Tuesday, June 4, 2024

David Weissman | Song from an Angel / 1988

song and dance man

by Douglas Messerli

 

David Weissman (director) Song from an Angel / 1988 [4 minutes]

 

This incredibly moving short film is dedicated to and performed by San Francisco musical performer Rodney Price. Price was a founding member of the Angels of Light, a San Francisco theatrical troupe that, as the introductory note explains, “for over a decade dazzled audiences with their musical extravaganzas.” In 1987, Price was diagnosed with AIDS.


     Sitting in a wheelchair and dressed in the indignity of a hospital gown, Price sings music based on Kurt Weill’s “One Life to Live,” with lyrics by Janice Sukaitis. The piece, retitled “Less Time Than You,” is a truly remarkable declaration to his friends to stop speaking of him as being already dead and simply take him out to dinner, give him a deep hug, or even something deeper as a gesture of love. With a ghostly appearance, but a wonderfully playful presence, Price sings and even taps from his wheel chair to a piano accompaniment by Scrumbly Kodewyn and moving lyrics such as those I’ve chosen below:

 

There’s an element of doom and desperation

when I’m the subject of the conversation.

Locals agree, I’ll never see

my washboard stomach or my derriere,

my youthful abundant head of hair.

 

 

….

 

I start the day every morning

inspiring angels like you.

You say I’m thinner,

take me to dinner

because I’ve got less time than you.

….

Don’t feel that you’ve got to cure me

I just need someone to drive

and keep the car running smoothly,

bring me flowers, they keep me alive!

 


     This may be one of the most remarkable short films about AIDS victims ever made; the zany attitude the dying man conveys speaks to the thousands of brave victims which hung on to their talents, entertaining us until the very last moment of their gifted lives.* 

      Song from an Angel is an absolutely memorable warble of death, something once you see it you can never forget. This angel, Price, who Weissman’s film so beautifully memorializes, is someone any of us would surely have wanted know while he was living, to have, to kiss, and to hold near. This man’s joy of living is so palpable that it hurts just to watch. Song from an Angel is a little masterpiece to the terrible AIDS era.


*Weissman wrote me in response to this essay several comments that must be included in this discussion.

 

“That was one of the most challenging and inspiring experiences of my life really. Rodney came directly to the shoot from the hospital where he'd been semi-comatose for over a week. I was afraid he'd die mid-performance. But never have I experienced such a profound manifestation of ‘The show must go on.’” 

    Price died on August 15, 1988, at the age of 38, just two weeks after he was filmed in this performance which Weissman was not sure he could recreate given his condition. As Price himself expressed it in the San Francisco Chronicle obituary essay about his performance: “It’s amazing the kind of adrenaline you get. I guess, that’s the ‘old trouper’ kind of thing, y’know. You never lose it.” Price made certain that the film was dedicated to “Beaver Bauer, without whose love and support my life could never be complete.”

 

Los Angeles, June 4, 2024

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (June 2024).

 

Nans Laborde-Jourdàa | Boléro / 2023

dionysus

by Douglas Messerli

 

Nans Laborde-Jourdàa (screenwriter and director) Boléro / 2023 [17 minutes]

 

Dancer Fran (real life dancer François Chaignaud) has returned unexpectedly to small hometown in the Pyrenees. We see him first either in a rehearsal or a performance of a new work Boléro, which commentator Mike Kennedy in Letterboxd as nicely summarized: “bare chested and wearing a costume of a long skirt made up of multiple layers of rainbow coloured tulle, with long red fingernails, long curly [red] hair and white makeup.”

 

     In the next frame he is sitting in his mother’s (Muriel Laborde-Jourdàa) car attempting to get a motor to turn over, she yelling for him to stop, fearful that he’ll flood the engine. She has made a phone call to Fran’s sister (Mellie Laborde-Jourdàa), who soon shows up to drive his mother to work, Fran wandering off instead of joining them.

      In real life Chaignaud describes himself as a dance artist whose choreographed works “criss-cross the confluences between erotic dance and operetta, hooping, drag and cabaret shows, as well as the 20th century avant-garde choreographic modernism, with influences ranging from François Malkovsky to Isadora Duncan.” And it is into the realm of erotic surrealism in which this short film now proceeds.

