Thursday, October 30, 2025

Jean-Paul Dupuis | Dansité / 1978

two bodies in motion come to rest

by Douglas Messerli

 

Jean-Paul Dupuis (director), François Verret (choreography) Dansité / 1978

 

French experimental filmmaker and composer Jean-Paul Dupuis’ Dansité (the dance site also representing “density” or “specific gravity”) features two beautiful nude dancers, choreographer François Verret and Alain de Raucourt in a male-on-male pas de deux on a sandy beach among rocks. There, the two dancers play out soundlessly their relationship to each other as bodies, not unlike the sand grains beneath them, in terms of their magnetic valence and movement. These two men lay and stand immobile, fall, are pushed, pulled, intertwined, lifted, and crashed back to earth just as the winds play upon the sand.


    And there is both a kind seemingly ceremonial patterning, a complete randomness of the tumbles, and an interchange between the two as if they were magnetically pulled to or propelled from one another. If they often react in parallel conjunction, the two men at moments looking and behaving as similar and different as two grains of sand, they also are sent, in equal duration, scattering along the shore in momentarily opposite directions.


     As the 10-minute piece progresses, the continued rising of the two figures gradually seems to give way to gravity itself, as near the end one of the figures seems to be attempting to the pull the other up as surely the other is pulling him down. Eventually, his weight falls from its own gravitational pull onto the sandy floor, the two interlocked into one appears to be an intense permanence of non-motion, as what one commentary described—far more anthropomorphically than I have been characterizing these “bodies,”—a frieze, “staring at the eternity of the moment.”


     Interestingly, as they move towards stasis, the images also turn darker, with far less contrast as earlier images.

     But, of course, these are human bodies, and no matter that we might wish to describe them only as figures in motion, they are also two men physically intertwined in what can only be understood by the human mind as a sexual interchange. Their patterned behavior as opposed to their explosions of movement away and apart cannot help but be perceived by the human eye as the emotional reactions of two lovers, themselves attracted and repelled by each other. The détente which they finally reach, might be described as either the recognition of love or perhaps, in full romantic terms, the cessation of all search for another, death. It is fascinating that none of the short commentaries that I’ve read about this film bother to express anything about the gay sexuality at the heart of this work, as if in fact these beautiful male bodies were nothing but grains of sand or flotsam floating across the beach. Indeed, this might be one of the longest and most erotic homo-sexual encounters ever put to film up until the date of this work.


     Dupuis has made more than 50 films, short works and, most recently, longer documentaries, as well as composing music for theater and orchestra.

 

Los Angeles, May 8, 2023

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (May 2023).

Lasse Nielsen and Ernst Johansen | Du er ikke alene (You Are Not Alone) / 1978

a boyhood idyll

by Douglas Messerli

 

Lasse Nielsen and Bent Petersen (screenplay), Lasse Nielsen and Ernst Johansen (directors) Du er ikke alene (You Are Not Alone) / 1978

 

1978 was a particularly mean year for LGBTQ characters in film. In Chile, La Manuela, of Arturo Ripstein’s Hell Has No Limits, a transvestite, was killed by the one she most loved; the German transsexual Elvira Weishaupt in Rainer Werner Fassbinder’s In a Year with 13 Moons,  ignored by the man she loves, slit her wrists before slipping into death; in Paul Aaron’s A Different Story, a gay man and a lesbian, both unhappy with their lives, fell in love and married into a heterosexual alternative; in Herbert Ross’ version of Neil Simon’s California Suite, Diana Barrie (Maggie Smith) was panic-stricken while lamenting her marriage to a gay, semi-closeted antique dealer (Michael Caine); in Arthur I. Bresson, Jr.’s Gay USA, the gay rights movement began to face their backlash in the form of Anita Bryant; in Alan Parker’s Midnight Express an American, convicted in Turkey for attempting to smuggle out a small amount of hashish, was locked away in a Turkish prison for 30 years, where he rejected the love of a sweet fellow prisoner (the Swede) and killed a guard who was planning to rape him; in David Hemmings’ Just a Gigolo pretty singer-actor David Bowie unhappily went to work in Marlene Dietrich’s male brothel; in Nighthawks Ron Peck made trawling the bar scene in London seem like Waiting for Godot; and Ulrike Ottinger’s Madame X and her female pirates killed off all the wealthy folk they found on a yacht.


