not like the movies
by Douglas Messerli
Joseph Biggerstoff (screenwriter and director)
17 / 2022 [10.20 minutes]
At
home, sharing dinner with his seemingly loving parents, Charlie is moody,
refusing to eat, and begs to be allowed to return to his room for a homework
assignment he needs to finish. Actually, what Charlie is completing is homework
on a meet-up with a man he’s met on the internet. He shows the lower half of
his body in his underwear to which the respondent answers “Nice undies. I’d
like to see them on my floor tonight?” When the man asks if he’s “got pics,” Charlie,
revealing his naiveté and his own internet interests, presumes the man means
porno, and demurs “I don’t take nudes.” But all his internet communicator wants
is a picture of his face, which he also describes as “adorable.” When he sees a
full picture of the man with whom he’s communicating, Charlie can only express
his reaction by saying “Wow, you’re hot.”
They make an appointment to meet up at a local grocery store with his
friend driving within an hour. In the meantime, it appears that the young boy
is not totally clueless as he follows the internet instructions of a man
explaining how to give oneself a douche. Clearly Charles expects to be fucked.
When they meet—outside a store whose neon sign announces “Fresh Plus,”
as if announcing the existence of the boy who is illuminated by its light—the
man looks ever better in person, driving the now excited boy to his “new,”
basically unfurnished apartment, where he puts on a movie, apparently mostly
for the dramatic love music it contains, while the naïve boy says that he’s
never seen the movie before, as if they
were about to watch it; the man admits he’s never seen it through before
either. Charlie proceeds to ask him if he’s “out,” another sign that the man
should have taken special care in handling his young would-be lover.
In the very next frame, however, they seem
to have finished they sexual act, the older man tossing the removed
shorts—which indeed are on the floor—to the boy. Back in the car, we observe the
boy holding back tears, turning to the man to say “sorry,” the other replying,
“That’s fine,” and finally offering up his name, “Tom.” He holds his hand to
shake the boy’s hand in reassurance, but Charlie quickly leaves the auto.”
It
appears that the pain of first-time anal intercourse may have been too much for
him, or that he himself could not get an erection and ejaculate. Perhaps both
occurred. We cannot know what the “sorry” fully expresses nor the impending
tears, but clearly the evening has not gone for the young boy as he expected.
Even feeling ready and desirous does not necessarily make result in the
fulfillment that porno leads one to expect. Sex, at least this time, was not at
all like it appears to be in the movies.
This film reminds me of a strange occasion with one of Howard’s students
in our early days of teaching. He called up and invited himself to our place.
But when we sat down to talk, he moved ridiculously close to me, clearly
seeking some sort of sexual activity. At first I was simply startled, and didn’t
quite know what to do with the young man physically rubbing his leg against my
thigh. But finally, both Howard and I, realizing that he was desperately
seeking sexual activity, took him to our bed, undressed him, and began to
caress him. But two males on either side of him, no matter how gently we were
treating him, clearly scared him, and he quickly sat up in utter terror. We
recognized immediately his fears, and attempted to calm him, assuring him that
this is not what sexual activity is all about, that he would surely find the
right situation for him. He quickly dressed and left. I don’t know whatever
became of him, but this was surely not the right first experience for this
young man, even if he had sought it out.
Los Angeles, January 3, 2023
Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (January
2023).
No comments:
Post a Comment