by Douglas Messerli
Sam Max (screenwriter and director) Chaperone / 2022 [16 minutes]
US director Sam Max’s Chaperone has the horrific reverberations
of works such as David, Hoyle, Gary Reich, and Mike Nicholls’ Uncle David
(2010) and Osama Chami and Enrique Gimeno Pedrós’ Young Diego (2021) in
which young boys, urged on by older men, determine that it is time to die.
The young figure in this
film, simply called “Client” (Russell Kahn), meets up in a car with a stranger
called the Chaperone (Zachary Quinto) with whom he’s obviously been in touch
through the internet, as they check off the pre-determined details: that he has
deleted everything from his computers, that he has sent his telephone and its
messages to an agreed-upon location (presumably for destruction), he has drawn the curtains, closed out all of
his bank accounts, and in this “client’s” case has not even been out of the
house for four days. Even the Client’s backpack is checked.
We can already guess that our
young friend will not be returning to his previous life, but if there is any
question left, when the Chaperone later sees the young man through something
out the moving car window only to discover that they were his house keys which
he’d forgotten to get rid of previously, and the driver screeches to a halt, going
back to retrieve the keys, we know that they are on a serious mission,
particularly since the Chaperone cannot even permit the keys to somehow be
possibly found by others.
Yet the Chaperone remains
friendly and gentle with his Client, asking him if he’s a little nervous, the
boy saying, “Yeah, I guess so.”
The Chaperone, however, certainly
doesn’t have a very developed sense of human, and he comments, “People usually
haven’t done something like this before,” to which the young man asks, “Usually?”
the Chaperone declaring “It’s a joke.”
That comment, however,
most certainly clues us in that people do whatever it is that he is about to do
only once, and that death is involved. For the rest of the film, accordingly,
we attempt to discern why and how the young man is determined to meet up with
death.
Suddenly he asks if they
can stop, evidently at a fast-food shop where he asks for “nuggets” and for the
toys, this a Halloween ghost, that such places given as toys to children.
The isolated country
house which they soon reach, is fully appointed with a kitchen, fireplace, and
comfortable furniture, even if it is fairly barren in appearance.
Our young man asks him a
rather strange question. “Is this where you take all the boys?”
Does this man’s job only
entail young men, we wonder. Is he a kind of Charon only for boys? And if
so, what does he first do to or with them, we have to ask ourselves. Like David’s
older uncle in the 2010 movie I mention above, does he first provide them with
a party and sex? Or like the man about to carry off “young Diego” in the 2021
film, does he have cannibalistic urges? This clearly has the makings of a
horror film.
But director Max soon
makes it clear when the Chaperone sits down on the plastic-wrapped furniture to
count the numerous stacks of bills that have been in the boy’s backpack, that
whatever is in the store, the Client has highly paid for it, a fact which I
found even more menacing, realizing at the same moment that had I not been
watching this on a DVD collection devoted to gay film, there would be no reason
at the point in the film, at 6 minutes, to even lead one to believe that this
might be a film about homosexuals or a gay boy.
The bedroom is empty
except for a plastic-covered bed, presumably the furniture all protected from human
body sweat, skin imprint, or any other DNA information. However, the death will
occur for whatever reason, it will obviously not be a bloody mess. There’s
something terribly cold-blooded and premediated about this whole affair.
No, there will be no sloppy
partying, no cutting up or tearing a flesh in this country house. A drawer in
the bathroom cabinet, however, is filled with trays of various drugs, all for
the young boy’s use.
So there is to be sex.
Well, not real sex, so it appears, as the Chaperone pulls a dildo out of a
drawer and wraps even it in a condom. Laid out on the bed like an etherized
patient, the boy has to beg the elder to pretend it’s his, to at least act like
it is his own penis penetrating his ass.
The older man unzips his
pants and puts the other end where his penis is, asking “Are you ready?” The
sex occurs off screen.
We observe the boy after
sex, not at all looking so joyful, as the Chaperone rolls up the now plastic-covered
dildo in a towel, presumably for burial in some distant corner of the universe.
If this young man were going this this process for the sex, I’d suggest that he
would be far from satisfied. But obviously, the major event as still not taken
place.
The boy walks over to a
window, the elder following him and in Quinto’s deep baritone voice asks if
everything’s okay, the young man responding, “Yeah, I think it’s time. I think
I need to do it now.”
In the dark, with a lamp
in hand, they walk several yards from the house where the Chaperone spreads out
a cloth almost like it was a picnic, as they sit down on the grass.
The boy holds out his
hand to accept the pill. “It doesn’t look so scary, does it?”
The Chaperone responds
quite surprisingly, with a half-smile on his face. “I think it’s kind of cute.”
Swallowing the pill, the
boy lays down, the older man stroking his face with his black gloves. “All of a
sudden, I’m scared,” the boy responds, “Will you play with my hair?”
A single tear wells up
and falls from the boy’s eye, as the glove wipes it away. A few minutes later
the Chaperone turns out the light.
We feel something coy
and even tawdry about this film, about these scenes in which we’ve never even
had a hint of why this young man, seemingly in good health, has been so intent to
seek out assisted suicide. Does he have some fatal disease, AIDS, a brain
tumor, a rare kind of cancer? Or is he simply fed out with his life, in
spending his days alone, and has decided to do himself in?
Any single answer, of
course, would have been pointless. There’s a reason why assisted suicide is not
permitted in this country for young boys of his age, and why this Charon has so
gone out of his way to cover all his tracks. It is a kind of murder, no matter
what reasons the boy might have given us to explain his desire to die.
This film ends with a
long scene in which we observe the older man vacuuming, even his shoes cover in
plastic, and where every wrap and scrap of clothing is gathered up and put into
a large plastic bag. The sink is scoured with heavy detergents.
With a gas mask in
place, the Chaperone finally pours whatever lethal chemical he has in the
plastic container upon the boy’s body, now placed in the bathtub, obviously
naked, even though we see only his feet as evidence of his former existence. Presumably
the chemicals will dissolve the body. He surely will successfully get rid of
all the “evidence” of the murder.
Only one small object
remains, which we see the Chaperone, now sitting alone outdoors, holding and
rolling over in his hand, the fast-food outlet’s child’s toy, the ghost of the
young man he has helped to kill.
Los Angeles, December 12, 2023
Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (December 2023).
No comments:
Post a Comment