the man that got away
by Douglas Messerli
Hoang A. Duong (screenwriter and director) Tom Clay Jesus / 2001 [17 minutes]
But this
is still a long 13 years away from when gays in the US could get married, and
accordingly, despite AIDS, there was still no strong cultural pull in the gay
community to couple up, even though Clay leaves Tom his telephone number with
the hope he might call him with the hope that a fuller relationship could develop.
When Tom’s
new pick-up asks who he had greeted at the bar, Tom replies “a friend.”
Clay
meanwhile often appears to sit home alone nights awaiting Tom’s call. The only
call we observe him receiving, however, is from his mother concerning his
father’s failing health.
Tom, we
can imagine perpetuates his life of pick-ups, although he too, we perceive,
remembers the smooth skin of Clay, recalls they raucous time in bed together.
Clay ages
a bit from his youthful cuteness, becomes somewhat lankier, and grows a beard.
Still no call from Tom.
Tom
appears not even to recognize him, but is still quickly attracted, introducing
himself to whom he perceives as a stranger. Clay, a bit flabbergasted, looks up
at the wood-paneled wall, where hangs a portrait of Christ, as he turns his
eyes back to Tom, naming himself Jesús. Tom invites him home.
The
two begin their foreplay, Tom clearly intrigued now by finding himself with a
man he believes is a Latin lover, responding to Jesús’s further query about his
“friend” that he, Jesús, is a better lover than Clay.
As
they get into bed, Tom tops Clay, asking what he prefers sexually. Clay pauses
before answering “I want to go home.”
A bit
taken aback, Tom suggests that he too has other work to do. Clay stands and
quickly leaves.
We
see both men pacing back and forth in their one-room apartments, both troubled
by the recent situation for different reasons, Tom clearly surprised by the
rejection and Clay/Jesús torn by the decision he has made to break with his
phantom lover.
Tom
takes up the blue slip of paper and calls Tom’s number. Tom nervously answers,
somewhat delighted that Tom has finally chosen to call. But when Tom speaks, he
tells him simply that he has a wrong number.
A
very smart commentator on the IMDb site, with the moniker of Atlantis2006, likens
it to French psychoanalyst/psychiatrist Jacques Lacan’s description of “phantasmatic
desire”:
“As Jacques Lacan explains in Ecrits, the
nature of the object of desire relies deeply on a most effective assertion:
one's greatest desire is to be the object of desire of the other. In "Tom
Clay Jesus", the lives of Tom and Clay get seemingly interwoven at first.
There is a promise, a longing for an ideal that would henceforth consolidate a
meaningful relationship. But as one could guess, ideals are not an easy item to
come by, whether it is an abstract ideal or the ideal man.
…Desire is mediated by this phantasmatic
distortion that forces Tom to overlook his newfound partner and makes him to
rapidly feel attraction towards Jesus, a bearded stranger he meets two months
after the first scene.
When Tom
fails to see beyond his phantasmatic obsession he disqualifies Clay as an
option. But when Clay can relinquish this failed status, and in fact has the
power to personify the very phantasm Tom so eagerly awaits, he also sees Tom
under a new light. Perhaps then, the shifting of what Lacan denominates
"object a" in regards to desire, eliminates the possibilities of a
steady relationship.”
He’s probably right in his analysis, but
you don’t need Lacan to explain that when you keep overlooking the one you
really love and, finally, can’t even recognize him when he offers himself up to
you in a slightly different manifestation, then it’s time for the other to call
the whole thing off! As sad as it is, Clay better start looking for another man
to replace his former heartthrob. And if Tom is smart, which he clearly isn’t,
he should rethink his life of one-night stands. As Tom ages, Jesús won’t be the
only one who turns him away.
Los Angeles, November 3, 2025
Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (November
2025).







