wing boy
by Douglas Messerli
Welby Ings (screenwriter and director) Sparrow
/ 2016 [15 minutes]
New Zealand director Welby Ings, trained as a
designer, creates films with slightly eccentric characters dropped into
landscapes that are stunningly beautiful and original despite the banality and
blindness of most who walk the same turf, the films’ images themselves often
overlaid with written sentences and fragments of language that attempt to make
sense of the characters’ absurd acts. I previously reviewed his remarkable
portrait of a small town outcast, Boy, in which the central character
finds a way to bring those who have tortured him to justice.
The
young ten-year-old boy of his 2016 film Sparrow shares elements of that
earlier work. In this case the boy, Jim (Merrick Rillstone)—somewhat
autobiographically related to the director—believes he can fly, a fantasy
somewhat tolerated by his father but which still results in his being demeaned
by his fellow students and other outsiders.
The problem is that this determined child wears his homemade “wings”
nearly everywhere—his father refusing to let him wear them to the dining
table—even on his way back and forth to and from school. And when he isn’t
wearing them, supposedly doing a writing assignment in class, he draws pictures
of birds, infuriating the teacher, who rips his drawings up.
In
his private time, the boy watches old films of his grandfather, a foot soldier
in Egypt during World War II, in which the film glorifies his past,
demonstrating frame by frame just what a hero his grandfather was, winning a
prestigious medal. He was killed in war and buried a hero, so proclaims the old
movie, even today his son, the boy’s father, wearing his war medal and marching
in local parades in memory of him.
While trying to repair his broken wings Jim visits the work shed in back
of the house, and looking in an old drawer for bits of parchment and string he
discovers a box in which trinkets of a soldier (buttons, a ring, etc) line a
tray beneath which lays a trove of letters which the boy secrets back to his
bedroom.
The outraged commander orders the wounded friend to stand at attention,
who, as he attempts to do so, is shot and killed by German gunfire. Outraged by
the incident, the boy’s grandfather rises from the trench, strips naked, and
refuses to any longer serve this country as he picks up his lover’s body in an
attempt to walk away with him from the battle site. One of their own soldiers
shoots him, he falling to the ground with the body.
Apparently he survived and was shipped back to New Zealand, where
mentally and spiritually broken, he was institutionalized in a psychiatric
hospital. He grew old with no one showing up to see him, his son, wife and
relatives obviously embarrassed and disapproving of the rouge deserter and
secret queer. The letters the boy reads were sent by his grandfather to his
father, never to be opened, the boy himself reading the truth for the first
time in all these years.
Ings reveals these facts to us through recreated wartime images that
play out in silence except for a musical accompaniment and sentences imposed
upon the images—as in the earlier film—such as “They brought him home,”
“broken,” “and “he died alone”—all of which provide narrative but force the
reader to imaginatively fill in what the letters are revealing in far greater
detail to the ten-year-old boy.
At
school we again see our young “queer” boy being taunted by his fellow-students,
male and female, who throw things at him, calling him “wing boy” and other
names. When two boys throw the sandwich he is trying to eat, his lunch box, and
finally the boy himself to the ground, he stands, strips open his shirt and
tells them: “Hit me. Come on hit me.” They back away. “Come on, just hit me.”
They move away almost in fear, unable to comprehend his seemingly masochistic
demands.
He finds a small bird trapped in a room hugging a wall lined with
leaves. He carefully picks up the sparrow, carries it to a window, and releases
it into flight, just as his grandfather has done for him through the truth of
his letters too long buried in that hidden box.
Once again, Ings’ film is not about the complexity of narrative or even
the depth of its ideas. Rather it is the emotive power of this director’s
images that make his movie into something profoundly moving and disturbing.
Even the wide-open, always-in-motion eyes of his young hero help us to realize
his wonderment of the world around him despite the general brutality of those
who inhabit it.
I can’t wait to see the movie he is currently
working on, Punch, in he takes his young hero Jim into adulthood.
Los Angeles, September 20, 2021
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (September
2021).
No comments:
Post a Comment