Monday, September 22, 2025

Dannon Lacerda | Indícios Dois (Traces Two) / 2012

evidence of love

by Douglas Messerli

 

Bruno Dubeux, Dannon Lacerda, and Caetano O’Maihlan (screenplay), Dannon Lacerda (director) Indícios Dois (Traces Two) / 2012 [12 minutes]

 

Two life-time friends from the Brazilian countryside, Guto (Caetano O’Maihlan) and Pedro (Bruno Dubeux), have suddenly arrived, a bit like country bumpkins to Rio de Janiero, amazed by nearly everything they encounter as the taxi takes them to their destination: a small apartment with only one bedroom and one bed which they will have to share.

     Yet hardly anything can quell their youthful excitement, when even the opening of a closed French shutter is a kind of delightful game: the views seem to them to be astounding.


      On the wall some previous tenant has written a decorative message in red: “We love to live not because we are used to living but because we are used to loving.”

      A moment later it’s time to hit the famous Rio beach, the two good-looking boys quite literally leaping through the sand to the water’s edge before stripping off their shirts and pants and jumping into the ocean waves.


      Momentarily we see the two studying together, obviously higher education being the goal that has brought them together in their adventure. Soon Pedro has met a new girl, Flavinha at the college, but Guto seems quite disinterested in another girl who approaches him.

     Talking together in their close quarters, Pedro describes his interest in the girl, speaking of her “great energy,” language which makes Guto tease him. And a frame later, Pedro awakens in the tiny bed their share with Guto’s arm about him.


    He jumps up, somewhat disturbed by the fact which he previously may never have even given a second thought. He stares at his face in the bathroom mirror as if pondering what their relationship really is about.

     Soon after, when Guto returns to the apartment he finds Pedro sitting in the room before two lit candles, pissed because Guto has forgotten to pay the electric bill. The friend argues that he’s fed up, Guto begging him to give him a break. Clearly their relationship appears to be beginning to fray at the edges.

      Yet, when Guto reminds him that it’s his birthday, Pedro suddenly produces a chocolate cake which he has specially made just for him. They sing happy birthday together, and this time in the middle of the night, it is Guto who awakens to feel Pedro’s arms about his body in a deep hug. He lights a match once, twice, and three times just to make sure of the reality of the experience.


     He too looks into the mirror in consideration of the newly discovered intimacy between them.

     In the last few frames of the film, we see a now empty bed, a lamp with a shade because there is no bulb, suggesting perhaps that their deep love is now just a memory of the past or perhaps has something they both have just accepted as the reality of their lives. On their wall the decoratively written phrase remains as one of the earliest signs along with the “two clues” (surely a better translation of the original title of this piece than the formally assigned “Traces Two”) that they have been in love all along.

      This short is one of the most beautiful testimonies to a kind of queer love between two friends that I have seen in a long while. One is almost tempted to read this Brazilian work as a prequel to the 2015 Argentinian short I recently reviewed, Matias and Jeronimo.

 

Los Angeles, September 22, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (September 2025).

 

Oliver Hermanus | The History of Sound / 2025

leavetakings and lies

by Douglas Messerli

 

Ben Shattuck (screenplay, based on his book The History of Sound), Oliver Hermanus (director) The History of Sound / 2025

 

I saw this film with my husband Howard early in its theater run rather than waiting for it to appear on Mubi, and both of us quite enjoyed it. Yet, by a few days later when I began this review I realized that my enthusiasm had somewhat waned, and that I wanted to love it far more desperately than I was critically able to.

   That is not say that Oliver Hermanus’ film was not emotionally moving or, perhaps even more important, given the film’s focus, that it was not a truly educative resource of American folk music.


     Beginning in the central character’s Kentucky youth, we are told that the young boy Lionel Worthing (Paul Mescal) has grown up with perfect pitch and the gift (or curse as some might describe it) of synesthesia, where he perceives music as an experience of color, taste, and touch as well as sound. He also possesses a beautiful singing voice, encouraged by the Appalachian musical traditions, and which, through help of a local teacher, allows him entry in 1917 into the New England Conservatory, at which point Shattuck seems to forget, at least in the script, all about his apt pupil’s special talents.

     Once there, after apparently only a brief time, Lionel has already made numerous drinking friends and one night encounters the man who will change his life, David White (Josh O’Connor), a born academic before he actually become one, who seems to know nearly everything about American folk music.

