consenting when you can’t
by Douglas Messerli
Jan Dalchow and Lars Daniel Krutzkoff Jacobsen
(screenwriters and directors) Fremragende Timer (Precious Moments)
/ 2003 [17 minutes]
Based on a true situation in Norway, Fremragende Timer (Precious Moments) concerns
a young 15-year-old boy, Olav (Tord Vandvik Haugen), a little less than two
months shy of his 16th birthday. Olav lives in a nicely furnished group home (a
Norwegian teen orphanage) in an apartment with two other boys his age, in a
small Norwegian town.
He
crosses through a large field where he hears a mewling kitten, and finding it,
picks it up to comfort it before proceeding to his destination.
What
we don’t know is that this charmingly innocent boy is responding to a personal
advertisement placed in the local newspaper purposing a sexual encounter with a
30-year-old man.
In
any event, Olav and Per meet up, have enjoyable sex, and after, almost like
delighted schoolboys discovering their sexuality, begin to play games, Per
stalking the room under a blanket searching out the boy who keeps delightfully
coming closer before withdrawing.
At that very moment two policemen show up, finding both of them
frolicking naked together.
The man can barely comprehend what has just happened, as the boy is
quickly forced to dress to be taken away by Susanne, who we later discover, has
followed him to the hotel, spotting him going into the room and reported the
event to the police.
Evidently the real “Per” was found guilty and imprisoned, something
directors Jan Dalchow and Lars Daniel Krutzkoff Jacobsen found troubling.
Krutzkoff Jacobsen is quoted: “I’m not saying everything that happened was all
that ’precious,’ but I can’t help wondering what the hue and cry is all about”
since the boy was only 56 days shy of being of age and that he had initiated
the sexual encounter.
What’s more, as I mention above, had he been living in Nielsen’s
Scandinavian sister country Denmark, the boy would have been of consenting age.
The film, accordingly, brings into question some of the difficulties and, one
has to admit, the absurd arbitrariness of determining legal sexual age for
young men and women between 14-18.
Clearly, given the terms established in the film, there was nothing that
occurred in that room between the two males that might be described as abusive
or criminal except for the societally imposed determination of age, which, in
fact, may represent the true criminality of the situation. I don’t know what a
sentence of child abuse means in Norway, but for a US citizen is results in a
life-long punishment that often keeps those involved, no matter of what age, from
living in most neighborhoods where children reside or visiting any institution
or place in which children gather. And in far too many cases it means being
outcast from the society for the rest of one’s life.*
This
film’s title, incidentally, comes from a work by Norwegian author Jens
Bjørneboe, whose character in his controversial novel Powderhouse
describes an experience of having sex with an underage boy as representing
“precious moments,” but obviously, in this case, the intense value of those
moments were not worth the elder’s freedom for much of the remaining life.
* I might just remind the reader that in the
US, legal age limited by relationship (the older male not serving in a position
of trust and authority) varies from state to state from 16 to 18 years of age,
with numerous variants allowing for sexual relationships with males and females
who share their age groups. In California, the state in which I live, for
example, the crime of "unlawful sexual intercourse" defines any act
of sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 18 who is not the spouse
of the person. There are no exceptions; all sexual activity with a person under
the age of 18 (and not their spouse) is a criminal offense. So if a 15-year-old
willingly has sex with a 17-year-old, both have committed a crime, although it
is only a misdemeanor. Harsher sentences are doled out for individuals who
significantly differ in age.
The
age of consent in Iowa, the state in which I grew up, is 16, with a
close-in-age exemption for those aged 14 and 15 who may engage in sexual acts
with partners less than 4 years older.
In
the state where I went to university, Wisconsin, the age of consent is 18 and
there is no close-in-age exception. There is, however, a marital exception
which allows a person to have sex with a minor 16 or older if they are married
to the minor. If the minor is below 16 both sexual intercourse and any sexual
contact are a felony; sexual intercourse with a minor 16-17 by a perpetrator
who is not married to the minor is a Class A misdemeanor. At 17 I would have
committed a Class A misdemeanor for having sex with someone of my own age, a
crime of which I am certain I was unknowingly guilty during my Freshman year
or, even worse for having sex with a couple of my teachers, putting them in
jeopardy as well.
In
the District of Columbia, where Howard I lived for fourteen years, the age of
consent is 16 with a close-in-age exemption for those within four years of age.
In thirty-one states the age of consent is 16, in six states it is 17, and in
thirteen states it is 18.
Los Angeles, May 7, 2021
Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog and
World Cinema Review (May 2021).
No comments:
Post a Comment