Tuesday, July 16, 2024

Alex Mello | Außerhalb des Aquariums (Outside the Aquarium) / 2021

 the definition of prejudice

by Douglas Messerli

 

Alex Mello and Fabio Brandi Torres (screenplay), Alex Mello (director) Außerhalb des Aquariums (Outside the Aquarium) / 2021 [25 minutes]

 

The aquarium, in the case, is the encased and separated world in which Jonas (writer and director Mello) is forced to perform in the German society which he has totally embraced and whose language he speaks fluently. Jonas, a seemingly assimilated German artist just happens also to be a black from Brazil who is beloved by his gay agent and by others in a society in which, nonetheless, he is fetishized by those around him as a black man with supposed sexual powers that have absolutely nothing to do with who he truly is.

    Working on a new exhibit of paintings he recalls how he was taken to a bar by his agent Felix (Johannes Langolf), kissed with Felix’s blue-painted lips and left behind. He goes home with the bartender, Felix (Johannes Langolf), who admits it’s his first time—with a black man that is—with whom he’s rather excited about the possibility of a fuck, particularly with the large imagined penis he stereotypically expects.

 

      Having carefully clean himself, he explains, he pulls down his pants and puts his ass out to be fucked as if somehow expecting an exotic experience created the by German white imagination.

     Jonas, disgusted by the situation, quickly puts on his coat and attempts to leave, but finds himself locked in and is told that if he insists on leaving or calling the police, as he threatens, that he’ll be arrested by the police for having stolen Felix’s wallet. What choice does a black outsider have in such a situation? And his anger is more than justifiable. The Germans around him see him, obviously, as some sort of special specimen, definitely not one of "them."


     Fortunately, we perceive that since this terrifying memory, he has met his new neighbor, Lukas (Julius Dombrink), another black man who himself feels in his adopted culture the same tensions. And the two have developed a loving relationship. The two, celebrating an anniversary, are now in a loving relationship, which Lukas wants to take to a new level by adopting a child, something Jonas is not at all certain he is ready to do.

     But in his newest painting, there appears a new figure between the images of the two of men, suggesting that he’s reading to move out of the “Aquarium,” the title of his new art exhibit.

      This film is quite fascinating and is an important statement of societal prejudice. My only wish is that the art it portrays was more significant than the cartoonish-like figures it portrays of Jonas’ artistic contributions.

 

Los Angeles, July 16, 2024

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (July 2024).

Arthur J. Bressan Jr. | Gay USA / 1977

taking stock

by Douglas Messerli

 

Arthur J. Bressan, Jr. (director, with Frederick Schminke, Pat Rocco, Grant Smith, and Bill Moritz) Gay USA / 1977

 

 Anita Jane Bryant was born in Oklahoma in 1940 and began singing on stage at the age of six, performing occasionally on radio and television. In 1958 she was the winner of the Miss Oklahoma contest and was runner-up in the 1959 Miss American pageant at age 18 soon after graduating from Tulsa’s Will Rogers High School.


    Throughout the 1950s Bryant had a total of 11 songs on the US “Hot 100,” three of them, “Paper Roses,” “In My Little Corner of the World” and “Till There Was You” selling over one million copies. In 1960 she married Miami disc jockey, Bob Green, the two of them frequently representing themselves as the ideal Christian couple with four children, two of them twins.

    In the 1960s she often toured with Bob Hope on holiday appearances for the United Service Organizations during the Vietnam War, and received the Silver Medallion Award from the National Guard for “outstanding service by an entertainer” as well as the Veterans Foreign Wars Leadership Gold Medallion.

      In 1969 Bryant became the spokesperson for the Florida Citrus Commission, winning over millions of orange drinking converts with her commercials touting "Breakfast without orange juice is like a day without sunshine” and singing “Come to the Florida Sunshine Tree.” Soon she also appeared in advertisements for Coca-Cola, Kraft Foods, Holiday Inn, and Tupperware while also teaming up with the Disney “Orange Bird” character which she brought into her orange juice commercials.