    And then there was the light and breezy Danish film by Lasse Nielsen and Ernst Johansen, Du er ikke alene (You Are Not Alone), where nothing bad happens to anyone. True, boarding school student Bo (Anders Agensø), gradually discovering over the summer break that he is sexually attracted to other boys, is a bit nervous about returning to his all-male boarding school, particularly given the fact that his fellow students have transformed into suddenly post-pubescent heterosexuals who can’t get enough of masturbating to the magazine photos of women which they have illegally plastered across the walls of their rooms and, far more importantly, recognizes that the rector (Ove Sprogøe) of this Christian-based school is a strict authoritarian who seems to have forgotten, as their sex education teacher daily reminds them, that “sex is wonderful.”

       For a while, as he is greeted with the somewhat predictable reactions of hormonally over-charged young male teens who suspect someone in their midst might be a bit different, they gently punish him with pushes and shrugs, and even an occasional verbal taunt. Bo is clearly a bit lonely, a good kid whose very caring attitudes make him a favorite of faculty and other adults, while remaining an absolute puzzle to his classmates.

     Well, not really “absolute,” since so many of these boys have such long beautiful blonde hair that they don’t at all mind getting confused, once in a while, for the opposite sex, or simply sharing an off-hours shower. We immediately perceive, accordingly, that Bo is not at all alone, particularly when he soon finds love with a boy a few years younger than him, Kim (Peter Bjerg), who just happens to be the headmaster’s son. 

    Kim, despite his parents’ warnings, likes to hang out with the older boys around the school in which he lives, and so open-minded are the directors and their fictionalized student body that we hardly can point to the moment when Bo and Kim catch each other’s glances; all we know is that suddenly Bo is sharing his bicycle with Kim’s slender thighs as well as whisking him away to a secret hut of hay he has built deep in the woods; for his part, before we can even catch our breaths, Kim is shimmying down a rope each night and slipping into Bo’s boarding room bed.

     Obviously, if his father and mother got wind of the relationship there would be hell to pay; but Kim’s folks are so fixated on the horny heterosexual boys that they can’t even imagine, presumably, that there is even such a thing as same-sex love between two young boys of any community, let alone their own.


      Most of the other students are so nonchalant about issues of gender that they hardly blink an eye during a picnic outing when Bo and Kim gently tickle one another’s chin and blow gentle whiffs of air across each other’s body. Even though Kim gets drunk and arrives home to have face his unforgiving father, the reaction of the elder consists of more bluster than actual punishment.

       Nielsen and Johansen’s lovely boyhood idyll might have gone on forever, a bit like the long-selling 1964 softcore book by Georges St. Martin and Ronald C. Nelson (that apparently Michael Jackson kept on a bookshelf near his bed), except for greater perceived evil in this lovely film that threatens the status quo.

      A young student who has been ordered to remove all the girly pictures from his bedroom has secretly repasted them in the boy’s bathroom. When the headmaster’s faculty stooge, Andersen (Jørn Faurschou) catches a glimpse, all students are called into the little gym in the middle of the night where the rector demands the guilty one admit his crime. After a long wait, Ole (Ole Meyer) steps forward to be sentenced the next day by the headmaster and faculty to expulsion.

    This is the real issue behind the film’s title, as most of the students now refuse to attend classes while creating banners and filming interviews of faculty members and the more than ever flustered rector until finally, in a new faculty meeting, the adults are forced to drop Ole’s punishment. The boys have almost all stood with their friend, who suddenly discovered, despite his bad parenting, that he was not alone.


     Now realizing their newfound powers, moreover, the enlightened boys, upon hearing that the only real danger to their existence, the motor-cycle riding townies, have cornered Bo in the woods and are busy torturing and humiliating him, hurry en masse to save him. Ole demands that the leader of the cycling boys kiss his ass! Which he finally does.

