Saturday, August 31, 2024

Rainer Werner Fassbinder | Pioniere in Ingolstadt (Pioneers in Ingolstadt) / 1971 (TV movie)

bridge to nowhere

by Douglas Messerli

 

Rainer Werner Fassbinder (teleplay, based on a play by Marieluise Fleißer, and director) Pioniere in Ingolstadt (Pioneers in Ingolstadt) / 1971 (TV movie)

 

Marieluise Fleißer, a German playwright of the 1920s, might be forgotten today were it not for two notable figures of drama, Bertolt Brecht, who encouraged her to write her second play, after her first, Purgatory in Ingolstadt was performed in 1924—also collaborating with her and directing it in its 1928 premiere in Dresden, without, evidently, completely taking credit for the work as he did with so many other female collaborators. The play, set in 1926, was described as a comedy in 14 scenes, but clearly presented such a dark vision of early pre-Nazi activities that the work outraged the citizens of her Bavarian community and was censured by the National Socialists, particularly when it was reproduced at the Theater am Schiffbauerdamm in Berlin in March and April of 1929.


     Indeed, the play might have been forgotten were not for its rediscovery in the 1970s—after Fleißer had attempted to again revise it—by theater director Peter Stein and playwright Franz Xavier Kroetz. Fassbinder’s 1971 adaptation of the play for television radically shifts the time- frame of the work, alternating through its costumes, dialogue, and sets between a kind of pre-World War II small town society and a post-war outpost wherein the nebulous “pioneers”—obviously reminding everyone in German culture of the pre-Hitler Jugend groups (akin the Soviet inspired “pioneers”)—have gathered. If these figures are represented by men instead of adolescent boy-scout-like youths, they are nonetheless almost as ridiculously innocent and inexperienced as boys, and what they discover is not something of the future but what exists already in the past.    

   The girls of this world, mostly serving women of the small community, desperate to find love and freedom, are equally childlike, represented by Berta (Hanna Schygalla) and the far less intelligent Frieda (Carla Egerer). Similarly, Karl (Korl in the original) (Harry Baer), and the wealthy industrialist’s son, Fabian (Rudolf Waldemar Brem), if not exactly innocent, have no idea how to function in the world in which they have discovered themselves. Set against these figures’ clumsy explorations of love and search for significance, are those who demonstrate their experience such as Berta’s friend Alma (Irm Hermann) and Karl’s friend, Max (Günther Kaufmann) or assert power such as the Pioneer regiment’s Sergeant (Klaus Löwitsch) and Fabian’s father, Unertl. The battles between these two groups of beings, played out mostly in a fog of alcohol and sexual desire which erupts from time to time into overt lust and violence, is the perfect Fassbinder Anschauung conveying, through the petty and insignificant activities of these backwater types, the larger issues of misogynism, sadism, sexism, and class consciousness that perverts the whole culture.


       To Ingolstadt the Pioneers have come to build a bridge, but not, as Fassbinder wryly points out, a grand structure as in David Lean’s Bridge on the River Kwai, not even a sturdy, well- constructed structure such as the one across which we see characters walking early in the film, but a small, poorly designed wooden crossing that seems to go nowhere and to have little purpose, except as a location for the young sex-craved girls to gather to pick out which of the  pioneers most appeals to then. Local businesses have banded together to provide the lumber, even though they steal some of it back each night, expressing a grandiose symbol of largesse without costing them a cent.


       Unertl and his son Fabian, serving as stand-ins for the local gentry, make it quite clear why the young maidens of this village rush into the arms of handsome strangers. Unertl is not only a misogynist pig, having already gone through a series of wives and mistresses, but is a crude beast whom even his son cannot abide. Yet Fabian, a slightly overweight imbecile who might be described as a mamma’s boy, is frightened not only by his father and their serving woman, Berta, but by nearly everyone in town. In the end, using Berta simply as a way to obtain a car his father has promised him if he could get the girl on a date, Fabian proves that his only capabilities lay in petty acts of revenge against the town’s visitors, loosening a connecting beam from the bridge from which the petulant, masochistic Sergeant falls, and planning for the destruction of the bridge by dynamite. The fact that his acts end in a series of torturous nighttime drills for the young Pioneers, results in their revenge instead of his, a brutal scene akin to the extenuated death scene in Fassbinder’s The American Soldier, except that, instead of representing a kind of homoerotic dance, the violence here is performed with Judo-like chops, as the “pioneers” deck Fabian again and again, only to stand him up temporarily before sending him into another fall. And, in this sense, his beating stands for a kind of absurd resurrection. For, when they are finished with him, Alma—having been rejected by all the would-be soldiers—rushes to his side, suggesting she will show him how to make love, and, accordingly establish a place for herself in the future society once the Pioneers abandon the town.