     In short, Bryant was an extremely popular family entertainment figure when in March 1, 1969 Jim Morrison and The Doors played at the Dinner Key Auditorium, a converted air hanger with 7,000 seats. The night was hot and muggy and the crowd, most of it standing, had grown impatient for the performance. Morrison, drunk as he was accustomed to being for many of his later performances, went into what some observers, including a couple of his fellow band players, described as a kind of hypnotic trance. After forgetting the lyrics to a couple of songs, he encouraged the crowd to strip: “Love one another. Love you brother, hug him. Man, I’d like to see a little nakedness around here...grab your friend and love him. Take your clothes off and love each other,” he yelled according to one report. As one reporter of the Matt Meltzer describes it “aside from the vaguely homoerotic elements of his screams, there wasn’t much that was so very offensive in his unorthodox performance.”

     But when, soon after, he stripped off his shirt and began shouting “You want to see my cock?” to which the crowd yelled in delight and rushed forward, the event turned into chaos. No one quite has the true answer of what happened that evening, and some can’t even name the correct date. But hundreds claim to have seen Morrison’s penis, although his fellow keyboard player onstage that evening, later declared on radio, "They hallucinated. I swear, the guy never did it. He never whipped it out. It was one of those mass hallucinations. I don't want to say the vision of Lourdes, because only Bernadette saw that, but it was one of those religious hallucinations, except it was Dionysus bringing forth, calling forth snakes. And they started coming down on a rickety little stage, and the entire stage collapsed.” Morrison and his band narrowly escaped death.

     A circus media outcry followed and 22 days later  Anita Bryant appeared with many others at a Rally for Decency at the Orange Bowl to protest the event.

     Wanted for his “crimes,” Morrison surrendered to the FBI in Los Angeles that July and faced a Florida trial in 1970; he was ultimately found guilty of two misdemeanors — indecent exposure and “open profanity.” Morrison was sentenced to six months in jail and a $500 fine, but he appealed the sentence and was released on $50,000 bond, granted unanimous clemency by Florida’s Clemency Board and pardoned by outgoing Florida governor Charlie Rist. But the event is generally described as the beginning of Morrison’s end; he would be dead less than a year later.

      Bryant, on the other hand, had found a new career in politics. Creating with others the “Save Our Children” campaign, she became the campaign and later foundation’s spokesperson. Bryant argued: "As a mother, I know that homosexuals cannot biologically reproduce children; therefore, they must recruit our children" and "If gays are granted rights, next we'll have to give rights to prostitutes and to people who sleep with St. Bernards and to nail biters." Those outrageous comments and many others gained her national attention, which soon turned into an organized opposition to gay rights that spread across the nation. Jerry Falwell Sr. and numerous others traveled to Miami in support of her anti-gay beliefs which they declared would be embraced across the nation.

     In 1977, Dade County, Florida, passed an ordinance sponsored by Bryant's former friend Ruth Shack that prohibited discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Bryant led a highly publicized campaign to repeal the ordinance as the leader of the “Save Our Children” coalition. The campaign was based on conservative Christian beliefs regarding the sinfulness of homosexuality and the perceived threat of homosexual recruitment of children and child molestation. She described gay people as “human garbage.” Bryant argued:

 

What these people really want, hidden behind obscure legal phrases, is the legal right to propose to our children that theirs is an acceptable alternate way of life. [...] I will lead such a crusade to stop it as this country has not seen before.”  

