out of focus
by Douglas Messerli
Rainer Werner Fassbinder
(screenplay, based on an idea by Asta Scheib), Rainer Werner Fassbinder
(director) Angst vor der Angst (Fear of Fear) / 1975, USA 1976
Obviously, everything’s wrong. Margot is not only beginning to
experience a wavy, watery view of the world around her and, more importantly,
of herself in the numerous mirrors that Fassbinder offers up as decorative
trinkets in her apartment, but she is suffering from a kind of undiagnosed
sense of imprisonment, which even her wallpaper seems to confirm in its endless
row of decorative 1970s paisley, arabesques, and calicos. Even their furniture,
we later discover, is not their own choice. Certainly, the potato pancakes,
“stinky” cabbage, and numerous other typical German dishes, regularly delivered
up by her Mother-in-law and her daughter are not appealing to her or her
family.
More importantly, she finds it impossible to describe any of her
increasingly disturbing feelings to her busy husband. Although Margot almost
manically attempts to distract herself through her intense love of her
daughter, she is everyday beginning to fall apart, fearing for her own sanity.
Her kindly doctor (who also lives across the street) insists nothing is
wrong with her, and nonchalantly proscribes Valium and other drugs, to which
Margot, in her increasing “angst of fear” begins to consume with greater and
greater frequency.
Many of Fassbinder’s films demonstrate the breakdown of individuals
(particularly The Bitter Tears of Petra
van Kant, Why Does Herr R. Run Amok? and
In a Year with 13 Moons), but Margot’s situation is the closest of his work
to a Hitchcock and reminded me of Mia Farrow in Polanski’s 1968
Hitchcock-inspired Rosemary’s Baby.
In fact, we wonder, supported through one of Margot’s insults against the
intrusive mother and daughter-in-law, whether her new son, Jan, might not grow
up to be another “cabbage-eater.” Certainly, given the film’s self-absorbing
fixation on the growingly mad mother, we rarely get even glimpse of the new
child after his birth, we can only wonder, will he, too, be as monstrous as
“Mutter” (Brigitte Mira) and daughter Lore (Irm Hermann)?
She and her daughter Bibi can now come out of their shadows (throughout
the film, Margot’s daughter stands behind doors and screens, overhearing her
mother’s intense interchanges with her husband) and claim their rights in the
relationship she has with Kurt. We cannot know where that will end,
particularly given Kurt’s reliance on his monstrous family; but even Lore’s
husband, Karli, has encouraged her to turn away from the family through his
simple gift of flowers. This beautiful woman, who at film’s end has obviously
turned to a career of typing, will clearly survive—after all, the local madman,
Bauer, has now died, and she, who has so feared his presence, has been renewed
by her brief interchange with fellow females. If her view temporarily goes out
of focus, her spirit, I would argue, has been renewed after her outspoken
battles with her mother-in-law and her daughter. And, no matter what happens in
her relationship with Kurt, she will surely move on as a stronger individual.
That all of this was first presented on German television—at least from
a US perspective—is startling. Yes, Bergman, who highly influenced Fassbinder, had
presented even more involuted psychological dramas on Swedish television, but
to present such startling visions such as this and later, Berlin Alexanderplatz, to an audience which it was obviously
critiquing, is fairly amazing, particularly at a time when, just across the
wall, in East Berlin just such family and neighborhood surveillance was a daily
occurrence and was still highly instilled in the German mindset. In 1975, once
again, Fassbinder was far ahead of his times, in filming about the past—and a
future of drug dependency—that was amazingly prescient.
Los Angeles, August 6, 2017
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (August 2017).
No comments:
Post a Comment