a
metaphor to the future
by Douglas Messerli
Stewart Main, Wairua
Wharemate-Sadler, and Rangi Chadwick (screenplay and story), Stewart Main
(director) Te Keremutunga o Nga Atua (Twilight of the Gods) /
1996
The soldier is discovered by Tao when he
hears the cry of his spirit-bird and runs to witness the death of his Māori friend (possibly a lover) and of several
renegades dressed in their uniforms. Among the soldier’s bodies Tao discovers
one handsome man still living and out of revenge is about to kill him but is
stopped by the song of his spirit-bird to who tells him to spare the man’s
life.
Angered by the bird’s message, Tao can
only wonder whether his gods have lost their powers given this request. Surely
as a warrior it is his duty to destroy the man who was party to those who
destroyed his friend and others of his tribe. He holds his spear ready to
plunge it into the dying man, but it suddenly turns into a burning torch in his
hands. When he picks up a large boulder to dash it against the soldier’s head,
it crumbles in his grasp.
Tao pulls away in contempt, and over the
next several hours seems to leave the soldier to suffer alone in the cold of a
sudden rainstorm. Although he tends to his own provisions, he appears not to
even attempt to feed his hated guest.
Yet eventually he does tend the man’s
wound, carrying him to a stream to gently bathe him where he mocks his now
prisoner for having an erection. Yet when he finishes and pulls away to clean
himself he suddenly fantasizes embracing and kissing the beautiful stranger.
When he comes to from the dream-like fantasy he is confused by what he has
experienced, and attempts to ask the spirit-bird why he is plaguing him with
these thoughts.
Gradually, the man heals and even taunts
Tao. At one point we see him tying knots to a tree limb in order to catch birds
to order for a later dinner. Previously, Tao has taunted him with an eel he has
caught my hand in the local stream.
When the soldier once again attempts to
kiss the warrior, Tao angrily pulls away, the two deeply battling with one
another in the stream until, gaining control over the weaker soldier, Tao
attempts to drown the man by holding him by the neck under the water. He can no
longer hear the song of the spirit bird, however, and grows troubled.
In the end, he cannot carry out his
resolve, and letting go, the soldier comes gasping back to life. A few moments
later, Tao turns back to him, embracing him into a deep kiss, as the two tussle
in their sexual desires, rolling each other over and over in sexual lust.
Finally, the Māori and the New Zealander have become lovers, a metaphor for a
future in which the film exists if not its specific story.
The next day, Tao is alone near the hut,
waiting for the soldier to bring him back food, hoping for a pig. We see the
soldier pulling birds from his traps, and suddenly we realize that Tao’s
spirit-bird has been among those caught in the small nets.
Almost as evidence of the god’s
punishment a small band of renegades appear out of nowhere, cornering Tao and
threatening him, he calling out to his friend, who is obviously too far away to
hear his calls.
When the soldier returns he encounters Tao’s blackened, bruised, and bloodied body hanging upside down from a nearby tree branch. Despite the look of horror upon the soldier’s face we can also sense his recognition of the inevitability of the event. The gods who have died, it becomes apparent, are not those to whom Tao and his friends prayed, symbolized by their wooden carvings, nor even the spirit-bird who communicates the gods’ will to the Māori warriors, but the warriors themselves, who ruled the land for so many ages.
Despite the devastation of the
indigenous Māori population of the latter half of the 19th century—presumably
when the events of this film were set—today there are approximately 776,000
Māori’s remaining on the island country, with about 140,000 surviving in
Australia.
Main’s film, shot in rich
black-and-white hues that remind one more of the cinema of the 1960s than 1990s
when this work was shot, provide it with an archaic look that seems appropriate
for its historical timelessness. It seems amazing, given its rather graphic
presentation of sexual genitalia and acts that it was funded, in part, by the
New Zealand Film Commission, obviously an organization far more open-minded
that any US governmentally-supported organization might be.
Los Angeles, March 11,
2021
Reprinted from My
Queer Cinema blog and World Cinema Review (March 2021).
No comments:
Post a Comment