Saturday, August 16, 2025

Lil Nas X | Jolene / 2021 [BBC Radio in the Live Lounge / music video]

no competition

by Douglas Messerli

 

Dolly Parton (lyricist and composer), Lil Nas X (performer) Jolene / 2021 [3 minutes] [BBC Radio in the Live Lounge / music video]

 

The always resilient Dolly Parton recounts how she created this song in her 1988 show. While she was touring on the road in the 1960s, apparently a beautiful bank teller named Jolene was taking care of her husband, and on her return from touring she confronted the “red-haired hussy,” the two of them getting involved in a cat fight in which Jolene pulled off her wig “and nearly beat me to death with it.” But she won, and “I’ve still got my husband,” she declared back them; he recently died.

     Parton sings this song, according, with a slight trill of righteousness in the higher octaves, hinting even a little of a possible yodel of delight as she sings out her plea to please not take her husband away despite her obvious superior beauty.

 

Jolene, Jolene, Jolene, Jolene

I'm begging of you please don't take my man

Jolene, Jolene, Jolene, Jolene

Please don't take him just because you can

 

Your beauty is beyond compare

With flaming locks of auburn hair

With ivory skin and eyes of emerald green

Your smile is like a breath of spring

Your voice is soft like summer rain

And I cannot compete with you

Jolene


    Strangely, it is almost as if Parton were making love to her enemy instead of challenging her, performing as Parton generally does as someone far more open and forgiving than most people. It is what we love about Parton: her honesty and general kindness even in the face of pure selfishness and cussedness.

     Performed just a few years prior to his highly controversial 2024 music video J Christ, Jolene is perhaps the perfect counterweight to Lil Nas X’s usually over-the-top choral gay song-and-dance performances.

     Here he stands in a nightclub setting, singing Parton’s iconic song in which he begs a woman to please not take away his man, which in his dark burnished baritone and bass notes, invokes a sense of near hopelessness and despondency.


    Lil Nas X has to deal not only with the beauty of Jolene but the inferred gender difference which, since his man has chosen a woman over him, almost defeats him almost before he begins his plea. No trills on the higher registers here, just the rolls of inevitability as he looks out with his dark brown eyes. He sings the song almost like a dirge at moments, picking up the tempo only in the second verse, as if he has already lost his lover, and almost fading into a chocked-up and throbbing throat by the end of the number. You almost want to cry for the loss to which gay boys have long grown accustomed.

     Parton’s reaction to the man named after the Mitsubishi Montero revealed, yet again, the great singer’s typical enthusiasm: “I was so excited when someone told me that Lil Nas X had done my song ‘Jolene.’ I had to find it and listen to it immediately…and it’s really, really good. Of course, I love him anyway. I was surprised and I’m honored and flattered. I hope he does good for both of us.”

 

Los Angeles, August 16, 2025  

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (August 2025).

      

Hannah Gadsby and Madeleine Parry | Douglas / 2020

the woman who showed up to a party in black

by Douglas Messerli

 

Hannah Gadsby (writer and performer), Madeleine Parry (director) Douglas / 2020

 

Yesterday I watched, with great joy and out-loud laughing, Hannah Gadsby’s second US comedic special, Douglas. It may not quite be at the same level of her self-deprecating previous Netflix release, Nanette; and even she jokes that had she known how popular the first US work had been—in Australia and elsewhere she’s done 8 other comedic presentations—she might have not packaged all her suffering, mostly from homophobic oppression, into one work, but perhaps stretched it out into a duo or trio. But Douglas is still a superb work. And the reviewer for The Guardian argues, this work “blazes with well-earned confidence,…that hitches up her crusading, patriarchy-bashing humor to great jokes, meticulous set-building—and a new cause.

     That new cause, connected with the fact that in 2015 Gadsby was diagnosed in high-functioning autism, links up to her wonderful crusade against anti-vaccination advocates.


     This new work reveals all from start as the comedian outlines to her audience precisely what she will be doing, almost a music and theater programme, even revealing her autism in that “introduction.”

      Obviously, this is a longstanding comic device since when the “show” actually begins she can surprise her audience all over again with the clever way in which interweaves their expectations with the actual jokes, asides, stories, while, in this case, incorporating pictures of Renaissance art.

      The pot-au-feu that Gadsby creates—in which from moment to moment she spins from short tales to one-liners, lectures, personal revelations, and a direct mocking of her audiences, made palatable in this case because of her own self-deprecation, and even hate-baiting (early on she warns her audience not to take the bait)—have made some, particularly males, to truly hate her kind of comic performances, or least raised a great deal of confusion among her critics.