     In fact, it is as he plays in the bar a song which Lionel knows from his youth, that draws the young man to him, and before you know it, Lionel is singing out the lyrics of "Silver Dagger," to teach the soon-to-be teacher a new song:

 

Don't sing love songs; you'll wake my mother

She's sleeping here, right by my side

And in her right hand, a silver dagger

She says that I can't be your bride.

 

All men are false, says my mother

They'll tell you wicked, lovin' lies

The very next evening, they'll court another

Leave you alone to pine and sigh.

 

My daddy is a handsome devil

He's got a chain five miles long

And on every link a heart does dangle

Of another maid he's loved and wronged.

 

Go court another tender maiden

And hope that she will be your wife

For I've been warned and I've decided

To sleep alone all of my life.

 

    At least that’s the version we know today through Joan Baez. Lionel sings a slightly more sad or raw version with which he’s grown up. But if he teaches David a new song, it is the latter who shows him some tricks as the two retire to White’s apartment, half-drunk, playing water games (of the kind that emanate from the mouth, not the penis), and before you know it have fallen into each other’s arms, this time with their cocks involved.


   How the Kentucky boy has become so adaptable to what in 1917 would be recognized as a true sexual deviation in such a short time is not explained. But it is clearly love at first sight, the two men sharing not only music but the bodies through which that music is expressed. We simply have to presume that, unlike most of today’s young movie characters, Lionel was a quick learner with little sexual guilt.

    There is hardly time, however, for the plot to thicken or their love to simmer before the War calls up David, Lionel being too near-sighted for him to serve. After the couple make their sad leave-taking, the Kentucky boy scurries back from the now near empty Conservatory to his boyhood home, there to find much he still loves, including his mother (Molly Price) and a friendly father (Raphael Sbarge) the latter of whom, however, soon after dies, leaving the hard work of farming on his son’s now slightly resentful shoulders.

    Fortunately, White has returned safely from the War, basically of sound mind—although we later discover he is seriously suffering from what today we would describe as Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)—and, as he explains, has received a small grant to travel through the wilds of Maine to record the rural folk music that still remains mostly in the coastal regions. He intends to catalogue and preserve that music on wax cylinders, transcribing the songs’ lyrics by hand.  He gives his friend and place a date and demands he be there to join him: “Meet me Jan. 1 at the Augusta Train Station.”

     Actually, we later discover, it’s all a ruse; there is no grant, no institutional support. The fairly well-off and sophisticated David has simply cooked up a way to return to the love-making that he and Lionel had just begun before the War cut it short.

     It is this “on the road” part of the movie, with the two of them camping out together as they trek through the woodlands of Maine that makes up the longest part of this film, and creates the deep bonds—and sexual frisson—between the two as well as presenting the film’s audience with a small anthology of folk music.

     I love folk music a great deal, and as Lionel later argues as a musicologist, it represents the true heart of the common man. I spent the entire year of 2004 gathering the lyrics of just such an anthology of my popular folk favorites of the US from the 19th Century (Listen to the Mockingbird: American Folksongs and Popular Music Lyrics of the 19th Century), so arguably I have proven my allegiance to the form. But the songs presented in this film, although many of them quite lovely, sound all too much alike and are understandably performed by amateur individuals, the aged, the very young, and the special in these rural communities, not always the best interpreters of the works.


     At the same time, the love between the two men is so hidden and attenuated in this film that it makes Brokeback Mountain look a bit like an out and in-your-face porn film. This grand gay tour comes off more like the faded pictures of a scrapbook than a record of these two handsome beings lusting in a tented outdoors. Despite the rather colorful lives lived by both musicians, the movie itself appears most often to have been filmed through a lens that wiped away the very elements of synesthesia that Lionel claims to experience. As Variety’s Owen Gleiberman describes it: “The film is quite handsome, full of woodsy earth tones and dark clothing, without any bright colors to get in the way of the meditative gloom.”

 

     Peter Bradshaw, writing in The Guardian, nicely summarizes my overall feelings:

 

“Oliver Hermanus’s The History of Sound has admirers in Cannes; but I couldn’t help finding it an anaemic, laborious, achingly tasteful film, originally a short story by Ben Shattuck which has become a quasi-Brokeback Mountain film whose tone is one of persistent mournful awe at its own sadness.

     Hermanus has made great movies in the past including Beauty and Living [and I’d add the 2018 film Moffie] but this is a film that is almost petrified by its own upmarket values, paralysed under the varnish of classiness.