 

     On June 8, 1977, Bryant's campaign led to a repeal of the anti-discrimination ordinance by a margin of 69 to 31 percent. And in that same year Florida legislators approved a measure prohibiting gay adoption, a law which remained on the books until November 25, 2008. She lead successful anti-gay attacks in many parts of the US which led to Senator John Briggs initiative in California which would have made any pro-gay statements regarding homosexuals or homosexuality by any public school employee a cause for dismissal; fortunately, later statements against the initiative by current president Jimmy Carter, Governor Jerry Brown, former president Gerald Ford, and former California governor Ronald Regan meant that it was roundly defeated. She led “Save Our Children” campaigns, furthermore, in Minnesota, Kansas, and Oregon. And after being publicly “pied” in Iowa in October 1977, her career and her advocacy, particularly with the pushback of gay activists began to take a downturn.

     On June 21 Robert Hillsborough, a San Francisco city gardener was killed in an incident of gay bashing. Will Kohler describes the incident on the internet site Back2Stonewall:

 

"Robert Hillsborough, and his roommate, Jerry Taylor, went out to a disco for a night of dancing. They left sometime after midnight and stopped for a bite to eat at the Whiz Burger a few blocks from their apartment in the Mission District. When they left the burger joint, they were accosted by a gang of young men shouting anti-gay slurs at them. Hillsborough and Taylor ran into Hillsborough’s car as several of the attackers climbed onto the car’s roof and hood. Hillsborough drove off, and thought that he left his troubles behind him. What he didn’t know was that they were following him in another car. Hillsborough parked just four blocks away from their apartment. When they got out of the car four men jumped out of the other car and attacked them again. Jerry Taylor was beaten, but he managed to escape.  Robert Hillsborough wasn’t so lucky.

     Robert was brutally beaten and stabbed 15 times by 19-year-old John Cordova who was yelling, “Faggot! Faggot! Faggot!” Witnesses also reported that Cordoba yelled, “This one’s for Anita!” Neighbors were awakened by the commotion, and one woman screamed that she was calling the police, which prompted the four attackers to flee. Neighbors rushed to Hillsborough’s aid, but it was too late. Hillsborough died 45 minutes later at Mission Emergency Hospital. Cordoba and the three other assailants were arrested later that morning.”

 

In may seem strange to begin a piece about the celebratory film, Gay USA, about gay pride marches in the US cities of San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego, Houston, Chicago, and New York City on June 26, 1977 by describing one of the many homophobic monsters that have long haunted US history and a brutal incident of gay hate, but as lesbian filmmaker and historian Jeni Olson—one of the individuals behind the preservation of this film—brilliantly points out, these series of events lay behind the insightful and amazingly prescient achievement of a filmmaker that up until that day had been perceived primarily as a maker of porno films. Although we’ve since learned that Arthur J. Bressan’s earlier work was far more complex and interesting than this mistaken description of  his early works hint, it is still almost mindboggling that he would be able to imagine such a project, coordinate filmmakers in those six cities, edit the results, and produce a work that not only commemorates and gives meaning to that day’s events, but presents the history of those marches and charts out a future for gay pride that still has significance today.

      Bressan’s work, as Olson has described it, “is a remarkable collective portrait of LGBTQ experience in the early years of the modern gay rights movement. As an estimated 250,000 celebrants enjoy the day in San Francisco (more than double the attendance of the previous year), Bressan’s camera crews interview dozens of attendees who share their stories,” as well as straight supporters, and, importantly, individuals who clearly shared Bryant’s homophobia.

      One man who claims to have attended the parade only as an objective observer agrees that gay marchers have every right to march, but appears not so be so very objective, nonetheless, in assessment of gay people as having an imbalance of sexual hormones, creating a problem that represents “an accelerating genetic process across the country that is not a healthy problem.”

       An elderly woman detests the parades which didn’t happen in her day and shouldn’t be allowed to exist today either. “I’m 70 and when I grew up fortunately I never had this to face. And my now grown children didn’t have to see it.” Why she had ventured out to watch it, nonetheless, is never explained.

       A New York man, citing Bryant, argues that gays are attacking boys and girls in the (New York) Port Authority, the arrival point of millions every year who travel by bus.

