Sunday, March 16, 2025

Evgeny Afineevsky | Oy Vey! My Son Is Gay!! / 2009

heterosexual hysteria about a gay love affair

by Douglas Messerli

 

Martin Guigui, Menahem Golan and Evgeny Afineevsky (screenplay), Evgeny Afineevsky (director) Oy Vey! My Son Is Gay!! / 2009

 

This comic movie is also what I might describe as a film of heterosexual gay hysteria, which is hard to imagine even being produced in the 21st century, when gay marriages along with a general acceptance of gay behavior were assumed. But somehow some movie directors of the period didn’t get the message, and Evgeny Afineevsky’s film, starring the generally watchable but always exaggerated Lainie Kazan playing Shirley Hirsh, whose son Nelson (John Lloyd Young) has just announced that he is seeing someone is the perfect example, along with her husband, who together become the full expression of true queer hysteria.


      Of course, in the heteronormative world of Shirley and Martin (Saul Rubinek) it has to be a woman, and worried about what kind of female her son has picked out (she has forgotten to even ask if she is Jewish), Shirley soon pays a visit to her son’s apartment, finding a man, Angelo Ferraro (Jai Rodriguez) there instead of a woman. To protect his lover, Angelo announces that he is Nelson’s decorator, and when their mutual friend, Sybil Williams (Shelly Burch) arrives to take a bath in Nelson’s Jacuzzi, Shirley naturally assumes the Playpen model of the month is Nelson’s new girlfriend.

     Her husband Martin, although amazed, is absolutely delighted, and now has a new fantasy given the magazine his wife has laid out before him. Queer dysphoria has seldom been made so obvious. Where does Nelson go from here? Uncle Mosiha (Eddie Levi Lee) immediately appears and asks it Martin is already going to the toilet. Shirley claims the magazine as her own, and Moshia suggests that she take it away if she wants her husband to do some work in the plant. Unhappy relationships are at the heart of Jewish families.

     Shirley actually likes the shiska, but also knows that if Moshia finds out, he’ll disinherit her husband and fire him on the spot, with no future with the company for which he has so long worked for the possibility of inheriting.

      It’s the usual problem in standard comedic films, money versus love.


     Meanwhile, we discover that Martin’s uncle Max (Carmen Electra) is a kind of transgender being who is still married to his sister, who he bought, as he claims, “on wholesale.”

      Nelson attempts to tell his mother telephonically that his real love is Angelo, without success, given her selfishly driven view of life, her own attempts at remaining young and her simple refusal to hear her son’s statements, her “supersizing day cream” being of far more importance. Again and again he attempts to tell her he’s gay, but each time she interrupts. There is no way of getting beyond the force of her motherly, fully heterosexually-demanding love. Even she, however, announces, given her incompetent servants, that she is hysterical. “I love you, I love you, I love you, bye bye,” says it all.


       Where can we go from here? Well, Angelo feels rejected and perhaps recognizes this late in time that the “whole damn world is not yet ready.” His frustration for an elderly man like myself who came out fully in 1970 is fully felt, his hurt makes me cry. Why in 2009 wasn’t the world yet ready? Why, I might ask, are we still having to face these problems in 2025? This isn’t a truly funny movie.

      We can’t quite forgive Martin and Shirley their endless social, religious, and personal dilemmas, even if they gradually work their way out to acceptance.

       Nor can Angelo forgive his own lover’s reservations, and his reluctance to invite him to the family wedding, where they might announce their relationship. Finally, Nelson agrees to let his lover come to the family wedding where supposedly his domineering mother will announce her son’s relationship with his non-existent girlfriend Sybil. Even Nelson’s attempt to tell his mother that he is bringing someone “very special” to the wedding is drowned out by her own selfish assumptions. There appears no way to get beyond her force of powerful discourse. If she might ever stop talking long enough to hear others, her world would be crushed.

     Shirley is convinced he’s bringing Sybil to the wedding, and argues that if he is serious about her, they need to be serious about her as well. So what if Moshia falls in a faint on the floor, and her husband Martin is out of a job. If her son is happy, they’re happy.



