logical assumptions
by Douglas Messerli
Michael Simon (screenplay), Samantha
Light (director) The Neighborly Thing / 2005 [11 minutes]
Samantha Light’s The Neighborly
Thing is surely the darkest depiction of neighborhood relationships that I
write about here, and it is also one of the most confusing. We don’t really
know what the relationship is between the upstairs owner of the building,
Kevin, and his downstairs
Clearly they have been close, Sebastian telling the renters who have
temporarily rented Kevin’s apartment that he visits him regularly several times
each day and he knows the apartment intimately.
In fact, in a very brief period of time, we quickly to suspect that they
have simply taken over the apartment perceiving Kevin’s absence.
But Sebastien, himself acts strangely, seeking, it appears, any excuse
to further check out the apartment. At first, he accosts Beca because of
smoking, she simply blowing more smoke his way and insisting that she, after
all, out of doors. He pretends to be more cordial and she as well,
When Richie returns from wherever he’s been, he seems terribly angry and offended not only by the neighbor’s presence but that he dare even ask them questions. But when Sebastien begins to leave, Richie suddenly apologizes, Sebastien reiterating his close connection to Kevin and demonstrating sudden anger about his departure. His comments “I feel so comfortable here, like it’s my second home. I can’t believe he just up and left like that!” are posed almost a kind of dare to both Richie and Beca and to his missing friend, made even darker by his next statement, “I don’t believe I can forgive him for that,” which sounds like a true threat.
Even more inexplicable is the fact that,
a moment later, we witness Sebastien taking up a hatchet before he returns to
the couple, sniveling out a few tears for a second and shouting, “I think you
should go!”
Richie turns with a gun in his
hand—possibly the one Sebastien has previously mentioned as Kevin owning—and
shoots him dead.
Beca begins screaming and crying, we
imagine, at first, because of the terrible and seemingly meaningless deed
Richie has just committed. But we soon discover that her real reason for her
reaction has to do with the fact that it was “her turn,” her prerogative
evidently to kill someone, further evidence that the two are on a killing
spree.
Has this couple already killed Kevin?
But if so, how has Sebastian not known about it, living in such close
proximity. And what does he mean by his angry threat of never being able to
forgive his former friend and possible lover? Did Sebastian kill Kevin for his
abandonment? Is his current intrusion upon the couple related to his profession
of digging up the dead?
Or, to put the question slightly
differently, is it Beca and Richie’s territory that is being invaded by
Sebastian, with Sebastian possibly being attracted to Richie; or is it Beca and
Richie who have invaded Sebastian and Kevin’s territory, with Sebastian
demanding a fuller relationship with Kevin perhaps than he has been willing to
offer? Certainly, it appears that Beca and Richie are squatters and serial
murderers. But perhaps Sebastian is also a serial murderer, stopped before he
can commit a second crime.
In short, it is nearly impossible to
make sense of this film. And finally, we have no real evidence that this is
even a queer cinema, although it is written by the same figure, Michael Simon,
who wrote the comic gay film, Is One of You Eddie? I write about below.
Whatever you want to make of this fairly gruesome murder story there
seem to be only dead ends, either a flaw in the storytelling or an intentional
ruse that forces you become as suspicious of these figures are about one
another, the work metamorphosing into a kind of formal check mate without
logical escape. If his 2006 work is fable about physical stereotypes, perhaps
this work is a fable about logical assumptions.
Los Angeles, March 20, 2022
Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog
(March 2022).
No comments:
Post a Comment