the trapped boy next door
by Douglas Messerli
Preston Sturges (screenwriter and director) The Miracle
of Morgan's Creek / 1944
If you were to believe Preston
Sturges’ 1944 film (filmed a couple of years earlier before its release),
nearly all the young soldiers heading off to World War II were sexually potent
beings who in a kind of desperate attempt to link with the women they would
have to leave behind, were ready to marry and fuck one grand last time, a kind
of “love them and leave them” routine outlined in so very many movies of the
period.
That, at least, is what the small-town Morgan’s Creek girl Trudy
Kockenlocker (Betty Hutton) seems to discover. Attending a last night dance for
the soldiers, Trudy ignores the warnings of her policeman father, played by the
ever grouchy William Demarest, and with the unwilling help of her admiring 4-F small-town
admirer, Norval Jones (the ever sad-eyed, nervous and stuttering innocent,
Eddie Bracken), dismisses her father’s stern refusal to let her have her
pleasures, which includes a dance and a follow up night-club after-hours event,
with a final drunken vow for of all the young soldiers to suddenly marry the
women who have joined them.
Using false names and hiding behind their one-night girlfriend’s
drunkenness, the soldiers marry the girls, with poor Trudy suddenly realizing
she has spent the night in bed with a man whose name might have had a “z” in
it: Razkywatzy of Zitzkywitsky. She doesn’t remember exactly, despite that she
is now, she soon after discovers, pregnant with his child.
Visiting a local lawyer, she attempts to have the marriage annulled,
without success, and then attempts to woo her previously discarded lover,
Norval, to save her name and help bring her child into a more normalized world.
Sturges always played at the edges of traditional morality, and the Hays
Committee, almost shot this film down because of its open flaunting of
traditional morality, its young 14-year old’s (the precocious Dynna Lynn) quite
cynical observations of her elders, and the film’s later flirtation with bigamy
and numerous other crimes.
Given her father’s bluster, Trudy’s new would-be husband, Norval, who
finally convinces her of his long-time attempts to be close to her—including
even taking a high school cooking class—is arrested on 19 charges (all of which
we know him to him to be innocent), including, soon after, an escape from jail.
I remember as a young man watching this film with great dismay. How
could such a decent person become so intensely punished for crimes he never
committed—reminding me a little of the black eye awarded Jack Lemmon in The Apartment
for having had a nonexistent affair with Shirley MacLaine. Both characters are
even a little bit proud for their travails which slightly redeems their damaged
manhoods.
Underneath this film’s comic veneer—which allowed it to join The
National Film Registry—there is a strong suggestion that, if Norval (dubbed by
his atrocious name), is not exactly a “pansy,”—he goes to movies instead of the
dances—is not truly worthy of the sexy Trudy’s love.
This time round, I laughed more than I
sneered, as the brassy Hutton began to realize that she was desperately in need
of a local man—especially with the appearance of six healthy babies. A call to
authorities suddenly frees (or perhaps I might argue, dooms the loving Norval),
to an endlessly restricted life of a father.
Even Sturges’ film-end quote, after
Norval falls in a faint upon hearing the news:
But Norval recovered and
became increasingly happy
for, as Shakespeare said:
"Some are born great, some
achieve greatness,
and some
have greatness thrust upon
them.”
All of which suggests a passive
rather than proactive role for this would-be Shakespearian hero. If he has
saved the princess of his dreams, he has closed-off any future possibilities,
while the soldiers have marched off to another kind of herodom, without any of
the repercussions of the own sexual acts.
If there was ever an argument for the #METOO movement, Norval, as well
as Trudy, might have claim to the impact which such blatantly sexist behavior
has had upon their lives.
I now, as an elderly man, realize what I didn’t like as a young kid
about this movie. No one here seems to have any moral choice to behave as they
might have. I love Sturges highly comic films, but not his moral possibilities—twins,
even double-twins, might have been able to make their own sexual choices, a
young unconquering hero, might have been allowed to outwardly speak the truth,
an older director in search of those lost to the Depression should not be
imprisoned for his search. Yes, order in Sturges’ movies is turned upside down,
but simply laughing about those facts is not quite enough.
Both figures of The Miracle of Morgan’s Creek become entrapped
into lives that they had not originally sought out, even if they now pretend to
accept a world of complete social normality. And Norval may one day wake up and
realize that he’s not truly the “marrying kind.” And how, one might ask, will
Norval, a lowly bank-teller pay for his six new children’s survival? The
miracle at Morgan’s Creek, alas, is not miracle at all, despite the reporter’s
call to the Governor, who can’t even quite perceive that this small town exists
in his state.
Los Angeles, December 23, 2019
Reprinted from World Cinema
Review (December 2019).
No comments:
Post a Comment