the sadist
by Douglas Messerli
Calder Willingham (screenplay, based on his
novel and play End as a Man), Jack Garfein (director) The Strange One
/ 1957
In
fact, if one is interested in studying gay behavior one might better look to
the flamboyant gestures and homoerotic game-playing that De Paris imposes upon
figures such as the dumb ox football tackle Cadet Roger Gatt (James Olson) who
he lines up to lose at cards with the real intention of getting him drunk,
knowing that once drunk, the beefy blond lug becomes violent and he’ll press his
flesh upon anyone who looks at him the wrong way. Dressed in shorts, a Hawaiian
shirt kept open to display his hirsute pectorals, and a long cigarette holder
pasted to his mouth, Jocko De Paris looks like a campy carney cut-up of Oscar
Wilde, a more virile and coarser wit whose epigrams can turn off or around
reality with a single quip. And throughout he plays a kind of courtier,
creating a rapport between the brute and Simmons by insisting the frightened
Bible-boy proclaim his admiration for football tackles and turning the poor
good-looking Cadet Robert Marquales (Peppard) into a convertible-driving kid
dripping with money. If at first Gatt almost melts into the pleasure of their
company, as they fail to meet his expectations—the teetotaler Simmons warning
the drunken Gatt about the dangers of alcohol and Marquales choosing the color
of his Cadillac to be brown instead of red as Gatt would have it—we almost see
the voyeuristic Jocko salivating at the anticipation of flesh-on-flesh
S&M-like physical contact. Even if the Hays office had forced the writer
and director to remove most of the homoerotic matter of this film, it oozes its
way back in through the intensity of Gazarra’s gazes and gestural hints. At one
point, Gatt even is ready to pummel Jocko for making fun of Simmons’ Bible-thumping
proclamations; and it almost appears as if he is enjoying the football player’s
sudden tackling of him.
Jocko even gets a greater rush, moreover, when the handsome next-door
neighbor, Cadet George Avery, Jr. (Geoffrey Horne), son of the school’s elder
Major Avery, files a complaint with his dad about their goings-on. When that
fails—the four poker players and Jocko all rushing back into their own beds
like the sexual players of some Feydeau farce—Avery, Jr. comes calling like
Williams’ “Gentleman caller” upon Jocko’s follies with Gatt now so drunken that
he is ready to award his violent blows on anyone who crosses his path.
After pumping a pint of whiskey into his gut like the evil neo-Nazis
will do two years later to Cary Grant in North by Northwest, Jocko
plants the beaten Avery on the morning parade grounds along with the rumor that
the drunken upper classman has fallen down the stairs before stumbling out into
the yard.
Much
of the aftermath of this event is focused simply on Jocko’s further
manipulations of the situation to get young Avery expelled while keeping those
involved from telling the truth—an easy goal when the two upperclassmen realize
that they will also be kicked out after all their hard work for three long
years, and the freshmen will be faced with the reality, in Marquales’ case of
returning home to parents who have worked hard for years to send their son the
Academy, and, in Simmons’ case of losing the opportunity of becoming a saintly
chaplain.
The
ramifications of Jocko’s prank, however, become far more serious than simply a
violent prank when the Major, shaken by his son’s expulsion, begins to mentally
unravel in his attempts to prove De Paris guilty. Yet nothing seems to stop
Jocko from setting up further doomed sexual encounters just for his private
titillation. And despite the utter meaninglessness of forcing the female-phobic
Simmons to meet up with savvy local sexpot, Peonie (Julie Wilson), who Jocko
has renamed “Rosebud,”**** our Iago is determined to carry it through,
apparently just to observe how it might turn out—likely with both parties
running from the other in disgust.
As
I suggest above, I am sure a great many of the homoerotic overtones of the play
have been erased in the film. But I didn’t have to employ much of my inborn
“gaydar” to realize that the homosexual McKee—in another complete reversal of
the usual trope—was subtly attempting to blackmail Jacko through the “facts” he
had embedded in his novel to join him in his own bed or at least to keep him
near and dear as a “friend.” As McKee tries to warn him, “The last chapter [of
his book] is gonna be gruesome,” Jacko keeps trying to lose him, saying, “fine,
fine, you just write it up,” McKee making it quite clear about what he means, “That
wasn’t the ending I had in mind.”