      Almost as under a sexual spell—a word in characterizes much of what follows—Fran first wanders through a nearby wilderness where, from the look of it, obviously lovers, primarily gay lovers, go to have elicit sex. There are numerous condoms spread throughout wilderness, filled and empty. But no one is visiting the spot in the middle of the day, and Fran moves on to a small stream that runs through the area.

      Soon after he has found his way into the center of the town and makes his way into the local grocery market. There he is recognized by a couple of teenagers, who claim that he studied athletics with one of their father’s; they want a photograph.

     Observing a rough gay man entering the nearby toilet, Fran soon follows, but the young man is leaving almost as he arrives. Instead he meets up with an older man. Asking if he comes to this toilet regular, Fran explains that he hasn’t been there for years, the man also telling him of the woods in which we’ve already seen Fran.


    The dancer recognizes him as a former beloved teacher with whom he and apparently many another gay student had sex. The teacher does not recognize him, Fran joking that he must have had quite a “harem” back in those days. The teacher asks if they mightn’t “warm up” together in the stall, to where, in fact, Fran immediately retreats, but locking the door. The former teacher becomes confused as he observes Fran removing his shows, socks, and all other items of clothing. He goes to the next stall, attempting to catch a glimpse of what is going on, as we observed Fran’s feet going into dance positions, his long hands waving their bright-red fingernails as he begins the rhythmic sounds of what is clearly his choreography of Boléro.

      The teacher himself seems to enter a sort of sexual trance as we hear him rhythmically masturbating to the dancer’s audible movements. Soon a couple of younger gay men enter the bathroom quickly becoming aware of the sounds. One of them lifts up the other to the top of the stall so that he can observe what’s going on, and he too soon begins masturbating.

      The music for Ravel’s famous composition can now be heard.

 

    A woman evidently in charge of the toilets also enters, fascinated by what is happening, and she is soon joined by numerous others, male and female, who begin to perspire in suddenly “hot” room, fanning themselves as discover themselves spellbound, unable to move. Males and females both lean their heads together obviously opening themselves up to all sorts of sexual possibilities.

       As a rhythmic pattern begins to be established by dancer’s feet, members of the group begin to breathe deeply, heaving in what can only be described as a sexual heat. Finally, an authoritative black woman enters and brakes open the stall door, the others crowding around her to find the dancer having passed out in exhaustion.


       They gather the dancer up, lifting his entire body into a horizontal position upon their shoulders as they parade him through the town and into the nearby countryside. Almost like a miracle whether they go, people are suddenly seen engaging in sex, two women at the grocery check-out line, three male soccer players engaging in sex in the middle of the field as another two head off, arms around one another, into the showers. 

      As they pass through the streets it appears as if chaos as occurred everywhere. Outside the city, a woman sits on the ground a tree with two men, the trio seem exhausted from a sexual encounter.

The crowd moves quick into a small wooded area almost falling into a kind of frenzy as the camera looking back into the two catches the images of several of the village buildings on fire, smoke pouring from them. Desire and lust have clearly created chaos for these small-town folk as they worship their new sexual deity.

      Laborde-Jourdàa’s 17-minute film was awarded the Queer Palm for short film in the 2023 Cannes Film Festival.

 

Los Angeles, June 4, 2024

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema (June 2024).

Tom Hopper | Les Misérables / 2012

look down

by Douglas Messerli

 

Claude Michel Schönberg and Alan Boubil (book, based on the novel by Victor Hugo and their original musical in French), Herbert Kretzmer (lyrics, with additional text by James Fenton), William Nicholson (screenplay), Tom Hopper (director) Les Misérables / 2012

 

Tom Hopper’s grand operetta, brought to film from the extraordinarily successful Broadway musical, begins with an improbable scene in which prisoners are forced to pull by rope a huge ship into dry dock while they sing of their humble position in life, “Look Down,” averting their glances into the eyes of their torturers to prevent themselves from further punishment. Among the men is the hero of this work, Jean Valjean (Hugh Jackman), who as the ship is finally pulled in, is forced by his arch enemy, the head prison guard Jauvert (Russell Crowe), to single-handedly pull in the huge flag, which, like Christ bearing the cross of his own death, he delivers up to his torturer.