   Yet that mix of the high, low, comic, and serious commentary, all delivered with a truly knowledgeable and intelligent wit, is precisely what those of us who love her work so enjoy in her performance and, I’d argue, even her persona. Without being disparaging, I’d suggest that Gadsby is like a bigger-than-life aunt who helps to educate us, make us laugh, and scold us when we need it, while letting us know that she truly loves us—the kind of aunt we’d all love to have (I did).


      Indeed, her guide to her program, warning us of the possible pitfalls along way, is a kind of act of love. I’m going to make fun of Americans at first she tells us, but don’t take it seriously. Mostly that opening “act” deals with the ridiculous differences between the Aussie language and words Americans use: “petrol,” a liquid for example in Australia as opposed to our “gas,” something that is not liquid at all; while a “fanny” in the US is the “bum,” in Australia it means the lower front of woman, so that as a child when she read an American book about children riding downhill on their “fannies,” she simply could not comprehend the act! Yet she loves the Southern pronoun “Y’ll” since its sexuality is neutral.

     This leads directly into one of her best stories. While walking her dog Douglas in the park, a man approaches her suggesting that a smile needs less energy than a frown, she claiming that her face was simply in neutral. His dog incidentally, a whippet, has unwanted shoes of his four paws.

The man then asks her dog’s name to which she responds Doug. The stranger laughs, finally insisting that it was great name, to which the now self-admitted somewhat argumentative Gadsby disagrees, suggesting it’s a terrible name. I’ll leave out some of the details, and of course, the comedian’s telling of this story is truly what makes it funny. But it ends up with a lie, that she named her dog after the Pouch of Douglas, a small empty and unreachable space in women, between the anal cavity and the vagina, named after the discoverer of this emptiness by Scottish man midwife Dr. James Douglas, which draws her to conclude that only men name everything.

       These themes are picked up again and again through Gadsby’s work, as she describes her own unfortunate visit to a male doctor, the consequences of autism most represented in the feelings of outsiderness, and a hilarious story about her grade-school teacher’s attempt to teach prepositions by describing someone inside, outside, or beside a box. Part of the great joy of Douglas is how Gadsby interlinks elements such as these stories, riffs, jokes, and art to her social and political views. Her work, in a sense, comes out of a long tradition of women monologists from Joyce Grenfell to Anna Russell (who, incidentally, died in Australia).

       But even if Gadsby belongs in this tradition, her art is all her own, a contemporary and original talent that you can watch over and over (I did, laughing almost as heartily as I did the first time).

 

Los Angeles, June 5, 2020

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (June 2020). 

Ashkan Mehri | Mani / 2020

innocence and guilt

by Douglas Messerli

 

Ashkan Mehri (screenwriter and director) Mani / 2020 [16 minutes]

 

Iranian writer and director Ashkan Mehri’s short film Mani is a bit like two Russian dolls, the one nestled into the other. Mehri’s central figure, 12-year-old Mani (Taha Seyf), is absolutely in love with his family’s driver (Milad Moaveri), a totally innocent love affair, that given his attempts to be around the driver at all times, reveals an illicit and not at-all innocent affair between his mother (Vesal Roozkhash) and the driver the moment the father leaves on a business trip.


     Indeed, actions in Mani’s world that might outwardly seem sexually perverted or even criminal are truly without any sexual intent and totally virtuous. The driver is able to touch, hold, and even fondle the delighted boy who is given apparently clandestine swimming lessons each day after school in an adult-only swimming pool where the driver becomes his instructor.

      To cover up his smoking, the driver douses himself with a male perfume which, again to Mani’s pleasure, he also dabs on Mani’s neck. Mani strokes the older man’s neck and even gives him a kiss on the neck as he pleads for him to stop at a Kinderstop and an Apple computer store.


      When the driver isn’t looking, Mani steals his leftover gum from the top of his cigarette pack, holing in away almost as treasure in a small tin where it joins other wads that he apparently chews in secret just to share the saliva of his adult lover, smelling it before popping it later into his own mouth.



      In the dark of the night, after hearing the car return to their driveway, Mani sneaks onto the balcony—his room door is apparently locked from the outside—to watch his mother climb the stairs with the driver, moving toward their bedroom for a truly illicit and immoral affair.

      We have no idea, however, how the innocent boy interprets the events. Clearly he knows that his mother and the driver are engaged in sex: he later observes them in bed together. But does he judge it as an immoral act or is he simply intrigued, almost envious that she can lure him into her bed, while he cannot? Is he simply happy to have the driver in the house with him?

