fool’s paradise
by Douglas Messerli
Anita Loos and Jane Murfin (screenplay, based
on the play by Clare Boothe Luce), George Cukor (director) The Women / 1939
It had been many years since I last George
Cukor’s The Women, and I can’t say
that it has entirely aged well. At many points, Clare Boothe Luce’s witty
language (spruced up to fit into the Film Production Code by Anita Loos and
Jane Murfin) helps the film to be still fun in a truly “bitchy” manner,
particularly through the gossipy chatter of Sylvia Fowler (Rosalind Russell)
and Edith Potter (Phyllis
At
moments their comments, especially those of the lesbian-like writer, Nancy
Blake (Florence Nash), are brilliant, presenting a far different view of New
York house-wives from any film later reaching into the 1960s. These women
are not only quite independent, but—at least two of them, Mary and Peggy Day
(Joan Fontaine)—are pleased with their companions. If you might have ignored Cukor’s credits,
wherein he equates each of these figures with animals, you might even think
that these smart women are proto-feminists. They’re certainly not stupid or
passive. Nancy is even hinting that she believes her husband to be gay.
Sylvia Fowler: Well, heaven be praised, I'm on
to my husband, I wouldn't trust him on Alcatraz, the mouse.
Peggy Day: Sylvia, you oughtn't talk about him
like that! Why, I think it's disloyal!
Sylvia Fowler: Oh now, listen Peggy, do we
know how the men talk about us when we're not around?
Nancy Blake: I've heard rumours.
Sylvia Fowler: Exactly... And uh... While
we're on the subject, have either of you wondered whether the master of this
maison might not be straying?
Nancy Blake: I haven't.
Sylvia Fowler: Well, for all you know Mary
Haines may be living in a fool's paradise.
Nancy Blake: You're so resourceful darling. I
ought to go to you for plots.
Sylvia Fowler: You ought to go to “someone.”
Certainly, there are witches here by the dozens. Not only, as Mary’s intelligent mother tries to tell her, are these “friends” eager to dish the dirt, but want to force Mary to confront her bedroom competitor and seek a divorce from the husband she still loves. And if their mean behavior was not enough, Cukor drags in a true “witch” in the form of Hedda Hopper (playing Dolly Dupuyster) who takes the affair to new levels by plastering the news all over the daily papers.
Like the character Mrs. Lord (Mary Nash) of the The Philadelphia Story—a film that was released the following
year—Mrs. Morehead (Lucile Watson) advises her daughter to simply wait out her
husband’s current obsession, just as she did in her own long marriage. (Two of
the actors in The Women also appeared
in The Philadelphia Story, Ruth
Hussey, and Virginia Weidler, the latter playing Mary’s daughter, just as she
later did Mrs. Lord’s precocious child.)
If
the film is sometimes fun in its satire of female gossip, it turns very sad,
however, on the train to Reno, particularly since two of the Reno ranch
tenants, Mary and Peggy, really don’t want their divorces. The script and Cukor
try to keep up the spirits of the clever play by introducing the hilarious,
serial divorcee, The Countess De Lave (Mary Boland) and the ranch owner, Lucy
(Marjorie Main). Peggy, who finds herself pregnant, returns to her husband; but
when Mary attempts to call him with hopes of a reconciliation, he calls her,
instead, to let her know, since the divorce has now gone through, about his own
marriage to Crystal.
Even if, a bit like All About Eve,
everything does work out in the end—particularly since the nasty Crystal has
now taken up with The Countess’ most recent husband, a Reno cowboy turned,
through her money, radio broadcaster—there’s something more than sad about the
horrible behaviors of all, male and female, involved. And we know by film’s
end, that the lovely mother that Mary portrays at the beginning of The Women will never quite be restored.
She may be the “owl,” which her mother represents, but she will never again be
the joyous, loving wife and mother of work’s first scenes.
In
a sense, The Women is a kind of
playing out of the Garden of Eden myth, but from the perspective only of Eve,
as if Adam didn’t truly matter. In such a world, as one character suggests
early on, there is no forward movement, no possibility for a new world:
“everything is going in circles.”
Los Angeles, June 15, 2018
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (June 2018).
No comments:
Post a Comment