     Most of Pioneers in Ingolstadt, however, are presented as living in a world in stasis, rather than action, in part because none of the things the girls are truly seeking will ever be found. Most of these poor working girls, unlike Alma, give themselves freely in sex in hopes of finding love and, in their dreamlike fantasies, potential husbands. But, of course, that is impossible, as the introverted Karl keeps trying to make clear to the purest of the Ingolstadt women, Berta, perhaps the only virgin in this small outpost. The innocent yet intelligent Berta, wants its all: love, a husband, and future in which she will be transported from the world which she now inhabits.


     Narcissistic and selfish—a role in which the handsome Baer seems to specialize—there is still enough kindness and empathy in Karl that he attempts, again and again, to explain to the disbelieving girl that he—and, for that matter, the entire male species—is no good. His specialty, it appears, is fathering unwanted children in all the towns which the Pioneers have visited, and, accordingly, he is one of the most disillusioned of all of Fassbinder’s figures, recognizing his position on the military totem pole, but also realizing the frailty of all ideas of power. He plots and, with others, actualizes the death of the tyrant Sergeant. And, although he tries hard to dissociate himself from Berta, in the end he uses her, violating her virginity at the very moment he is about to leave her behind.

   Berta’s first reaction after their sexual intercourse is so painfully expressive in its understatement that it nearly burns the words in our ears: “Is that all?” For Berta it is not simply a Peggy Lee-like plaint for the lack of meaning in life—“Is that all there is?”—but is a desperate plea for life to offer more than the backside of a departing “Pioneer.” Berta ends her scene by crying out in a prone position that can only remind one of Petra Kant’s “bitter tears” of a year later in Fassbinder’s film chronology.


    For Ingolstadt’s desperate women and even the equally abused military boys, sex is merely a surrogate for something they know they can never attain, physical and spiritual intercourse that might transform their lives. In one of the most amazing scenes of this often-melodramatic expression of Fassbinder’s concerns, the characters sit around a bar in desultory, drunken positions, some figures alone, others in deep embrace, several males reaching out for a simple touch be it male or female, others retreating in despair while the camera nervously pans the room—the effect of which, in many respects, reminds one of Visconti’s gay military orgy in The Damned, filmed just two years before Pioneers. It is almost as if Fassbinder’s camera itself were itself attempting to find someone in the room to approach, to hold onto, or simply to touch, some other being to serve as a bridge, no matter how short and insignificant, to a better future. Unfortunately, as Berta discovers, there is only this place, this terrifying now—a hellhole from which there is no exit. As Alma has already comprehended, it is better to grab on quick to the empty figures who remain in Ingolstadt after the Pioneers have gone.


Los Angeles, February 2, 2015

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (February 2015).

Arthur Halpern | Futures (and Derivatives) / 2007

redecorating the power point talk

by Douglas Messerli

 

Arthur Halpern (screenwriter and director) Futures (and Derivatives) / 2007 [18 minutes]

 

Marty Simko’s (Bill Barnett) agency is clearly on a spiral downwards, one of the biggest accounts not even willing to meet with him as he seeks for more “personal” attention, which actually means he’s on the lookout for a larger agency with more know-how. Marty’s assistants, Roger (Kelly Miller) and Gordon (Vin Knight) haven’t a clue about the more sophisticated procedures his client is seeking, Roger spending hours in his office consulting, instead, his Magic 8 Ball, remind me a little of the business executive in Eric Muller’s This Car Up (2003)—although he was consulting his magic ball for something far more tangible, a boyfriend.

 

   Nonetheless, Marty begs successfully with a meeting with the big honcho, Wally Beauchamp (Peter Picard).

     Since this company isn’t even hooked up for a powerpoint demonstration, the secretary Adele Lenz (Cam Kornman) calls in an outsider, Elliott (Mark Hervey), who’s given a single night to work out some sort of hookup and plan.

      Elliott, the most unlikely looking of techies, arrives and gets immediately to work, doing exactly what is anybody’s guess. He’s assigned to Roger, clearly a gay man, whose only instruction to the computer whiz is “make it sing.”