     But they’re disconcerted when Nelson brings his “decorator,” who has even created his own rainbow yarmulke. We have entered another world which no one in the synagogue has quite yet imagined. But Nelson’s sister quickly recognizes her brother’s relationship, particularly when Angelo grabs Nelsons’s hand as the married couple slip on their mutual rings. And finally in the midst of the sacred ceremony, when his mother can no longer speak, Nelson whispers in her ear that he is gay.

      Drunkenness and general family chaos follows as his parents attempt to assimilate the “problem.” Immediately, they start blaming one another for their son’s,” predilections” citing their uncles and cousins as example of perhaps men who didn’t prefer to marry, the usual miscomprehension of parents suddenly faced with a gay child. My own parents, so I was told by my sister, came back from my own coming out ceremony wondering whether or not having dropped me as a child made me gay, or whether or not some ancient car accident when my mother was pregnant might have caused the “illness.” In other words, it was a disease, a condition that needs to be explained instead of a natural phenomenon that might be accepted. My parents were troubled idiots from 1970; but these individuals from 2009 might have been imagined to have matured into a greater awareness, but evidently not.  

     In the midst of proving his virility, Martin finally fucks his wife after many a long year. But what that says about the subject at hand, their gay son, I have no idea. It’s still another example of heterosexual hysteria. Okay, he can, if only he would, still shtup his wife. Glad to know it. But the film has gone far off track, or perhaps is simply expressing its terror of gay relationships.

    And now Martin is even terrified to be in an elevator with a gay man. I guess we’re supposed to sympathize with his situation, but at this point Afineevsky’s film has grown into such a homophobic disaster than I can’t quite deal with it. Does his character feel that he’s being attacked by a gay man for even sharing a small, overloaded elevator stuffed with mean executives, given that a paisley frocked gay boy exists within? Perhaps gayness is a significant force to with which straights have to adapt or, at least, accept as being among them. Even his dominant wife realizes that her husband has truly become homophobic, and demands he enter a gay bar to “face his fears.”

    Inevitably, several young and older men are perfectly happy to flirt with our recalcitrant anti-hero, who covers his tracks by suggesting he’s simply there for research. But Skip, another elderly patron, would like being Martin’s “bicycle seat,” at which point Martin attempts to escape the bar only to discover his brother-in-law Max amongst the crowd. And in the bathroom it cuts even closer to the heart when a drag queen, a fellow-office worker Noodleman, recognizes him. Martin has floated down into a rabbit hole from which there is no escape, people from his own long normative-life popping up to remind him that his world is not the only vision possible.

     In a fit of his own hysteria, Martin admits that his son is not like any other others. Perhaps he simply doesn’t understand women, since for most men they make so sense whatever. Which, of course makes no sense at all to Shirley. We have now entered another planet, wherein even heterosexual couples cannot explain their relationships, as Martin attempts to recall his gay encounters, it was “kind of exciting,” forbidden and enticing, the world all gays know it to be. For the first time in his life Martin has awakened into another world which he cannot simply comprehend. “It was uncomfortable and weird, but it was also erotic.” Yes. Yes. That is the gay world indeed which Martin has suddenly discovered, suddenly singing out “I’m a gay man.”


     Shirley’s response, “This is all happening to somebody else,” a true sign of total unease and displacement.  But oddly enough, Shirley is determined to go into her son’s life and learn to live with it, not the lesson you receive from so many other films. She might be a control freak, but she is also loving and caring and desirous of understanding something outside of her narrow purviews. So, in a sense we forgive the overbearing woman she is, as she and her husband both struggle to comprehend who their son might be in a world they never imagined.

      But the gay jokes still continue as Noodleman meets ups with Martin again in the office elevator, whispering, “I didn’t know, you sneaky little devil you.” Like a Dantean world Martin is meant to suffer all his fears and doubts. This is after all, despite its generally caring message, still a work of gay hysteria.

