by Douglas Messerli
Lewis John Carlino (screenplay, based on the novel by David Ely), John
Frankenheimer (director) Seconds /
1966
The story based on David
Ely’s novel and adapted by playwright Lewis John Carlino has many of the same
elements as Georges Franju’s Eyes without
a Face and the later Pedro Almodóvar work The Skin I Live In. Like those two films, Seconds involves a complete transformation of the body, in this
case through an underground organization run by a disreputable doctor, an Old
Man (Will Geer), and a Mr. Ruby (Jeff Corey), who seek out unhappy beings ready
to shed their former lives and identities.
Arthur Hamilton (John
Randolph) is just such a being. Although he has apparently made it good as a
businessman and lives in a lovely home in the Manhattan suburbs with an
attractive wife, he is clearly at a mid-life crisis, unable to enjoy anything
and no longer interested in having sex with his wife. Randolph plays the role
somewhat like a lumpen beast who sweats constantly, a man in a crisis of
conscience but who is also desperate to get out of the life he has built up
around himself.
Of course, it is a hell
for which he sells his soul, as the address he first visits shows us: a man
sweating over a pressing iron. The “new” address turns out to be an equally
gruesome place, a beef storage firm, whose foreman, addressing him now as Mr.
Wilson, transfers him—much like a cow gone to slaughter—to the mysterious
organization’s offices, by comparison lush quarters, with a Picasso hanging on
the wall.
After meeting with Mr.
Ruby and the Old Man, Arthur signs away his life and hands over $300,000 to be
“reborn” through an operation and a highly staged “death.” It’s interesting
that the three major “reborns”—actors Greer, Corey, and Randolph—had been
blacklisted a decade before this film was released.
But even Hudson plays it
fairly “straight,” reiterating some of the doubts that Arthur himself had had,
and carefully imitating some of Arthur’s body movements and affectations. As
outrageous as it appears to discover Hudson playing such a serious science
fiction role, the actor gives a rather convincing performance of a man at odds
with his own body, fearful, as surely Hudson himself had often been, of giving
away the secrets that lie within.
It’s also fascinating
that the “organization” now equips him with a male houseboy to help with his
assimilation into his new life. The houseboy keeps suggesting that he might
want to give a party for the neighbors near him—obviously others who have had
similar transformations.
Returning to the doctors
to express his doubts and to request yet another identity, he is assured that
his concerns will be taken under consideration, but just before he is about to
undergo the new operation, he perceives that he will be killed, his body used
as a new “catalyst” for yet another customer. The final shot of the film is a
drill entering Wilson’s head.
Although this film was
entered in the Cannes Film Festival of 1966, it was booed and the audience
laughed. The film did little better on its US release. Yet today, it appears on
The National Film Registry, and has gained a cult-like status. The advances in
rhinoplasty and body replacement have almost made such a transformation possible
and have created implications that almost suggest what was seen at the time as
science fiction is now close to reality. And today we can envision Hudson in a
different way that audiences might have at the time.
In the film Hudson’s
character, after having expressed a desire to be an artist, is given the chance
to paint, only to discover, obviously, that he has little talent and can never
put more than a few lines to his canvas, while, in his former life as a banker,
he was a genius. The irony of this, particularly working in his later years,
after his Douglas Sirk and Doris Day periods, must have struck even Hudson, and
it shows, if not in his acting skills, in his darkened, older face. He’s
scared, probably, of playing someone that comes so close to the bone: a man
hiding out in his own skin.
Today, we might almost
think of this film as Frankenheimer’s most honest film, were it not that his
other two “paranoia” movies have struck a new chord in the days of Donald
Trump.
Superficially, this is
not a film of gay interest with regard its surface plot—yet it very much is a
work of fascination to the LGBTQ community given that two of its actors, Will
Greer and Hudson, were gay, and at least three of figures were political
outsiders, banned from performing in Hollywood movies. The search for another body
to begin a new life outside of the confines of heterosexual normalcy is also
clearly a theme of interest, even if in this case the new person was presumed
to also have normative heterosexual desires.
Los Angeles, March 28,
2018
Reprinted from World Cinema
Review (March 2018).
No comments:
Post a Comment