      Adele wishes him goodnight, and Roger telephones in just to check up, as Elliott begins by drawing parallel pink lines on a Post-it notepad, hardly what seems as a good omen for a campaign to sell the business expertise of this failing company.

    It is now morning, Marty, Roger, and Gordon, dressed in their very best business suits, pacing the meeting room, with still no Elliott in sight. Beauchamp and his spokesman arrive. After a passing around of a plate of cookies and a few tense moments, Elliott finally arrives with disk in hand.

      Adele puts on her rain cap, perhaps a prediction of the meeting and an indication where she feels she might be heading. Roger pushes in the disk and Marty reads the headings, “A presentation for Prospex Financial.”


      As Marty begins his speech in front the screen, the others look on with confusion at the images being projected, a sky of clouds, a cup of coffee, a line-up of bones, all clearly suggesting trouble ahead. Suddenly a butterfly appears on the screen; another, and in quick multiplication numerous others quickly regenerating into a proliferation of color. We can’t see what’s on the screen, but from the faces of the boardroom audience it’s apparently transformative.

      We get a clue of their wonderment when a secretary peeks in on the room where Elliott worked, which is filled with multicolored paper mobiles in all shapes and forms, a joyful space of paper

banners, colored tabs pasted together as flowers and other colorful creative expressions more abstract.


       Whatever was in the unseen computer presentation, we are made to perceive that it has completely transformed all the viewers’ lives—as suddenly Adele lifts the blinds to look out upon the setting sun and goes home to sit, hand-in-hand, with her husband, Marty looks anew at his portly figure, Beauchamp lays out in his red-hued hotel room bed enjoying one of the pieces of complimentary chocolate candy beside him, Roger wondrously experiences the luster of New York’s night lights (you just know he’ll be going out to a gay bar to enjoy the company of others), and Gordon is seen stroking the chest of his gay lover.

 


     This is not an LGBTQ film—although Elliott is clearly some sort of genius fairy queen who is clearly able to “redecorate” the Power Point talk—but a film about looking for the beauty around us every day. Whether or not that sells clients on investments, I have no idea, but the futures (and derivatives) certainly do look to be positive.

        If this film is more than a bit hazy regarding its narrative, it’s made quite delightful through its colorful images and its positive spiritual outlook.

 

Los Angeles, May 11, 2023

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (May 2023).

Michael Simon | Gay Zombie / 2007

date with a zombie

by Douglas Messerli

 

Michael Simon (screenwriter and director) Gay Zombie / 2007 [20 minutes]

 

Other than the luscious piece of female flesh dressed up to the hilt in glittery gowns, a beautiful blood-sucking vampire, and the lone, moonstruck, and constantly coming-out werewolf, the vision of the starved, flesh-eating come-back-to-life zombie is among the perfect drag images of the lives us sexually craved denizens of the dark—gay men—as we are generally conjured up in the crazed minds of heteronormative men and women. Since we are all monsters, they need only take their pick.

     The nice thing about the zombie is that he is immediately recognizable by his rotting flesh and his steady ambling walk, often with hands out as if in search for something even he doesn’t know he wants.

 

    Poor Miles (Brad Bilanin) is just such a beast, and is trying desperately to bring himself back into normality, meeting up with his psychiatrist and reporting his progress. He’s certainly cut down his intake of human bodies, but, no, he hasn’t yet even attempted to go out and meet his own kind at a gar bar; he’s terrified, obviously of the consequences.

   Meanwhile, although Todd (Ryan Carlberg) regularly visits the bars, he’s terrified of approaching other men for sex, and tonight his friend Greg (Robert Laughlin) insists they won’t leave until Todd has tried to make a connection.

     And, in fact, that man with his back to you seems the perfect type, Greg coaxes his reluctant friend. Give it a try!

      Greg returns to his conversation with another man at the bar, while Todd turns to face the challenge, who when he turns toward him is not quite the type of man he expected, the half-decayed face of Miles staring back at him. But then Todd, if nothing else, is polite, and the two, confused about their mutual interests, strike up a conversation. You know, like “What’s it like being a zombie?” “How does it feel to be dead?” Just general small talk.

     Miles explains that he was killed on Valentine’s Day, a sad statement with which Todd can easily commiserate. By the time Greg turns back to see what’s happening and to confront the monster with whom Todd has struck up a friendship, it’s far too late to say “we have to be going,” as everyone else in this West Hollywood bar shouts out as they run to the nearest exit.