When, for absolutely no logical reason, finally, Jocko asks Simmons and
Marquales to join him in the bar above the diner where he intends to introduce
the religious zealot to his “Rosebud— and that bar, The Hound and the Hare,
turns out to be an all-male room where half the men sit around in tables with
shirts stripped off—I think even my mother and father, had they seen this film,
might have suspected that something else was going on. If, considering its
sudden appearance in a 1957 movie, I wouldn’t exactly describe this an actual
depiction of a “gay bar,” it certainly looks and smells enough like one that
Cadet Gat surely might have quickly turned tail upon entering. Simmons even
says something to the effect, “Surely he (Jocko) wouldn’t bring a girl into
this place, with men half-naked?” Hounds and rabbits are perfectly at home in
almost any gay meeting place.
As
film commentator Jamie S. Rich wrote in 2009 about The Strange One:
“I am not sure exactly what was censored from The
Strange One in 1957, I can find no specific information—though apparently
the movie was sunk more by producer Sam Spiegel's bruised ego and his taking
the final edit out of Garfein's hands more than it was its salacious content.
In addition to the homoerotic elements, there was also some scandal about Jocko
hiring a hooker (Julie Wilson) to try and bribe Simmons with her wares. There
is no real question about the girl's profession in this cut, nor is there any
ambiguity about what the hungry-eyed Perrin, nicknamed Cockroach, is really
after. In his only screen performance, actor Paul E. Richards plays Cockroach
as a greasy, nervous, and calculating predator, his Southern drawl dripping
with lust every time he talks to Jocko. Even if you don't catch Jocko calling
him a ‘three-dollar bill,’ the sexual tension in the scene they have alone in
Jocko's room, or Cockroach's trying to convince him not to go out with the
girl, should erase most of the mystery. It's a potent subplot, and well-handled
for the time, especially under Production Code restrictions. Sure, it's not a
positive portrayal, but the pathology makes sense given the setting and
circumstances.”
Perhaps Crowther saw an earlier more censored version than the one
currently available. Yet his objections that the school authorities weren’t
involved in settling the situation sounds absolutely ridiculous in the context
which has already been established: that going to the Colonels and Majors
produces no results, and, in fact, is the reason why Major Avery is about to be
asked to resign. Those boys involved by Jacko De Paris in this terrible
incident and all the others who have long suffered Jacko’s belligerence are
about to end up as men (the idea being that through hazing you end up as a man)
only by themselves taking the action the school authorities are unable to,
arresting the perpetrator, demanding that he sign a full confession, and
putting him on a train that might take him as far away from their school as
possible. If it seems mean and petty to bind Jacko’s eyes near the train tracks
as he screams, quivers, and shouts in fear that he is about to be set out on
the tracks to be killed—something which he might ordered others to do with
anyone who had endangered his own life—it nonetheless reveals his own
cowardice. And, once he realizes that they have simply purchased him a ticket
out of town, his race to the caboose to shout out "I'll be back! I'll get
you guys! You can't do this to Jocko De Paris!" is recognizable as the
feeble cry for the continuance of his sadistic experiments which rational
beings will no longer tolerate.
If
this strangely titled film is not a great one, in the end it was a brave one in
its day.
*In 1957 this promotional pitch, given the
fact that director Elia Kazan and actor Marlon Brando had recently brought The
Actors’ Studio to fame with A Streetcar Named Desire (1951), clearly
offered this rather odd Hollywood offering a great deal of clout. James Dean
was another famed Studio product. This film was Ben Gazzara’s and George
Peppard’s first film roles.
**While Simmons is most obviously a “momma’s
boy,” in this highly homoerotic work, he is in no respects gay. Simmons is a
“creep” or an “outsider” only because of his religiosity and his birth in the
North, not because of his sexuality.
***Particularly of interest was McCullers’
play and later film adaptations of her novel The Member of the Wedding (the
play 1951, the film in 1952), with its budding lesbian “outsider” hero who
talks about observing young boys in the alley involved in homosexual acts. Most of her novels were published in the 1940s, although she was still a popular
writer throughout the 1950s.
****I should note that “rosebudding,” in gay
terms, is kissing, licking, or sucking the anus in anal prolapse, when the anus
from continued penetration has slipped forward, poking out of the anal entry.
Willingham is not here referring to Citizen Kane. More recently, it has
been applied to such heterosexual acts as well.
Los Angeles, April 2, 2021
Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog and
World Cinema Review (April 2021).
No comments:
Post a Comment