by Douglas Messerli
Michael Powell, Emeric Pressburger, and Dennis Arundell
(screenplay, based on the opera by Jacques Offenbach, with a libretto by Jules
Barbier, which, in turn was based on stories by E. T. A. Hoffmann), Michael
Powell and Emeric Pressburger (directors) The
Tales of Hoffmann / 1951
If Powell and Pressburger’s Black Narcissus and The Red
Shoes and Powell’s Peeping Tom are
all more successful works of cinema, The
Tales of Hoffmann, an opera-ballet based on the Offenbach opera, is perhaps
the work most suitable to their temperaments. In this work, given the
transformation of Hoffmann’s Stella from an opera singer to a ballerina and the
balletic-inspired performance of the Olympia section (both figures performed by
The Red Shoes dancer Moira Shearer),
Powell and Pressburger could move almost entirely away from the confines of
realism, creating a fantasy completely given over to the theatrical in the name
of art.
The high art stodginess of the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra, conducted by Sir Thomas Beecham, along with the balletic assertiveness of Léonide Massine bring this work a kind of inherent gravitas in which singers and dancers appear to be striving to emphasize their mastery—all which is gloriously undercut by production and costume designer’s Hein Heckroth’s decision to let loose nearly every gay-decorating convention of overwrought kitsch: rows and rows and rows of gauzy curtains, overwrought baroque bric-a-brac strewn about the sets, brocaded purple waist-coats (for Hoffmann, sternly sung by the pudgy-faced Robert Rounseville), and miles of tasseled cloaks for the work’s scowling villains Lindorf, Coppélius, Dapertutto, and Dr. Miracle (all played by Robert Helpmann and sung by Bruch Dargavel).
Add to this enough makeup stuccoed upon
faces in way that suggests severe tattooing instead of merely highlighting and
prettifying eyes, cheeks, and noses, and an absolutely campy mix of
anachronistic dresses, hats, pants, and other attire that suggests, long before
RuPaul, everyone male and female is competing in a drag competition, and one
ends up with a work that makes you want to laugh every time you might be
expected to sigh or even cry. Even Cecil B. DeMille, hardly known for his
subtle presentations of history—who wrote Powell and Pressburger saying “For
the first time in my life I was treated to Grand Opera where the beauty, power
and scope of the music was equally matched by the visual presentation”—could
not have imagined a Venetian bordello orgy as grand as the gaudy technicolor
bash the directors cooked up for The
Tales of Hoffmann. The evil magician Dapertutto, with curlicues of green
paint strewn across his
Yet as silly as
all of this may seem, there’s a definite method in all the filmmakers’ mad
commitment to imagery and scenarios that are so obviously “over the top.” And
despite the utterly kitsch expressions of art, the way in which Powell and
Pressburger have given themselves up to the artificiality of work they have
created is so fascinating and spectacular that any critical judgment seems
absolutely pointless. Good art or bad art is quite irrelevant when witnessing
an artifact created only to be goggled over. To be truly “kitsch” it would to
pretend to be something it was not. And as for camp, neither the directors nor
the performers (except for the remnant of the Olympia doll) ever winks. If
their utter seriousness is, at times, fairly comic, so is that part of the
film’s charm.
Each of the
humans of this work, meanwhile, attempt to become works of art. If the original
opera might have seemed to be a drama in which the hero devoted his life to the
discovery of love, here he and all the others instead seem hell-bent on giving
up their breathing, sentient selves to become vessels or creators of art, soon
after to be destroyed or to destroy others in the act. In short, the central
human figures of this work are perfectly willing to hand over their souls to
the devil-art in order to continue to dance, write, and sing, echoing the theme
of the two P’s most famous film, The Red Shoes (1948).
The ballerina
Stella ends up holding the arm of the satanic Lindorf; Giulietta has already
given her soul (and body) over to Dapertutto before Hoffmann falls in love;
Antonia, choses to pursue her singing rather than protect her health; and
Hoffmann, by film’s end, having finished the telling of his tales, has drunk
himself in oblivion. Only Hoffmann’s dear companion Nicklaus (performed explicably
in a pants role by Pamela Brown) seems to stand apart from the others,
attempting to warn his friend as Hoffmann clumsily stomps through life. The
directors and writers obviously felt that they had to desexualize the role of
this figure representing such a faithful and enduring love so that his
friendship has utterly no effect.
The film ends
with yet another flourish of its total artificiality, showing Sir Thomas
Beecham, in tails, baton erect, conducting the work’s final chords, before
closing his score, upon which the cinematographers quickly stamp a golden seal
declaring their “product” to be “made in England.”
Los Angeles,
April 11, 2015
Reprinted from World
Cinema Review (April 2015).
No comments:
Post a Comment