by Douglas Messerli
Roscoe “Fatty” Arbuckle (screenwriter and director) His Wedding
Night / 1917
Roscoe Arbuckle’s His Wedding Night,
released in late August of 1917, steals a great portion of its story from his
own April release of that year, The Butcher Boy in that “Fatty”
works behind the counter of a store, in this case a soda fountain, from which
he can once more display his remarkable juggling and culinary talents that
appear in many other of his films as well, such as The Waiter’s Ball (1916)
and The Cook (1918). As in the Butcher Boy, moreover, his
character is again in competition for the bosses’ daughter, Alice (Alice Mann)
with the local ne’er-do-well played by Al St. John, one of the most remarkable
actors in Arbuckle’s small company. This time, however, her father has already
promised her in marriage to Fatty, the fact of which further infuriates the
suitor who, in this case, has no intentions of giving up his “rights” to the
local beauty.
This short film has more than the usual number of distasteful, racist,
sexist, and even criminal scenes which one must sit through in order to glean
its comic entertainment values. At the center of several of these incidents is
a bottle of perfume, which is free for sampling. The temptation of the “free”
perfume bottle, however, is far too great for the customers of this small-town
emporium who all seek out a better self-fragrance. We first see a handsome
woman applying more than a “sample” to her face and other body parts, which
leads the counterman to reprimand her, but as she turns away a black woman has
replaced her, sampling the perfume in profusion, and when Fatty turns back,
apparently with the intent to make it up with the woman by giving her a hug he
puts his arm around the black woman instead, an act which delights her but is a
comic faux pas in the racist US of the day. But even worse, while she
has turned, the hand-written sign announcing the expensive perfume’s price, “$4
an oz,” has been imprinted into the backside of her dress (even more
ludicrously, not in reverse), suggesting as one commentator has observed,
“within living memory of slavery,” that she is for sale.
Having been successful the first time around, Fatty tries his luck on the next woman who enters the store, only to discover that the chloroform has utterly no effect on her, even when she finally drinks it. Either this gal has been nipping on the side or she is a vampire long before her time.
While her fiancé plays the field below, in her upstairs bedroom Alice is
planning for her wedding. And at that very moment, Buster Keaton, as a delivery
boy, is speeding up to the front stoop of the store, where upon he crashes his
bike, flips over forward (from childhood on he had worked as a kind of abused
acrobat), knocks over the cracker-jack gent sitting on its front porch, and
somehow manages to poke something in his left eye that leaves him winking and blinking
through the rest of the movie.
Keaton immediately bellies up the soda bar, winking at Fatty in a manner
that might, in fact, be read as flirtatious. But obviously context is
everything, and the barman interprets it as a sign that he asking from
something “under the counter” so to speak, and immediately pours him a pint of
stout, which the delivery boy drinks down without hesitation while Fatty, in
cartoon mode, proffers up not only a foot rest for the bar but a spittoon and,
in a final flourish, a little sawdust.
Indeed, things become more complicated as, at that very moment, the
suitor returns, this time to rape (“carry off”) the bride-to-be to a local
judge of the peace. Realizing that her model has been kidnapped, Alice goes
racing off to get her dress back at the same moment that Fatty, hearing Alice
has been spirited off, chases the suitor and his gang, all ending up a
free-for-all, with Fatty and Alice being reunited at the last moment after it’s
discovered that the kidnapped bride is only the winking deliverer of bad news.
The judge is ready to marry them, but when asked to pay out the money for the
wedding, Fatty sprays some “perfume” on the judge before he can even ask the
important questions, just to get his money back.
Los Angeles, March 3, 2023
Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog
(December 2023).
No comments:
Post a Comment