Thursday, December 18, 2025

Mark Pariselli | Monster Mash / 2014

the scars

by Douglas Messerli

 

Mark Pariselli (screenwriter and director) Monster Mash / 2014 [21 minutes]

 

In a local drag Halloween party men’s room Carrie (Geoff Stevens) of the 1976 movie of that name meets Regan (Eric Rich) of the 1973 film The Exorcist, and it’s love at first sight. Forget Divine who is about to get it on with Mr. Tusk, or Carrie’s friend who seems to be dressed as Louise Brooks’ Lulu about to head home with Jesus. Hand in hand, Carrie and Regan head off via the local cemetery where some ghoul is making a ruckus and a quick stop-by at the haunted school where boys’ bodies were found under floorboards. Clearly, this is not a very nice town.


    These two ghouls, Regan with an electric upside down cross over his bed, the other lugging the same symbol from the bathroom wall with him, strip down to the young men they really are and begin to circle in for hot sex—that is until Carrie backs off, insisting he needs to go home.


     Evidently, it’s just all too much for him, all a bit overwhelming; although the other points out that with only one shoe (the other broken in the walk) and layered in blood it’s too late to be out walking about town alone.

     Regan knows best, riddling him with questions about the horror genre they clearly share: “Argento or Fulci?”* Both go for Argento. Favorite classic horror movie monster. Carrie likes “Gill-man” from The Creature of the Black Lagoon (1954). Regan likes “The Mummy,” but as Carrie points out, “the mummy doesn’t do anything.” They share information about their past costumes: Regan’s the mummy” made it hard to piss and Carrie’s “The Bride of Frankenstein” had her beehive set afire.

     By this time Carrie’s back on the bed while Regan goes off to get their drinks.

    Favorite death scene: Carrie likes one of the scenes from Prom Night II ((1987) with Mary Lou, while Regan likes the floating head in Scanners (1981).

   These boys obviously know their horror films, recognizing themselves like the heroes of their movies, outsiders from their own worlds; they have lost themselves in the world of bizarre often homophobic worlds that they have appropriated and reconstructed as their own.

   They even imagine which of the horror monsters they might be able to get it on with. And the queerest of the queerest horror movie characters. For Regan that’s easy: Jesse The Nightmare on Elm Street, Part 2. Carrie argues for Angela in Sleepaway Camp.


    And why did Carrie choose that costume this year? He never went to prom. He was too scared he’d get beat up. When he got heckled in the hallways or pushed around in the locker room he fantasized about having telekinesis, of having the ability to make a particular bully plummet down the stairwell.

    Regan’s costume represents a typical angst rebellion against a strict Catholic upbringing. “My parents are total Jesus freaks. Their idea of a pleasant Sunday afternoon is protesting outside an abortion clinic or a Pride Parade. You can only dress up as Satan for so many years.”

   These are kids who have learned to act out death, to imagine, even worship it rather than actualizing it.


    They sleep side by side as innocents. But when Carrie gets up to shower, almost humorously ridding himself of his mockery of blood, Regan quickly rises, unable to resist momentarily playing out the scene from Psycho before dropping the knife and joining his new friend in the shower as they gently help wash away each other’s “wounds.”  

 

*Dario Argento, director of Suspiria (1977), Deep Red (1975) and numerous other films of his famed giallo genre. Luigi Fulci, also working in the giallo genre, directed City of the Living Dead (1980), The Beyond (1981), and The House by the Cemetery (1981) and many other horror films.

 

Los Angeles, December 18, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (December 2025).

Trae Whyte | Lloyd / 2020

the scapegoat

by Douglas Messerli

 

Trae Whyte (screenwriter and director) Lloyd / 2020 [17 minutes]

 

Jamaican-born writer and director Trae Whyte’s 202 short film Lloyd is a complex interweaving of the personal and the political in which a young college student, Lloyd (Olly Sholotan) is caught up in political events in a community named Wellington between black and white factions.

     That might be bad enough for a young black college kid like Lloyd who works at various jobs, including a hospital intern, to support his education. He is late to work at most of his venues, in part because it looks as if he has been involved in the violence stirring around him. But we later learn it is even more complex when we discover that Lloyd is also gay with his friend and mentor Husain (Danny Royce). At the same time, he is being attacked at work simply for doing his job and reprimanded by the school authority, Dr. Johnson (Jayd Swenseid), also evidently the man who lived with his mother, Sylvia who recently died—a political activist who people claim is behind the current racial turmoil. In short, the young conscientious man is being attacked from all directions, often innocently and despite the fact that he is doing his best to simply survive.