      Being nice gay boys, Greg and Todd take Miles back home with them, scarring the shit out their sissie housemate, Dwayne (Craig Olsen). But even he, eventually gets used to their new friend, particularly when they decide what Miles really needs is, why of course, a makeover! It’s great fun to see such a thin guy, a perfect model, slip in and out of every kind of outfit they can find in their closets that might fit him. Dwaye even applies make-up to his horrific face—although I can’t say that it makes much difference.


      A group yoga workout doesn’t go as well, particularly after some of the other members of the group, like Scorpio (Andrew Miller) complain. When Scorpio stalks out and returns as a “pretend” zombie, he’s gone, however, just a bit too far. And the first chance he gets, Miles drags him into a back room to feast on his body parts. Alas, Todd comes along to discover him in the process, and simply doesn’t have the stomach for that kind of behavior!

     The boys are ready to give the somewhat penitent Miles a good talking to before he can return home with them. And Todd is even ready to kiss and make up. But fortunately, Miles’ therapist shows up and puts a bullet through Miles’ head, turning him into dust. She reports, in a totally friendly manner, that if they’d tried to remain friends much longer it would have ended rather badly. But then, as Todd observes when he spots a bit of decay on her arm, perhaps she is a zombie in-the-making herself.

     This silly satire is absolutely without any true cinematic value; but it certainly does provide a few deservéd giggles.

 

Los Angeles, April 24, 2023

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (April 2023).

 

Guy Maddin | My Winnipeg / 2007

 

si un jour

by Douglas Messerli

 

Guy Maddin (screenwriter and director), George Toles (dialogue) My Winnipeg / 2007

 

The question, “What if one day….?” seems to dominate Maddin’s remarkable docu-fantasia: the artist considering not only “what if” he might be able to actually leave his hometown, but if he might be able to leave the memories—pleasant and nightmarish—visions, and obsessions behind. Blanketed by deep snow through many months of each year, his Winnipeg, one of the coldest cities on the continent (the narrator claims Winnipeg to be the coldest city in the world, but, in fact, it does not come near the icy temperatures of Yellowknife, Canada, nor colder cities in Sweden, Russia, Mongolia, and, obviously, Antarctica) is appropriately described as a world of sleepwalkers, metaphorically expressing that quality by insisting that city laws declare that owners can keep the keys to their previous homes, whose occupants must open their doors to them when they suddenly appear. Mythologically pulled in by the deep currents running under the waters where the city’s major rivers, the Red and Assiniboine, fork, the city’s citizens, so Maddin declares, cannot escape, but are trapped within their growing tunnels of now, traveling not only the city’s major roads but a world of secret backstreets not even on the map, a dual system of driveways split up by the two major Winnipeg taxi companies.


     Throughout much of this early “documentation” Maddin focuses on sleepy travelers—particularly the actor who plays him, Darcy Fehr—who seem unable to awaken themselves. In an often fanciful but, nonetheless, illuminating introduction to the new Criterion edition of Maddin’s film, Wayne Koestenbaum declares that this train-obsessed film uses the locomotive as a symbol of the cinematic apparatus, a kind of loop tape that connects it with all the trains of the 20th century, including the nightmarish rides of the Jews to concentration camps of World War II represented in Claude Lanzmann’s Soah, while also calling up Andy Warhol’s “fixed-camera vision of a fellated man’s ecstatic face” in his Blow Job which resembles, at times, Fehr’s image as reflected in the constantly shifting light.

      If this duality seems, at first, more than a little irreverent in its comparisons between the extermination of a race with moments of ecstatic sex, there is, nonetheless, an element truth to Kostenbaum’s assertions. For Maddin’s film—while not truly concerned with the extermination of a race—is interested in the possible death of people who cannot escape their own pasts, connecting it, in numerous ways with both sexual and spiritual rapture, the kind of rapture also found in films themselves, which results often in a trance-like, stuporous state of being. The only way to escape this condition, Maddin as narrator argues, is to go back and explore life itself through a dissection of the film, to replay the loop by recreating its intermittent cuts which will perhaps release him, his fellow citizens, and us from its deadly charm.


     Maddin’s My Winnipeg, accordingly, is itself an irreverent voyage back through memory, combining private life with public, family with the community as a whole with threads that are both factual and fantastical, realities that are public combined with those of the imagination. Accordingly, Maddin’s loop tape not only takes him back to his white cube of a house, where he reenacts specific dramatic scenes from his childhood, including his mother’s accusations of his sister for her presumed sexual behavior, the elder’s self-centric and domineering relationships with her family (she, like the actress, Ann Savage, who portrays her, is a melodramatic figure), and, ultimately, her refusal to even participate in family life. She lives a life on the edge, just as in the series in which she has supposedly starred for 50 years, “Ledge Man.”

