Wednesday, September 11, 2024

Sonny Midha | Untitled—Take Me to Your Leader Toshiba series / 2010? [commercial advertisement]

in need of a new cut

by Douglas Messerli

 

Sonny Midha (director) Untitled—Take Me to Your Leader Toshiba series / 2010? [37 seconds]

[commercial advertisement]

 

Toshiba has long been known for its general lack of sensitivity regarding the LGBTQ community. In 2013 Toshiba Canada received some flack for an advertisement titled “Math Notes” which featured Toshiba’s Excite Write tablet, which has the ability to convert handwritten notes and sketches into sharable files. In this case a guy asks his roommate for his calculus notes and, upon receipt. looks rather “dismayed,” so Queerty reported, and “almost repulsed, when he instead receives a drawing of himself reimagined by his roommate as a hunky centaur.” The sender responds, “Oops, wrong document.” If nothing else that ad was, as what GLAAD has described it, rather “homo-queasy.”


     But even earlier Toshiba apparently showed English director and producer Sonny Midha’s 2010 animated advertisement as part of their “Take Me to Your Leader” campaign which featured two aliens, one greeted with total disgust by the earthlings with whom he meets up, the other, who quickly assimilates to his/her location, seen as rather charming. 

      In this case, the aliens visit a hair salon, headed up by an extremely fem hairdresser in a pink half-tank top and slim light-blue jeans, who behaves in a stereotypically gay manner and whines and moans in a very high vocal register.


     Meeting up with the coarse alien, pointing his gun, the startled queer reacts with horror as the alien yells out “Take me. Take me,” the hairdresser, putting hand to mouth aghast. A moment later, the second alien pops out from his/her hair dryer with high bouffant hairdo into and out of which fly bees, which quite delights the queen.


     Finally, the course manly alien yells out the full phrase, “Take me to your leader!” the femme hairdresser pointing to his left where we watch the Toshiba logo being spit out across the page.

     We all know such gay figures exist, but using such a stereotype to promote a product just doesn’t sit well with this gay viewer. Did Toshiba see this ad as an attempt to include the LGBTQ+ or even just the gay community? Did it expect us to follow the shears of this tired and stale view of gay men to the brave new world of Toshiba? Forget it. I’ll stay and have the hairdresser give me a stylish new cut.

 

Los Angeles, September 11, 2024

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (September 2024).

Adam Tyree | In Half / 2012

reasons for a death

by Douglas Messerli

 

Adam Tyree (screenwriter and director) In Half / 2012 [14 minutes]

 

There’s something basically unlikeable about Adam Tyree’s short, 14-minute film about twins, In Half. If not precisely unlikeable, at least it begins feeling like something is askew, that the central characters have not yet quite figured out on which side of the issues they stand. 

      It begins mid-way through a funeral, evidently being held of the UCLA campus in Los Angeles, although that simply may have been an available space for Tyree to film his work since it no way plays a role in the film itself. 



      We also recognize the brother of the dead man, James (Jake Brown), who we quickly perceive was a twin to the man who apparently has committed suicide. And we are just as suddenly introduced to the man who was the dead twin’s former lover, Travis (Adam Bucci), who has evidently attended the ceremony uninvited. The other figures are never identified with regard to their specific relationships to the dead boy, but we presume one of them is his mother and others are family friends and other relatives.

      When Travis attempts to introduce himself to James, he is quickly dismissed with a snarl, “I know who you are.” And others in the background also show their hostility to Travis. One, in particular, a black man named Sam (Kim Estes) seems to blame the brother’s death precisely on having had a relationship with Travis, as well as being gay, attended with what he presumes means drugs, diseases, and a destructive lifestyle.

       Travis, having overheard Sam’s homophobic comments, immediately speaks out for James, but whatever sympathy he might arouse in that defense is almost immediately muted when he rather violently accosts Sam, James being forced to pull Travis away from the confrontation by taking him outside the chapel, reprimanding him for behaving that way at the solemn occasion.

       Whatever judgment we might have suspended about Travis’ behavior is quickly dismissed, moreover, when all he can do in response is to offer James a joint, make light of the situation, and, skateboarding around the troubled brother of the dead man, accuse him of being the opposite of all the good qualities the brother represented while in the very next moment asking if he can “crash” at James’ place for the night since his current lover—yes, we discover, he had broken up with the brother over some vague notion that it was “time to move on”—lives in Pasadena.

       Far too old to be such an adolescent, wise-cracking, “smart-alek,” Travis is someone we quickly grow to distrust. And we are even more amazed when the apparently rather straight-laced James agrees to the share his apartment with him for the evening, where a few frames later the movie takes us.