      Shirley, in all of her endlessly good intentions, introduces her husband to the head of The National Society for Gay People. Despite their good intentions, he admits he feels “shocked,” “disappointed,” “horrified,” summarizing it as “a nightmare for our family.” Clearly, even the erotic experiences at the gay bar have done nothing to relieve his homophobic horror. And by this point in the movie, I have to admit, this terrified couple is frankly getting on our nerves. My parents behaved similarly, and frankly never fully accepted the reality of my life, but fortunately I didn’t have to live with their own tortures to which this film keeps demanding we attend. Such close-minded people should be left in peace for their own ridiculous inabilities to accept another human being for his own existence, but this film can’t let up—at least not yet. Making everything worse, Uncle Moshia appears at that very moment, Martin, in total despair, inviting him into their impossible conversation.

      When they ask him about sex, Moshia immediately suggests the boys should go to a whorehouse to fulfill their sexual needs. “There is nothing healthier than a healthy hooker for a healthy sex life style.” The comedic situation becomes even more misogynistic when he suggests that “girls should be encouraged to stay virgins until they are married,” a proposition to which the gay boys easily agree. Even Martin has to admit he’s pretending to be on another planet at this moment.

     In the next scene we see the now quite recalcitrant parents ringing the doorbell of their son’s apartment, having brought orchids to Angelo. The parents don’t at all like Angelo’s wonderful canapes nor Angelo’s brilliant main dishes. They drink plenty of wine, thanking him for his terrific meal, but finally and painfully their son Nelson attempts to explain who he might be to his parents:

‘How can I explain to you what I am what I am any better than I can explain what you are?” That is perhaps the most profound statement one might make to one’s parents. “You have to understand, this has nothing to do with you. I am who I am, probably since I was born….I don’t feel I have to be dishonest with myself just so you two can feel comfortable.”

     When his mother challenges him about how does he know, Nelson explains that his relationship with Angelo is not his first one, and he simply knows now who he is. Now his father is perhaps even more disturbed and wants to have a few private moments with his son. He takes him to a local sports bar where he thought they were always “on the same page,” but Nelson makes it clear that they were in different books, his father enjoying the sports game, while he always like the “players.” His father, probably similar to my own father if he could have expressed his feelings, suggests that if he might have opened up to him earlier, they might “have fixed this.” But Nelson makes it clear, that was precisely why he didn’t come to him earlier, “I’m not broken.” He points to the soccer players, saying you know some of those guys are gay, the only thing that’s broken is that they can’t come out.

     Yet the parents in this film are still unable to come to terms with their son’s sexuality. They seek out a doctor Herman, whose wisdom consists of normative blanket of comfort, blaming yet again the mother for her lack of attentiveness, and the child replacing his mother with his father. Bad Freudian psychotherapy that is, in fact, totally nonsense. Even Shirley suggests “if you ever go back to med school, I’ll pay for it.”

     Still not accommodated to the sexuality of his son, Martin calls up Sybil, you remember her, the Playpen model, to encourage her to have sex with his son. She argues that it’s truly impossible since he’s gay, but Martin still can’t quite assimilate the situation, and the encounter turns into his own sexual compulsion as he attempts to have sex with her, which again reveals his own frustrations, related, of course, to his inability to accept his own son’s sexual orientation.

     As she leaves Martin’s office, she runs into Uncle Moshia who recognizes her as the gift of God’s beauty. She quickly kisses him and escapes, describing him as “a real man,” whatever that might mean in this endless confusion and misunderstanding of sexuality.

     After all we’ve been through, Shirley wants to meet with Angelo’s parents, another entire dimension that I’m not sure this already hysterical film needed to prove its point. But here we are with Angelo’s father suggesting he has no desire to meet “the other parents,” and his wife arguing that it is nice gesture. We already know we are entering a territory in which there is no turning back.

     But where can they meet? The Ferraros are terrified of any Italian restaurant where they might be seen by friends, the Hirschs afraid of any Chinese restaurant where they would be recognized. Shirley doesn’t like raw food, so a sushi place is out of the question. Besides the Vietnamese, the Korean, and the Thais are excluded because they all buy from the Hirsch’s. They finally settle on a Russian restaurant, which serves only vodka.