       Another man questioned states that “If the country goes this way it will be a very unhealthy thing,” the interviewer suggesting that “Gay people don’t want the country to ‘go’ this way, they just want their rights.”

 


      But many others who identify as straight, some having even brought their children say that they’re worried for all human rights, and fearful of anti-abortionists and for racial inequalities as well.

       A woman who has brought her two sons claims that she wants them to see what’s happening and insists that they enjoy the noise and open fun. Her well-spoken pre-teen speaks out: “I believe in equal sexual rights for kids.”

      In San Francisco some mention the horrifying effects of Anita Bryant and the recent murder of Robert Hillsborough as being their reasons for attending. Others note the parade’s vast diversity, and still others describe its combination of seriousness and fun.

      A completely masked man’s sign reads “I am the homosexual you don’t want to see.”

      A woman insists that “To be with this many people and out in the streets and with so many men and feel so safe has never happened before.”

      After a rather long series of queries about how people define themselves, with a microphone poked into their face with the question “Are you gay?” one individual responds “Today I’m more than gay, I’m jubilant.”

       At another point in the hour and 20-minute movie a 30-year-old man who was once arrested and jailed for several days just for being gay, announces that he’s proud and joyful for this moment.     


      A woman from Kansas tells of the limitations she’d experienced in her home state and of the several jobs she’d lost. Two lesbians from Wichita explain why they eventually had to move to New York.

      Poet Pat Parker reads from her poem “But Gays Shouldn’t Be Blatant”:

 

Have you met the woman

who's shocked by 2 women kissing

& in the same breath,

tells you that she's pregnant?

but gays shouldn’t be blatant.

 

Or this straight couple

sits next to you in a movie

& you can't hear the dialogue

Cause of the sound effects.

but gays shouldn’t be blatant.

 

And the woman in your office

Spends your entire lunch hour

talking about her new bikini drawers

& how much her husband likes them.

but gays shouldn’t be balant.

 

      When the screen shows the inverted pink Act Up insignia and a float featuring blow-ups of Stalin, Hitler, Anita Bryant, a Ku Klux Klan member, and Idi Amin, the director intercuts with footage from Leni Reifensthahl’s Nazi parade documentation, and a narrator describes some of the history of how gays were rounded up and sent to concentration camps by Hitler and the Nazis to die.

      And at another point, after an interviewee describes the changes from the early 1970 Christopher Street day parade celebrating Stonewall, Bressan interweaves brief previously forgotten footage of that parade along with a discussion of the history of the Gay Pride parades.

  

    An older man, when asked what he thinks about the outrageousness of some of the gay men in drag costumes recounts some important gay history of a time when homosexuals were often forced to hide their identity in order to keep their jobs and function in the majority heterosexual society: There were always those among us who stood out as being what people describe as outrageously gay. We’d always say “So and so was not for ‘streetwear.’ You couldn’t be seen walking with them down the street. They’ve always been there and,” he admits, “gave us cover. We could stand on the side and say that’s what a gay person looks like. But today we can join them, march with them, and hold hands.”

      Bressan and his colleagues’ coverage has so much to say and more. But it is the row upon row of marching faces: the black, Hispanic, Asian, white, and native American teachers, philosophers, dancers, hard hat workers, lesbians, parents, writers, singers, drivers, historians, drag queens, cooks, cops, farmers, dykes on bikes, firefighters, actors, scientists, and so many others marching side by side down the streets of six cities as far as the camera’s eye can register that finally brings tears to the human viewer. So many thousands of people dressed in sweaters, dresses, pants suits, extravagant attire, or half naked joining with one another to say “we’re here, we’ve always been here, and we’re not going away” makes anyone with a heart and brain to go with it extraordinarily proud of being an LGBTQ individual in the USA. 

