early wizards
by Douglas Messerli
I love The Wizard of Oz and every gay-boy-born-before-1960’s favorite musical diva Judy Garland who sings all about the LGBQ+ Rainbow long before it was ever imagined, as well as that “sissy” of a lion (Bert Lahr), so you might certainly describe me as “A Friend of Dorothy’s.”
I
also recognize that all those who join Dorothy Gale along her Yellow Brick Road
trip to the Land of Oz are fully outsiders, in danger from all sorts of
authority figures—although in this film, except for the Munchkin town council,
authority is primarily matriarchal (including Auntie Em and the homegrown
broomstick rider Elvira Gulch) coming from outsiders of another sort, witches
good and bad. And even the great Wizard of OZ, a presumably patriarchal figure
of heterosexual normality, is finally recognized to be fraud who goes floating
off into the greatly inflated nowhere, while Dorothy gets a ride home just by
clicking her lovely ruby slippers, which I’ve worshiped at the shrine in which
they are now held many a time since they happen to be located in the Academy of
Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences Museum in Los Angeles across the street from
where I live.
Yet for all that, I—who have blithely argued for many a work of cinema
that no one previously imagined as being queer—have some great difficulty in
perceiving the 1939 masterpiece and all of its previous manifestations—which
include The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (1910); Dorothy and the Scarecrow
in Oz (1910) now lost; Land of Oz (1910) also lost; The Patchwork
Girl of Oz (1914); His Majesty, the Scarecrow of Oz (1914, also
titled The New Wizard of Oz); The Magic Cloak of Oz (1917), The
Wizard of Oz (1925), and The Wizard of Oz, an animated version from
1933—as true queer works of cinema, in
the sense of sharing the sexual interests of the LGBTQ community. I’ll
certainly go with the queer, which is why I have permitted this discussion in
these pages, but I have qualms about arguing these remarkable fantasies’ place
in the homosexual / transexual / transgender spectrum. I’ll save my discussion
of the most significant of these films, the Norman Taurog, Richard Thorpe,
George Cukor, and Victor Fleming-directed The Wizard of Oz for my 1930s
volume.
But in these pages I will discuss the
“actual” rather paltry LGBTQ-like figures in two versions of this work, the
first of which appears regularly on gay lists, His Majesty, the Scarecrow of
Oz, while the other far more queer-involved work, Larry Semon’s 1925
version, The Wizard of Oz has never been mentioned, to my knowledge, as
being of LGBTQ interest
Los Angeles, June 18, 2022
Reprinted from World Cinema Review (June
2022).
No comments:
Post a Comment