black narcissus
by Douglas Messerli
Eugene O’Neill’s 1920 play The Emperor
Jones is on the one hand perhaps his most experimental work, but also reveals
nearly all the problems of his early explorations of character types and
dialect. It’s particularly difficult to wander through the dynamite fields of O’Neill’s
sometimes seemingly racist attempts at dialect given that the central figure of
this work is a black man and a con man to boot.
Despite
this, however, there have been several memorable stage productions of the work,
as well as the highly entertaining 1933 film by Dudley Murphy, Alvin Rakoff’s
now lost BBC TV version of 1953, a second TV version, directed by Fiedler Cook
in 1955 on the Kraft Television Theatre, and the truly remarkable Wooster Group
productions in the 1990s which resulted in their video compilation of 2009.
Yet
as good as it is it can’t match Murphy’s 1933 film, which seems always, in its
long monologues, ready to fall apart. In his often juvenile but also
entertaining and invigorating essay on his Acid Cinema site critic Erich
Kuersten finally expresses what comes fairly close to my overall feelings about
this film:
“The Emperor Jones remains a true work
of art in part because of its flaws…. It’s utterly unique unto itself, an avant-garde
howl of racial fear and confusion. It’s a celebration of black power, even as
that power is—before our eyes—broken down, crushed, frustrated and torn apart,
until the terrifying roots of slavery are exposed. Jones exposes below
those roots, even, until life itself, the ‘first man’, is revealed as
originating in a bloody whirl of black skin and primordial anguish. Moby
Dick isn’t Greenpeace-friendly and Jones isn’t PC, they are
literature from an age when literature didn’t mean snoozing in the Merchant /
Ivory section and running creative decisions through a cultural committee.
There’s a little something for (and against) nearly everyone in The Emperor
Jones: horror, action, spirituality, island beaches, and great
bass-baritone singing. It’s messy, it’s complicated, and it’s retroactively
racist. But real art doesn’t leave you pious and ethical and with arms of
hand-printed socialist pamphlets you’re expected to hand out at the door or
else be labeled part of the problem. It kicks you in the groin, knocks the
pamphlets out of your hands, and then tells you it’s sorry with a song that
gets you too teary-eyed to resist when it steals your wallet.”
Los Angeles, February 7, 2023
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (February
7, 2023).
No comments:
Post a Comment