      The final scenes take place at a of student-parent dinner celebration where Bo and others, on the advice of their teacher, tackle the subject of one of the Ten Commandments, “Love thy neighbor.” They do so through a rather amazing early performance piece, in which a young man is attacked and killed in the streets followed by a lovely long camera shot of Bo and Kim standing

half-naked in the forest innocently kissing.

      It is hard to know whether this short film-within-the-film is the one actually being shown to their parents and, of course, to the headmaster himself, or whether it symbolizes the spirit of some other such film; but whether it be the actual thing or merely a simulacrum, the point is made: sex and everything leading to it is truly wonderful!


      When asked whether the long kissing scene was always planned to be the end of the film, director Nielsen responded:

 

“No. We actually shot more scenes after the parent’s night film screening, where Kim runs out of the room after being scolded by his father. Bo and Kim meet down in their secret spot in the woods. Unfortunately, however, that scene turned out too dark and we didn’t have enough money left in our budget to re-shoot. So the new ending was created in the editing room. But of course it was always meant to be a happy ending!”

 

     In Scandinavia, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, and elsewhere this film, soon after its release, came to be seen almost as a classic “coming-of-age” film. When it was originally shown in Denmark the censors classified the film as “forbidden for children under 12,” believing that younger children would not understand the homosexual theme. But even that was later lifted and despite the fact that it remained uncensored at all other places it was shown, it still caused problems for the directors, and even for me, when Google banned me and stole all my various blogs because I posted pictures from the film.

     Perhaps even the directors didn’t quite realize that it was one of the first ever to celebrate homosexual sex without the characters suffering pain and unhappiness, with often one of the couple dying, an amazing statement in 1978 and for years after.

     I think had this film been made and shown in the early 1960s my parents might never have let me attend a boarding school in Norway in 1964, where I might suggest the values were already very similar to ones presented in Nielsen and Johansen’s work. I might have easily “come out” at that time and been happily accepted; indeed, several males even encouraged my nascent sexual desires, but I was too much of a US product to even realize it was possible. Lucky Kim, lucky Bo.

 

Los Angeles, October 5, 2020

Reprinted from World Cinema Review and My Queer Cinema blog (October 2020). 

 

David Hemmings | Just a Gigolo / 1978

paying for romance

by Douglas Messerli

Ennio De Concini and Joshua Sinclair (screenplay), David Hemmings (director) Just a Gigolo / 1978

A young German officer arrives at the front trenches of World War I just hours too late. Standing uselessly by the edge of the German excavation with bombs exploding all around him, the man, immaculately uniformed, having been trained in the best of German military schools, wonders if it is truly necessary to climb down into the trench. It is, says his captain. But that very moment the  soldiers around him begin to shout out, rising from their smoking hells to dance in joy. The War is over. The captain assures the newly arrived lieutenant that it is simply a piece of propaganda passed to his soldiers through Allied pamphlets. 


     In the very next scene the officer wakes up confused about his whereabouts in a French hospital room, whose nurses, doctor, and governmental representatives, about to celebrate his recovery, are shocked to hear him, having come out of his long coma, speak German, his helmet evidently having signified that he had been one of them.

      Now in full color, the film reveals post-World War I Berlin, our naive officer having returned home with a pig, half-covered by his long wool coat, in arms. So begins the comic-war drama Just a Gigolo, directed by British actor and child soprano, David Hemmings—yes, the photographer of Michelangelo Antonioni’s Blowup and, later, in Roger Vadim’s Barbarella as Dildano, the leader of the Sogo underground, who long before those roles had sung as a boy soprano, Miles, in Benjamin Britten’s operatic adaptation of Henry James’ Turn of the Screw.

      Before I go any further I should reveal the fact that the movie, one of the most expensive films of its day, in part because a portion of the original was destroyed by fire, was an utter flop which, as one of its stars put it, when the actors met one another today they covered their faces in embarrassment.


