing.

   Seeing Achilles on the war field, Hector immediately demands a duel, and the two begin the bloody fight, Patroclus revealing his identity when his headwear falls off, but nonetheless losing his life to Hector’s sword.

     The Greeks bring Patroclus’ body back to Achilles’ tent where the great warrior breaks down in a torrent of tears and sorrow, realizing that he has betrayed his lover as well. His laments are surely some of the saddest of film history.


        The Trojans have won the day once again. The cost for Achilles and the Greeks has been far too much. As the victorious Trojans return to the city, Hector has been left upon the field after his encounter with Patroclus. Achilles rushes to the battleground encountering Hector and challenging him, in revenge of his lover’s death killing the Trojan leader quickly, before tying up his body to his cart and racing back to the Greek outpost.

        We can point to this very moment, the death of his son and the loss of the Trojan’s greatest soldier, as the moment when Priam first proves his insanity, not only lamenting the death of his son, but raving, demanding to once more visit Aesacus, who has been imprisoned now for eight long years (our first indication of just how long these wars have been going on). Priam insists that Aesacus predict a different future for him and his beloved city, but when the prophet refuses, insisting it is fated, he further punishes him by cutting out his tongue, and finally killing him.

       When the first Greek prisoners are brought behind the Trojan walls, Priam insists that Helen place the laurels upon their head, the signification of their capture and deaths. She challenges him by not only refusing but reminding him that she is Greek (some of the prisoners have hailed her as their queen), he threatens her with imprisonment.


       Priam, Andromache, and Hecuba travel unarmed—even their route littered with the bodies of the dead—to plead with Achilles for the return of Hector’s body; he at first refuses since his sorrow for Patroclus’s death has not been slacked. He finally agrees only if Helen tosses down from the city’s walls the crown that was to have been his, so that he might now place it upon his beloved’s bier. 

       They agree that he will approach the city walls upon witnessing the smoke from the funeral pyres for Hector’s cremation. His captain warms him of danger and demands he accompany him for protection. But Achilles resists his advice.

       Priam, meanwhile, has become truly treacherous, creating a deadly poison into which he dips the arrows that he demands his son Paris shoot at Achilles when he arrives. Given Helen’s pleas, once more Paris refuses to be involved, but this time Priam will not be crossed, pronouncing, since Paris refuses to kill Achilles, any man who accomplishes the feat shall have Helen in marriage.

       Torn between his love of Helen, the family honor (both the contradictory commitments of revenge and the pledge to not harm Achilles on this visit), and Helen’s pleas to resist Priam’s command, Paris turns once more to the impulses of Aphrodite, taking up his bow and shooting the arrow into Achilles’ heel, betraying not only family honor but Helen’s love.

       At first Achilles is merely amused, perceiving his foe as a bad marksman, but he soon realizes that the arrow has been dipped in poison—no mention in Noa’s version of Thetis’ dipping of him as an infant into the River Styx to protect all but the heel by which held him.

      With the death of Achilles, Paris has suddenly lost Helen’s love, and for his hateful challenge of Priam in response, is himself locked away in the dungeon. There is no indication that Helen finds love for him again, even when late in events, freed from prison through Hecuba’s machinations, he accepts death rather than being separated from Helen.


       What is apparent is that the now treacherous Priam is mad. And in that madness he orders the gift of the clever new Greek leader Ulysses, the Trojan Horse dedicated to Athena, be brought into the gates, even dismantling the doors to do so.

       While the Trojans celebrate their victory, Priam is haunted by ghosts of destruction of which he had been warned. Helen is captured, permitted to live by Menelaus and taken off to be returned to Sparta, while the city is ransacked and burned, its men killed and its women enslaved, all of which Noa spectacularly portrays in frames tinted in red.

 

*The obvious exception to this statement was the film attributed to Bernard Natan, the 1920 short movie Le Ménage moderne du Madame Butterfly, which showed both male / male, female / female, and heterosexual cunnilingus sex and copulation, with all body parts exposed. But that film was basically underground and not shown in popular theaters as was Noa’s film.

 

Los Angeles, July 16, 2022 / Reprinted from World Cinema Review (July 2022).

Index [listed alphabetically by director]

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.