     As Bressan’s central figure Robert says in the director’s 1985 film Buddies: “... Gay Day is great. Just look at all those people, most of the year passing for straight and then, wham! they’re out. The world has to see them and deal with them. ... You know, a chance to be yourself without worrying who’s watching or what they’re thinking. ...For me it stands for not letting the world say that I’m not here. That there’s only supposed to be straight people, straight love....”

      But Robert was speaking from a perspective of eight year later when gay marchers were not merely expressing their pride but their anger for their government and fellow citizens ignoring them in the time of AIDS.

     1977 was a seminal year in part because it was one of the last years when the simple joy of being able come together and show your face among so many thousands of others still stood as a forceful anecdote against homophobic hate. In the few years since the Stonewall riots the LBGTQ movement had grown up to become a powerful force that truly could, so it seemed, change gay people’s lives.

 

    Just six months earlier Harvey Milk had been sworn as the first gay San Francisco city supervisor. Despite Anita Bryant and all the others like her, gays knew that they had begun to win their cause, and celebrated that realization in a manner that could never be as innocent and pure-minded ever again.

     Bressan’s important film, aired alas only on Public TV and watched mostly by gay viewers—just imagine how powerful this film might have been if seen by general audiences throughout the nation—expressed that well-deserved pride and joy shared by the whole community. It was a time for taking stock.

     Only 5 months and 1 day later, on November 27, 1978, San Francisco City Supervisor Milk was shot and killed by Dan White. On June 5, 1981, less than 4 years later, the AIDS epidemic was formally recognized by medical professionals in the United States.

 

Los Angeles, June 26, 2021

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (June 2021).        

Tom Palazzolo | Gay for a Day / 1976

fruit loops

by Douglas Messerli

 

Tom Palazzolo (director) Gay for a Day / 1976 [11 minutes]

 

Shot a year before Arthur J. Bressan’s far superior celebration of Gay Pride Day in several US cities, Gay USA, Tom Palazzolo’s 1976 documentary Gay for a Day is a rather desultory and amateurish view of the Chicago Gay Pride Day, which IMDb mistakenly identifies as taking place in San Francisco.

      The film was shot along the parade route on Halsted Avenue, with far less elaborate floats and costumes than we have seen since, including in the Bressan multi-city celebration of the following year.

      

     Basically, Palazzolo just points and shoots, sometimes catching gay men in drag simply being confused about where they are to enter the parade. But at other times he catches bits and pieces of funny conversations such as a man in drag announcing himself as married to his gay friend and as having gotten her entire set of clothes for only $5.00—the one presumed as impossible, the second as only somewhat improbable. At another point a young man hides behind what appears is his straight girlfriend, fearing evidently being seen at such an event; at one moment we can hear her mentioning his parents—presumably people who would not approve.

       In another scene two gay men are busy sewing on the crown of a friend who appears as a Medieval King. Two effeminate blacks praise gay life while lounging across the top of a car, insisting that it should be celebrated across the US and all over the world.


      A couple of cute boys dressed in outlandish 70s attire sit on the back of a Cadillac eating Fruit Loops. A pair of straights express their feelings that they think the parade is beautiful for permitting them to watch people stand up for human rights, “whether they be black or gay, yellow, or crippled—whatever,” certainly not quite the precise sentiments we might express today, but truly well meant. “They are just as deserving for their civil rights as any other group,” the male concludes.

      A few gawkers appear appalled at what they are witnessing and someone eventually throws an egg at Palazzolo while he shoots one of the Pride floats. Soon after, his lens glimpses a man wearing a T-shirt declaring “White Power,” with a Nazi insignia in between the words; but since the man appears to be black, we have to presume it’s a statement of sarcasm.

      Finally, it’s clear just from the title the director gives the film, “gay for a day,” that not everyone has yet fully assimilated the lessons of Stonewall, just six years earlier. These individuals, it suggests, are not all yet fully out of the closet, openly celebrating their gayness just for a day.

      Any such documentary filmmaking, however, is crucial if we are to understand our full history as LGBTQ+ beings.