      As I argue in this essay, the film is actually quite fascinating, if not a fully successful work of art. I think simply by mentioning the cast anyone might perceive the problem. Let us start with David Bowie who performed as the German officer, Paul Ambrosius von Przygodski, described above. His mother, Frau von Przygodski, was played by the Austrian-born actor Maria Schnell (who in her day played opposite great actors such as Yul Brynner, Gary Cooper, Marcello Mastroianni, and Marlon Brando). Kim Novak, in her last film role, plays one of Paul’s elderly lovers. The great German actor Curt Jürgens acts the role of the Prince. And, also in her last screen appearance, Marlene Dietrich is Baroness von Semering, head of a bordello for beautiful young boys servicing elderly women, who sings the 1929 German song originally composed by Leonello Casucci and Julius Brammer, with English by Irving Caesar,  “Just a Gigolo.”

     Even the less noted figures, singer Sydne Rome, Rudolf Schündler, and Werner Pochath (who died of AIDS in the arms of his longtime lover, the chief choreographer and general manager of the Hamburg State Opera, John Neumeier) had notable careers. With such remarkable talent on board only something spectacular was to be expected. As Vincent Canby of The New York Times bluntly put it: “It's a very bad movie of more than routine interest because of the talent of many of the people involved and because of its literary antecedents.”

     Canby continues, suggesting those “antecedents”:

 

“The screenplay, credited to Ennio de Concini and Joshua Sinclair, seems to have been inspired, at least in part, by Christopher Isherwood's Berlin Stories as well as by various works of Günter Grass, including The Tin Drum. The production, directed by Mr. Hemmings, deals in all of the cliches one now associates with movies set in Berlin in the decadent 20s, everything from the first film version based on I Am a Camera and its spinoff,  Cabaret, to Ingmar Bergman's The Serpent's Egg, which may well have been made after the Hemmings film. Just a Gigolo has been knocking around, unreleased, for several years.”

 

      Finally, the last sentence of Canby’s review is very telling: “Maybe only Rainer Werner Fassbinder could do justice to the film's source material.” For indeed, just two years after Hemmings’ film was released, Fassbinder did indeed film a work remarkably similar, in some respects, to Just a Gigolo, his remarkable masterwork Berlin Alexanderplatz.


      Paul might easily be seen as a better educated and far more cultured version of Fassbinder’s Franz Bieberkopf (his last name, in German meaning “beaver head,” the name Fassbinder also gives to himself in Fox and His Friends) is a fool, a kind of Simpliclus Simplicissimus who in Franz’s case has just been released from prison. So too has Paul been released back into the Weimar Republic from the prison of war, and like Franz does not quite recognize the changed world into which he has been thrust. His childhood friend Cilly (the name also of one of Franz’s woman friends), the daughter of his family’s servant, has become a revolutionary of the streets, (who in this instance sings Bowie’s “Revolutionary Song,” written most definitely in the Kurt Weill tradition) in whom Paul, now “shell-shocked” as she describes him, has no sexual interest.

       Everyone, including his mother, responds upon reencountering him, “I thought you were dead,” as well might be given his complete aloofness to the suffering they have had to endure and his utter passivity to a world which now has no place for him. Just as Franz takes up selling shoelaces, the Nazi newspaper, and finally gay-oriented magazines in Fassbinder’s film, so does Paul take on a job of a human beer can that advertises the product. If Fassbinder’s “hero” falls accidentally with the future would-be Nazi Reinhold Hoffmann, so does Paul almost accidentally come into the clutches of the Nazi Brownshirt leader, Otto (Pochath), willingly sharing his bed for more than the cause that Otto espouses.

       After Otto demonstrates his complete misogynism by slapping Paul simply for talking to Cilly (Rome), the handsome boy determines to shift jobs once more, this time becoming the kept lover of Helga von Kaiserling (Novak) whom he meets at the funeral of her military husband as warring Communists and Nazis shoot it out in the cemetery where is about to be buried. Ducking down beside the coffin, Paul and Helga suddenly discover themselves atop one another and in their deep sense of fear and sensual adrenaline simply cannot resist one another. Perhaps we must acknowledge the influence of Evelyn Waugh upon this work as well.

       When one has already become a bisexual male whore, as has Paul, why not take a job with more money and less responsibility than the one Baroness von Semering offers? Besides, Paul has all the credentials necessary for the position: a beautiful face, a good education, and a complete lack of moral scruples; moreover, Helga has just taught him how to tango. Finally, even if you’re “just a gigolo...selling each romance,” there are all those other pretty boys hanging around at every party.

