itching to sin
by Douglas Messerli
Julien Duvivier and Henri Jeanson (screenplay),
Julien Duvivier (director) Au Royaume des cieux (The Kingdom of
Heaven, aka The Sinners) / 1949
The director of this institution, clearly a frustrated man-hating
lesbian, sadistically punishes and tortures her charges, at one moment
participating in an incident that today might be described as rape.
Just as intense as the pent-up human lusts and hate boiling in the
inside of this institution, outside the rivers and streams roil up with the
annual rains in this land of water and mud, threatening to drown the
townspeople just as the emotional pressures rise within the old fortress
transformed into a what has become a young womens’ prison. It is no accident
that when the dam walls break, so too do the women inside rise up and rebel
against their sadistic director, bringing together the redeeming heterosexual
love story and the internal “queer” emotions that have been kept under lock and
key within the institution, creating a perfect symbiosis between the normative
and queer forces at play in this work.
Duvivier, moreover, is a classy, “A” list director, and with his
cinematographer Victor Armenise is perfectly able to alternate his
inside/outside maneuvers in a manner that reveals that the two are innately related.
The most notable of these scenes is when the inmate Maria describes what
“rain” means to her as she recounts a
sports event she attended with her lover Pierre in Paris which a downpour
halted, while the two lovers, escaped to a shelter under a porch. There, a man
nearby turns on his car radio playing a song to serenade their hidden
love-making. Duvivier’s camera swings back and forth in the telling of this
event from Maria, laying on her bed in the reformatory telling the tale to her
fellow prisoners, to Pierre, relating the same story at the table of the
Barattiers where he is boarding, each time between swings pausing
It
is that same rain that ultimately endangers everyone’s life but also permits
the escape of Maria and Pierre, and helps, with the sacrifice of her life of
the anarchist inmate, to foment the inside revolution that results a permanent
change with the establishment of a new, kinder director, Miss
Guérande (Monique Mélinand).
The
interconnecting between what happens in the larger world and within the prison
walls is also played out in the character of Margot (Liliane Maigné), who in
her regular escapes and returns from and to the institution plays the role of
the Greek Hermes or the Roman Mercury, who links the inside and outside, those
of high position and those of low. It is she who delivers Pierre’s letter to
Maria, describing his plans to help her escape and relaying his expressions of
his love for her.*
As
the girls indirectly introduce themselves to the “newbie” Maria, they also
reveal their own crimes and sexual
preferences, some clearly heterosexual, others obviously lesbian, as when one
girl, advertising her natural breasts asks Maria to touch them in order to
prove that everything within her bra is real, while another greedily attempts
to grab a feel for herself.
Another resident, nicknamed Gaby “Invoice” apparently for her use of her
body for monetary purposes, appears to be bisexual, raising her skirt to show
her thighs: “The left thigh is for men.
These variations of sexuality are presented as the director as normal,
even if for his audiences they may have appeared to represent the rough lives
these young girls have had to endure in order to survive their broken home
lives and the criminal actions of their own parents. Yet the girls wear their
differences like badges of honor, even allowing one girl to cry in response to
almost everything since it clearly makes her feel better. And there are few
hard feelings about their personal desires or past actions.
The
major issues of conflict that arise between these young women relate to their
present survival and future acts. They all dislike the anarchist among them who
appears to constantly seek out dissension in order to foment revolution, which
as I suggest she eventually accomplishes. Their fights with one another,
however, are mostly about how to proceed, not about their core values or the
acts that brought them all together. And their major topic of discussion is how
to survive until they are released, particularly given the most recent
developments regarding the directorship and regulations of Maison Haute Mère.
It
is perhaps not so strange that it is the arrival of the innocent Maria—her
major crime being to attempt to escape from her assigned employment with a
family whose father and son both attempt to force her into sexual
relationships—that sets off the series of events that completely alters the
order of these girls’ lives as well as those who themselves seek to be free of
such malevolent control.
Things begin rather benignly, as the current director of Maison Haute
Mère, Madame Bardin (Paule Andral), meets the young woman just brought to her.
