having to do what you have to do
by Douglas Messerli
Edwin Burke (screenplay based on the novel by
Tiffany Thayer), John Francis Dillon (director) Call Her Savage / 1932
The 1932 pre-Hays Code film Call Her Savage
is perhaps best known today for its late-in-the-movie scene in a New York
Greenwich Village restaurant where the denizens are entertained by two gay
performers as they dance to racy lyrics. Arguably, it was one of the first
appearances in US filmmaking of self-identifying homosexuals without any
pretense of a drag comedic performance or a coded sequence of under-the-radar
sexuality. Perhaps only Ralph Cedar’s western spoof The Soilers of 1923
or James Whale’s The Old Dark House of the same year so
openly expressed LGBTQ figures.
Nasa, as the old man in the wagon train (Russell Simpson) had predicted,
also grew up wild, presumably—so posits Edwin J. Burke’s racist
screenplay—because of her “savage” blood. So mercurial in temperament is Nasa
that at one moment, after having been almost bitten by a rattlesnake, she whips
her lover, the “half-breed” Moonglow (Gilbert Roland) before, a moment later,
she tries to nurse him back to health, tearing away part of her own blouse to
serve as a tourniquet. As she explains human nature, in part justifying her own
behavior:
"Nobody is good or bad. People
just do things they’ve got to do
that’s all. Something inside
makes them. Nobody ever likes
the things I do, but I got to
do them.”
If
there ever was an early attempt to describe non-normative behavior, both in
terms of daily personal encounters and sexual desires, Nasa’s philosophy
represents Hollywood’s declaration. And soon after, when she is sent away by
her pious father to be straightened out in a Chicago School for Women, she
proves her theory of uncontrollable vacillations of behavior by acquiring the
Windy City’s journalistic moniker of “Dynamite.” As a social newspaper
commentator observes in announcing her societal coming-out party: it’s hard to
determine whether this is be described as a society event or as police car
news.
At
the party her father is determined to announce his daughter’s marriage to the
heir to another fortune, Charlie Muffet, a man she cannot abide, and to whom
she later announces—when he insists that he wants to marry her—that she is
“making arrangements for a nervous breakdown.”
Crosby, whose father owns a couple of banks, is in the midst of breaking
up with current lover, the equally wild woman Sunny De Lane (Thelma Todd).
Packing up, Crosby’s butler holds up a woman’s slip to ask “Will you take this
with you Mr. Crosby?” to which his employer quips, “Do you know the difference
between a woman’s dress and a gentleman’s trousers?” No answer is given.
When
only a few moments later Sunny De Lane argues that Crosby will surely
eventually come back to her because, “I understand your little peculiarities,”
we can only suspect that woman are not the only basis for his admission that,
“I wonder if there’s any sin in the calendar I haven’t been guilty of.” When
the woman to whom he says this ponders how he finds time to do anything else in
his life, he quips: “I lump them all together and commit five or six of them
all at once,” which leaves almost any many of combination of sinful acts to our
astounded imaginations.
His ex, Sunny, is also determined to attend Nasa’s party, declaring that
she’s not afraid of “dynamite,” and before the evening comes to an end the two
girls have not only made a public spectacle of themselves in a good ole women’s
wrestling match, but Nasa finds herself married to the already gone-missing
Crosby. On their wedding night he returns home drunk at 2:00 to, after a 5:00
telephone message, get dressed again and return to whatever party he’s
previously left.
Realizing that her marriage to Crosby was an act of spite against Sunny,
Nasa determines to make the best of it by going on a shopping spree that any
stylish beauty might envy. But eventually that comes to a stop, not because as
Crosby’s lawyer argues, her husband has cut off her expense account, but
because he is now dying in a New Orleans hospital and begs to see her before he
goes.
Obviously, we might interpret such a disease to have something to do
with alcoholism, but I’d argue the script is more clearly winking at that
pre-Aids scourge to both sexually active hetero-and-homosexual lovers,
syphilis. Certainly, Nasa is suddenly worried, not necessarily about her
philandering husband’s deteriorating health, but for the well-being of her
soon-to-be born baby. She must have been impregnated the first afternoon of
their sham marriage.