     It’s about two young men in early 20th-century America, a singer and an academic musicologist, who…hike around the hills and backwoods of rural Maine, meeting local people and recording their authentic folk songs on wax cylinders, sleeping under the stars and falling in love.

    Mescal and O’Connor are of course very talented actors and they never do anything other than an impeccable professional job but they have each shown more passion in, variously, Andrew Haigh’s All of Us Strangers [Mescal] and Francis Lee’s God’s Own Country [O’Connor].”

 

      Part of the story, obviously, is that although they do truly love one another, there are problems that remain unspoken between them, and that tension is what forces both to remain relatively cautious in their passion, particularly David who apparently is far more conscious than Lionel of the way society might describe their love. Lionel, on the other hand, is angry for what he perceives as David’s lack of political commitment, particularly when they visit a community that is being closed down by the police so that wealthy men might use the land for their own purposes. When they encounter the police camped out in the woods on their way to the small village they have just left, David does everything he can do but actually vanish from their sight, shirking any sense of responsibility to the lovely people they have just visited and recorded.


      The differences in their personality, however, might still heal, one imagines, if they were given enough time, but this film is actually a story of leave-takings, a betrayal of those who one has come to love or, perhaps, pretended to. And it is soon time, in this part of the film, for David to return to his teaching at Bowdoin College, and for Lionel, following his lover’s advice, to travel off to Europe.

     If David has already left Lionel behind twice, once to go off to War and now to return to the college which he attempts to convince his friend is not a place where he would feel comfortable, the next third of this somewhat over-long film, focuses on Lionel’s serial abandonments, first of the America he so loves, second of the Italy where he sings a very different kind of music in a renowned choral group and has taken up with a gay Italian boy, Luca, as his lover to whom he simply announces that he’s decided to take a job as a conductor at the University of Oxford.


     Once Lionel has relocated to England, a young socialite, Clarissa Roux (Emma Canning) quickly falls in love with him, and is all ready to whisk him off to the altar, but first must seek out the approval of her very wealthy but Bohemian-style parents (Emily Bergl and Michael D. Xavier). On a visit from Lionel to their mansion, they quickly approve, but the young Kentuckian now is beginning to have his doubts about turning straight, particularly since he walks the nights in memory of his time on the near-freezing ground with David. The cold stone floors of the Roux mansion can’t compare. The receipt of a message that his grandfather has died makes for an easy excuse to return to Kentucky to pick up the pieces for his ailing mother, as he quickly kisses his eager would-be wife goodbye forever.


   Back in Appalachia he discovers that he’s too late to help his mother, since she too has died, their modest shack having almost rotted away and now is literally blowing in the wind. After a brief meet up with an old acquaintance, now married, the itinerant Lionel heads off to Bowdoin to reconnect with his true love.

     Once there, however, he discovers a reality that he (and the film’s viewers) might never have imagined. His beloved David has died several years ago, so announces a senior professor who was Department Chairman in David’s tenure. What’s more, the college never commissioned or offered to pay for David’s tour of the Maine coast. No one has any knowledge of wax cylinders. Perhaps, the professor suggests Lionel might want to contact David’s widow Belle (Hadley Robinson) about the existence of such recordings.

     Even more startling than his death and marriage, is the youthful age of David’s wife whom he met and married when she was a 15-year-old teenager, who tells Lionel of her husband's sufferings after returned from the trenches and his basic abandonment of her. She makes it clear that the cause of David’s death was suicide, and reports she has read all of Lionel’s unanswered letters, now strangely relieved to actually meet him.

     She, herself, has remarried and has a child for which she interrupts this dreadful communication several times. She hands Lionel back his letters, and assures him that he is free to look in the attic for the cylinders.

     In short, David has betrayed Lionel time and again, having lied about full sexuality, his life at Bowdoin, and his own purposes for the trip into the Maine wilds. He has also kept Lionel in the dark about the horrors that he himself was suffering from his experiences in wartime Europe.

     This time, we fully understand Lionel’s quick leave-taking without checking the attic for the fruits of musical endeavors.

      I admit that all of what Bradshaw describes as Lionel’s “long goodbye” is sad and painful, even occasionally drawing tears from these tired eyes. But it is difficult after the series of endless lies both told to one another and themselves to fully share in their obvious longing to share one another’s lives. For both there were just too many barriers between them, country boy and sophisticated rich kid, for them to really share their lives together.