     The two women, mothers of Angelo and Nelson, share photographs, while the reluctant fathers wait for their drinks, not at all seemingly interested on the youth of their own now lost sons. But the men, almost in competition, bring out their own pictures of their sons engaging in sports. Their patriarchal interests become immediately apparent until it breaks down into Nelson as a cheerleader, Angelo playing a character in Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Ceasar in what Martin describes as a skirt. Their macho world is gradually falling apart before their very eyes as they realize their “boys” where already moving into a world which they themselves could not easily embrace.

    Their meet-up does not end amicably. Little in this hysterical film ends up with a reasonable possibility. Shirley returns home ready to put her face into a gas oven, although they have only an electric stove. Angelo and Nelson seek an island where they will be free, although Angelo reminds him that there are no islands like that.


       But in the last segments the two men are on TV as one of the first same-sex couples demanding rights to adopt a child. When they meet with local objections, both families leap into the fray to help their sons, and together, the Hirschs and the Ferraros finally are joined in a battle that is far more important than their regrets and problematics. Finally, they become proud grandparents of a new generation, the men smoking cigars in reward of the successful adoption of the child by Nelson and Angelo as if they had just concluded a mafia deal. That is, in fact, the height of the hysteria that this film felt was needed to take its audience into the embracement of a simple relationship between two men. Forget it, Mr. Afineevsky, I might argue. We have all mostly been there long before you imagined it.

 

Los Angeles, March 16, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema (March 2025).

Ron Fisher | 1st Shade of the Heart / 2024

love thwarted

by Douglas Messerli

 

Ron Fisher (screenwriter and director) 1st Shade of the Heart (2024) [11.30 minutes]

 

Ron Fisher’s 2024 short film 1st Shade of the Heart is yet another tale of a young gay boy who just isn’t ready or who doesn’t have the courage to come out. It’s an endless tale, and reveals once more just how the heteronormative world holds control of young minds. You might think that as late as 2024 that young boys and men might have been able to escape the forces that make them suffer, but in Tom’s case (Stuart Bassett), despite his brief affair with a boy he meets at a party (Cale Kazmeirczak), he just can’t escape the chains to which he’s attached himself to heteronormative behavior.


      Apparently the two boys even have sex, although we don’t get a glimpse of it in this film, one of the increasingly Puritanical series of films that have recently been released; but he just can’t commit himself to a gay relationship. In this case, at least, he recognizes that his resistance is a problem within himself, even asking his friend, “Do you think I’m a bad person?” He also keeps a shield of heterosexual being by describing himself as simply “complicated.”

     Obviously, the pushes and pulls of his inner self are at war with what he has been taught. Even a discussion of Christ “walking on water,” leads him to describe it as blasphemy. Without making it entirely clear, director Ron Fisher suggests that Tom is a child of a highly religious upbringing.



     Usually, in such films there is a resolution, a discovery that leads the confused figure out of the darkness of the fear, but no such luck in this short. Tom’s would-be lover, after a final hug, drives off into the dark accompanied by the sad music of Frank and his daughter Nancy’s “Somethin’ Stupid”:

 

I know I stand in line

Until you think you have the time

To spend an evening with me

And if we go some place to dance

I know that there's a chance

You won't be leaving with me

 

Then afterwards we drop into a quiet little place

And have a drink or two

And then I go and spoil it all

By saying somethin' stupid like, "I love you" 

 

    The young man of this film is simply not ready to be loved by another man, and will clearly have to go through the long heartbreak of many a heterosexual relationship, perhaps even marriage, before he recognizes how truly stupid he has been to deny himself what he truly desires.

 

Los Angeles, March 16, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (March 2025).

 

Nickolas Perry | Must Be the Music / 1996

the date

by Douglas Messerli

 

Nickolas Perry (screenwriter and director) Must Be the Music / 1996

 

Nickolas Perry’s 1996 work Must Be the Music begins in a car in the Los Angeles San Fernando Valley with four teenage boys—Eric (Michael Saucedo), Kevin (Justin Urich), Dave (Travis Sher), and, driving and narrating the events, Milo (Milo Ventimiglia, in is his very first role) heading to downtown LA to a gay dance club, Orbit. It is a typical Friday night at 11:00 when young high school or recent teenage graduates head out to find love, suggesting that this not very profound little movie might even be described as representing the “searching for love” or “first date” gay genre. Except nothing quite turns out to be entirely typical in this 15 minute short.


