Tuesday, February 20, 2024

Lisa Cholodenko | The Kids Are All Right / 2010

adopting a family

by Douglas Messerli

 

Lisa Cholodenko and Stuart Blumberg (screenplay), Lisa Cholodenko (director) The Kids Are All Right / 2010

 

The feel-good movie of 2010 might be said to be Lisa Cholodenko's comic The Kids Are All Right. Like many another movie of its kind, the writing centers on the well-being of children coming of age within a family that is either having difficulties or is about to fall apart.


      The standard requires everything to turn out all right at the end, and Cholodenko's work follows that pattern precisely. The only difference with this version of the genre is that Cholodenko's family consists of a lesbian couple rearing a 15-year-old boy and a soon-to-college girl, who are just at the age when they begin to wonder who their father was—in this case the same sperm donor for both women. Despite the healthy relationship of the kids to their mothers, the young Laser (Josh Hutcherson) is eager to know what his invisible "father" looks like, and pleads with his sister Joni (Mia Wasikowska) to call the donor center for information.

     With information in hand, he telephones the local man, Paul (well played by Mark Ruffalo) and sets up a lunch appointment with his possible father, himself, and his sister. The man they discover is a slightly empty-minded, but well-meaning chef/restauranteur who successfully grows his own garden, despite his seeming inability to maintain adult relationships with women. His main "squeeze" at the moment is his hostess, Tanya (Yaya DaCosta).

     Meanwhile, the mothers (Nic and Jules, both excellently acted by Annette Benning and Julianne Moore) are beginning to wonder about Laser's behavior, unable to comprehend his relationship with a trouble-making boy, Clay (Eddie Hassell) and wondering, particularly when they discover their own gay male porno lying open by the DVD player, if he might be gay. When they question if he is keeping secrets, he admits to meeting with the sperm donor—a man they've never before seen—which clearly promises various emotional responses from them. But since the children seem to have liked him, like any caring parents, they must open up their lives as well to meet the biological father of their kids.

     Although Nic remains dubious about the whole thing, Jules finds Paul appealing, as he hires her to landscape his back yard. At this point, however, the movie takes a kind left turn that, while creating the drama of this small work, also slightly confused me.

     Perhaps we should go back to that gay male porno tape which the women watch. I have no problem with beings of either sex watching a gay porno tape—indeed I've seen the very tape glimpsed in the movie—but is this common with lesbian sex? I have never watched a lesbian tape, although I know there are gays probably attracted to that as well. But, for me, it seems to indicate somehow the confused sexuality that rears its head once Jules begins working for Paul, particularly when they find themselves engaging in abandoned sex, as if Jules had just been waiting for this release her entire life. I am ready to admit that I know very little about lesbian sexuality, but does Cholodenko really want to confirm the male heterosexual myth that lesbians are just waiting for a truly good cock? I have had at least three women friends who, when I was younger, apparently felt that they could save me from my homosexuality, and were determined to do so. Not desiring conversion, I quickly moved off. But Cholodenko's character apparently cannot control herself.



    What we also discover in Jules's temporary abandonment of her seemingly happy relationship is her own inability to accomplish what she sets out to do, that she is somewhat confused as she stumbles about her life. Nic, on the hand, is utterly controlling in her immense abilities often ready to treat her mate as another daughter instead of a supporting lover.

     Perhaps I should just stop there, and attribute the issues I've brought up to the complexity of the characters. We all know that there are many mixes of sexualities in all of us. It may be that we've now grown sophisticated enough that we can easily assimilate these variations. Upon her discovery that her companion has been sleeping with "the enemy" so to speak, Nic, despite her anger and hurt, and, after telling Paul to go find another family to adopt or to create his own, seems willing to accept her partner's indiscretions. As Jules, somewhat incoherently, admits:


"...marriage is hard...Just two people slogging through the shit, year after year, getting older, changing. It's a fucking marathon, okay? So, sometimes, you know, you're together for so long, that you just... You stop seeing the other person. You just see weird projections of your own junk. Instead of talking to each other, you go off the rails and act grubby and make stupid choices...."

     The son reiterates his support for his mother's relationship with an unintentionally humorous observation:


Laser: I don't think you guys should break up.

Nic: No? Why's that?

Laser: I think you're too old.

Nic: [wryly] Thanks, Laser.

[Jules grins and puts a hand on Nic's knee, and Nic covers the hand with

her own.]


     At film's end, Joni is off to college and Laser has given up his mean-spirited and problematic "friend." The kids, indeed, are all right. We must ask, however, how about the mothers?

 

Los Angeles, January 11, 2010

Reprinted from World Cinema Review (January 2010).

No comments:

Post a Comment

My Queer Cinema Index [with former World Cinema Review titles]

Films discussed (listed alphabetically by director) [Former Index to World Cinema Review with new titles incorporated] (You may request any ...