     Even worse he is being physically attacked by a fellow student Anthony (Will Osborn), a brute of a being who at one point appears to almost succeed in killing the boy, the appearance of Husain saving his life at the last moment.

     The attack is the final straw, as Husain and Anthony consider fleeing both the situation and the community, at that very same moment they find themselves being accused of having killed Anthony. Has Husain gone back in anger and killed off the villain or did his original attack in response to Lloyd’s near-death later result in the bully’s death? Has someone else intentionally murdered Anthony to pin it on the gay couple? Or has Anthony himself—who is clearly mentally deranged—arranged for his own death to make it seem as if the boys were the culprits.

      It hardly matters since there is now no possibility of escape as the police dragnet closes in, presuming as has everyone else, Lloyd’s and Husain’s guilt, an easy thing to pin on boys that do not fit into the society in the first place.

     One has to marvel at the complexity of Whyte’s short movie, but obviously that is also its failure. There are so many loose plots ends that we simply cannot tie them together to create a coherent narrative. Who and why precisely are behind these attacks on the community and the welfare of these boys? Why does nearly everyone blame Lloyd for the community tensions which he appears at times to support but does seem to be directly involved in. Certainly, given the layers of cultural, social, and sexual prejudice he has to endure, he would be a saint not to be raging with anger within, forces which Husain seems to calm within his lover. But now it appears that even their deep love for one another will not be enough.


     What Whyte’s work really desires to become is a feature film which can fully explore the several avenues which it has almost randomly presented us. As a short, the multitude of forces at work in this piece, racial hatred, the inheritance good and bad left us by our loved ones, and homophobia seem, along with straight-forward racial prejudices that seem never to be laid to rest, swirl around this cinematic fragment fascinatingly but are totally incapable of being resolved.

      Whyte’s talent is so obvious, I would love to see where he goes in his next movie or if he can possibly expand this work into a more coherent whole.

 

Los Angeles, January 4, 2023

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (January 2023).

 

Isobel Sandoval | Lingua Franca / 2019, general release 2020

if only…

by Douglas Messerli

 

Isobel Sandoval (screenwriter and director) Lingua Franca / 2019, general release 2020

 

This morning before I sat down to write it dawned on me that perhaps in some future time the film I had seen and admired yesterday, Isabel Sandoval’s Lingua Franca, might be perceived simply as a heterosexual romance instead of a film focused on which the very serious complications concerning the central character Olivia (played by Sandoval herself), most notably that she is an immigrant without a green card working as a caretaker for an elderly Russian-Jewish woman, Olga (Lynn Cohen) residing in Brighton Beach, Brooklyn, at a time in which President Trump has illegally ordered ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) agents to arrest people like Olivia while they go about their daily lives.


     In this film, however, the man with whom Olivia falls in love, Alex (Eamon Farren), Olga’s handsome grandson, living in the same house, has seemingly inexplicably stolen her passport, the only document which might allow her through marriage to become a US citizen and to gain access to a green card and the legality which would take away her fears of suddenly being returned to her native country, The Philippines, as Olga’s previous nurse Wanda was.

      In a future when these ICE problems have disappeared, Sandoval’s narrative might simply center primarily upon the mixed feelings of the rather immature Alex—who also has serious problems with alcohol and, accordingly, in maintaining a job—has about getting married to the woman with whom he has been sleeping and is, quite apparently, now in love. The issues here might instead be centered upon their cultural differences, Alex’s erratic behavior, and upon his dependence upon his boyhood friends who clearly prefer that he remain trapped in the teenage world-views which they have never escaped.

    But in the world we inhabit in the present, things are far more nightmarish, as one of Alex’s drunken friends, staying overnight in Olga’s house, lifts Olivia’s passport and a CD from her bedroom drawer, passing in on to Alex, something which the latter never mentions. But the very fact that Alex has held onto these items argues that his good intentions to help out Olivia and, perhaps, reiterate his professed love has all been a kind of pretense.

     At one moment, he even appears to have switched off the apartment’s electric power— terrifying Olivia in the increasing would of paranoia which she inhabits—to suggest that ICE may be on her trail. Soon after, Alex goes even further with a clumsy lie, telling her that he has seen a man in a ski-mask leaving her room. Why, asks Olivia’s good friend Trixie (Ivory Aquino), would an ICE agent dress up in a ski-mask?

