by Douglas
Messerli
Fábio
Leal (screenwriter and director) O Porteiro do Dia (The Daytime
Doorman) / 2016 [25 minutes]
Just this side of
porn, Brazilian director Fábio Leal’s The Daytime Doorman is one of the
sexiest short films ever made, not one bit afraid of representing the lust
between the gay predatory Marcelo (Carlos Eduardo Ferraz) and his
heterosexually married doorman Márcio (Edilson
Silva).
It is still early morning when Marcelo
arrives home by taxi so drunk that he vomits the moment he opens the taxi door,
the nighttime doorman asking if he needs help the moment the vehicle speeds
off.
Back
in his room he jacks off. But still he’s up early for the arrival of Márcio who
brings the morning papers which tells of a murder in a Recife neighborhood of a
man his brother-in-law knew. Figuring out that the doorman lives in Ipuntinga
(a worker’s village in the Minas Gerais province) Marcelo wonders if he might
want him to join him on his trip home since he himself has to go that way to
look after a friend’s cat. He suggests they take the bus together when Márcio
gets off work, but the doorman, having a bicycle, offers to give him a ride
instead.
Further conversation reveals that Márcio recognizes that both he and his roommate Hugo (Fábio
Leal) are gay, but they are different kinds of queers, Hugo with a steady
lover, Lucas, while Marcelo, as he puts it, is easier going, or as Marcelo
himself rephrases it, “a flaming queen.”
Márcio responds that he’s a married man
with two daughters.
Yet, this is Brazil—a sexually expressive
country—and the moment the two are cycling on their way to Ipuntinga, Marcelo almost
immediately licking the cycler’s arm and hinting at the delights they might
enjoy when they finally arrive, all to the tune of "Pé na Tábua,” Stevie
Wonder’s “Ordinary Pain” as interpreted by Marina Lima. Márcio himself slathers
his rider’s neck with wet kisses.
When, after a brief stop for Márcio just
to catch his breath in Córrego do Jenipapo, the impoverished northern edge of
Recife snuggled up against the mountains and therefore subject to regular mudslides,
they finally reach the cat’s house where the two, after a quick drink of water,
quickly begin to engage in sex—which is actually what the rest of the film is
all about. Except this first time, Márcio
just can’t get erect, most likely from the dehydration of his voyage or the
fact that his wife is waiting up home for him. Marcelo begs to let him fuck his
friend, but is immediately rejected as going too far given he’s just bedded a
heterosexual man. The two lie side by side naked, Marcelo even attempting to dry
hump his doorman’s friend body. But is now completely rejected as Márcio rises,
dresses, and rushes off home to his wife.
As Chucho E. Quintero observes on the
Letterboxd site: “The one element from the film’s iconic sex scene I’ll
treasure forever (and probably steal for myself) is how instead of showing us
each fuck in chronological order (first, this position, then, this other
position, and then, they flip) Leal mixes them together in a quick montage
making time and ‘roles’ lose all meaning: at one point I wasn’t even sure who
was fucking who. The bodies melt into each other, they might have been fucking
for ten minutes, one hour, the whole weekend, who knows? Who cares?”
Pure guiltless lust is the only aim of this
brilliant scene and the two actors, clearly engaging in real sex, go at it full
force, with everything but visual penetration and erect cocks revealed.
And here is where, as in so much of
Brazilian literature, we see the ugly face of racial and social divides in the
culture again rear their heads, as Hugo insists that Marcelo not bring the
doorman into their apartment. Although Marcelo calls his comments for what they
are, straight forward prejudice, and even points out that Hugo is himself
derided for liking young boys such as Lucas, Hugo remains firm: his friend is
no longer free to invite the worker into their house.
That doesn’t stop Marcelo however, as we
soon seen another aftermath of a sexy afternoon together on his mattress.
Marcelo is convinced that he is reacting
this way simply because he wasn’t invited, obviously not at all the situation;
but the very fact that despite their sexual relationship, Márcio must still
play the role of the apartment owner’s stooge, infuriates the predator. And it
appears that Hugo’s fears have been justified. To bring a “mere” building
employee into your sexual life is a dangerously destructive act.
His
shout of “It would [will?] be bad for you asshole,” says it all; as Marcelo
pulls the plug to their recorded music, their sexual activities have come to a ferocious
end due to social differences.
Or so it might seem. But Leal’s world Marcelo,
who we have seen as an always sensuous human being, is now at a beach for New
Year’s when his phone rights. It is apparently Márcio at the other end, as the
two chat for a few moments before Marcelo hopes that they see each other often
in the New Year. The relationship hasn’t ended, and the two men will go on, at
least for a while, enjoying one another’s bodies despite the dictates of marriage,
social class, the roles they play in each other’s life, or any other ridiculous
restrictions. Sex wins out for one of the very times in such conflicted films.
Finally, this film almost demands to be
compared with director Etienne Kallos’s 2006 short film, The Doorman.
Los Angeles,
December 29, 2025 | Reprinted from My
Queer Cinema blog (December 2025).