     First of all, one of the boys, Dave, Milo’s cousin who lives in the Valley in Northridge, is straight. His only claim to fame, so the voice-over tells us, is that he was beating off during the 1994 Northridge earthquake and he claims that he was the best orgasm he’s ever had. Alas, this is also the funniest line of this Sundance Festival premier.

     Eric is a little “immature,” but cute so Milo tells us. The final member of this quartet, Kevin, is quite apparently obnoxious in his behavior, so the voice-over tells us, to irritate his parents. After all, like the narrator he went to Fairfax High, which seems to explain everything.

     Orbit is a large sprawling complex of open rooms with ear-splitting music and, as in most such youth oases, hundreds of skinny, sweating bodies, mostly male but also female, heaving themselves against each other in the hopes to draw enough attention from someone with whom they might share the night.

      Each go their separate ways almost immediately after entering, Dave to find a corner—not very successfully—where he might wait out the time for the others to return him home. Why he has joined them is never quite explained.

      Milo heads directly to the main floor of dancers, while the two other split away to disappear from sight. But soon after we observe Kevin slapping the hands of friends. And in another corner of the warehouse, Eric finds his previous boyfriend Matt (Grant Swanson), whose new lover Gregg (Eddie Mui) challenges Eric about whether or not he’s “still confused,” Matt having evidently spoken to Gregg about the fact that when Eric is with boys he’s gay, but when he’s with girls he describes himself as straight. The movie doesn’t explore this “sexual confusion” any further; if it had it might have provided this work with a little more depth.

      Meanwhile, when the crowd opens up the view a bit Milo spots a tall, very thin, blond-haired boy dancing by himself (Jason Adelman, who first performed in a McDonald’s ad at age 10) in a manner that might appear as if the stranger is completely drugged out, spinning in his own groove in almost slow motion; but for our young hero it is clearly lust at first sight.

      Having retreated to the bathroom to wash off his face, Milo once again encounters the young adonis, and for a moment we might even imagine that the film was about to explore the common gay phenomenon of bathroom sex, particularly when a few seconds later both boys find themselves at the urinal separated by a few dividers but coyly eyeing one another nonetheless. Another boy intervenes between their glances, and Milo exits, Kevin meeting him almost the moment he returns to the deafening noise to ask for a favor.

     He’s met a new guy who’s “totally cute,” and he’s got to leave now, he declares, because the boy’s parents demand that he return by a certain hour. Obviously, he’s asking Milo to leave the bar in order to drive the boy home where hopefully they can have sex or at least make a date. The only thing is he can’t recall the kid’s name.

     Milo at first refuses, but Kevin insists he’s got to help “hook him up,” “he’s gorgeous.” Putting Eric in charge of keeping an eye of Milo’s cousin, he finally agrees, evidently intending to take Kevin’s date home and return to the dance.

     “I think his name begins with an “M” or an “S,” says an exuberant Kevin, who obviously has been so delighted to have met the “cute” guy that, as he puts it, he can’t remember anything. Besides, it’s impossible inside to hear anything.

        As their conversation emphatically ends they suddenly meet up with Kevin’s date, who introduces himself as Michael—the same boy over whom Milo has been drooling earlier on.

        The viewer can only wonder how someone as unattractive and socially unfit as Kevin might have attracted the blond beauty, and it is clear that the now angry Milo wonders the same thing. Driving the boy home, Milo must now play the role of a chauffeur for the couple in the backseat, chattering away about whether or not they have boyfriends and other necessary pre-dating data.

        The voice-over returns, Milo saying how much he hates Kevin and calling him an “asshole.”

“Here I am trapped in a moving vehicle with the cutest guy I’ve ever seen. It’s not fair. I’m dangerously close to getting into an accident just so that I can throw myself on Michael a split-second before he dies.”

         Indeed, he almost does crash the car, but fortunately they arrive safely to Michael’s house, Kevin accompanying him the door like every young movie suitor hoping for one first kiss before the end of the night.