      Paul’s final party, an evening in bed with Cilly who has just married a Prince (Jürgens), ends rather badly in another shootout between the Communists and Nazis. Both sides claim him; after all he has already given up his living body to both causes. But as Otto previously declared, “we will get him in the end” (all puns intended). Accordingly, Paul unintentionally becomes the first hero of the Nazi cause that leads to Hitler’s rise.



          Thus, Hemmings turns in a rather sophisticated and often outrageously witty picaresque comedy very much in the manner, if not with the profound insight and directorial accomplishment, of Fassbinder.

        The problem is simply that Just a Gigolo has a few too many irons in its fiery expectations. The fact that Cilly abandons the revolutionary cause to become a kind of Sally Bowles-like cabaret singer before moving on to Hollywood stardom and her marriage to the Prince—if at moments seems charming, particularly when she sings “Don’t Let It Be Too Long”—may certainly elucidate the writers’ themes, yet her trajectory ultimately takes us away from the true focus of the film.

       Most importantly, as good as Bowie always is in floating through his numerous film roles, he’s hardly a good candidate for the passive role in which Just a Gigolo casts him. Bowie is simply too sexy and talented not to have the opportunity to belt out a song or two, dance up a storm instead of a tango, or, at least to let us watch him zestfully jump into either Otto’s or Cilly’s bed. As it stands, he is in this role after all just a kind of gigolo, a pretty face who has sold out his true talents to the lure of Hemmings’ grandiose cinematic aspirations; Bowie didn’t even get to meet Dietrich since she filmed in Paris while he picked up the glass of champagne she offered on a stage set in Berlin.

       Nonetheless, along with the wonderfully goofy music of Gunther Fischer, the jazz era renderings of The Pasadena Roof Orchestra, and even the stylings of The Manhattan Transfer, there is something quite wonderful about Hemmings’ version of the Weimar angst. Perhaps after these many years of dismissal, it’s a film worth more careful attention.

 

Los Angeles, November 1, 2020

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog and World Cinema Review (November 2020). 

        

Lew Gifford and Paul Kim | Queerdom / 1978 [animated short]

something in the air

by Douglas Messerli

 

Lew Gifford and Paul Kim (directors) Queerdom / 1978 [animated short]

Korean-American Paul Kim and Lew Gifford created their own animation company, working on numerous commercials and on School House Rock, the animated series that began in 1973.


    Their 1978 film Queerdom is a truly outrageous gay fantasy where one day a handsome, muscular man with a wife and children wakes up to find he’s feeling rather strange. His head is spinning and he feels dizzy. The day is no different from any other day, but he can’t quite determine what it might be.

    He looks out the window and finds it to me a perfect day, but still he feels somewhat strange. “What was this mad sensation that came over me?” Indeed, he feels a little queer  today.

    But it is time to catch the bus to work. He quickly puts on his tie and rushes off, lifting the bus-stop sign itself and even carrying it off for a moment into the bus as if to prove he was a he-man. He quickly returns it to its proper place before the bus speeds off.

    At work, his colleagues greet him quite normally, “saying good morning in their usually normal way,” yet something feels different, and at that very moment his boss enters his office to tell him “I love you.” 


    Our hero is quite startled to hear such words from another man. He feels funny. A man never said he loved me before, it was only women. Pulling out a girlie magazine as if to prove his heterosexual interests, he ponders that such words are not usually spoken to a man. Yet in the middle of the magazine, the centerfold contains a full pull-out of his boss. And he recognizes, that something strange and weird has happened: “I liked it.” 


     The boss tells him to meet him to lunch that afternoon. “I asked him why?” And once again the boss replies: “I love you.”

    “Why did he stay he loved me? What would my wife say, and my kids when they found out their father was a…HOMOsexual?”

    So what if I am a homosexual, our hero ponders. That doesn’t mean I should be rejected from society. “Some people like women, and other people like men,” he declares in a slightly hysterical voice. “Just because I happen to like a man doesn’t mean I should be rejected like that.”