Although she greets the new girl with a rather menacingly interrogation of her
past record, she soon after assures her that she recognizes these as minor
infractions and attempts to explain that she is not being locked away in a
prison—the doors and gates remain open, although there are punishments for
those, like Margot, who abuse their regulations—but rather will hopefully be
given the skills to work upon release in professions that do not entail the
kind of indentured situations in which Maria has been placed. Complaining of
the cold and damp of the former fortress which serves as the girl’s home, she
suddenly receives a call from authorities saying they’ve have finally found new
quarters for the institution. But hardly has Madame Bardin had a moment to
share the good news, before she falls to the floor, dead apparently of a heart
attack.
Given the speed with which she takes up the telephone conversation and
her seeming disinterest in what has just happened to Bardin, Miss Chamblas
(Suzy Prim), we cannot help but suspect, that she may have involved in her
predecessor’s death. Suddenly having been given command of the reformatory, she
orders the open doors immediately bolted, the girls’ playtime be taken away
until she discovers who has broken a drinking glass, that the nearly rabid dog
Goliath be untethered, and, after abruptly re-interrogating Maria, that she be
locked away in basement cells that have never been previously used.
Somewhat like the wicked stepmother in Snow White, Chamblas
immediately recognizes that Maria, in her beauty and innocence, represents
everything she is not. And whereas, she can quite easily intimidate and
dominate the other girls, even possibly sexually satisfying her desires with
some of them, Maria, in her moon-struck innocence is incorruptible.
Determined
to discover what the wisp of a female being possesses in order to bring a man
to their doors, as well as attempting to witness her beauty for her own
delectation, the furious matron strips off the girl’s blouse as her fingers
appear to itch in midair to get her hands on “the skin” which makes a man
follow her “like a dog.” In an utterly over-the-top performance Prim strokes
that skin in self-gratification thrusting her face so close to the girl’s that their
lips almost touch all the while knowing that if they actually had the whole
scene might have been cut. Certainly, I can’t imagine that these frames would
have made it through the US or British censor of the day.
Maria’s outrage and declarations of hatred are so deserved that even
Chamblas is speechless, as she sentences the girl to return to the dungeon, as
if we needed further proof that in the perverted version of love represented by
Chamblas, desire can only be expressed through power and pain; this character
obviously has long been a student of de Sade.
Using
the excuse of the annual girls’ Christmas choral presentation at the local
church, Guérande once more intercedes, freeing Maria
so that she might meet up with Pierre at the Christmas mass.
Oddly, God himself is presented in this film as an even more malevolent
force than Chamblas—if you believe that nature is an expression of God’s will.
The damn breaks and the flood waters come crashing into the church, rendering
any actions of the priest almost meaningless as he calls for the roughly hewn
rowing boats to be brought into to the sacred stone structure to save his
parishioner’s lives.
After hiding out in the church steeple Pierre and Marie finally escape,
but only after a chillingly dangerous run through the local fog and bogs in a
police chase that almost takes away the frail child’s life. We can only hope
that this time the police, wherever the two end up, will not yet again
intervene in their relationship.
Meanwhile, the girls, finally realizing there are fifty of them compared
with four elderly administrators, take over the reformatory, as Chamblas and
her only true supporter lock themselves inside their office. The half-starved
girls vandalize the institution’s kitchen, most of them getting drunk on the
wines stocked for the pleasure of the staff. Once more her associate
intervenes, allowing Chamblas safe passage out of the building where she is
severely bitten by the brutal dog she has previously unleashed. Guérande is
ordered to take over as director and the girls’ lives return to
semi-order—although given that these young women have now come to realize their
power, it seems doubtful that they will ever be fully ruled again.
It
appears that “the kingdom of heaven” that this film proposes is attained only through
challenge and disobedience, laying as it does outside of any self-described
normative attempt to define, control, or delimit behavior, including sex and
love. This sounds suspiciously close to Milton’s description of the great angel
Lucifer to me. Maybe The Sinners is not such a bad title after all.
*It is difficult to believe that Stephen
Sondheim had not seen this film prior to writing the lyrics of his song “Maria”
in West Side Story given that his message to Maria ends with the
repetition of her name—“Maria, Maria, Maria”—with a final emphatic “Maria” at
the end.
Los Angeles, May 10, 2021
Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog and
World Cinema Review (May 2021).
No comments:
Post a Comment