born again
by Douglas Messerli
George Seaton (screenplay, based on
a story by Valentine Davies and director) Miracle on 34th Street / 1947
I’ll begin by admitting that I
absolutely enjoy George Seaton’s and Valentine Davies’ holiday fantasy, Miracle on 34th Street. I have probably
watched this film every year of my adult life on Thanksgiving day or during the
Christmas season, and I get delight just imagining that I might have been able
witness the premiere of this film as a 6-month-old baby.
This year, watching it just before Thanksgiving dinner, however, I had a
different, more contrarian view of the holiday chestnut, listed in the National
Film Registry.
Let me start by saying the obvious, a cliché spouted each year by
thousands of religious Americans, particularly’ one imagines, by those who
describe themselves as “born again:” the Christmas season has increasingly
become commercialized and most Americans have lost the sense of the holiday’s
true focus, the birth of Christ.
Admittedly, I am not among those religious or “born again” Americans,
but even I was amused when the Christmas shopping season, it was announced,
would begin this year not on the Friday morning after Thanksgiving, but at
midnight. A local radio station began 24-hour programming of Christmas carols
(most of them centered on the holiday festivities instead of the child in
Bethlehem) two weeks ago!
Generally recognized as the emblem of that pagan, commercialized
Christmas is Santa Claus, the jolly, fat Dutch gift-giving Sinterklaas. You remember him, the one about whom your parents
lied, leading you on to believe that he was the source of all of those lovely
Christmas presents beneath the tree until you grew old to appreciate the loving
care they had been secretly showing you for all those years? As I have written
elsewhere, I came to that realization, almost miraculously one morning, at a
far younger age than most of my peers; it didn’t bother me one little bit that
there wasn’t any Santa Claus and that my parents had been so nice to me for all
those years. But my revelation of that fact to a school friend sent her off
crying into her mother’s arms. I was told that I must never reveal the truth to
anyone my age or younger. But even older children, I realized, might not like
to hear my discovery.
Seaton’s work, however, begins almost at the opposite end of the
equation. The young girl at the center of this story, Susan Walker (Natalie
Wood), has been told by her level-headed mother, Doris (Maureen O’Hara) that
there is no Santa Claus, without any noticeable effect in the child’s demeanor.
Mrs. Walker, who works at Macy’s, coordinating the all-important Macy’s
Thanksgiving Day Parade, is apparently a strong-headed and practical woman, who
has, one imagines, tried to remove almost all fantasy and myth from her young
daughter’s life. She has told that there are no giants, and the girl is
discouraged from reading “fairy tales.” Obviously, the mother has been hurt by
what she perceives as the fantasies of her married life. One wonders how she
has dealt with Christian myths, including the child born in a stable. But
fortunately, for the survival of the film, Seaton has skirted that issue and,
indeed, all issues having to deal with the real season’s purpose.
Meanwhile, Doris’ daughter, Susan is watching the parade from a
neighbor’s window, from what we might presume is a Central Park West apartment.
Today we might worry about the fact that she is watching this with an adult
male, Fred Gailey (John Payne)—although we have been reassured by the Walker’s
maid that she has been keeping an eye on the girl—who occupies an apartment
across the way. The Santa Claus, declares Susan, is quite convincing, far
better than the one of the year before. Gailey is a bit troubled by her mature
dismissal of Santa, as well as giants, but is not beyond encouraging her to
invite him to dinner in the Walker home. Mr. Gailey may be a happy man (the old-fashioned
meaning of “gay”), but he is represented as bit disturbing in his
Kris, meanwhile, not only looks the part of the perfect Santa, but is
quickly hired by Macy’s to become their Department Store Santa. Kris is
delighted to be able to return to his rightful place, and everyone seems happy
with his “acting,” until it is discovered that he has been telling some parents
to purchase their children’s gifts at competing stores—even Gimbels. The scene
where Thelma Ritter (in one of her first film roles) stops to thank the floor
manager for their unusual new policy, where they put the spirit of Christmas,
so it appears, before their own financial gain, is one of the most delightful
of the film.
To back her up, Doris summons their Santa, encouraging him to tell Susan that he is not really Santa Claus, but when he insists that he is, she demands his file, wherein she discovers that he goes under the name of Kris Kringle and declares his birthplace as the North Pole. A visit to the store psychologist is ordered for Kris, who passes all the tests with great aplomb, yet raising the ire of the psychologist, Granville Sawyer (Porter Hall) who throughout the interview pulls at his eyebrows—a trait shared by his secretary—by suggesting that something may be problematic in his home life. In retaliation, Sawyer suggests that Kris may have a latent hostility that could break out at any time. A call to the doctor who heads the Long Island nursing home where Kris has been living brings reassurances from Dr. Pierce (James Seay), who also suggests it may be easier if Kris can find a place to stay nearer to the store in Manhattan. Before you can say Kris Kringle, Gailey has invited the old man to share his bedroom, further insinuating his being into the Walker’s life.