 

Los Angeles, November 16, 2023

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (November 2023).

Volker Schlöndorff | Der Fangschuß (Coup de Grâce) / 1976

the dark center of the human heart

by Douglas Messerli

 

Jutta Brückner, Margarethe von Trotta, and Geneviève Dormann (screenplay, based on the novel by Marguerite Yourcenar), Volker Schlöndorff (director) Der Fangschuß (Coup de Grâce) / 1976

Volker Schlöndorff’s 1976 film Coup de Grâce is a thoughtful, visually beautiful film that is also somewhat frustrating in its refusal to present a specific viewpoint. We know what the issues are: the old military order of the defeated Prussians against the new Bolshevik revolutionaries is at the heart of this Latvian-based film. In 1919 a detachment of German Freikorps soldiers is stationed in a chateau in the town of Kratovice to fight Bolshevik guerrillas. The soldiers have set up on the estate of Konrad de Reval (Rüdiger Kirschstein) and his sister Sophie de Reval (the wonderful Margarethe von Trotta).


      In the film’s first scene we see the return home, against the background of warfare, of Reval with his dashing childhood soldier friend, Erich von Lhomond (Matthias Habich). Sophie, her elderly grotesque Aunt Praskovia (Valeska Gert), and even the retainers are delighted for their return. And Sophie, who has been a long-time friend of Erich is even more delighted since she has long been in love with him.

      Despite his gallant treatment of her and her aunt, it quickly becomes apparent to anyone who knows anything about human behavior that Erich and Konrad are very much in love, Konrad insistently pounding his now battle-scarred piano as he stares in Erich’s eyes.
       Even the ghoulish old Aunt, who must be carried down to the dinner table seems to be more aware of the situations going on around her than the love-stricken Sophie, who attempts to entrap Erich in numerous ways, offering him food, coffee, poetry, and, of course, intimate situations to prove his love for her.

     The frustration for the young woman, who has had to bear many of the terrors of war simply to save her home and the soldiers within—many of whom are dying from Typhus—is obvious. Rockets, launched at the estate, are a regular occurrence. Secretly, Sophie has been visiting several of the village’s Bolsheviks, most notably a local seamstress, whose son is an important figure for the revolutionaries, who loans her books.

     Unlike the novel by Marguerite Yourcenar, where the violence of the war (a different war in fact) remained at a distance, Schlöndorff’s film shows us the gritty ugliness and its true meaningless up close, reiterating the pointlessness of both sides of this battle. Eric seems to have no difficulty in ordering up the deaths of discovered or even suspected revolutionaries, and allowing their bodies to rot.



     As he continually evades Sophie’s attentions, she turns to other men on his watch, at first the handsome Franz (Grigori Loew), and, when he is killed, taking up with Volkmar (Mathieu Carrière). The overlaying images of a kind of cheap series of love affairs with the constant dangers of a meaningless war might almost remind one of George Bernard Shaw’s great play Heartbreak House which was first performed in the very years that this film takes place. Like that play, a great deal is made of turning off lights or, at least, covering the windows so that the enemy can’t see the target, a command that time and again Sophie refuses to obey. At one point, to prove the necessity of the action, Eric takes her outside of the house, a lamp in his hand, which results in a direct hit on the estate’s stables. His very absurd show of bravery, however, only convinces her that he truly does love her—this despite the fact that she has witnessed her brother and Erich playing in the snow like two school children who can’t keep their hands off one another.

     It is, finally, Volkmar that makes it clear to her that in their brief weekend trip to Riga, the two men finally consummated their relationship. One can only wonder what has taken them so long. And the director reiterates their “distant” manly love by discretely pulling away from nearly every scene in which Erich might demonstrate his love of Konrad, revealing quite clearly that Erich’s love is far more conservative and chaste than any a typical heterosexual being might experience.
     Sophie’s choice—to hint at another film that quietly rumbles through this one—is to join the revolutionary forces and, as Hans-Bernhard Moeller and George Lellis argue in their essay on this film, reassert this as another narrative alternative, an anti-patriarchal, feminist perspective, that counteracts the Prussian patriarchal values. Sophie does this even presupposing the results, her capture and eventual death from the hands of the men she once passively nursed. And her demand that Erich von Lhomond, himself, put the bullet through her head is a recognition that in his inability to love her, he had already destroyed her life long before.