     Like so many movies with queer characters of the past, this film kills off the weaker of the two gay men and turns the other into a kind of transformed (we might even describe him as “converted”) individual. In the final scenes Lionel (played by Chris Cooper) has ceased being a man who’s lost his one true same-sex lover, having become a noted ethnomusicologist who in an TV-interview shares his passion for folk music, as well as for classical, pop, and other forms of sound. And guess what? Belle has found those wax cylinders, and seeing him on TV, packed them up and shipped them to him.

    Inside he finds a special one addressed to him: the voice being that of David’s who rather ineffectually explains that he has never come back to life after fighting in the war, apologizing to and thanking Lionel for his time and passion, signing off with the song, this sung in his own voice, “Silver Dagger.”

      The movie plot, accordingly, was also a sort of ruse, a come-on trying to attract us to watch a film filled with a then-nameless love and significant forgotten and now-lost songs, neither of which it even pretends to deliver, the writer and director knowing all along that this was an impossibility given the American culture in which their characters had been nurtured and in which they attempted to exist.

 

Los Angeles, September 22, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (September 2025).

 

Yen-Chu Chen | 癡癡的愛 (Craving) / 2021

the gift

by Douglas Messerli

 

Yen-Chu Chen (screenwriter and director) 癡癡的愛 (Craving) / 2021 [16 minutes]        

 

This remarkable Taiwanese short film by Yen-Chu Chen reads almost like a Kafka fable. A young man, Wei Jie (Ting-Jhen Hsu) is tending his fish in a small bowl, when a police officer (Hao-Zhe Lai) shows up.

    There has been a complaint—Wei Jie later imagines that it is from the old woman who lives below him—about noise. There is no evidence of any partying or that the rather admittedly smart-alecky resident has been making any noise whatsoever.


     Nonetheless, the police officer demands his identification, which the young man provides, joking that it is false; but admitting it is just a joke when he perceives that the young policeman seems to believe him. The policeman, accordingly, demands to see the full apartment which consists of just a small living room space and a bedroom, the very sight of the latter somewhat disturbing the policeman.

     He cannot observe, however, any real problems and prepares to leave. He puts his shoes back on and gets as far as the elevator before turning back, again knocking at the young man’s door and greeting the surprised tenant with a passionate kiss, which, after a pause, Wie Jie enthusiastically returns.


     Putting handcuffs on the lone apartment-dweller, the handsome policeman begins to fuck him, the two engaging in what appears to be quite fulfilling sex.

    Finally, the policeman has to leave, but begs to see his new lover the next evening. However, the young man declares he has other business that night and asks for a “rain check.” He raises his hands so that the policeman might release him from his handcuffs, which the officer does, while also stealing the young man ‘s keys which hang from a nearby hook.

    The next evening, the policeman arrives, opening the door, and wandering briefly through the young man’s living room, leaving him a small gift-wrapped box on a table.


     At that very moment, however, he hears a noise in the bedroom, and cautiously opens the door to discover his new-found lover having sex with another man (Young-Cing Liao).

     An overpowering rage suddenly overcomes him as he rushes in, after retrieving his gift, and brutally beats the stranger to death, pounding him over and over with the little box, while the young man, still in bed, pleads for mercy and forgiveness.

     Suddenly the policeman’s rage is over, and the realization of what he has just done washes over him in gestures of regret. He hands over the gift to the young man who quite hesitantly opens the box.

    Inside is a pair of handcuffs. Slowly, he hesitantly and somewhat apologetically offers up his arm, to which the policeman attaches one end of the cuff, while connecting the other to his own wrist. Together the two engage once more in passionate sex, the dead body lying on the floor near the bed.


    Throughout this film, it appears that the cop is a rookie—at least when it comes to gay sex, having been suddenly overwhelmed by a kind of love at first sight that drives him to want to possess the object of his desire. It seems that in doing his duty as a guardian of city, he has bottled up a craving so intense that when it is released, he simply does not no how to control it.

    But the power of this short work is that it offers up no attempts of explanations, resolves, or possible solutions. It is simply what it represents, a snapshot of a powerful desire that ends in revenge, murder, and a reiteration of the sexual release, which might be described as hinting at something close to a gay version of the desire portrayed so vividly in the Japanese director Nagisa Ōshima’s unforgettable In the Realm of the Senses (1976).

 

Los Angeles, September 22, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (September 2025).

My Queer Cinema Index [with former World Cinema Review titles]

https://myqueercinema.blogspot.com/2023/12/former-index-to-world-cinema-review.html Films discussed (listed alphabetically by director) [For...