perfect happiness
by Douglas Messerli
Roberto Rossellini and Federico
Fellini (screenwriters), Roberto Rossellini (director) Francesco, giullare di Dio (God’s
Jester) / (The Flowers of St.
Francis) / 1950, USA 1952
Given many of the negative reviews
when Rossellini’s Flowers of St. Francis
after its 1950 premiere in Venice, it appears that many filmgoers simply couldn’t
comprehend a religiously accurate text with humor. Marcel Oms, for example,
described the film as “a monument of stupidity,” critic Guido Aristarco
insisting it presented a formalist and, therefore, false reality. Even my
beloved Time Out Film Guide, usually
an embracing catalogue, describes St. Francis’s followers as a motley crew,
suggesting that the film shares their qualities.
On the other hand, François Truffaut described it as “the most beautiful
film in the world,” and, although I wouldn’t go quite that far, I’d certainly
agree with Martin Scorsese’ 2005 assessment of it, as a film filled with humor
and grace. The problem with most films
about saints, argues Scorsese, is the issue of “reverence”:
The aura of
reverence is almost always at odds with the way
the saints must
have felt about themselves. It’s as if they’d
already been
declared saints in their own lifetime, as if every
word out of
their mouths had been pre-sanctified.
Rossellini’s study of St. Francis and
his followers belongs to a far earlier tradition, expounded by Desiderius
Erasmus and his friend Thomas More, which described Christ as a saintly fool, a
man who, despite the logic of daily needs and human conditions, gave himself
completely over to his faith. Working with two St. Francis books, Fioretti Di San Francesco and Vita di Frate Ginepro, Rossellini and
Fellini created a true believer, who, in the original Italian title, is also a
kind of jester, “God’s Jester,” another kind of holy being.
Using monks from the Nocere Inferiore Monastery to play the roles of St.
Franciso and his followers, the director maneuvers his figures through the 9
marked tales in this lovely film, as if they were a herd of deer running
through woods in an escape of bright lights. Indeed, the film begins with the
Franciscans on the run through a rainstorm, racing to find cover only to
discover that their small shelter has been overtaken by an interloper and his
donkey, the old man insisting that his donkey remain. The monks, withdraw, only
to take joy in their suffering.
Many of the following episodes—and this film is deliberately episodic,
as if it might have expanded exponentially to contain as many “tales” as the
writers may have desired—are comic, others startlingly touching in their very
simplicity. Most of the comic tales involve the near-idiot cook of the group,
Brother Ginepro, who is so humble that he gives up his very robe twice,
returning home naked. Even though Francis would give up nearly anything to the
poor, he orders that Ginepro never again give up his tunic. At another point,
left alone to his chores, Brother Ginepro tries to comfort an ailing Brother
Amarsebello, who has fasted too often. The broth he
I’ve never seen
another film that deals with this basic question
of compassion so
eloquently.
The most joyous episode of this film, certainly occurs when St. Clare
and two of her sisters come to lunch with Francis. The brothers scurry about,
as usual, this time carefully gathering up masses of flowers in order create a
kind of carpet of blossoms where she might step. With the few tools they have
at their disposal, they brush their hair, cut their beards and groom their
filthy faces. When Clare arrives, they pray, eat and quietly talk—a fire,
reports the narrator, igniting the sky.
Los Angeles, March 10, 2014
Reprinted from International Cinema Review (March 2014).
No comments:
Post a Comment