two silent remakes
by Douglas Messerli
Although silent films had been dismissed,
ignored, and maltreated, the large majority of them having even been destroyed through
their being printed on nitrate and neglected. For example, 16 of the great director
Alfred Hitchcock’s silent films have been lost or only survive in only
fragments. Some of the greatest of silent filmmakers’ and actors’ works of the
silent era have been lost including the 1917 Theda Bara production of Cleopatra,
one of the first of science fiction films, Bruce Gordon and J. L. V. Leigh’s The
First Men in the Moon (also 1917), the 1910 short version of Frankenstein,
and the 1926 movie The Great Gatsby are among the many hundreds of films
lost. It is estimated by perhaps 70-90% of silent films have gone missing.
Poil de
carotte, 1925
Of
those that remained, filmmakers of the 1920s and throughout Hollywood history
turned to them again and again as sources of movies which, once sound came into
being, they could readily pirate, plot intact, and remake in a manner that
would further appeal to their audiences. On occasion, films were remade
numerous times; one only need think of King Kong, Dracula, Frankenstein,
The Student of Prague, or the numerous remakes Dr. Jekyll and Mr.
Hyde, several of which I recount in this very volume of My Queer Cinema.
But just as many lesser-known films were also remade in the 1920s and long
after, the endless sea of films from the first decade of this century and the
1920s brought to the screen over the following decades.
Poil de
carotte, 1932
Some of these remakes of been written about, a few of them even
extensively. But most of the attention to the films has been focused on the
remake rather than the original, and often—and I know that those who dislike silent
films will be surprised by my saying this—the original silent film was far
superior to the talkie remake. And even if technically they were inferior, as I
have noted about the earlier versions of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, some
of silent films were much closer to their original sources and were far more
adventurous regarding their themes, costumes, and dialogue than were the late large
studio productions. Even when they were helmed by the same director as in the
case of Julien Duvivier’s Carrot Top I describe below, the works of took
chances and were more visually expressive than what came later.
In
this special gathering, I discuss two versions of Julie Duvivier’s Carrot
Top, one from 1925, the second from 1932, both before the heavy hand of the
Hollywood Production Code might have had any effect (European films were also affected
by the code, particularly if they were attempting to market their films in
translation in US). And I also compare the two versions of Ben-Hur, both
grand Hollywood productions, the first from 1959. I believe the differences I
noted might help in a new interest in and attention to how films are
retransformed over the years, even in as short of a period as a single decade.
Los Angeles, September 21, 2025
No comments:
Post a Comment