the standoff
by Douglas Messerli
Michael Moore (screenplay), A. P. Gonzalez
(director) Clay Farmers / 1988
A full 17 years before Brokeback Mountain director
A. P. Gonzalez and writer Michael Moore created Clay Farmers, a
western-based film far more convincing than the sheepherders’ romance of 2005, Brokeback
Mountain.
We
never quite know for sure whether or not the drifter, Mike (Nicholas Rempel)
working as a temporary hired hand for Dan the local farmer (Todd Fraser) have
sexually consummated their obvious homoerotic attractions for one another.
Indeed, the few paragraphs written about Clay Farmers all seem to
suggest the two are just friends whose attraction for one another is still in
the early stages. Yet these handsome boys joyfully touch, hug, and rough-play
with one another in a manner that is far more explicitly sexual, and immensely
more sensuous, than the two fun-loving cowboys romping in nature after their
one-night romance represented in Ang Lee’s Brokeback. Just because we
haven’t (and won’t be) invited into their “tent” does not mean that Mike and
Dan aren’t on their way to becoming the homosexual couple that their neighbors,
particularly the mean homophobic next door drunk Jim Antonelli (Asbury Ward), imagine
them to be. I’d argue that if we don’t perceive them as a couple Gonzalez
doesn’t even have a story to tell. For, it is ultimately Mike’s inability to
commit to a longer relationship, once faced with the hostility of the isolated
community in which he has found himself, that is central to his film.
Gonzalez, in fact, goes out of his way to show through his
beautifully-shot images of their partial nudity as they work side-by-side
planting and weeding the rows of crops—as well as in their gentle shaping of
the clay-hewn art works that Dan creates in his spare time—that those two are
natural pair. That clay work, representing images of dwarves, half animal and
beast figures, and a large feminine figure with the head of a man clearly
spells out the characters’ perception of themselves as bisexual beings at home
in their bodies and an imaginative space that does not tie them down to
normative definitions of existence.
In
many ways, however, this is not really the story of a budding romance between
two hot farmers but a tale of the terrible abuse by Antonelli of his two boys
and wife which the local community abet in their silence. Although Dan does not
own the farm which he has contracted to manage, he too is a local, and he warns
the newcomer Mike, who has clearly already gotten on the wrong side of
Antonelli even before the film has begun, to stay away from their neighbor and
to keep quiet about his behavioral abnormalities.
That is difficult since the youngest of the neighbor’s boys, Gary (Liam
McGrath), despite his father’s admonitions, almost daily crosses over from the
Antonelli farm boundary to hang out with the two younger farm workers, in part
because they teasingly treat him like a pestering younger brother, and, as we
later discern, because they offer a sense of belonging and protection that his
own home life doesn’t offer. Mike even notices marks on the boy’s body clearly
from abuse, and tells Gary that if his father even touches him again to come to
them, a statement representing the very kind of offer which Dan has warned him
previously can only lead to problems.
Indeed, the way writer Moore and director Gonzalez have structured this
narrative, we know almost from the first frame of the work that there
ultimately will be a showdown between the farm workers and their irritable
neighbor. A trip to the local bar makes it clear that there are tensions
between the town folk. Barkeeper Trapper (Diane Conway) keeps a rifle beyond
the bar to take care of any fights that might break out.
Evidently, however, Dan and Mike have made at least temporary friends
with the others who inhabit the bar by buying rounds of free drinks and
offering up their friendly and upbeat personalities. But the first scene in
this bar still remains tense when Antonelli enters to begin drinking in earnest
alone at the bar, leering at the two friends throughout his obvious
determination to become inebriated. Dan moves to the jukebox to put on what is
evidently his favorite song, Will William’s “What Love Can Do,” a gender free
song that seems just as appropriate for gay men as the heterosexual country
western audience for which it was probably written*:
You love me, I love you
What more is love to do?
Kiss me and hold me close
Let’s see what we can do.
So give your heart to me
I promise you I’ll be true
I’ll give my heart to you
Let’s see what love can do.
Gonzalez’s camera focuses, for the first time, on the Antonelli farm as
Jim attempts to return home. His wife and the children’s stepmother, Terri
(Dolores Dwyer), obviously herself a common victim of her husband’s abuse, has
already locked the door, with Jim calling out for Randy (Aaron Denney), his
eldest son, to open up. They too refuse, cautiously peering out a backroom
window to observe his whereabouts.
When Gary returns home, he finds his brother lying on the barn floor,
dead. Either the boy, in loading the gun, has accidently killed himself or his
father has killed—accidentally or out of fury—his son. The Antonelli parents
choose to describe the event in a third way, that Gary accidentally killed his
brother, despite Gary’s insistence he is innocent and that he found his brother
already dead.
Perhaps the only major flaw in this movie’s logic is that the very next
morning Gary escapes his family farm—despite his father’s quite emphatic
warning that he must never again communicate with their neighbors—to hang out
with his young working friends. At first, he says nothing about the recent
incidents on his farm, but he gradually does reveal that
Once more, the audience seems to be more savvy about what is in store
with regard to what superficially appears as a pedophilic encounter than are
the characters. But then one commentator seems to argue that they are not even
fully cognizant of their own sexual predilections.
Further, while Mike momentarily contemplates a confrontation with
Antonelli, Dan again admonishes him, insisting that what happens in their
neighbor’s lives is not something in which they should interfere.
This time Mike attempts to explain just what Gary is experiencing. In a
long and quite emotionally stirring scene which reveals that as a child he too
had been the subject of abuse, he expounds that it is not simply a temporary
moment of suffering for the boy but something which he will have to suffer for
the rest of his life. Sitting near the ocean, Mike angrily faces off with his
friend:
“You don’t really know what’s going on with
Gary, do you? All you see is marks on his skin. His brother didn’t kill himself
because of that. You don’t even think about the marks he’s got in the inside,
do you?” When Dan argues “Of course I do,” Mike continues, “Naw, all you see is
some dumb kid who wants to hang around and get in your god damn way. That’s not
why he’s around. I mean do you know what it’s like to be hit every day and to
have to make up stories about where those scars came from. You don’t get over
it. You carry it with your goddamn life. ...He don’t even know what he’s being
hit for.”
Returning to the bar the two now encounter a world that now stands
against them, even Gary having been forced to admit to the community’s
assertion that they forced him to join them. Mike is bloodied by Antonelli and
others before the bartender ends the fight with a shotgun blast, the two young
workers escaping back to their farm.
Earlier in the film, Mike has shared with Dan his desire to get away
from the farm and to move on to Los Angeles. A spat between the two ensues,
with Dan suggesting that we might want to move on with Mike as soon as his
contract with the farm owner expires within a couple of months, Mike allowing
that he would stay for while if that would happen. In short, they seemed to
have made a kind of commitment a more permanent relationship than what Mike has
seemingly been running away from for much of his life.
Dan, now alone, sits in the hollow of a tree branch playing his favorite
song on his harmonica and is suddenly poked from behind by Gary, who joins him
on another branch in the tree.
In the world in which he lives, Gary can only hope to be consoled by
those who stay behind in an expression of permanence that demands a repression
of sudden judgment and change, while Mike can only wish that through a swift
reversal of that behavior his lover will impulsively act to join him. It is a
standoff as intense as any in the old west.
*The musical score by Robert Stine is
excellent throughout.
Los Angeles, November 12, 2020
Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog and
World Cinema Review (November 2020).
No comments:
Post a Comment