      Yet, despite all of these incredible obstacles, the fact that near the end of this work—which might remind any knowledgeable cinema buff of a film by Hong Kong director Wong Kar-wai—Alex, after spending a romantic night in a local bar dancing with Olivia to the standard love song “Smoke Gets In Your Eyes,” appears to be more intent upon marrying this Filipina from the Cebu region more than ever becomes confusing. The lovers even briefly discuss what size family they might each desire as we almost buy into the film’s title by recognizing that the “lingua franca” which the movie touts is love.


    As in any traditional Hollywood romance, when the couple wakes up the next morning in a hotel room with the male beginning a sentence with “About last night…” we know the lovely fantasy the film has woven has come to an end, just as it does in this case.

      I was highly amused by comments by many of the critics, male and female, who all seemed to concur that Sandoval’s great movie somehow ran out of steam in its last minutes by not more carefully explaining why the couple’s relationship could not last.

     Writing on the Roger Ebert site, Christy Lemire, for example, wrote:

 

“Sandoval wisely refrains from spelling everything out about these characters and their backstories, but her film might be a bit too understated. It ultimately runs out of steam just as it’s reaching its most compelling point, leaving us hanging emotionally. Still, the dreamlike mood she’s set lingers afterward.”

 

     Or, as Dennis Harvey concurs in Variety:

 

“There’s a simultaneous delicacy and straightforwardness to Lingua Franca that stamps Isabel Sandoval’s third feature with a distinctive directorial sensibility—even if her script eventually muffles some of the film’s early promise. …Nor does the ambiguous fadeout offer much satisfaction. To a point, Sandoval’s commitment to intriguing understatement comes off as intelligent restraint. In the end, though, a little head-on confrontation and plot resolution surely wouldn’t have hurt.”

 

      One wonders if either of these writers and the others who have argued similarly have ever seen Damien Chazelle’s La La Land in which Emma Stone, despite her clear love of Ryan Gosling, intentionally chooses the wrong man and lives somewhat happily ever after; or Catherine Deneuve who, in The Umbrellas of Cherbourg purposely abandons her young romeo Nino Castelnuovo for an older and wealthy man. Or, for that matter. The central couple of Wong Kar-wai’s In the Mood for Love; the list might go on forever. Heterosexual romances in film, I might remind them, just as in life. do not always end up in perfect bliss.

       LGBTQ films, moreover, seldom end up in standard romantic notions, and that, obviously, is what is missing in my attempts above to imagine Sandoval’s film being located in the precise genre in which in any sane world it might belong. But in 2020—a throw-back year which in every way possible has retreated to the cruel days of hate while wiping away so many recent representations of social responsibility and loving that one might have previously imagined—the fact that Olivia (including the actor who performs her and has written and directed this work) is a transsexual woman, skews the entire fabric of this finely wrought fabulation in the direction of a life that inevitably is battered by the winds of fear, bigotry, and outright horror for both lovers.

      Women like Olivia must generally seek out men whose love or marriage they must purchase, as has her friend Trixie has, a companion (permanent or temporary) to escape the terrors of living as a woman with a passport from another country on which her former male name is her sole identification. Yes, there is the constant worry as an illegal alien she might be arrested at any moment, but there are just as great fears that she will never find anyone who truly loves her or might, if her previous sexuality were to revealed, be subject to deadly violence.


      In a sense, Alex, in toying with her own fears (stealing her passport, controlling the apartment lights, and creating a fiction that suggests that ICE is following her movements) and in his own return to alcohol has played out just such violence, even if he mercurially loves her as well and even visits websites about the logistics of New York State marriage.

     He may even see himself as a kind of hero by enabling her to release some of her layered anxieties, but somewhat like Stephen Rea in The Crying Game, who attempts so save a transgender woman (not a transsexual one who actually has undergone a medical procedure to alter her birth sex) with whom he has experienced a deep relationship, his love will perhaps always be mixed with a strong element of disgust.

     Sandoval fortunately doesn’t linger on this issue. For if Alex deludes himself into believing that he might brave the mockery and violence of the brutes surround him who will surely dole out if he were to actually make such a commitment, the sensitive viewer of this cinematic masterwork knows that the hero, Olivia, will surely be better able to buy her way into the American Dream rather than waiting for it to happen naturally. Besides, as all LGBTQ people know very well, what most people perceive as something they might define as natural are usually quite blind to everything else.

 

Los Angeles, September 27, 2020

Reprinted from World Cinema Review and My Queer Cinema blog (September 2020).

 

My Queer Cinema Index [with former World Cinema Review titles]

https://myqueercinema.blogspot.com/2023/12/former-index-to-world-cinema-review.html Films discussed (listed alphabetically by director) [For...