by Douglas Messerli
Bertrand Mandico (screenwriter and director) Ultra
pulpe (Apocalypse After) / 2018 [37 minutes]
French director Bertrand Mandico has created in Apocalypse After a hot-sex art house film
that is beautiful to look at but is frankly rather empty in its narrative about
a film shoot in which the actress and director, Apocalypse and Joy D’Amato
(Pauline Jacquard and Elina Löwensohn) end both their lesbian affair and their cinematic
relationship in a series of surreal-like images.
Pushing
both the bond between the two and the actor to give her more of the “subliminal
perversions” of film she is seeking, Joy makes films that are essentially filled
with allusions from everyone to artist Henry Darger to filmmakers such as Jean
Cocteau and Walerian Borowczyk. The images she captures—through Mandico’s
camera—are, in fact, quite stunning, but the pop science fiction tale behind it
is pure hokum and distracting.
He continues “… In a way, the film shoot setting positions “Apocalypse After” as Mandico’s Knife+Heart (a movie he acted in as a porno cinematographer), but it’s even less of a coherent, linear story and even more of an expression of its director’s fascinations & frustrations with his artform. Dialogue that declares details of the film shoot “magnificently hideous” or complain, “It’s beautiful, but at the same time I don’t know what he means,” function as meta commentary on the achievements & shortcomings of Mandico’s art. No dialogue feels more essential to the piece than an actor’s monologue recalling watching forbidden, adult films as a child – compelled & mesmerized by the images on the screen but too young to fully comprehend them. Mandico has a way of turning pornographic indulgence into transcendent visual art, and even then he directs his avatar in Löwensohn to shout that the images are still not erotic enough. Nothing ever could be.”
Although Mandico’s film also calls up elements of Guy Maddin, Kenneth
Anger, and James Bidgood, I’ll take their films any day over the layers of
imitation that constitute Mandico’s cinematic world. Perhaps the true missing
element here is his utter lack of humor. It’s one thing to imitate those
figures I’ve mentioned along with Yann Gonzalez and even Peter Strickland, but
it’s quite another to carry the viewer into the work’s narrative. Camp, which
at times this film veers towards, is more about the audience than the auteur’s
vision.
I feel
chocked, put off, restricted in watching Apocalypse After as if it were an LGBTQ
science-fantasy that never once attempted to reach out to me. If Mandico has
only paid a little less attention to his own cinematic self-satisfied images
and just focused a little more on the viewer, I might have been able to share
in his mad fantasies.
Los Angeles, November 17, 2024
No comments:
Post a Comment