by Douglas
Messerli
Jamie Travis
(screenwriter and director) The Armoire / 2009 [22 minutes]
The young adolescent Aaron (William Cuddy) has met up after school with his best friend Tony (Ricardo Hoyos) and together with him gone to his house. There he asks Tony if he wants to play hide-and-seek, Tony saying simply that he didn’t want to, but nonetheless agreeing to it when his friend pleads with him to do so.
Aaron closes his eyes and counts, but
when he goes on the search for Tony, he cannot find him anywhere in the house,
his mother calling later to report he’s missing and wondering if Aaron has seen
him, so goes the boy’s simply, but mysterious rendition of events, turning eventually
from a personal accounting, to a police report, and finally into national TV
news.
His caring parents (Tammy Isbell and
David Keeley) are worried, and tell him that they surely can understand if he
might want to stay home from school, but Aaron assures them that he is fine. The
film, however, tells us that he’s not just fine, with the picture of his
choirboy friend Tony appearing on the front page of the local newspaper, the
camera zeroing in on the picture while the music whirls up a few darker chords.
Moreover, at school, while a local
policeman talks to the students, yet again, about the dangers of riding with
strangers and the need for a “buddy system,” Aaron begins to have visions: two
hands appear under his desk with a pencil inserted into a pencil sharpener, a
whispered voice following. Aaron asks to be excused to go to the bathroom and
there hears a voice speaking to him through the drain of one of the urinals.
Back in the now empty classroom, Aaron opens
his pants and sits down at his desk, apparently planning to masturbate or
urinate, an act interrupted by the schoolteacher’s return. His parents attempt
to comprehend why he has committed such an act, his father beginning a
sentence, “You
The milk carton announces on one of its
panels, accompanied by a picture of Tony, that the child has been missing since
May 30, 1991. Aaron punches a hole in the mouth of the boy in the picture,
permitting the milk to pour out over him, dropping from the table onto the
region of his penis.
My best Freudian guess is that Aaron and
Tony have been playing games involving their penises, confusing the joys they
feel and perhaps even what they have begun to ejaculate with urine, the only recognition
of young children of what issues from the region of their bodies. Have they
also been injecting their “pencils” into other orifices? Or, of course, it could also be all Aaron’s
precocious imagination, a sublimated desire never acted upon.
In the very next scene, Aaron is sitting
across from a gentle female psychiatrist (Maggie Huculak), suggesting that she
is going to ask him some questions and prevailing upon him to answer as
honestly as he can.
He talks about visits to Disneyland and
Disneyworld in Orlando with his very best friend Tony, about many sleepovers,
mostly in his house because he has bunkbeds, wherein Tony would sleep on the
top while he would always get stuck on the bottom. One morning Tony woke him up
to show him, through a crack in the door, Aaron’s step-dad doing sit ups, an
image that can only be described, in terms of the way it is shown in the movie,
as homoerotic, and surely being precisely what to these adolescent boys, curious
about the male body, would be attracted to. Aaron reports, Tony thought it was “funny,”
a child’s word for “strange,” an oddity not about the behavior of the adult but
in relationship to his feelings concerning it. The language in this film represents
truly a child’s language and imagination, which needs to be translated into
adult jargon. Sleeping on top, for example, might suggest the dominance of the
other boy which might later in their lives define itself into a sexual
position. We can only guess that Aaron preferred more normative games, while
Tony might have been exploring more complex issues.
He has a similar problem with a substitute
teacher who wanted his students to just call him Mike, presumably the use of a
common name suggesting to the precocious child a more casual relationship that
called up sexual possibilities along with it.
At this point, the psychiatrist is, quite
humorously, already a bit troubled by the child’s sexual imagination,
interrupting the child’s open conversation to speak to his mother, presumably
to warn her about the troubling things she has observed, given that it is still
early in the 1990s, only two decades after the American Psychiatric Association
had stopped seeing homosexual behavior as a mental aberration.
Throughout this scene the director has
carefully placed on the wall behind the confessing child, children’s colorful
paintings of rainbows, symbol, obviously, of the LGBTQ+ community.
In the very next scene, with an ice-cream
cone dripping down across Aaron’s fingers, we see the boy hearing the TV news
about the discovery of his friend’s body behind the elementary school he had
attended.
Aaron is delighted to have become the new
soloist with the choir. The choir director announces that Tony would be proud.
But in the very next frame the psychiatrist
is hypnotizing the boy, obviously in an attempt to further dig deeper into his
memories. In reverse order (one of the many formalist devices used by Travis
throughout) we now observe Aaron looking for his friend in their hide-and-seek
game, beginning in the kitchen under the sink, moving to the garage—a ping pong
ball which had fallen to the floor, now leaping up back to the table from
whence it fell—moving the shower curtain away to see if Tony his hiding there,
and finally returning to the armoire in his own room, before he returns to the
couch, his hands over his eyes as he counts.