      As Moeller and Lellis hint, Erich, the only survivor of this debacle, might surely later be one of the gay Nazi Sturmabteilung brownshirts so brilliantly portrayed in Visconti’s The Damned.  But in Schlöndorff’s far more evasive work, we have no clear indication of his future. Sophie simply becomes another rotting, stinking corpse, left behind in a meaningless murder by a man who has no clear understanding of why he murders. Perhaps Erich, despite his brief love with the weak Konrad, has no heart. Or perhaps it is a heart so wounded that he can no longer feel for human beings. Was Sophie’s revenge just as meaningless? Surely, Erich has no regrets, but has himself become a cog in the ever-moving engine into the darkest centers of the human heart.

 

Los Angeles, September 17, 2017

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (September 2017).

 

 

Juanma Carrillo | Caníbales (Cannibals) / 2009

burned up

by Douglas Messerli

 

Juanma Carrillo (screenwriter and director) Caníbales (Cannibals) / 2009 [19 minutes]

 

In the 19-minute film, accompanied a low grinding score as if it were some kind of horror film, Spanish director Juanma Carrillo takes the viewer into a world that many heterosexuals may not know of, the world of cruising. This cruising ground is a rather open park evidently 10-minutes outside of Madrid.


    The central figure goes to the park in search of something that is not quite apparent until the very end of the film. What we do see in this short film is dozens of men wandering the space, some waiting until they can hook up with another, some already involved in sucking, fucking duos, threesomes, or in one case a foursome. Many are young and cute, others old and shunned. Like the gay world in general, they represent all kinds of individuals, some lean and appealing, others tough, brawny, and even brutal looking.  

 

     The camera, like the voyeurs who also wander this park, takes us through what becomes almost a maze of these individuals, revealing one by one, men showing off their bodies or those already engaged in sex—reminding me a bit like the “can you believe it” exploitation documentaries of the 1960s such as Mondo Cane, directed by the team of Gualtiero Jacopetti, Paolo Cavara, and Franco E. Prosperi.

 

      For a gay man, the hunt for sexual gratification in a world where the only other primary “hunting ground” is their local gay bar, is actually somewhat alluring despite the film’s evil-sounding title. These are not, even metaphorically speaking, cannibals, but rather men seeking pleasure, and although the behavior of these men might seem distasteful to many, gay men have long realized that sometimes a part just filled with men ready to openly engage in sex if preferable

to heavy-drinking meat-racks of gay bar life.

      Carrillo’s film, however, as we eventually discover is a moralistic fable. The wanderer, whose eyes are witnessing this forbidden world, we finally discover is a woman on the search for her husband, whom in discover in the final fames on all fours getting fucked, having just sucked off another man who leaves soon after spotting the intrusive female.

 

     Through the burning photos of married couples displayed throughout the credits, the film seems to suggest that the entire park was made up of married men, cheating through gay sex on their wives. In some respects that may be partially true. These men clearly do not feel comfortable to visit the local gay bars, and the public bathrooms that once served as anonymous gay sexual undergrounds have mostly been closed and reconceived to discourage gay sex. For men who have been unable to come out and have either willingly or through their families forcibly entered into heterosexual marriages, such parks are their only alternative sexual outlet.

 

Los Angeles, July 16, 2024

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (July 2024).

My Queer Cinema Index [with former World Cinema Review titles]

Films discussed (listed alphabetically by director) [Former Index to World Cinema Review with new titles incorporated] (You may request any ...