      Of course, in beginning with the concept of “looking down”—the position in society in which most of the “miserable” characters of this piece exist—the musical also posits its opposite, as Valjean—freed soon after by Jauvert, but haunted through the early part of the film by his parole documents—strives to “look up.”  Particularly through the religiously inspired scenes, as Valjean aspires to gain faith, the songs switch to inspirational-like ditties, the most notable of which is the poor former factory-worker turned prostitute Fantine’s (Anne Hathaway) paean to life as it might have been, “I Dreamed a Dream,” possibly the best song of the film.

     So is the pattern of this film revealed, as various figures, including the evil Jauvert, vertiginously walking a high ledge overlooking the city, shout-out in chant-like pieces the necessity of “looking down,” while the score alternates with quieter pleas for beauty and grace. That pattern, indeed, is at the center of this sprawling work’s various directions, as some characters seek out love (Valjean, Marius, Cosette, Éponine), others freedom through revolution, and still others look into the deep depths from which they have risen or in which they, like Madame Thénardier and her husband, remain. Unfortunately, it seems, neither the original musical nor this film version, offers anything in between. Les Misérables, it seems, are unhappy because they live at the extremes, phantom beings out of some vast tapestry that keeps weaving and unweaving itself, each figure chasing or running from one another like laboratory rats.


     If anything, director Tom Hopper—perhaps in an attempt to maintain the popular theatricality of a work seen on stage by millions of adoring fans—further exaggerates the dichotomous pattern of the work, lifting his fussbudget camera to the towering heights only to drop into the lowest depths (the sewer scene is hard to endure), pulling away momentarily from his players only to rush forward, as the figures, like Sunset Boulevard’s Nora Desmond, call out that they are ready for their “close ups.” Although one can commend Hopper for asking the singers to perform their songs in real time, the constant placement of his camera up and close creates such an artificial feeling that, except for in the large group scenes, we must wonder at times whether these characters have torsos and legs.

      In fact, they don’t. Like so many rag dolls, each fills the large cinema screen with tears and perspiration running down his or her face—or even worse, as in the “Lovely Ladies” scene, with macabre patches of red, white, and black paint swabbed across her eyes, cheek, and nose. At times, particularly in the comic scenes involving the Thénardiers (Helena Bonham Carter and Sasha Baron Cohen) it is almost as if the performers have escaped from another movie, in this case, Burton’s Sweeney Todd, to suddenly reappear in Les Misérables. At least this dour film of eternal suffering has these few comic moments!


       Allowing his international cast to use their own dialects, from the Aussie-vocalizations of Jackman, the Kiwi shout-outs of Crowe, and the apparently Cockney utterings of the Dickensian-like David Huddelstone (as Gavroche)—all of whom are supposedly French—Hopper creates a mish-mash of character-types that, once more, squeeze any humanity from them.

       Hopper’s over-the-top direction is particularly unfortunate for Jackman—whose presence in this film was, in part, what drew me to the theater—because his full and rich baritone voice on display in his stage-version of Oklahoma! here seems considerably strained, perhaps due to the fact that he was forced to lose 30 pounds in order to appear like a man who has just spent nineteen years in chains. As I’ve suggested, since Javert does little more that howl, I have no idea whether Crowe can sing or not.

      While I’m at it, I should admit that I came to Les Misérables with a bit of a chip on my shoulder, mostly because I see the lumbering and bumbling musical score, similar to Cats, as being responsible, in part, for the death of the American Broadway musical. Yes, both works have moments of lilting melodies, but the unimaginative tunes of the rest, combined with never ending series of banally rhymed couplets nearly drive me to despair. If any tears flowed from my eyes—and a few did; I’ve admitted elsewhere I’m a sentimentalist and Les Misérables is sentimentality determined to try to break your heart—I might almost attribute them to the pain inflicted by its music and lyrics. It is hard to imagine, for example, actually having to sing the following passage:

 

           Javert:  Now Prisoner 24601, your time is up and your parole's begun.

