Saturday, February 24, 2024

Ulrike Ottinger | Freak Orlando / 1981

beyond explanation

by Douglas Messerli

 

Ulrike Ottinger (screenplay and director) Freak Orlando / 1981

 

Like most of Ulrike Ottinger’s early works, and particularly her “Berlin Trilogy,” of which Freak Orlando is the second installment, the director centers her work a visual circus of life, completely surrounding the viewer with performative scenes that luxuriate in visual sensuality and, at many times, are a shock to the senses, particularly since Freak City where the Orlando of this voyage—a variation of the figure having previously appeared in the director’s Laocoön & Sons (1975) and Madame X: An Absolute Ruler (1978)—has wound up is a world of religious fundamentalism and cruelty not unlike the Inquisition.



     One might almost describe the work as a kind of camp horror-film that alternates with scenes of gentle love and tenderness—even if, as in Madame X’s world, the later don’t last very long. The work, indeed, is filled with contradictions. Clearly a feminist-influenced piece, as in most of her cinema Ottinger purposely frustrates her feminist admirers by creating a nebulous moral compass that itself points at various moments in different directions. And the lack of a clear declaration of values as opposed to the total wonderment of difference no matter how loathsome it might become sometimes serves as a block to even the most opened-eyed liberal. Despite her work’s obvious political intentions, time and again Ottinger refuses to make declare moral judgement.

     In her essay, “Ulrike Ottinger’s Strange Subversions,” Adina Glickstein nicely summarizes some of these issues while describing important perspectives of the film:

 

“I can never set aside the sense that films like Madame X and Freak Orlando take advantage of the bodies that have been coded as different, can never parse whether they work with or against the oppression that this perceived difference catalyzed, in Ottinger’s time as well as our own. To offer a good-faith reading, these films could easily be summed up as a celebration of difference, calls for solidarity among the exploited. There’s a feminist gesture in Ottinger’s rejection of straightforward narrative and form, refusing to position the women who populate her films in line with the cinematographically-constructed demands of “to-be-looked-at-ness” that, even by the 1970s and ‘80s, dominated mass-cultural representations of women onscreen. Yet that same disavowal, in denying any narrative framing that might elucidate the films’ underlying politics, can make them feel, at times, more like pageants—trotting out the “strange” and “zany” to an indeterminate end.

     The second installment in the Berlin trilogy, Freak Orlando, is one such showboat of spectacle. The titular “freaks”—gay men, bearded women, people with dwarfism and other physical disabilities—cavort through bleak West German landscapes that resist placement in space or time, moving from mystical department stores to coal fields and fairgrounds. BDSM leather daddies are elevated to the level of righteous religious self-flagellants, their procession punctuating the film with ecstatic grunts as they wander between sooty industrial scenes. Freak Orlando is a raucous celebration of extremity, a cavalcade of strangeness unburdened by narrative constraints. Nothing about it wants for a storyline, but perhaps in part because its form is so arcane, its ethical implications are also completely confounding. Is it a jubilant invitation to embrace divergence? Or rather, does it come across an uncritical caricature, its depiction of diversity less satire than ridicule? For all the ways in which Ottinger’s early filmography feels outside of time, it also telegraphs a sense of ethnographic excess that is distinctly of its era.”

 

     In the context of it being a spectacle or a series of inchoate performances, Freak Orlando does not provide a coherent plot. Instead, Ottinger divides her work up, in manner not unlike Andrei Tarkovsky’s Andrei Rublev, into episodes; in Freak Orlando there are five.

      I’ll briefly summarize these episodes in order to provide a broad sense of a work that must be seen in order to make any sense.

 


     The First Episode consists of a character named Orlando Zyklopa (Magdalena Montezuma) who arrives at the Freak City gates, pauses before a naked buried torso (a kind of Mother Earth-Venus figure all in one), and enters, soon working with her own seven dwarf-shoemakers in a futuristic shopping mall, in what appears to be an instant shoe repair that primarily destroys the footwear while stamping them as her creation with a huge anvil. The customers grow angry and she and her dwarfs are chased away by the crowds and the store manager, Herbert Zeus (Herbert Zeus). The dwarfs, two intertwined dancers who reappear throughout the work (Claudio Pantoja and Hiro Uchiyama) make their way to a forest where they hide themselves in a tree which becomes a kind Trojan Horse. Soon after as they make their way to another location they discover a sacred stylite to whom a group of city flagellants, who look like crazed Tom of Finland leather boys, also make their annual pilgrimage. But just before their arrival, the stylite begins to move, naming Orlando as his successor, before he falls to his death. The citizens of the tourist spot insist that she must immediately replace him since the BDSM boys travel there each year just to see him, spending a great deal of money of their decadent pleasures after. When she refuses, the villagers of the holy shrine murder her.