      There, he further makes himself uncomfortably at home, prodding James even further in an attempt, evidently, to break through his shell of apparent heterosexual normative behavior. In the process he does, however, manage to convey just how full of life James’ brother was and how much he loved James. Indeed, he finally reveals that he knows just “how close” the twins actually were, insinuations that result it a near violent reaction from James—which ends in a crying jag on Travis’ shoulder, the two embracing and kissing, and ending up together in bed.

        Obviously, the twins did have a very close relationship involving sex, and we can now well understand James’ fascination with Travis in his attempt to get closer again to his brother to find, after they had broken off their relationship, how he felt and how he loved.

        Yet, Tyree’s film offers no rational solutions to James’ deep loss. The next morning, after Travis leaves, he goes to Sam’s house, knocks on his door, and makes sure Sam watches him from his bedroom window, as he puts a bat through Sam’s car windows and runs off. If we might applaud James’ return to the righteous fold of LGBTQ life, we certainly cannot admire his way of attempting to solve homophobia or come to terms with his own deep loss.

        I can’t say as I admire this short work about gay twin love that refuses not only to explore the roots of homophobia, its possible solutions, or the reason for James’ brother’s early death, leaving us only with the characters who, in their own failed behavior in life, may represent a few clues of the reasons for the latter.

 

Los Angeles, September 13, 2021

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (September 2021). 

Florian Gottschick | Zwillinge (Twins) / 2010

love at first sight

by Douglas Messerli

 

Florian Gottschick and Denise Langenhan (screenplay), Florian Gottschick (director) Zwillinge (Twins) / 2010 [15 minutes]

    Florian Gottschick’s film concerns two brothers Daniel and Jan (Stefan and Tobias Schönenberg) who meet up again, after a year and a half self-willed hiatus, at the bachelor party for Daniel who the next day plans to marry Sofie (Natalie Krane).


   When he answers the doorbell, dressed in a bunny rabbit costume, Daniel is shocked to see his brother, whom he almost hints is not welcome at the event. Nonetheless, he cannot resist inviting him in, and over a night of partying that extends evidently to a local nightclub, he ends up inexplicably handcuffed to a pipe in the women’s bathroom, his brother sitting at his side, who releases him only after a deep kiss.        

     The two men have been justified in the uncertainty of the reunion as they find themselves sharing a bed again. And in the morning, when Sofie enters the kitchen where Jan is now hunkering

down over his coffee, she is startled after sharing a kiss and confidences with him to discover he is not Daniel. Apparently, it is she who has invited him to the previous evening’s stag night, and as soon as the two get a moment to know one another, she wastes no time in laying out the territory, openly asking him if he and Daniel are still fucking. She adds that she’s not the jealous type and knows that in marrying Daniel she is marrying both of them.


       Although apparently they have invited no one to witness their private ceremony, she dresses, in her bridal gown with only Jan in attendance; soon after, again with his brother at his side, Daniel begins to dress in his blacks and whites, wondering out loud whether he’s made the right decision in agreeing to marry.


     Jan says it probably is for the best, but as the two lock eyes, Daniel suddenly undresses as they engage suddenly in a quick act of coitus. Daniel redresses—at least we presume it’s Daniel—and heads off to the marriage ceremony, the other sitting on the bed in contemplation of their obviously unresolved sexual relationship with each other.

     Surely, Sophie has married both of them, and Jan and Daniel may now not even attempt to live apart.

 

Los Angeles, June 4, 2021

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (June 2021).

 

Douglas Messerli | "Sleeping with Yourself: Two on Twins" [Introduction]

sleeping with yourself: two on twins

by Douglas Messerli

 

Gay men—I honestly have no idea whether or not it is true of lesbians as well—have long been fascinated by the sexual allure of the identical twin. One might immediately jump to the conclusion that this attraction has something to do with the Narcissus complex that underlies so much of gay mythology; for many decades psychiatrists attributed homosexuality as being a manifestation of a severe condition of narcissism which explained the attraction to the same sex. I think, given the crippling self-hatred experienced by so many gay men throughout history, however, that we can quickly dismiss that notion.


     Perhaps it is just the possibility of finding someone of the same sex who shares so very many things in common without having to go through the difficult process of finding a compatible other in a world in which, given the LGBTQ minority, there is so much less possibility of selection that attracts us to the twin—someone who knows and loves you completely from birth—makes everything else so easy. And if you like your own appearance, that makes it even better. It is certainly the most succinct example of the metaphor of falling in love with someone “at first sight.”