      Mani certainly goes out of his way to push open a door to downstairs where a large plaster stature has been put up to foil to illegal entry, sneaking upstairs to hear their lovemaking.

      Back in his room, unable to sleep, he again slips out and through connecting balconies peers into his parents’ bedroom to watch the couple, masturbating with wide-open eyes.


      In the morning, he is allowed to engage in a boy’s Freudian orgy as he climbs into the bed where his mother sleeps, snuggling up to her as he takes in the musk of the driver’s perfume and body odors from the pillow.

      Strange to say, in a few years Mani will probably be wracked with a sense of guilt with memories of having been, as a young gay boy, drawn to his mother’s bed by his boyhood idol, while the truly guilty mother will have perhaps completely forgotten about her affair with the family driver.

      This simple narrative film is filled with issues that later help to define individuals’ lives, including the differences between being a child and an adult, of acting out simple urges or knowingly engaging with them, and living in a cocoon of innocence or spreading out one’s wings to embrace guilt.

 

Los Angeles, October 19, 2023

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (October 2023).

 

Barbara Rubin | Christmas on Earth / 1963-1965

the one-shot miracle

by Douglas Messerli

 

Barbara Rubin (director) Christmas on Earth / 1963-1965 [the version I watched was made in 2019]

 

The first paragraph of Giulia Rho’s otherwise rather academic essay, “Anarchiving the New York Avant-Garde: The Phantom of Barbara Rubin’s Christmas on Earth,” published in Frames Cinema Journal rather nicely summarizes the work I am about to discuss:

 

“Barbara Rubin’s Christmas on Earth (1963-1965) is one of the most transgressive and provocative films of the North American avant-garde. Just a seventeen-year-old* ‘woman with a movie camera,’ Rubin shot the film on a 16mm Bell and Howell borrowed from none other than Jonas Mekas, the “midwife,” in his own words, of the New York avant-garde. The 20-minute short film is considered ‘one of the most sexually explicit, beautifully hallucinatory films to come out of the 1960s’** as it powerfully conveys the inexhaustible romanticism, physical experimentation and cultural desires of the era. Filmed over just a few days, at a drug-fuelled party in John Cale and Tony Conrad’s New York City apartment, it features three men and one or possibly two women engaged in various acts of lovemaking.*** The film’s psychedelic editing was further complicated by Rubin’s instructions for its screening, which involved two layered reels, coloured gels of the projectionists’ preference, and also the projectionist’s choice of live rock radio ‘played loud,’ so that the audience’s experience was never twice the same.”


     Amy Taubin, a close friend of Rubin’s, describes other cinematic decisions: “The action is filmed in two diametrically opposed styles. In one, bodies are painted black, with breasts and genitals outlined in white fluorescent paint, so that the couplings seem ritualistic. In the other, the lighting is bright and direct, and whatever mystery or eroticism has been suggested is thereby removed.”

     Rubin herself describes the process of her editing of the film she had first titled “Cocks and Cunts,” changing it later to the Rimbaud inspired title of Christmas on Earth****

 

“So I spent 3 months chopping the hours of film up into a basket and then toss and toss, flip and toss and one by one Absently enchantedly Destined to splice it together and separate on to two different reels and then project one reel half the size inside the other reel full screen size.”


     Inspired by other underground filmmakers such as Jack Smith’s (Flaming Creatures), Mekas, P.Adams Sitney, Jerry Jofen, and Gregory Markopoulos, Rubin’s 29-minute work met with great praise (Jonas Mekas described the process of seeing it: "The first shock changes into silence then is transposed into amazement. We have seldom seen such down-to-body beauty, so real as only beauty (man) can be: terrible beauty that man, that woman is..."), criticism (fellow filmmaker Ken Jacobs described it as “dreck”), and police raids as they attempted to suppress the film’s showings. Several critics have argued that it was this film that aroused Andy Warhol’s interest in making films.


      Just as the accompanying music changed during every showing, so did Rubin continue to edit it, Taubin describing what eventually became a self-destructive project:

 

Christmas on Earth is Rubin’s only completed film. She edited and re-edited it obsessively, refining the relationships between the reels so that they would maintain their balance of intentional and aleatory congress no matter the circumstances of their projection—forward, backward, superimposed or sequential, in or out of sync. Night after night, she examined that succession of images, the sign of the central region of her being—as an artist, a lover, a midwife, a gynecologist, but mostly, I think, as a displaced person. Eventually she went too far and, having taken a lot of speed, cut a print of the film into three frame pieces, tossed them around in a trash basket and tried to paste them together. Luckily, Mekas had kept either the original edit or another early version.”


