Friday, March 22, 2024

Allan Dwan | A Modern Musketeer / 1917

a kansas cyclone

by Douglas Messerli

 

Allan Dwan (screenwriter, based on a story “D’Artagnan of Kansas” by E. P. Lyle, Jr, and director) A Modern Musketeer / 1917

 

Allan Dwan’s 1917 silent 68-minute film A Modern Musketeer turned up on many of the lists I used to discover LGBTQ movies, but after watching it several months ago, I immediately dropped it from that compilation. And even after much thoughtful brooding ever since, I would argue that it’s not really an LGBTQ film in that none of its figures outwardly express any interest in same sex love nor in gender change or transition, unless you imagine the film’s imaginative shifts between the 17th century dress of  Charles de Batz-Castelmore d'Artagnan with his long hair, blousy shirts and cape, and the local Kansas boy Ned Thacker—both performed by Douglas Fairbanks—represents some sort of crossdressing fantasy. 

 


    Strangely enough the author of the 1918 Photoplay review felt it most certainly was, but in reverse, Fairbanks masculinizing the original D’Artagnan by virtue of his manic leaps, jumps, and absurd acrobatics:

 

“Draft the dictionary, order the thesaurus into intensive training, mobilize the superlatives and equip the book of similes for the first line trenches ­ "A Modern Musketeer" has arrived. Here is Douglas the Fairbanks at his most Douglasish and eke at his Fairbanksest. Here is the breaker of all speed records in the speediest of all forms of entertainment making all his past performances look like the funeral march of a colony of paralyzed snails. Here is Briareus threshing about with every one of his hundred arms at once. D'Artagnan, forsooth! Fairbanks makes the Dumas swashbuckler seem a popinjay, a milksop, a wearer of wrist watches in times of peace, a devotee of the sleeve handkerchief, a nursery playmate, and eater of prune whip, a drinker of pink lemonade, a person susceptible to hay fever, a wearer of corn plasters, an habitue of five o'clock teas, a reader of ‘Polyanna.’”

 



     And I will say both his D’Artagnan and the cyclone force of Ned are quite queer in their behavior in their excessive hyperactivity aimed primarily to help women out of straits they were perfectly happy to be in or in which they were never truly involved. Both represent the kind of courtier who might toss down a cape upon a muddy street where a woman was about to walk with such a force that the mud would be sent straight into her eyes. Or, perhaps, he might first jump into it just to test it out, slinging mud both upon himself and everyone about. God forbid that he get excited; this boy not only climbs quickly to the roof of the village church, but straight up its steeple to sit in its weathercock. As D’Artagnan he spends more time during a duel in the rafters than swashbuckling it out on the floor below.

  

    One might further observe that this film represents the queerest mish-mash of genres that ever made it to the screen, beginning as it does as sort of comic swashbuckler, occasioned by the fact that his mother, loving Dumas, read him The Three Musketeers before and after his birth so many times that he believes he is himself D’Artagnan. In “reality,” if such a word has any meaning in this series of vertiginous tales, he is just a small town Kansas boy born in a cyclone which throughout youth makes him feel it necessary to personally perpetuate as he speeds of on a road trip where he transfers his car, which perhaps was moving too slowly for him, onto a railroad track beating the train to El Trovar, the Grand Canyon resort hotel where he proceeds to court a young teenage old girl Elsie Dodge (Marjorie Daw), charm her money-grubbing mother (Kathleen Kirkham), and alienate the young girl’s would-be fiancée, the wealthy Yonkers businessman Forest Vandeteer (Eugene Ormonde), whom he soon discovers is already a three-time bigamist and business scammer.

 

   Given their location, the film quickly falls into the genre of a Western, which includes Indians (both a sympathetic portrait of the Hopi Tribe and a negative portrait of a renegade Indian Chin-de-dah [Frank Campeau] who uses the former cliff-dwelling Puebloans [Anasazi] tribe’s homes as their hideout) and bandits who plan to steal Elsie rather than rob a bank.

     Such evil-doings, both of Chin-de-dah, who, as a guide to Vandeteer and Elise, plans to lure them into his camp at the base of the Canyon, toss Vandeteer into the Colorado River, and scoop up Elise as a wife whether she likes it or not.

     Once our young cyclone gets a wind of these goings on, obviously, nothing can stop him, as he rappels down the canyon wall, greets the arriving trio to temporarily knock out Chin-de-dah and half of his gang before rushing off on horseback to lead them on a chase during which Elsie and Vandeteer are encouraged by the former gang member James Brown (Tully Marshall) who has teamed up with Ned, to put themselves in the noose of the rope so that they might be dragged back up the cliff by a horse tied to the rope at the top.

      Vandeteer, himself as evil as Chin-de-dah, almost falls to his death, but Ned saves him on the condition that he write out an admission of having involved James Brown in a former scam, that he give up any claims to Elsie, and pay him a large sum of money which he shares with Brown.

      So does Ned win the girl, although we are certain that he won’t be able to sit around long enough for the marriage and certainly could never sit still long enough in her arms for them to truly make love.

      Indeed, in this film, despite his constant attempts to save women from harm, most of the time he and D’Artagnan are awarded slaps and words of abuse from women who never wanted their help in the first place. And even for the grateful girls, his rewards are a brief kiss and wave goodbye as he leaps off into another adventure.

 


     Other than the end-of-the-movie kiss he receives from Elsie for saving her life, most of the rewards Ned receives come from males, Vandeteer’s French chauffeur who is so delighted by Ned’s ingenuity and his love of all things French, that he attempts to award with a big, long kiss (in French declaring that Ned is the most wonderful man he knows and cannot resist kissing); and what almost appears as a longed-for respite Ned gets as he is forced to hold down Chin-de-dah and two of his cohorts for several long frames while laying sprawled out on the flat rock floor of the Indian’s hide-out—a very queer scene in the midst of all his intense actions, with even an intertitle commenting on how “cozy” they are. And, of course, his father has awarded him a car for leaving town, akin to the knobby horse D’Artagnan is left his by his father, the source of his first violent adventure after strangers mock the animal.

 

     And then are the inevitable analogies to that touchstone of gay movies, The Wizard of Oz, which also has no real LGBTQ figure unless you count the sissy “dandy-lion.” Like that other  Kansas hero, Dorothy, Ned takes his own cyclonic self out of the land of alfalfa and wheat to a strange new world where he becomes the Scarecrow, the Tin Man, and the Lion all in one, employing his quick thinking, his love for the girl and the adventure, and his courage to do battle with this film’s version of the witch, Chin-de- dah, whose ruby shoes in this case is the special necklace which the Indian wears, claiming it makes him imperious from harm, which Ned cuts from his neck as his reward to having saved the day. The only major difference is that, in this case, Kansas doesn’t really want to return home.

  

     Finally, there is Fairbanks himself, who through this early trial-run of his later swashbuckling adventures, plays the role fully in camp mode, preening to the camera and mocking his own efforts as he shows off D’Artagnan’s extraordinarily long curls and his absurdly-shaped moustache as well as Ned’s cyclonic efforts to climb, jump, leap, and ride atop every inanimate and sometime animate figure he encounters. Certainly, in his duels and battles this hero puts his whole body into the effort, making physical contact with more men than make up an American football or British cricket team. In short, Fairbanks employs all the standard gestures of what is defined as masculinity to reveal their real purpose, to butt up against a fellow male like two stags locked in a horny duel.

     So, in the end, if this film isn’t truly gay, it’s certainly queer, and ought to be recognized as such.

 

Los Angeles, July 23, 2022

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (July 2022).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Index [listed alphabetically by director]

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.