     Moreover, identical twins are themselves born outsiders, a minority that seems queer to the normative world simply because of the deep bond and interconnected thinking of brothers unavailable to others. As I’ve often written, the idea of doubles and doubling have long been intertwined with gay consciousness.

      And finally, since a 1980 study of twins and homosexuality—as I have noted elsewhere in these pages—found that 65.8% of monozygotic twins (identical twins) were diagnosed as having a homosexual orientation, while only 30.4% of dizygotic twins showed that orientation, there is not only evidence “supporting the argument for a biological basis in sexual orientation,” but some statistics arguing that identical twins “have a shared genetic predisposal to same-sex sexual behavior.” In short, identical twins not only seem to prove that homosexual behavior is genetic but that monozygotic twins themselves are prone to same-sex desires. 

      Gay porn, with its many famous twin sexual performers, might certainly seem to argue for their gay appeal: the early Bruce Weber shoot of the Carlson twins (who later claimed not be sexually active with one another), and the numerous porn films featuring the Peters, Mendez, Goffney, Fischer, Studding, King, Aston, Boston, Stax, Mercury, Odyssey, Rosso, and Otov twins, as well as the Visconti triplets—twins are a staple of the gay-porn diet.

      Several films have approached this topic, but in 2010 German director Florian Gottschick rather straightforwardly took on the subject in his Zwillinge (Twins), not to be confused with Ivan Reitman’s 1988 comedy of the same title which improbably paired Arnold Schwarzenegger and Danny DeVito, about to be, so I read only today, revisited in a sequel.

 

Los Angeles, September 13, 2021

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (September 2021).


Julián Hernández | Atmósfera (Atmosphere) / 2010

coming out

by Douglas Messerli

 

Emiliano Arenales Osorio, Ulises Pérez Mancilla, and Sergio Loo (screenplay), Julián Hernández (director) Atmósfera (Atmosphere) / 2010 [20 minutes]

 

So prescient is Julián Hernández’s short film AtmĂłsfera that if you were given no date, you might imagine that he premiered this work in 2022, as most of us gradually came together after long separations due to the pandemic COVID-19 and its variants. But this 2010 film features three individuals who are isolated and terrified because of undetermined previous epidemic that plagues a Mexican coastal city, where public speakers announce (with the voice of Patricia Madrid) every few minutes to “Be calm. Do not touch objects or other people,” as well as suggesting that individuals who have come down with the disease thus far evidently have gone on “shopping sprees” after being exposed to the sun or water.


     Although the epidemic’s symptoms are evidently still in question, the announcements caution the population to stay indoors, to remain in the dark, and to drink only bottled water, which one of the first figures we observe Cecila (Damayanti Quintanar) does in great quantities. She is a photographer who has evidently sneaked out, as later it appears she regularly does, to snap photos, often leaving them where she has taken them (her camera is the automatic self-developing kind) before rushing back to her room and closing off the blinds.

      She is the first one to observed, after one of her raids on the sunlit terrace of her apartment complex, that touching her body brings about great pleasure, not terrible suffering, and that doing so her clothing begins to take on color in a world that Julián Hernández otherwise presents as being in black-and-white. Her dress grows purple, and as she puts on lipstick, her otherwise gray lips turn red, the color of which remains on the black-and-white glass window to which she presses them.


       Two other men in the complex, Alberto and Felipe (Harold Torres and Guillermo Villegas) also begin slightly to break the rules, one skateboarding the terraces of his complex as he darts in and out of the sun, and the other taking a nice hot bath in his tub, both feeling, it appears, rejuvenated from the experience. The skateboarder Felipe (Guillermo Villegas) finally faces the sun, enjoying the feeling it has upon his face and the bather Alberto (Harold Torres), hearing the movements of both the skateboarder and the stealthy photographer, checks out the terrace, discovering some of the photographers’ planted pictures.      

     Increasingly over a few moments in time, as the public announcement system continues blasting its dire restrictions, they all escape from seclusion and move, as Cecilia already has, to the beach, joining her near the place where she sits.



      The dark blue water and the golden sand are so irresistible that finally Felipe strips naked and walks in the water, waving the others to follow. Cecilia does the same, and finally Alberto, all of them discovering the joy of just standing together in the plashing waves. As Cecilia sets her camera to make a self-photo the three gather in the incoming waves to have their picture taken, which soon after they paste along with others to Felipe’s surfboard before returning to the waters as they move out further for a swim, suddenly disappearing from view as the film ends.

       The epidemic, it appears, perhaps spread by local tourists, is simply one of enjoyment, of a sense of freedom and communion with each other, which these three disobedient youths have suddenly discovered. Just being with others is a lure that this trio could not ignore despite the societal warnings.