      In the Second Episode the former Orlando Zyklopa, is miraculously reborn as Orlando Orlanda on the steps of a basilicum of the Middle Ages, a child with two heads who enchants the crowds by singing a lovely two-part harmony. The two heads, however, are not always in agreement, basically taking opposite viewpoints, the one more dominate scolding the other. Their acrobatic dancers (again Pantoja and Uchiyama) are taken prisoner by the flagellants, locked away in a cone shaped metal contraption that looks much like the dunce caps which are used to punish those who stray, mostly women. Orlando Orlanda follows the flagellants along with the famous dwarf painter Galli to the convent of Wilgeforte wherein lives the bearded woman saint. Orlando again undergoes a metamorphosis, dressed in new clothes in the department store warehouse, with Galli painting the portrait of the transformation.

      The Third Episode tells of Orlando Capricho, now captivated by a special travel offer made by the Freak City department store, but learns to distrust her mirror image. She falls into the hands the Spanish Inquisition persecutors and the 18th century, and locked in cages with other significant figures of the day, barely escapes, deported with other great men and women, including Galileo and Einstein.

 

     Now Mr. Orlando, he is engaged at the entrance of a psychiatric ward by freak-artistes of a side-show traveling throughout the country, headed by Helena Müller (Delphine Seyrig, who also plays several other roles throughout the work). Orlando falls in love with the left side of Siamese-twin sisters, Lena, the other named Leni. Together they have a baby, but Leni, distraught over Lena’s having found a lover, becomes an alcoholic, the two fighting day and night, Lena not being able to live her life due to her sister’s alcoholism. The baby constantly cries, and Orlando, trying to stop their intense bickering finally shoots Leni dead, obviously killing his beloved Lena as well. The head of the troupe is now forced to sentence Mr. Orlando to death in compliance with the age-old tradition of artistes.

      In the final Fifth Episode, Mrs. Orlando, called Freak Orlando because of her special orientation, has become an entertainer, touring with four Playboy-like “bunnies” (Jackie Raynal, Jill Lucas, Vivian Lucas, and Beate Kopp), a special attraction of shopping centers and family celebrations, etc. Now host to the annual Festival of Ugliness, she performs before a party of handicapped veterans (the former BDSM boys) and others, crowning the winner with a trophy inscribed: “Limping is the way of the crippled.” The award this year goes to a passing traveling salesman who has not even entered as a contestant. The festival ends, and Orlando’s story is over, as she makes her way, limping, out of Freak City, pausing once again before the nude, half buried living statue.

     As I suggested, my commentary explains nothing. Ottinger’s images are in a world of their own, calling up mythological and historical characters (Narcissus, Zeus, Hermes, Janus and the Cyclops for example) as well as figures and scenes from a vast array of cinema history including, of course, Tod Browning’s Freaks, Walt Disney’s Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, Luis Buñuel’s Simon of the Desert, Ingmar Bergman’s The Seventh Seal, Federico Fellini’s Satyricon, Pier Paolo Passolini’s Salò and Pigsty, and numerous other works. Oddly, the film has a great deal in common with Mel Brooks’ History of the World, Part I, released in the very same year.

 

    But Ottinger clearly draws on her own nearly endless imagination for the largest part of her totally engaging tableaux, with figures you cannot easily forget even if they often seem beyond comprehension. Who might have imagined the scene where. as Orlando Capricho is dressed in a gown featuring Christmas Tree lights, the bearded saint of Wilgeforte nailed to a cross sings an aria of her family troubles while acting out the entire holy trinity: her father, her mother, and herself? She is accompanied by an acolyte who holds on a pole before her at all times a martini, a bit like the water served up a sponge to Christ by a guard.  Or a dinner party where the naked guests, wearing blindfolds must reach in through barbed wire for their drinks to toast their goodbyes to freedom? Or, finally, a dance routine with the Tom of Finland boys (Luc Alexandeer, Jochen Benner, Klaus Dechert, Polo Espinoza, Dan van Husen, Reinhard v. d. Marwitz, Jörg Matthey, Stefan Menche, Konrad Regber, Peter Schmittinger, and Emile Snytscheuvet) on crutches? Only Ottinger could conjure up these scenes.

     This is a world of queer folk, all outsiders who are unable to fit into any other world but their own. Or perhaps all the others simply can’t fit into their various societies. According to Ottinger, it appears, a freak is just someone whom the others in the neighborhood can’t explain.

 

Los Angeles, December 1, 2022

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (December 2022).

No comments:

Post a Comment

My Queer Cinema Index [with former World Cinema Review titles]

Films discussed (listed alphabetically by director) [Former Index to World Cinema Review with new titles incorporated] (You may request any ...