                        You know what that means?

           Jean Valjean:  Yes, it means I'm free.

           Javert:  No.

           [hands him a yellow paper]

           Javert:  Follow to the letter your itinerary, this badge of shame you wear               

                       until you die. It warns that you're a dangerous man.

           Valjean: I stole a loaf of bread. My sisters child was close to death, and we were 

                        starving...
           Javert:  And you will starve again unless you learn the meaning of the law!

           Valjean : I've learnt the meaning of those nineteen years; a slave of the law.

           Javert:  Five years for what you did. The rest because you tried to run, yes 24601...

           Valjean: My name is Jean Valjean!

           Javert:  And I'm Javert! Do not forget my name. Do not forget me, 24601.

 

     Or consider this inane rhyme, repeated throughout another song:

 

           Marius: In my life, there is someone who touches my life. Waiting near...

           Eponie: Waiting here...   

     

      Despite that, however, I must admit the orchestration was quite effective.


    And then, there were those wonderful surprises, such as the performance throughout of Eddie Redmayne as Marius, a handsome young man with a glorious voice, particularly well employed in “Empty Chairs at Empty Tables,” as he sings of the passing of his revolutionary partners. Quite moving also was Samantha Bark’s rendering, despite the drip-drop of rain down her face, of “On My Own.” Throughout, Amanda Seyfried as Cosette sang quite waveringly beautifully.

      But in the end, none of them could save Hopper’s up and down, in and out cinematic eye-balling of this war-horse of a crowd-pleaser. My comments, surely, will mean little to those thousands of devotees of this over-the-top display of loving and hating types, and even I did share the feelings of a slightly grumpy elderly man who left the theater loudly muttering, “That was most boring movie I’ve ever seen.” And although I’ve heard of thunderous applauses in local movie theaters, no one applauded at the early morning showing I attended. I might have simply called Hopper’s film, “ponderous.” It’s hard to “Hear the People Sing” without of real human being in sight.

 

Los Angeles, January 3, 2013

Reprinted from Nth Position [England] (February 2013).

John Brahm | Hangover Square / 1945

better off

by Douglas Messerli

 

Barré Lyndon (screenplay, based on the novel by Patrick Hamilton), John Brahm (director) Hangover Square / 1945

 

For the most part in writing about the essays in My Queer Cinema I have attempted to make a clear delineation between the actor and his or her character. Only in the case of figures such as Ivan Novello, Cary Grant, Katherine Hepburn, Rock Hudson, and a few others, wherein the homosexual actor, seemingly conspiring with their writers and director to create coded gay figures inside the heterosexual outer shell of the character required by the plot, do I bring in the issue of the actor’s sexuality as being important to the film. As I joke, Grant and Hudson played gay coded figures so often that you might have thought that they had written into their contracts. And actors such as Novello, Farley Granger, Anthony Perkins, and other Hitchcock heroes were simply too beautiful for that brilliant director to resist suggesting other sexual complications in his characterizations. Hepburn, as Cukor argued, was determined to play certain strong female feminist roles which, in the terms of Hollywood character stereotypes of the day, brought her closer to lesbian identity.


       Although not all of them were gay or lesbian, the numerous crossdressers and pansies of the earlier films had required a certain male or female type which often included the sexual “aberration” which the role satirized or mocked.     

     And so too in the 1940 and 50s there were some actors who simply because of their voices and/or mannerisms were hired to play villains or comic supporting roles who, although necessarily presented as heterosexuals in the script, read to most of their audiences as being gay, bisexual, or lesbian, hinting at their actual sexuality even though they generally denied it or joined in lavender marriages to hide it. Since they were villains or fussy second bananas and homosexuality was perceived as representing evil or at least abnormal behavior, film casters and directors did not at all mind that they behaved slightly odd or queer both in and out of costume. In fact it was why they were hired. The examples of these individuals are actually quite numerous, but three immediately stand out, each of whom made their greatest impact in movies of the 1940s and 50s when even cleverly coded films were carefully combed through by the Hays people: Raymond Burr, Vincent Price, and the writer I am focusing on in this essay, Laird Cregar. These three all appeared in noirs, horror, and monster films which permitted a niche in which their morality was at issue which made it allowable for them to appear somewhat gay; they were after all “wicked” or, better yet, psychologically sick beings according to the script. Both Burr and Price would also occasionally play heroes, as Cregar might have if he had lived longer.

