the joy of sex
by Douglas Messerli
Dominik György (screenwriter and director) Dotýkání (The Touching) / 2020 [39 minutes]
Dominik György describes as “the touching,”
exploratory sexual play which probably includes mutual masturbation. György
does not reveal what goes on behind that closed door, so we might imagine as
much or little sexual activity as we wish.
I have long
argued throughout these pages that, unless it is an enforced activity, I see no
problem at all with brothers exploring one another’s bodies. In fact, it may be
the safest way for young boys to explore their sexualities. Incest is taboo primarily
because of the fear of the shared gene pool of a brother and sister or a mother
and a son being so similar that it often results in mental and physical harm to
a child born of such couplings. Whatever flaws exist in the DNA of such
partners are simply magnified in the child of familiar sex.
But two
males, two females do not pose this problem in any manner. So what is the harm,
particularly in this case of two brothers mutually enjoying sex? Certainly,
David is delighted, even excited by their time together, so different from the
abuse he receives all day long at school. And Marek is just of the age when boys
become desperate to enjoy that pleasurable release of sperm.
Their father has apparently bolted their house for good, hinting in his occasional telephone calls that he might return at Christmas, while clearly having abandoned the family. David still believes that, like St. Nicholas, he might return, but the resentful Marek knows better. The hard-working mother (Lída Jakubuv) is nearly oblivious of her sons’ activities, arriving home late each day, the time when the two brothers are left alone to explore their bodies.
Apparently,
the father was or is still a sailor, and David has also begun a project with
his father of rebuilding a model boat of the Titanic, obviously a symbol of
problems to come.
At first,
since he still need relief, Marek continues the sessions of sexual contact with
his brother, but that also is soon cut off. David, frustrated with the turn of
events, invites a classmate home and explains and eventually demonstrates the
joys of “touching.”
Yet, he
senses that his friend is not at all as open to the joys of sex as was Marek.
As the boy returns home to tell his mother, David determines to take his
finished Titanic model on a trial run in the nearby lake.
At that
very moment, the irate mother of his friend is on the way to complain to David’s
mother about his behavior. Unable to find her son in the house, but noticing
the missing model ship, she drives, the angry mother and distraught son in tow,
down to the lake only to find David, whose boat has pulled away the ball of
twine and sunk, desperately floundering in deep waters, unable to properly swim
to shore. She dives in to save him.
On their drive home, David announces from the
back seat, “Dad is not coming back.” He too has painfully grown up.
So ends this truly beautifully made
black-and-white little masterwork.
My only
complaint was what I perceive as an absolutely unnecessary ending dedication,
perhaps added to defend this lovely film from people, like the friend’s mother,
for whom any youthful sexual activity is something immediately to be halted:
“Dedicated to all child victims of either conscious
or unconscious sexual abuse.”
These are
not the Menendez brothers, and as far as I can see, there is no sexual abuse involved
in the brother’s mutual exploration of sex. This is, rather, a quite
beautifully filmed tale of childhood desire, in this case two boys without
a father who explore their bodies and the surrounding horror by the adult world
of just such natural and innocent acts.
Los Angeles, January 21, 2025
Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (January
2025).
No comments:
Post a Comment