As the old gent speaks to Susan, he is saddened to learn that she does not believe in his existence and that she has been spurned by her playmates for being unable to imagine herself as an animal. “But I am not an animal,” she declares, after which he patiently teaches her how to pretend to be a monkey.
It is clear that he has taken on the Walkers as a kind of test case:
…Christmas isn’t just a
day, it’s a frame of mind…and that’s what’s
been changing. That’s why
I’m glad I’m here, maybe I can do
something about it.
Kris
even repeats the sentiments I stated earlier in this essay, disparaging the
commercialism of the holiday—a strange thing for that emblem of the commercial
to do; but it is clear the director and writer want to both ways.
Soon after Kris discovers that a beloved young janitor, Alfred (Alvin
Greenman) has also been seeing the mean-spirited Sawyer, who suggests that
Alfred has psychological problems simply for wanting to play Santa Claus at his
neighborhood YMCA. Furious with the abuse of this good-hearted boy, Kris
charges into Sawyer’s office, accusing him of malpractice and hitting him over
the head with his cane. The violence Sawyer has predicted has, alas, become
reality, and Kris is sent to Bellevue Psychiatric Hospital for evaluation,
believing that Mrs. Walker has been behind the decision.
Despairing of the lack of faith she has shown, Kris purposely fails the
psychiatric examination, and is destined to be locked away. Almost everyone
knows the rest of the story, how Gailey takes on Kris’s case, fighting to
convince a disbelieving world and court that Kris Kringle is truly Santa Claus.
Even Mrs. Walker and her daughter come round to support his cause.
The case is miraculously won due, in part, to the political exigencies
of the court. As the Pol Charles Halloran (William Frawley) puts it to Judge
Henry X. Harper (Gene Lockhart):
All right, you go back
and tell them that the New York State
Supreme Court rules
there’s no Santa Claus. It’s all over the papers.
The kids read it and
they don’t hang up their stockings. Now what
happens to all the toys
that are supposed to be in those stockings.
Nobody buys them. The
toy manufactures are going to like that; so
they have to lay off a
lot of their employees, union employees. Now
you got the CIO and AF
of L against you and they’re going to
adore you for it and
they’re going to say it with votes. Oh, and the
department stores are
going to love you too and the Christmas card
makers and the candy
companies. Ho ho, Henry, you’re going to be
an awful popular fella.
And what about the Salvation Army? Why,
they got a Santa Claus
on every corner, and they’re taking a fortune.
So much for Kringel’s dismay for the commercialism of Christmas! Perhaps
no clearer statement of the relationship of the fat, jolly, fellow and money
has ever been made. Harper’s children even hate their father for putting Santa
Claus on trial, and Gailey calls the young son of District Attorney Thomas Mara
to testify that his father has told him, assuredly, that there is a Santa
Claus.
Even more cynical are the US Postal employees, tired of all the
unclaimed mail addressed to Santa Claus, who win the day for Gailey and Kris
Kringel by forwarding dozens of sacks of letters to the courthouse, providing
the Judge with an easy way out:
Uh, since the United
States Government declares this man to be
Santa Claus, this
court will not dispute it. Case dismissed.
So, insists Seaton’s film, Santa Claus, despite all evidence to the
contrary, is alive and well. Yet Seaton and the original author go even
further, demanding of even the adult characters and viewers their utter belief
in the commercial emblem. When asked what she might like for Christmas, Susan
pulls out an advertisement for a suburban Long Island home. Even Kris Kringel
is a bit stunned by her demand, when he suggests, “…Don’t you see, dear? Some
children wish for things they couldn’t possibly use like real locomotives or
B-29.s.” Her retort is the stubborn insistence of any spoiled consumer:
If you’re really Santa
Claus, you can get it for me. And if you can’t,
you’re only a nice man with a white beard like mother said.
The filmmakers hardly pause to take in the significance of what the
child has just said, before Kris has sent the three traveling along a route
that winds by the house of her dreams. Upon glimpsing it, Susan demands they
stop and runs into the home as if she already owned it. How can Mr. Gailey and
Mrs. Walker resist such a consumer dream, even if it means giving up their
perfectly nice apartments, overlooking the parade route, and now probably worth
millions of dollars? They will simply have to marry, move to the suburbs, and
build up the little family with which they have begun. The discovery of Kris’s
cane left near the fireplace convinces them—just as surely as a “born again”
Christian’s zealous rediscovery of Christ—of Santa Claus’ existence, just as
the audience is bathed with consumer assurances that this is, in fact, the
perfect house.
Perhaps never in the whole of Hollywood productions was there a more
central pitching of consumer products. Even movies with thousands of “product
placements” cannot match Nathalie Wood’s answer to Kris’ question of where she
had found the lovely sweater she is wearing: “My mother got on sale it at
Macy’s.”
During an ad between events of this year’s Macy’s Thanksgiving Day
Parade, Macy’s proudly quoted that line among other cinematic mentions of the
august department store.
As Susan chants to herself: “I believe…I believe…it’s silly, but I
believe.”
Los Angeles, Thanksgiving 2011
Reprinted from American Cultural Treasures (November 2011).
No comments:
Post a Comment