      Clearly in the 1945 British film Hangover Square Cregar was attempting to escape being typecast as he had recently been in the 1941 film  I Wake Up Screaming and The Lodger (1944) where he played psychopathic murderers. For Cregar, in particular, it was also a matter of his weight of he had been conscious throughout his life. In being asked to play a character in John Brahm’s newest film, he was scripted to play a distinguished British composer named George Harvey Bone—already a clue that there was something strange about him; if you recall Katherine Hepburn pseudonymously names Cary Grant, Mr. Bone in Bringing Up Baby—but was romantically involved with two women, the proper Barbara Chapman (Faye Marlowe) and a night-club singer Netta Longdon (Linda Darnell) which he felt might be used to his advantage to create for himself a more romantic, leading man. And in order to gain more acceptance as such a figure he underwent a severe crash diet, mostly through the consumption of amphetamines, which forced the studio to film chronologically so that his weight-loss appeared to be part of the plot itself and resulted in his sometimes erratic behavior. Within a few weeks after shooting, Cregar died of a fatal heart attack brought on by his weight loss, and did not get to see the final film when it was released.

 

     Part of this desire to change his image surely had to do with the fact that just two years earlier Cregar’s lover, the young actor David Bacon, was attacked and killed with a knife. The tabloids quite quickly linked Cregar to Bacon describing him as “such a good friend” of the victim, leading Darryl F. Zanuck to arrange for a Silver Screen article to romantically link him with actor Dorothy McGuire which reported that, despite his weight, the actor was considered quite sexy by many women. Surely Cregar sought to erase the weight equation.* 

   We all know that there is no “gay sounding voice,” that homosexual men speak in thousands of various tones and intonations just as gay men look as different from one another as does the general population. And yet, I have to admit there are certain timbres of the voice, careful intonations of words that inexplicably hint at the individual’s sexuality. Both George Sanders, who also performs in this film and Cregar simply “sound” gay—although Sanders, who was married several times including to two of the Gabor sisters, Zsa Zsa and Magda, was apparently not homosexual—and directors cast these individuals as effete wicked beings for precisely this reason (Sanders plays such figures, for example, in Rebecca and, most notably, All About Eve). Cregar is simply possessed of such a voice, and even revealing that he was after all quite good looking, has a face that was made for this role: a fussy, effete, artist—just such characteristics needed also to play Oscar Wilde, a stage production of which in 1940 won him rave reviews and the attention of the Hollywood studios—who in this case is also psychologically affected by noise (a situation that hints of the same condition of Poe’s Roderick Usher) that makes it clear that we will never win the love of the showgirl Netta, for whom he wastes his precious energies while he should composing his concerto by spinning off popular songs for her new musical, Gay Love**—surely not an accidental use of the word “gay” since Cary Grant had publicly revealed that word’s urban usage in his 1938 film Bringing Up Baby.

 

     Although, Bone is convinced of his love for Netta, even she hints that although he has spoken nice words, he was never even attempted to “get close,” and she describes her seduction of him as a painful experience to both her friend Mickey (Michael Dyne) and the man to whom she gets engaged to be married, Eddie Castairs (Glenn Langan). Her love for him is a pretense to milk her for her successful musical numbers. 

   Barbara, the music-loving pianist, who is the daughter of the great conductor Sir Henry Chapman (Alan Napier), may believe she loves the man of such talent, but it is a pure and prim kind of love by which composer Bone is not aroused...if he is ever by women aroused. He treats her more like a loving sister, admitting his most personal of problems including the fact that even he believes that something is wrong with him, having suffered throughout much of his life by moments of blackout but which has suddenly, as the film opens, stealing an entire day from his life as he returns home without remembering anything that has happened.

