look down
by Douglas Messerli
Claude Michel Schönberg and Alan
Boubil (book, based on the novel by Victor Hugo and their original musical in
French), Herbert Kretzmer (lyrics, with additional text by James Fenton),
William Nicholson (screenplay), Tom Hopper (director) Les Misérables / 2012
So is the pattern of this film revealed, as various figures, including the evil Jauvert, vertiginously walking a high ledge overlooking the city, shout-out in chant-like pieces the necessity of “looking down,” while the score alternates with quieter pleas for beauty and grace. That pattern, indeed, is at the center of this sprawling work’s various directions, as some characters seek out love (Valjean, Marius, Cosette, Éponine), others freedom through revolution, and still others look into the deep depths from which they have risen or in which they, like Madame Thénardier and her husband, remain. Unfortunately, it seems, neither the original musical nor this film version, offers anything in between. Les Misérables, it seems, are unhappy because they live at the extremes, phantom beings out of some vast tapestry that keeps weaving and unweaving itself, each figure chasing or running from one another like laboratory rats.
If anything, director Tom Hopper—perhaps in an attempt to maintain the
popular theatricality of a work seen on stage by millions of adoring
fans—further exaggerates the dichotomous pattern of the work, lifting his
fussbudget camera to the towering heights only to drop into the lowest depths
(the sewer scene is hard to endure), pulling away momentarily from his players
only to rush forward, as the figures, like Sunset
Boulevard’s Nora Desmond, call out that they are ready for their “close
ups.” Although one can commend Hopper for asking the singers to perform their
songs in real time, the constant placement of his camera up and close creates
such an artificial feeling that, except for in the large group scenes, we must
wonder at times whether these characters have torsos and legs.
Allowing his international cast to use
their own dialects, from the Aussie-vocalizations of Jackman, the Kiwi
shout-outs of Crowe, and the apparently Cockney utterings of the
Dickensian-like David Huddelstone (as Gavroche)—all of whom are supposedly
French—Hopper creates a mish-mash of character-types that, once more, squeeze
any humanity from them.
Hopper’s over-the-top direction is
particularly unfortunate for Jackman—whose presence in this film was, in part,
what drew me to the theater—because his full and rich baritone voice on display
in his stage-version of Oklahoma!
here seems considerably strained, perhaps due to the fact that he was forced to
lose 30 pounds in order to appear like a man who has just spent nineteen years
in chains. As I’ve suggested, since Javert does little more that howl, I have
no idea whether Crowe can sing or not.
While I’m at it, I should admit that I came to Les Misérables with a bit of a chip on my shoulder, mostly because
I see the lumbering and bumbling musical score, similar to Cats, as being responsible, in part, for the death of the American
Broadway musical. Yes, both works have moments of lilting melodies, but the
unimaginative tunes of the rest, combined with never ending series of banally
rhymed couplets nearly drive me to despair. If any tears flowed from my
eyes—and a few did; I’ve admitted elsewhere I’m a sentimentalist and Les Misérables is sentimentality
determined to try to break your heart—I might almost attribute them to the pain
inflicted by its music and lyrics. It is hard to imagine, for example, actually
having to sing the following passage:
Javert: Now
Prisoner 24601, your time is up and your parole's begun.
You know what that
means?
Jean Valjean: Yes,
it means I'm free.
Javert: No.
[hands him a yellow paper]
Javert: Follow to the letter your itinerary, this badge of shame you wear
until you die. It warns that you're a dangerous man.
Valjean: I
stole a loaf of bread. My sisters child was close to death, and we were
starving...
Javert: And you
will starve again unless you learn the meaning of the law!
Valjean : I've learnt the meaning of those nineteen years; a slave
of the law.
Javert: Five years for what you did. The rest because you tried to
run, yes 24601...
Valjean: My name is Jean Valjean!
Javert: And I'm Javert! Do not forget my name. Do not forget me,
24601.
Or consider this inane rhyme,
repeated throughout another song:
Marius: In my life,
there is someone who touches my life. Waiting near...
Eponie: Waiting
here...
Despite
that, however, I must admit the orchestration was quite effective.
And then, there were those wonderful surprises, such as the performance
throughout of Eddie Redmayne as Marius, a handsome young man with a glorious
voice, particularly well employed in “Empty Chairs at Empty Tables,” as he
sings of the passing of his revolutionary partners. Quite moving also was
Samantha Bark’s rendering, despite the drip-drop of rain down her face, of “On
My Own.” Throughout, Amanda Seyfried as Cosette sang quite waveringly
beautifully.
But in the end, none of them could save Hopper’s up and down, in and out
cinematic eye-balling of this war-horse of a crowd-pleaser. My comments,
surely, will mean little to those thousands of devotees of this over-the-top
display of loving and hating types, and even I did share the feelings of a
slightly grumpy elderly man who left the theater loudly muttering, “That was
most boring movie I’ve ever seen.” And although I’ve heard of thunderous
applauses in local movie theaters, no one applauded at the early morning
showing I attended. I might have simply called Hopper’s film, “ponderous.” It’s
hard to “Hear the People Sing” without of real human being in sight.
Los Angeles, January 3, 2013
Reprinted from Nth Position [England] (February 2013).
No comments:
Post a Comment