          Michael, however, reports that he’s forgotten his sweater in the car and runs back to tell Milo that he’s sorry for the situation, having not known that Milo and Kevin were friends. We can only suspect that he’s shown interest in Kevin simply so that he might hitch a ride home so to please his mother who “freaks out” when he gets home after 1:00 a.m.  He gives Milo his telephone number, hinting that he would love to hook up with him.

          Kevin says goodbye and returns to the car kiss-less, the “friends” driving back to the bar, with Milo at least knowing that he’s got a date. So, in the end we discover that this movie was after all just a “dating” flick. I have to say, I much prefer Jan Oxenberg’s quite hilarious version of lesbian first date encounters in her 1975 film A Comedy in Six Unnatural Acts.

          And I have to presume that director Perry’s title is ironic, for surely it is not the music that pulls these boys into and sends them out of orbit every weekend. 

 

Los Angeles, January 23, 2021

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog and World Cinema Review (January 2021).

David Fourier | Des majorettes dans l’espace (Marjorettes in Space) / 1996

the film is a mensch

by Douglas Messerli

 

David Fourier (screenwriter and director) Des majorettes dans l’espace (Marjorettes in Space) / 1996

 

The French award-winning LGBTQ 1996 film Des majorettes dans l'espace (Majorettes in Space) is a film of definition, a comic study of Aristotelian deductive logic that attempts to explain gay values by spoofing standard logic.

     It begins with two simple presumptions: “Of all living beings, only man knows he is going to die. Of all living beings, only man is capable of humor and poetry.” It then introduces three living beings: Catherine, Laurent, and Vincent. Vincent, the narrative voice reports, is a homosexual.


     Suddenly the narrator along with the visual image shifts to a hevea tree, which produces latex which, as we know, goes into the making condoms. Showing a picture of a male nude, the narrator declares of the object in his fingers: “This is a condom.” Condoms, the voice-over explains, are used, for example, to prevent conception when two heterosexuals make love. At that very moment the film displays an erect penis upon which the condom is placed.

     “Otherwise,” the narrator continues, “Catherine and Laurent would have dozens and dozens of children. Which is impossible because their car is too small.”

     The image shifts once more to nature where the narrator takes us from one tree to many, a group of trees, he posits, being called a forest. A group of people often make up a march, in this case many homosexuals celebrating in a Gay Pride parade. It is a demonstration by Vincent and his friends, asserts our disembodied voice, to show that they exist and to claim the same rights as heterosexuals like Catherine and Laurent. This proves that homosexuals have a lot of humor, the unsaid presumption of course being that Laurent and his friends are therefore human beings.

      Two nude figures running near the forest reveal that Catherine and Laurent are not at the march. “They are in the forest and are going to make love.” Like most human beings they regularly make love, except for,” our narrator notes, “the astronauts on Soyouz 27—my own addendum: for those of you who may have forgotten, Soyouz 27 was the 1978 Soviet crewed spacecraft which flew to the orbiting Salyut 6 space station—“junior majorettes, and Jean-Paul”—who was the Pope of the Roman Catholic Church from 1978-2005.

    Dimitri and Igor, the cosmonauts aboard Soyouz 27, so we are told, are heterosexuals, and heterosexuals of the same sex do not make love together...the narrator pauses...“unless the mission is prolonged.”

     And here this charming philosophical treatise collapses into something quite different from what so far we have been led to expect, noting that Igor has forgotten the condoms so Dimitri is sulking. The junior majorettes don’t make love, the narrator argues, because they are too young. In the new illogical logic which narrator has now established, John-Paul is described as being “a rare and resistant (they show him being shot in an assassination attempt in 1981) being called a Pope. He lives in airports and with invisible beings in space, sorts of cosmonauts.”


      The film shows a junior majorette, Julie, who also communicates with individuals in space (the film shows several cartoon heroes behind her) but she is not a Pope. Deductive logic falls apart.

     The Pope, it goes without the narrator saying it, believes in neither condoms nor in homosexuals like Vincent.