     The director interleaves these moments, moreover, with representations of city history, including the public leaders’ pattern of destroying what he perceives as popular monuments to civic history, particularly those related to athletics—another way of trying to wipe-out reality. These destroyed institutions, particularly the destruction of the Winnipeg Arena, are connected with the narrator’s father and his own heterosexuality, since the elder, at least in the confines of this film, was involved with the famed hockey team who played there, and Maddin, so he claims, was born in the building. Like a territorially defined jock, he pisses in the urinal minutes before the building is brought down by dynamite—one of the film’s “true” events, according to the accompanying DVD copy. The mythical “Black Tuesdays” hockey team—made up of famous players now in their 60s, 70s, and 80s—link him, in this manner, personally with his “male”-centered past.


    Against these normative (if homoerotic) patterns of his memory, Maddin posits a series of “abnormalities,” generally connected with compulsive behavior, religiosity, and perverse sexuality such as the documentation of civic leader’s attraction to spiritualism (factually, Arthur Conan Doyle did travel to Winnipeg in an attempt to convert its citizens to cause of Spiritualism) and in the mythical tale of a Winnipeg mayor of the 1940s and 1950s (named Francis Evans Cornish, actually the city’s first mayor who served in 1874) who allegedly judged the all-male “Golden Boy” contests—a kind of local beauty pageant in which the most beautiful male, based on his physique and general appearance—held in the famed Paddlemill Restaurant atop the Hudson Bay Company Building (a real restaurant and building, but a fantasy contest), which, our narrator reports, resulted in a scandal when it was discovered that many of the contest’s former winners appeared on the government payrolls.

     Connected to these two forks that move away from the normative behavior of Winnepegans, are the legendary forces running below the deep forks of the city’s rivers themselves and the tale of two homosexually-inclined bison, who, in a mad sexual frenzy, led a herd of their kind to destroy the city’s amusement park, Happyland (the park, real, closed in 1922, the bison representing, clearly, something like a traumatized childhood memory).


     Another such tale involves the burning of city’s racetrack (a real event) which, in Maddin’s dark work, ends symbolically in the track- horses attempting to escape and rushing into the freezing rivers from which, for that entire winter, their heads protruded, revealing the anguish in which they died, reminding us, again, of the citizens without the possibility of escape.

     In other words, in Maddin’s black comedy version of his beloved-hated hometown, sex and death, ecstasy, and destruction are interminably combined; and these two are linked even closer to the images suggested by Kostenbaum’s opposing cinematic friezes observed in Blow Job and Soah.

    Finally. in the events surrounding a real World War II dramatization of a speculation (“What if…Hitler were to invade take over our city?”) everything is linked up within the film’s speculative and disjunctive structure. Through the perversity of the city fathers, Nazis, in the form of acting and costumed soldiers and officers, overtake the city, issue edicts, and potentially terrorize the sleepwalkers in an attempt, apparently, to bring them to their senses. The citizens of Winnipeg and the surrounding areas financially paid for these events: during the so-called “If-day” and the weeks following 45 million dollars through the purchase of Victory Bonds. Yet what wonders what those citizens, particularly their children, actually learned or even thought about these dramatized tableaus. Did they viscerally share, if only temporarily and empathetically, the fears and horrors of those the Nazis had conquered and despised? Or was it simply an amusement, another day in Happyland or a day at the Public Baths—beneath which Maddin magically adds two levels lying below the family friendly pool, worlds divided, once again, by sex, girls, and boys, wherein, at least in the lowest level, gangs of naked, hairless children raced about in a kind of sexual ecstasy?  Just as poet Hart Crane asked of Edgar Allan Poe, in his locomotive-like voyage by subway beneath the East River on his way home to Brooklyn in his long poem The Bridge, did the poet remain awake or sleep for the remainder of his voyage, was he drunk or sober at the time of his death in a polling house tavern? so does Maddin ask similar questions of his fellow Winnepegans.

