the nun
by Douglas Messerli
Volker Schlöndorff and Margarethe
von Trotta (writers and directors, based on a novel by Heinrich Böll) Die verlorene Ehre der Katharina Blum oder: Wie Gewalt
entstehen und wohin sie führen kann
(The Lost Honor of Katharina Blum, or:
How Violence Develops and Where It Can Lead) / 1975
By the next morning, the young woman,
whom her friends call “The Nun” (presumably because of lack of promiscuous
behavior) is arrested, brutally handled, and subjected to intense questioning.
Her house is ransacked, and nearly all of her personal friends are contacted
and subjected to the same intrusive actions. Even worse, the police work
hand-in-hand with the tabloid—simply called “The Paper” in the film—exchanging
documents and information, which suddenly splashes the young Katharina
(wonderfully performed by Angela Winkler) across its front pages, while
accusing her of collaboration with terrorism and labeling her as a whore. Even
the prosperous attorney and his wife for whom she works—well known to the
police force—are tracked down on vacation and scrutinized by the media. “The
Paper” illegally breaks into the hospital room where Katharina’s mother is
dying in an attempt to get a deathbed statement. When she says nothing of
importance, they make it up. All of this Katarina suffers with a quiet and
patient strength, comprehending the necessity her stance, while abhorring their
abusive methods and the newspaper intrusion into her life.
Throughout, she speaks the truth, we are
led to believe, about everything except the relationships of the men in her
life, which with great dignity and strength of purpose, she refuses to reveal.
And it is this feminist aspect of her being that helps us to completely
sympathize with her plight. Her former husband, only too ready to be
interviewed and comment of his previous wife, indicts himself in his act; we
can clearly perceive why Katharina has left him. Another man, with whom she has
been having an affair, refuses to come forward and rescue her. The country home
to which she has given her the key, has now become the hiding place of the
so-called terrorist Ludwig (Jürgen Prochnow). Despite hate letters and
salacious offers for sex, however, Katharina remains firm in her convictions:
she is convinced that the police have no right to intrude upon her personal and
inner life. Amy Tubin has expressed the issue rather nicely:
The men she
encounters react to her sense of self-worth as a
challenge to their
masculinity. When she refuses to play their
game, they become
enraged and intent on destroying her. The
one thing that can
be counted on to unite the various men in
this film across
class and political lines is the need to keep women
in a subservient
position. In the eyes of the law, Katharina is
guilty,
first and foremost, of the crime of being a woman. That
she’s
a woman who refuses to allow the patriarchy to determine
her
value compounds her guilt.
Eventually, she is freed and the “terrorist” found to be only a slightly
confused thief. Were the film to end there, it would have brilliantly made its
point, that a culture fixated upon threats ultimately turns its own citizens
into terrorists as well. Unfortunately, the otherwise excellent filmmakers felt
they had to carry Böll’s fiction forward to its melodramatic, if
psychologically rewarding, end. Katharina accepts an interview with the
horrific reporter, Werner Tötges (Dieter Laser). Carrying a gun, she shoots him
down, and the movie ends with a horribly ironic, if inevitable, funeral with
Tötges (and “The Paper”) being eulogized as a hero who has died for the cause
of the freedom of the press. Along with some critics, such as Roger Ebert, I
agree that this ending undercuts the character the film has established,
turning her into simply another victim instead of the strong figure she has
been represented as. With the reporter’s murder, “The Paper” and police can
continue to proclaim their empty paranoia, destroying others whom they
inexplicably “suspect.” The true terror of government and media intrusions into
personal lives is justified in her final act, and can now put her away where
her story can no longer have any significance.
Los Angeles, August 12, 2013
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (August 2103).
No comments:
Post a Comment