The baby, nevertheless, is born healthy—although in a story about the
damned children of several generations (the old coot from wagon train quoted
from the book of Numbers from the Bible: “The LORD is longsuffering, and of
great mercy, forgiving iniquity and transgression, and by no means clearing the
guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third
and fourth generation.”) it may be possible that her son, like Oswald Alving in
Henrik Ibsen’s Ghosts, might still one day go blind. But Nasa
doesn’t give the poor kid a chance. Without money, she determines to briefly
work the streets in order to raise enough money to pay for her son’s medicine,
and, leaving her newborn alone in the care of a young neighbor girl, returns to
discover that her child has died in a rooming-house fire. But there’s good news
along with the bad: her grandfather Mort has died and left her his substantial
fortune.
Her
escort, Jay Randall (Anthony Jowitt) is yet another wealthy young, dapper, but
somewhat effete man, pretending in this case to be an obedient employee just to
get closer to the woman which has caught his eye, much like the jewels that
Crosby so enjoyed holding.
When Nasa requests, one night, that they go slumming, he takes her to
that now infamous Village restaurant—sure to be filled, as he warns her, with
wild poets and anarchists—where the two gay performers with which I began my
essay, dressed as cleaning maids replete with feather dusters they flap in the
faces of their admiring diners, sing a song something like this:
“If a fairy in pajamas I
should see, I know he’d scare the life out
of me. [The second responding]
And on a great big battle-
ship you’d like to be!”
It’s interesting that Nasa’s escort knows all about this place, and when
the couple enters, appears to be widely recognized by the crowd. There is, in
fact, an anarchist in the crowd who recognizes Randall to be the son of the
mining mogul, Silas Jennings, resulting in a male and female kerfuffle—the
likes of which the Hollywood screen would not again see until Marlon Brando
flew down the missionary doll played by Jean Simmons to dinner in a Cuban bistro
in Guys and Dolls. For Nasa it’s so invigorating that she immediately
accepts the proper polo player’s offer to marry.
The
father, as moguls are wont to do, thoroughly disapproves of Mrs. Crosby’s
intentions regarding his son, and invites the couple along with the surprise
guests of Mrs. Crosby and Sunny De Lane to dinner just to test Nasa’s mettle.
Evidently the now-cured Crosby (Dr. Erlich had found his “magic bullet” in
1910) has returned, perhaps for his “peculiarities” to his former mistress.
With the wedding called off and near total rejection by anyone of social
importance, Nasa falls into a self-pitying drunken state, daring not even face
herself in the mirror. A telegram reports that her mother, back in Texas, is
near death.
Sobering up, Nasa returns home to her mother’s deathbed, where, in her
last breath, Ruth whispers the name of Ronasa. When Nasa’s old friend Moonglow
tells her that Ronasa was a great Indian chief who fell in love with a
beautiful white woman and committed suicide, Nasa suddenly answers the dilemma
she has long faced concerning her “difference,” perceiving that she too is a
savage, a half-breed. Now, finally, she is free to marry her first love, the
calm and long-suffering Moonglow, the perfect foil for her “blazing sun”-hot
temperament.
It
appears that critics such as The New York Times’ Mordaunt Hall didn’t
quite know what to make of all Nasa’s transformations and the men spinning
round them: “Miss Bow
does quite well by the rôle of this fiery-tempered impulsive Nasa, but whether
the flow of incidents makes for satisfactory entertainment is a matter of
opinion.” Hall seemed more taken by the New York theatrical sites than with the
events of the plot, although strangely deleting any mention of the Village
bistro, ending his November 1932 review:
“With a charming setting that gradually comes
to view after introductory lighting effects and flashes of movement and color,
there is on the stage of the Roxy, Maurice Ravel's composition ‘The Birth of
the Waltz.’ It is a gratifying rhythmic spectacle, with graceful girls in
attractive gowns, and men in uniforms swaying to the melody. The first number
of Frank Cambria's footlights diversion is Edelweiss, in which there is
a colorful mélange, including dancing, singing and balancing.”
Well, he likes dancing and singing girls and
boys at least, even if miscegenation, homosexuality, adultery, suicide,
sexually transmitted diseases, and down and dirty female wrestling bouts are
deemed unworthy of being topics for entertainment. Only two years later, Hall
would find in Will Hays someone who utterly agreed.
In the
1970’s The Song of the Loon directors Andrew Herbert and Scott Hanson
brought many of this film’s major concerns once again to the screen.
Los Angeles, February 28, 2021
Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog and
World Cinema Review (February 2021).
No comments:
Post a Comment