   It is a print made from Mekas’ archive that we watch today, although Rho justifiably wonders whether the DVD released by Filmmakers Co-op, “which froze the film into a definitive form rather than leaving the images to interact differently depending on exhibition circumstances,” along with a set soundtrack of music by The Velvet Underground and other songs of the day actually can be said to represent the original work.

     Obviously, there is something to be said for that argument; yet a film seized by the police, was dropped from Amazon on-line screening because of complaints of pornography, and has seldom been shown since the 1960s, along with the $200 rental fee charged for personal viewing makes it difficult to argue for the purists. If I am sympathetic with Rho’s comment that “The digital of Christmas on Earth is now a runaway document rebelling from official histories of the New York avant-garde, which seem to neglect the importance of Rubin,” yet I was absolutely delighted to be able to find one digital version of Rubin’s film still available from a Russian “ok” network which at least presented me with a notion of what the original might have been.


     I also must admit that seeing this film in 2025 is a truly different experience than what it must have looked like in 1963 or ’64, the year I might have graduated from high school. After decades and decades of pornographic pummeling, in which as an active gay man I certainly participated as a viewer, Rubin’s work seems rather tame, bemusing at times, and even formalistic, despite its editorial and presentational demands for happenstance.

     As a commentator going by the moniker of “theironcupcake” argued on the Letterboxd site, perhaps Rubin’s work is best understood in the context of its release in the year in which it was produced: —“If you consider some of the films that were produced by the American mainstream at the time, those innocent rom-coms with Doris Day or Sandra Dee—the ‘will she or won’t she?’ attitude of Sunday in New York—Rubin’s work makes for an eye-opening comparison. But 1963, the year when Rubin began her project, was also the year that Jayne Mansfield starred in Promises! Promises!, breaking new ground for a Hollywood actress to go topless, and the same time that Ingmar Bergman pushed the boundaries of erotic content with both sex and masturbation in The Silence, so the film world was more ready than ever to explore this territory. It’s also impossible not to think of Barbara Hammer’s later Multiple Orgasm and Carolee Schneemann’s Meat Joy and Fuses as the parade of intimate acts, extreme close-ups and body paint.”

      Of course, I might question even the notion of “those innocent rom-coms of Doris Day or Sandra Dee,” but what ironcupcake also doesn’t indicate, and perhaps explains one of the reasons why Rubin’s work has been so long ignored, is that Christmas on Earth isn’t simply a feminist work, or even a lesbian testimony to the female body, but features a great deal of audacious male-on-male sexual action. Rubin’s work is the real orgy, one might argue, that Jack Smith’s film pretends to be.

     And the very fact that a then underage female who later married and became a Hasidic Jew and died shortly after giving birth to her sixth child in 1980 had imagined and created in 1963 such a truly liberating work was a bit unthinkable to even the queer (still male dominated) underground moviemakers and critics. Clearly, in their minds, it didn’t bring film history and theory along with it, even if that knowledge was something to be satirized or even sacrificed in making their own movies. In short, as a young, seemingly “undereducated” female—despite the oft quoted references of Mekas and Warhol—Rubin simply didn’t have the proper credentials to propel her into film history. Rubin was akin to a one-shot miracle.

           

*Other sources point out that Rubin was 18 the year this film was shot and first released.

 

** Ara Osterweil, “Absently Enchanted.”

 

***As Rho notes in a footnote, John Cale (b. 1942) is a musician, member of The Dream Syndicate in the early 1960s, then of The Theater of Eternal Music with Tony Conrad, and eventually of The Velvet Underground. Tony Conrad (1940 – 2016) was a musician and structuralist video artist member of The Theater of Eternal Music with John Cale.”

     Among the recognizable figures involved in the night of sex were poet and filmmaker Gerard Malanga, Debra Feiner Coddington, and possibly Naomi Levine. However, Malanga argues that he didn’t recall Levine being there, but did remember a dancer with the Martha Graham School of Dance, Barbara Gladstone (not the New York gallerist).

 

****From Rimbaud’s poem “Morning” from A Season in Hell: “When will we go, over mountains and shores, to hail the birth of new labor, new wisdom, the flight of tyrants and demons, the end of superstition, – to be the first to adore! – Christmas on earth!” (translation by Paul Schmidt).

 

Los Angeles, August 16, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (August 2025).

My Queer Cinema Index [with former World Cinema Review titles]

https://myqueercinema.blogspot.com/2023/12/former-index-to-world-cinema-review.html Films discussed (listed alphabetically by director) [For...