Now, however, he backs out the door
alone, backs down a wooded path and can be seen putting soil over a shallow
hole before he drags a wrapped body…not into the whole but up the stairs of his
house, a living boy seemingly writhing with, the covering rolling up neatly to
become an extra blanket as we end up with Tony on his bedroom floor, Aaron
sitting in his armoire. Asked what he’s seeing, he replies, “Nothing. I see
nothing.”
The psychiatrist snaps him out of his hypnotic
condition, with the boy repeating “Nothing.” If the narrative is accurate, it
appears he has embedded the boy in the blanket, dragged him to and deposited
him into the shallow grave behind the school before returning home to play the
game of hide-and-seek alone. Of course, this could also be entirely in his
imagination, the product of guilt or sorrow, filling in the imaginary details
that accord with what he has heard about his friend’s death. True or not, it is
disturbing, a truth he has not revealed to the doctor. The emphatic nothing is
either a lie or the actual truth.
In the garage, we see the boy open the armoire, crawl inside, and close the doors behind him. The boy clearly has chosen the abnormal, outside of his parents' attempts to protect him.
It is clear that their games with their
bodies have been played out within the wardrobe, a hidden space, a kind of
closet just as surely as the metaphoric one where gay men often hid themselves
during the same period.
In the angelic voice of a boy soprano, Tony
begins to sing, but eventually interrupts himself, responding not to anything
Aaron has said, but simply to his curious movement of his eyes with the word “What?”
Aaron says the very same words he had previously spoken to his doctor, “Nothing.”
Tony dares his friend to go back in the armoire, which Aaron does, crawling
back into its depths. Tony quickly shuts the doors, locking it with a fork.
Aaron begs to be let out, Tony answering “Not
until you say you’re sorry.” “What for?” “I’m not going to play your games.” “Let
me out, Tony, I can’t breathe” “You liked it in there before, didn’t you?”
Aaron shakes the doors, “Please Tony.” “Not
until you say you’re sorry.” …”Count to one hundred and I’ll let you out.”
As Aaron slowly counts, Tony sits on the
bed, finishing his bagel with cream cheese.
When Aaron finally reaches 100, Tony pulls
away the fork, the doors opening. He moves back to the bed, learning up against
it, to speak the words: “Your turn.”
It’s evident that whatever went on in the
armoire is something that Tony will not accept as his fault, blaming it on his
friend, as if any sexual activity between the two were not a mutual act. It’s
also seems apparent that Tony is basically torturing his loving friend,
attempting to instill guilt for their sexual explorations.
“Truth or dare?” Aaron asks, seemingly
recovered from his temporary imprisonment.
“Dare,” answers Tony.
Aaron points to a wall socket: “I dare you to stick your fork in that
outlet.”
Tony bends down to the outlet, pulling
out the night light and turning back with a look at Aaron of deep
recrimination.
We now know what must have truly happened, a
terrible accident on account of their almost saddo-masochistic childhood versions
of truth and dare.
But strangely, Travis’ film, despite its
tragic events, ends in a rather surrealist ray of hope. Travis, in an interview
in 2012 with James McNally, himself argues that in making The Armoire he
felt he “couldn’t have my sad child films end in such a dark way. With The
Armoire, there is a light at the end of the tunnel of adolescence.”
Aaron suddenly exits from his residence
in the garage Armoire, walks firmly into the room where his parents sit and
marches upstairs. He climbs into the top bank, explaining that he is ready.
Below him his friend Tony moves his feet up into the air, slightly tilting the
top mattress and turns on a tape recorder with music as Aaron sings in a lovely
high soprano voice a song about “sailing away despite the crashes of the ocean,”
“take my hand, let us both make our way, let us both make our way.” Together
they reach a new world, a time beyond the difficult voyage they have just
encountered, a song written and performed by Alfredo Santa Ana entitled “Floating
Down the Stream.”
Despite his actions, despite the horror
of their games, Aaron remains an innocent who will pass through this dark
episode into a continued life of new possibilities, a world outside the
armoire. Yet, I doubt an easy resolution as he grows older and realizes his culpability
for what happened. If he need not have felt guilt for their sexual games, he
will surely feel it for their aftermath. The sadness, in this case, may exist
mostly in the future.
This truly awesome short work reminds me,
in several respects, of Travis’ fellow Canadian director John Greyson, with
their surprising intersections of various genre and music.
Los Angeles, April
10, 2024
Reprinted from My
Queer Cinema (April 2024).
No comments:
Post a Comment