traces of civilization
by Douglas Messerli
Jean Gruault and François Truffaut
(screenplay, based on the book by Henri-Pierre Roché), François Truffaut
(director) Jules et Jim (Jules and Jim) / 1962
As those many film-goers and readers
who have seen François Truffaut’s 1962 picture or have read the earlier novel
by Henri-Pierre Roché, Jules and Jim is
the tale of the triangular interrelationships between two men, Jules (Oskar
Werner) and Jim (Henri Serre), and a woman Catherine (Jeanne Moreau) presented
over a number of years. The close friendship and male bonding between Jules and
Jim is described as similar to the inextricable pairing of
Early in the film they both bed a number of the same women, particularly
since it is Jim who introduces Jules to romantic trysts; but it is, finally,
Catherine, who most attracts them, for her beauty and, more importantly, her
impetuous behavior. For the two slightly pedantic “fools,” Catherine, a
proto-feminist figure, is irresistible in her ability to bring out the
insignificance (and comic silliness) of their lives, and they soon determine to
join her in a vacation chateau, where they seem content to share her. She, in
turn, entreats them to join her on ridiculous activities such as searching for
traces of civilization in the countryside about (the three discovering all
sorts of lost objects, from shoes, cigarette packages, cups, hats, etc.) and frolicking,
a bit like children, in the slightly “befouled,” but nonetheless Prelapsarian
paradise.
When Jules determines to go further in his encounters with Catherine,
with the intention of marrying her, things begin to take a slightly more
serious tone. Although outwardly the trio attempts to remain open about
sexuality and to refrain from jealousy and expressions of sexual dominance,
these very issues rear their head in Jules’ disquisition on Baudelaire’s
attitude towards women and in Jim’s passive silences in response; Catherine
reacts, as she will increasingly throughout the tale, with an impetuous act
that runs counter to her two friends’ muted attempts at self-preservation, by
jumping into the Seine. Fortunately, she survives the act.
Outwardly, then, the film presents itself as a being about the battle of
the sexes in which both men, in thrall to the feminine, attempt to resist their
own temptations to manipulate or control their “Queen.” Catherine, on her part,
refuses to settle into a normative domestic world, continuing to goad both men
with numerous outside affairs and through her erratic behavior, while still
playing upon their own desires for domesticity and progeny. In the larger world
in which they exist, their sexual experimentation is destined, alas, to end in
tragedy, as Jim, finally exhausted with the flirtatiousness and
unpredictability of Catherine’s version of “love”—l’amour for him as opposed to Jules’ more stolid and abiding notion
of the same emotion Liebe—attempts to
leave her, only to be destroyed by the “Queen Bee” for his attempt to abandon
“the hive.”
This time, however, I realized that Truffaut was also telling us other
tales in his focus on the sexual alliances which seemed so central to the
film’s story. First, the tale of Jules, Jim, and Catherine is a story of
photography and the cinema itself. Early in the film, their mutual friend,
Albert shows slides in the manner of La Belle Époque, the era when the film
begins. Soon after, as the figures frolic throughout the landscape, their
capers are presented more in the manner of a Charlie Chaplin film, as they
seemingly improvise their silly antics, the film speeding up to match the
frantic movement of the little tramp, along with momentary friezes, in which
the moving images are transformed into still photographs, reminding us again of
the photographic roots of cinema. Soon after, Truffaut infuses his film with a
sense of the scratchy documentary style of World War I filmic images,
presumably many of them borrowed from war-time archives. Jim’s visit to Jules’
and Catherine’s Alpine-like chalet in the Black Forest corresponds with a
cinematic rendition of post-war romances in which loving images of domesticity
alternate with interludes of romantic trysts and stylized representations of
longing.
These scenes are followed by Jim’s return to Paris where the scenes
appear to be much more related to the Jacques Prévert-influenced tales of the
underground city, which transform, soon after, into much more contemporary
(clearly new-wave inspired) street scenes and bar-crawls, including the comic
story-telling of the erotically uncontrollable Thérèse. By film’s end,
Truffaut’s movie takes on images that might remind us more of scenes from Open City, with Catherine’s careening,
out-of-control car circling a square (and foretelling the last major scene of
the film) and with a newsreel rendition of the German book-burnings,
particularly the one on May 10, 1933. Jim and Catherine’s mad drive across a partially
demolished bridge certainly suggests the soon-to-be war-time destruction, and
the film’s final scenes clearly represent post World-War II realism, as the
camera focuses on the burning bodies and burials that would become common in
post-Holocaust imagery.
Just as importantly, moreover, is how this film applies love as a metaphor for cultural and national distinctions and the inevitable struggles that result. Love, in other words, stands in for war throughout this film, and the seeming vagaries of these figures’ love-lives can be directly connected to their national distinctions. If Jules and Jim begin as inseparable friends, like Germany and France, they soon must go to war with one another. Although they are both terrified of destroying one another, they both seem active in the battles that destroy everyone else around them.
Jules’ Alpine chalet could not be more different from Jim’s urban Paris,
or even from their shared country chateau in the earlier part of the film (in
fact, another interpretation of this film might involve just the architectural
images presented in Truffaut’s cinema). This is a film, we must remember, in
which most of the action occurs between the wars, and we must recognize that
the prize both men seek, Catherine, symbolically speaking, is the cause of the
great discord documented throughout the film.
Catherine’s and Jules’ return to Paris may suggest their personal moral
positions, indicating their inabilities to remain in Germany at the time of
such growing discord, but the battle continues, suggested through their once
again rural idyll of a mill-house abode and through Catherine’s clearly
war-like endeavors (in the form of her motorized terrorizing of the square
outside Jim’s window, a gun with which she threatens to shoot Jim, and her own
threatened suicide). Her “final solution,” taking her former lover and herself
to their grave with another kind of dive in the river waters, is merely a
reiteration of the violent actions Jules must now face in France from his own
compatriots (Catherine is, after all, still his wife). If he and his daughter have
survived the war of love, he may not be able to survive the battles of the
nationalities ahead.
The search the threesome underwent early on in the film for traces of
civilization, may be harder to perform for Jules in the spiritually empty
landscape that he must now face. Throughout the film, all the characters read,
sharing books and ideas; but after the German book-burning events, he may find
little literature left to help him interpret the world he now faces.
Los Angeles, April 1, 2015
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (April 2015).
No comments:
Post a Comment