    However, he admits, in a now much calmer voice, he not only likes the idea, but loves the idea. As the time for lunch comes, the boss again comes by, grabs him by the arm, and repeats: “I love you.”


     Why did he say it again, he wonders, realizing that he’s beginning to “like this man.” “The man began to appeal to me.” The boss pushes him and his swivel chair in to the elevator and they are off the a truly underground Chinese restaurant, Mama Fugami’s, where they are greeted by Mama, who he suddenly realizes is not a woman, but a man. In fact, there are only men in this restaurant. “Today I love men, and I don’t know why. Why should I love men? Oh well, we ate lunch and listened to some crazy music (the bongo drums and jazz clarinet get louder).”

      As they leave the restaurant the boss again tells him he loves him. “Yes, it was a mad, crazy feeling being a homosexual. It was fascinating,” he observes as his face suddenly becomes textured in variously different patterns. 

    The boss now takes him home to his apartment filled with strange art of naked men and…well actually filled with naked men, naked men dancing, naked men playing.

    Suddenly, the boss says something different: “Let’s go to bed, baby.” All the other men leave, giggling on their way out.


     Delighted with being thought of as “grand,” our hero is so completely delighted that he grows a head piece of dangling penises, that eventually attach to his entire body. His enchanted feelings are now most definitely queer as he’s on his way to buy a bowsneck, tennis shows, a pair of tight denim pants and walk down Sixth Avenue. “O, I love queerdom.” And off he trots down a lane with his short statured boss, the catching a ride on the moon—or is it the morning sun?


       Throughout the credits we hear only the sounds of the sexual moans and groans.

     Obviously, this isn’t an experience that suddenly comes over a man in a single day, but I’ll give creators Kim and Gifford the benefit of the doubt by arguing that for a closeted man in a marriage with kids, coming out may seem like a sudden overwhelming experience of a single day in his life. The creators suggest through their continual markers of sunsets and sunrises that, in fact, this all takes place over a period of time.

     Similarly, our rumbustious hero’s constant associations of his new gay feelings with being cartoonish perceived as having to do with becoming a woman, are again those of a man who has pretended he was straight for so long that he cannot explain his feelings except through standard gender binaries.

      I wish I knew who voiced the central characters, particularly our new joyous queer, who sometimes, in his New York accent, seems to be alternating the voices of Joe Friday of the 1950s TV series Dagnet and Dudley Do-Right, the Canadian Mountie who appeared on The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle and Friends.

 

Los Angeles, October 30, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (October 2025).

 

 

 


Kyle Jumayne Francisco | Gulis (Lines) / 2019

reconnecting

by Douglas Messerli

 

Kyle Jumayne Francisco (screenwriter and director) Gulis (Lines) / 2019 [8 minutes]

 

Andrei (Jal Galang), a pediatric nurse, and his father (Menggie Cobarrubias) are removed and distant from one another, particularly since the boy’s mother and the father’s wife has recently died.

     We have no idea of the sexual identity of the young nurse, but he has ordered up a kit to check on his HIV status, so we might guess that he’s gay. Alas, the blood test is positive.

      After a day of hardly sharing a word, the two are seated together on their couch, the father shining his shoes when Andrei, in tears, reports to his father that he is HIV positive

     The father, just as I did, wonders why Andrei hasn’t visited a clinic for a more reliable report, for which the boy has no answer. But soon after, the father stands and leaves the room, Andrei now fully engulphed in tears. The father merely brings him a glass of water and invites him to their dinner table. As he begins to serve up their food, he tells his son that if a clinic is open that evening, they’ll visit; otherwise, he’ll take off work and visit it the next morning. They are in this together, he asserts, and we will be there for his son as he needs him.

      At least in this short film by Filipino director Kyle Francisco, father and son are brought together with the results of the test, and it is clear that Andrei will not have face the shame of being HIV-positive nor fight for his health alone.

 

Los Angeles, October 20, 2023

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (October 2023).


My Queer Cinema Index [with former World Cinema Review titles]

https://myqueercinema.blogspot.com/2023/12/former-index-to-world-cinema-review.html Films discussed (listed alphabetically by director) [For...