without a shadow
by Douglas Messerli
Robert Bresson (screenwriter, based
on a novel by Georges Bernanos, and director) Mouchette / 1967, USA 1970
Like most of Bresson’s suffering figures, she nonetheless is more than
resilient, ignoring and battling her schoolgirl companions and the neighborhood
boys in their taunts. In a stunning scene at a weekend carnival, Bresson
reveals the possibilities of her life through the movement of Dodg’em cars: at
first her car is simply hit by others again and again, but gradually, as she
spots and starts to flirt with a handsome boy in another “auto,” manipulating
her car into position to successfully crash into his and others’ cars. Later,
as she begins to trail after the young man, she is quickly pulled aside by her
ever-watchful father and struck in the face.
Bresson films this young woman’s abuse with an almost abstract, “flat”
directorial eye, allowing his non-actors (he chose evidently an entirely
amateur cast) to reveal their own stories in action, since they are quite
clearly a people of few words. Yet the actions in which they engage are
anything but uneventful. Luisa, the local bartender is courted by the
gamekeeper Mathieu, but is obviously more attracted to the small-time poacher
Arsène. Like Mouchette, who occasionally helps out in the bar to earn her
family a few more coins, Luisa’s life is one of repetition and boredom, but in
her role as the dispenser of what all the men seek—wine and liquor—she is a
woman of power, while Mouchette has so little choice over her life that she
hardly casts a shadow.
As in his other films, Bresson employs the images of hands in this
work—the camera follows Luisa’s hands over and over as she pours out the
drinks, lingers over Mouchette’s attempts to soothe and heal her mother and to
hold and change the diaper of her baby brother, and mocks her father’s bedtime
antics of driving a car—but it is the legs and feet of his characters that
dominate: the embarrassing slap of Mouchette’s clogs against the earth as she
arrives late to school and the later loss of one of those shoes in a storm; the
angry crush of dirt into the carpet of an old woman, who late in the film,
demands Mouchette ponder her own death.
What also gives this film such power is the oddity of its few events,
particularly the scene beginning with her journey home from school through the
woods. In these woods we have already observed several battles—similar to that
of Renoir’s Le Règle de jeu—between
gamekeeper and poacher, between the pheasants and rabbits inhabiting the place,
and those who would take their lives. Caught up in this struggle, Mouchette is
forced to take cover under a tree during a rainstorm. Meanwhile, Mathieu and
Arsène encounter one another, a fight-in-the-brewing for some time. At first
Arsène seems conciliatory, willing to give up his trap. But when it is refused,
he pushes the other into a stream where they briefly fight. Yet it is a
ludicrous battle they perceive, and it ends with them laughing at each other as
they share the wine in Arsène’s cask.
By the time Arsène comes across Mouchette, however, he is so drunk that
he believes he has killed Mathieu. At first he appears solicitous of the young
girl, determined to help her find his missing clog, and to have her help him
with an alibi. They briefly take cover in a small hut, but after hearing two
rifle shots—shots clearly coming from Mathieu’s gun—Arsène insists that they
wipe away all evidence of being there and takes her to his own house.
Again, he seems caring of her situation; but suddenly, in one of the
strangest of cinematic events, he undergoes an epileptic fit. As she has
previously nursed her mother, Mouchette holds his head, wiping away the blood
and spittle that issues from the poacher’s mouth. It is as if she can find no
other role in her life but that of caregiver; little is ever offered in return.
And with Arsène’s revival comes the inevitable. She now fears for her own
safety and, somewhat lamely perhaps—given both her need for love and her
expectations of the abuse—attempts to fend him off before finally, as he begins
the rape, accepting him in an embracing hug. In short, it is the very
“strangeness” of these scenes that make them appear to be so inevitable, as if
these events were too odd to be anything but the “truth.”
When Mouchette finally returns home, the baby is bawling, her mother
near death. She cannot even find a match in the house to warm the milk. In the
night la mère dies.
The next morning, she is determined to go for the baby’s milk. But this
time she encounters, briefly, people who seem willing to help. A grocer offers
her coffee and a croissant, but as she attempts to place another croissant into
the girl’s pocket, Mouchette backs away—now terrified, evidently, of even human
touch. A customer accusatively stares at her as the camera makes apparent what
the women observe, the top button of her dress is missing. “Slut,” one of the
women hisses.
Checking up on Mathieu, Mouchette is surprised to see him still living;
seeing her there he insists she come into his house to reveal what has occurred
during the night. As the gamekeeper and his wife begin to interrogate her, she
resists, but ends up by declaring Arsène is now her lover.
An old friend of the family invites her in to present her with a shroud
for her mother and some dresses for the girl herself. But Mouchette is
indignant. What can those things mean to her now? Why didn’t the woman help out
during her mother’s life? The “friend” is, quite obviously, inured to the dead
(“I am a friend of the dead”) rather than to those who are alive.
In world such as Mouchette’s, love and life is squandered, creating a
vacuum that offers only a mean death. As she once again crosses the woods on
her way home, Mouchette pauses, checking out one of new dresses of the “gift”;
like all of her other clothes, it too is quickly torn in the brambles. Wrapping
herself in it, Mouchette rolls down the hill toward the stream, but her body
comes to a standstill as it reaches the bushes at water’s edge. With new
determination, with a will that represents her attempt take back her own life,
Mouchette repeats the act, rolling in her new “shroud” down the hill once more,
this time hitting the mark, her body falling like a stone into the water from
where it will never rise.
Has the renowned Roman Catholic director now advocated suicide? some
viewers asked upon the film’s release. I cannot speak for Bresson. But in such
an immoral world, perhaps even self-murder can be seen as a spiritual act.
Los Angles, February 28, 2000
Reprinted from International Cinema Review (June 2011).
No comments:
Post a Comment