      Atmosphere is certainly not one of Hernández’s best films, but is utterly fascinating, particularly given its new pertinence in our post-epidemic days. This short science-fiction tale may reveal an entirely new meaning for “coming out” movies.

 

Los Angeles, August 20, 2022

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (August 2022).

Andrew Steggall | To the Marriage of True Minds / 2010

the impediments

by Douglas Messerli

 

Andrew Steggall (screenwriter, with Abdulkarim Kasid and Hassam Abdulnazzak, and director) To the Marriage of True Minds / 2010 [11 minutes]

 

I think it best to read British director Andrew Steggall’s short film of 2010, To the Marriage of True Minds as a parable of love and a kind of riff on Shakespeare’s Sonnet 116 rather than seeing it as a small naturalistic drama.


    While it is true that the film begins in a house in Baghdad where two gay men are holed up, trying escape those who have ordered their arrest—perhaps a very real situation—it quickly moves into a poetic fantasy of sorts as one of the men, Falah (Amir Boutrous) reads to his lover Hayder (Waleed Elgadi) Sonnet 116, his friend at first imagining that perhaps Falah, himself, has written these lines:

 

Let me not to the marriage of true minds

Admit impediments; love is not love

Which alters when it alteration finds,

Or bends with the remover to remove.

O no, it is an ever-fixèd mark

That looks on tempests and is never shaken;

It is the star to every wand'ring bark

Whose worth's unknown, although his height be taken.

Love's not time's fool, though rosy lips and cheeks

Within his bending sickle's compass come.

Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks,

But bears it out even to the edge of doom:

If this be error and upon me proved,

I never writ, nor no man ever loved.

 

    The persecutors break through the doors, shining lights upon the two hidden men, representing their possible arrest, imprisonment, and death. The screen turns white.

    In the next frame Hayder is being questioned by British authorities attempting to determine his history and possible reasons to grant him asylum. His comments are often dissociative, as he focuses on a small whole in the ceiling, allowing them to follow the passage of day or night: “Then there was a storm and there was no star for a time.” Falah, we are told, grew ill. He couldn’t stop him Hayder explains, he argued with the clerics, believing he should be free.


      The female British interrogator (Jane Bertish) only makes things worse, as she advises him, “Let’s not worry about Falah,” attempting to turn the questions back on Hayder himself. But Hayder becomes even more incoherent, even more troubled about his missing lover. “Where is Falah,” he demands to know, “tell me where he is.” He tries to explain to her what would happen to them, to Falah, having spoken out against the clerics.

      The translator suggests it is now calm in Baghdad, no reason to leave. Hayder demands to know, “When did you leave Iraq?” obviously incredulous that, having lived through his ordeal, someone could say that. The central interrogator attempts once more to return to Hayder himself as the subject: “Why did you leave Baghdad? Why did you come to England?”

      Perhaps not even now feeling safe to explain his love, Hayder remains quiet, as the film’s narrative flashes back to a time when he was a young teenager, having made a paper boat. Another tougher kid comes back, rolling a tire. Or perhaps it is the other way around, Falah with the boat, transfixing the tough street kid with his imaginative creation.

       In any event, the interrogation is now over, with Hayder sitting disconsolately on a bus bench. We have no clue to how the interview turned out, whether or not he has been able to explain to them that he has been forced to leave his homeland because of his love of Falah.


      In a small book he has with him he obviously has looked up a name, and now goes on search of it. It finds what he is seeking, Al Saqi Books, but the store is now closed. He pounds on the glass in frustration, but gradually notices in the front window, a collection of Shakespeare’s Sonnets translated in to Arabic.   

     The reading of the poem continues, as we return to the first encounter between the two boys, the one with the paper boat still imagining that the concrete street is a river, while the boy with the tire fills up the empty inner ring with water, putting the boat upon it. By this time, it is clear, the boys have become friends destined to grow up into the film’s lovers.


       It appears that Hayder, with place to go, wanders the streets all night, falling against a wall as a narrator reads the lines:

 

Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks,

But bears it out even to the edge of doom.


       In the next frame Hayder is in a London park, either Regent’s or Hyde Park, with swans swimming past him. He has once again constructed a paper boat. As he looks in the direction of its course he notices another man who also seems to be moving toward him. He stands and begins walking to greet the man, his beloved Falah, as the two embrace, finally answering the interviewer’s probing question.

      This is a lovely political/poetic fantasy that frankly only a British director such as Steggall might have ever imagined making into a film.

    

Los Angeles, September 11, 2024

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (September 2024).

    

 

 

 

Index [listed alphabetically by director]

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.