    Meanwhile, in order to avoid thinking of Igor, Dimitri has hung pictures of majorettes in his bedroom on Soyouz 27. Yet we are told there are no real majorettes in space because when you throw a baton it does not fall back. Besides booties, worn by majorettes, are outlawed in outer space, just as we might remind ourselves without the narrator needing to bother, are condoms and homosexuals outlawed by the Pope.

        The narrator now reveals that this may be the last time that Vincent attends the Gay Pride parade since he is ill. “Vincent has AIDS. AIDS is a killer disease transmitted by blood and sexual secretions.” John Paul is old. He will soon die. Vincent is young. He will soon die. Deductive logic has no power in the world in which AIDS exists. The narrator cannot offer any further rational deductions, so we are now forced to make our own.

      Evidently, Vincent has not used a condom, perhaps become the Pope has outlawed them. And now Vincent is going die at age 20, and being a human being, he knows it. He soon will no longer exist, despite all his and his friends attempts to declare that homosexuals do, in fact, exist.

      A bootie is also a slang word in English for the ass, which is the entry, for most gay men, of sexual secretions. Igor and Dimitri would not need condoms in space if there were no AIDS because they would not have children, who generally know nothing about death until they grow up. Even though we know gravity exists, it does not exist space, where the invisible beings with whom the Pope communicates are believed to exist.

       And while homosexuality is not permitted by the Pope, a cosmonaut can still imagine having sex with a child majorette.

       This film won the 1997 BAFTA Award for the Best Short Film and the 1998 César Award for Best Short Film, evidently for its sense of humor. This film is evidently a human being. But let us hope it does die.

 

Los Angeles, February 18, 2021

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog and World Cinema Review (February 2021).

 

Greg Osborne | Intersect / 2024

the calm of the gay bar, the peace of drugs

by Douglas Messerli

 

Greg Osborne (screenwriter and director) Intersect / 2024 [30.30 minutes]

 

US director Greg Osborne’s Intersect has got to be one of the worst LGBTQ movies I have ever watched—and since I’ve now watched some 3,000 such films, that is saying a lot.

     This film begins with an absolutely inane introduction spoken in a voice-over about the need for “calm” in a world of constant motion, distraction, and hate. In a highly repetitive speech in which the narrator keeps asking the viewer whether or not he can hear him, the word calm is repeated enough times to almost make the viewer want to turn off the movie at that moment.


     And the “calm” the narrator calls for, evidently, is found in the world of gay sex and drugs, the first segment involving a young man about to get married to a female who, after an argument with her seeks solace in a gay bar, having long been “curious” about gay sex. There he finds anything but calm as a pole performer lures him upstairs for drugs. Somehow, after a long vomiting scene, the handsome user quite explicably is now hooked, on the drugs evidently since we have no evidence that he ever did involve himself with gay sex.

     In the second segment, an experienced gay man attempts to lure a young, highly tattooed pre-med student away from his books, and finally gets him to meet up in a desert gay spa. Once more, the chase seems to be the major subject since we never see them engaged in the “calm” or even the wild chaos of sex.

     And in the third segment we see an entire young police force busily shaking down and stripping hustlers for their own sexual purposes—no sex portrayed—as well as for drugs and kick-backs such as the lovely home to which one young officer retreats after he is fired from the force. Don’t worry about him. The sergeant in charge is also fired and comes looking for him, admitting that he has always had his eye on him, the two evidently falling into a permanent affair.

     Most of these short serial dramas are portrayed by a narrative voice, since the actors, not even listed in IMDb, cannot provide us with the slightest hint that they know how to act. As one Letterboxd commentator put it, “this is a porn film without the porn.”

     I have no clue why Osborne wanted to make this film, what he was trying to say, or who might have put up the money to support such a clueless offering; I can only suppose that the director was also on drugs. Certainly sex was not on this creator’s mind. It’s almost as if this film wants to be gay without being involved in gay sex.

 

Los Angeles, March 16, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (March 2025).

 

 

My Queer Cinema Index [with former World Cinema Review titles]

Films discussed (listed alphabetically by director) [Former Index to World Cinema Review with new titles incorporated] (You may request any ...