one moment of hope
by Douglas Messerli
Sabrina B. Karine, Pascal Bonitzer,
Anne Fontaine, and Alice Vial (screenplay, based on an original concept by
Philippe Maynial), Anne Fontaine (director) Les Innocentes (The
Innocents) / 2016
Over the last few weeks, I have
watched a spate of movies in which horrible events happen, or almost happen, in
the last days and after World War II—as if somehow the War’s horrors had spun
so out of control, they might never be brought to an end.
When a young novice, dressed all in
white with a black cloak, quickly escapes the confines of the church through a
boarded up back entrance, we might even question if we are not up for some
shockers such as those in the Audrey Hepburn film, The Nun. What is all this hidden suffering about?
What Mathilde, the daughter of Communist parents, quickly discovers is
that at least six other nuns are pregnant, the entire community having been
repeatedly raped by Soviet soldiers. At first the doctor is more startled than
sympathetic, particularly when most of the women, virgins and committed to
chastity, find it difficult to even allow her to touch their bodies, let alone
observe their genitals and measure they pregnant bellies to determine the
condition of the fetuses.
One young novice, however, admits that after she has her child, she will
leave the convent to find the man who raped her, since he had protected the
order from being murdered and had treated her gently. And soon, perceiving
these women as individuals instead of a slightly hysteric community, Mathilde
grows closer to them, particularly after, while returning home one evening in
her jeep, she herself is stopped by the Russians and nearly raped before their
leader interrupts their actions.
The situations which these women face, finally even begins to affect
Mathilde’s own relationship with her fellow doctor, Samuel (Vincent Macaigne),
a Jew whose parents were killed in Bergen-Belsen.
On another trip to the convent, a child is suddenly born to a nun who
showed no signs of being pregnant. The woman refuses to nurse it, and the babe
is given to the mother of the first child to be nursed, allowing the woman to
create a bond with it. The Mother Superior, herself, it turns out has also been
raped and has contacted syphilis in the act, but refuses to be touched or cared
for, seemingly taking on the disease somehow as God’s will.
When she discovers that Maria has passed
on a child to another of the nuns the elderly leader demands obedience. I will
not have a scandal in this convent, she declares, while Maria ironically
reminds her that they already have had one.
At another moment during Mathilde’s visits the Soviet soldiers return
for yet another of what they describe as an “inspection”; the nuns cower in
terror, while the quick-thinking doctor insists that she is visiting the
convent because the order is now infected with typhus; the soldiers scurry off.
Just when we think events cannot get any worse, we watch the Mother
Superior carrying away the second child who was being nursed, after which the
would-be mother to the babe attempts to follow, hoping to retrieve the child;
but she loses her way, as the camera moves forward to watch the Mother Superior
put the child on the cold ground in front of a cross, pouring a small vial of
either liquor or poison down the baby’s throat. The heartbroken nun, having her
“baby” jumps from a tower of the convent to her death, and when, the next day,
Maria travels to the peasant woman to tell her of her daughter’s death, is
surprised, when she asks about the new babies, that the now distraught woman
has no idea what she is talking about. Suddenly Maria has discovered the truth.
The newborns have been horribly “sacrificed” by their hypocritically pious
leader.
At dinner that evening the entire order
is forced to discover the truth when Maria asks the Mother Superior to explain
why she has not been able to find the babies at the woman’s house. “I have
damned myself,” admits the now-broken woman, “in order to spare the rest of you
any shame.”
Soon after, the predictable happens, as several of the pregnant nuns go
into labor at the same time. Mathilde is called, but is forced to seek out her
lover Samuel’s help, admitting the whole ordeal while committing him to
absolute silence. This time the nunnery cannot keep out a male, brought there
to help, and the babies are successfully delivered. But now, without Mathilde,
whose Red Cross group has been ordered elsewhere since their job in Poland
done, how will the order be able to deal with the reality of these new births;
will they too be “sacrificed”?
After a long sleepless night, where she is kept company by one of the
orphans who swarm about their camp, she hatches a plot. Gathering up all the
orphan boys, she brings them to the convent, insisting to the nuns that they
can keep their babies if only they change part of their
The innocents of this profound film’s title, it turns out, are neither
the virgin nuns who have had their innocence taken away, nor the innocent babes
whose lives have been sacrificed to religious dogma, but all those of us who
might imagine that belief is something easy to achieve and simple to maintain.
Los Angeles, July 23, 2016
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (July 2016).
No comments:
Post a Comment