     No one can sufficiently answer these questions, and, accordingly, Maddin is not easily freed from the intense ties he has with the past. Like most of his compatriots he may be forced to emotionally and mentally remain where he began, a dead-man-walking without the vision for a new life. His solution is to create a new pin-up, cartoon-like figure, Citizen Girl, the heroine of the 1919 worker’s newspaper The Citizen. In short, he leaves it in the hands of the brave Winnipeg citizens of the past, those who created the city not simply by ordering it up or paying for its construction but through the hard work of their bodies. Neither imagination (or lack of it) nor even art can create (or recreate) a city; only those who “build it,” sexually and spiritual, and die within it can do that. A reimagining, as expressed in My Winnipeg, is just that—a personal dream of a homeland. The real thing—whatever we perceive that to be—sits still on the prairie, rising out of steel, rust, and glass, allowing one to safely travel, after all, away from it on a voyage to the rest of one’s life.

 

Los Angeles, February 21, 2015

Reprinted in World Cinema Review (February 2015).


Luca Leggieri | Fairlane / 2023

love lost

by Douglas Messerli

 

Valerie Betts and Luca Leggieri (screenplay), Luca Leggieri (director) Fairlane / 2023 [16 minutes]

 

Luca Leggieri’s 2023 Fairlane is a beautifully filmed work about love found and lost almost as quickly as the movie’s 16-minute playing time.

 

    New in town, Brandon (Jordan Doww) begins work as a mechanic in an auto shop in order to help his single mother out in paying their bills. Immediately set to work with a cute experienced mechanic, Evan (Bejamin Esqueda), Brandon shows his talent for working on the Ford Fairlane with his fix-up of its generator that he’s learned from his now dead father, impressing both his fellow worker and his boss, Mr. Morgan (Larry Kastner).

      Over a cigarette break the next day, the two boys briefly discuss their lives. Brandon, who previously lived in Atlanta has clearly moved to the smaller town because his mother got job as a teacher. And he’s still feeling hurt and lonely his father’s death of a couple of years earlier. Evan, with empathy, tells of how he lost his mother a few years ago, “so, I get it.” Brandon’s father would fix up old cars and sell them, presumably what the boys are now working at for Morgan’s garage. Evan’s mother was a musician, and he, himself, “dabbles” in music.


      Before the night’s out Brandon is asked to join Evan at his favorite bar-restaurant where the two begin serious drinking and soon find themselves dancing together. Before the night’s out, both having truly enjoyed themselves, we watch them kiss in Evan’s car.

      Brandon is suddenly overjoyed to rush back to work, only to find that he is now to be entrusted with the night’s lockup, since Evan will be leaving. The shock is obvious, and Brandon rushes to the shop early the next morning only to find that Evan has already gone.  

   Has Brandon been hired to simply replace Evan? Apparently so, since, as the boss hands over the keys to Brandon, he observes about the other’s boy’s leaving, “Shame, since he’s a good kid, but I know I got the right person for the job.” If so, Brandon surely cannot give up a job he himself needs to pay the overdue bills he discovers at home. It appears in this lovely film, the sexual joys he’s just begun to explore have just as suddenly be whisked away from him, returning him to the lonely state-of-being with which the short film began.

      Leggieri gives no answers, as the film ends with only a gift Evan has left behind: a mixed tape of his music specifically labeled “For Brandon.”

      If there’s nothing too profound here, we do sense the sweet sorrow of young love that often ends almost as quickly as it has begun, and we are moved through the director’s beautiful handling of character, music, and image.


     Yet, there is a great deal of logic missing in the script, or least questions that it appears Leggieri and his cowriter Valerie Betts have failed to answer. If Evan has been fired, why can’t Brandon still find out where he lives and visit him, explaining his deep disconcertment and attempting to restart their relationship? Mightn’t they again at least meet up at the kicky small-town bar?

      If Evan was all along planning on leaving, why start up a new love on the very week you know you are about to leave? There’s some explaining to do on the part of both the film’s central characters. Moreover, although we know a teacher’s salary is not always commensurate with other workers, surely Brandon’s mother now makes enough that she might be able to pay the bills, permitting Brandon to threaten to leave if Evan is not rehired. These, of course, are not issues the average filmgoer might care to think about. After all, the point is that Fairlane, just like the beautiful car of the 1950s and early 60s, is about something we fell in love with but was just as quickly lost. My family also drove a Ford Fairlane 500 from 1957; and even I, not at all an admirer of automobiles, lost my heart to that car, along with our Robin Egg-blue suburban house with its St. Charles Terra Cotta colored metal kitchen cabinets topped by a yellow counter at 1130 Northview Drive, the same year from September through December, Alfred Hitchcock was shooting Vertigo. This is a movie less about love than its loss.

 

Los Angeles, August 31, 2024

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (August 2024).

    

Index [listed alphabetically by director]

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.