 

     We see what has happened, as he stabs a Jewish shop owner of fine art curios. In a clearly anti-Semitic slur, the doctor-detective Dr. Allan Middleton (Sanders) who Bone consults—when after reading in the newspaper of the shop owner’s murder, he fears he may somehow in involved—absolves him of the crime suggesting the victim had been cheating his customers, hinting that he somehow deserved being murdered. Yet despite the fact we have seen Bone plunge the knife into the victim’s chest, Middleton finds no trace of blood on the weapon nor can he match the blood on the composer’s coat with that of the shopkeeper’s. Nonetheless, he still suspects him, and even has Bone followed.

        Upon his second near-blackout, when he discovers Netta has been lying to him about her activities, the composer unsuccessfully attempts to strangle Barbara, who still does not suspect her friend, would-be lover.

      But by his third blackout, when after discovering that Netta is about to marry Carstairs, he kills her, placing her body at the top of a pyre set up in celebration of Guy Fawkes Night,*** although police still have no evidence, Middleton finally puts together the facts and prepares to arrest the murderer, who escapes to finally perform his completed concerto with Barbara in attendance and her father conducting.


      Finally, trapped by the police, Bone sets fire to the place, and realizing his own monstrosity, plays the remainder of his concerto until he is burned alive, Middleton commenting to Barbara, not so very differently from his statement about the Jewish shopkeeper, “It’s better this way.” Bernard Herrmann’s own “Concerto,” accordingly becomes to true unspoken hero of this work, surviving its fictional composer and outshining all the film’s characters in its splendiferous sounds.

      I wonder what Cregar might have thought about his performance if he had seen it. Certainly it’s a tour de force, among the best of noir incarnations of the often unintentional evil that propels such plots. One wonders, however, whether he would have seen an actor in himself able to take on leading man, romantic roles. I fear not. And, most terrifyingly, you can almost hear Zanuck or some other studio exec saying the cruel words they actually had wanted Sanders to speak, but which he absolutely refused to utter: “He’s better off this way.”

 

*As any reader has surely realized by this time, I am fascinated by unlinked connections and coincidence. Raymond Burr was also obsessed by his weight, particularly early on in his career. As he revealed in a 1993 interview in the Toronto Star: "I was just a fat heavy. I split the heavy parts with Bill Conrad. We were both in our twenties playing much older men. I never got the girl but I once got the gorilla in a 3-D picture called Gorilla at Large. I menaced Claudette Colbert, Lizabeth Scott, Paulette Goddard, Anne Baxter, Barbara Stanwyck. Those girls would take one look at me and scream and can you blame them? I was drowned, beaten, stabbed and all for my art. But I knew I was horribly overweight. I lacked any kind of self-esteem. At 25 I was playing the fathers of people older than me."

 

**In another interesting but somewhat unrelated coincidence, after Netta Longdon’s murder, we see the poster of her play Gay Love begin plastered over with another announcing a performance by French dancer/actor Gaby Deslys, an historically real performer interviewed by Djuna Barnes in April 1914. If Netta is clearly a woman who has used the admiration of a gay man to benefit her career, Deslys was known for her absolute “deviltry,” rumored to have stolen Jean Cocteau’s heart (he wrote a prose poem about her) and infatuated Sir James M. Barrie, the Scottish creator of Peter Pan (he wrote an entertainment for her, Rosy Rapture). In her interview, Barnes claims to steal away her reputation for that deviltry, revealing her to be simply an exhausted young doll-like girl—precisely the kind of woman Barnes herself loved. One has to wonder whether set decorator Thomas Little, who designed some 504 film sets over his career, including for Laura and All About Eve, was subliminally telling us something that even director John Brahm didn’t know.

 

***Finally, it is perhaps worth nothing that it is on Guy Fawkes Night that director Ken Russell choses for his Oscar Wilde character to attend the last (and only) performance he saw of his play Salomé in Salome’s Last Dance (1988), during which of course a great deal of sexual activity occurs.

 

Los Angeles, January 23, 2022

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (January 2022).

 

Index [listed alphabetically by director]

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.